Table 1 Effects of mutations on the size of attractor basins

From: NF-κB epigenetic attractor landscape drives breast cancer heterogeneity

 

Wild-type

p65 degradation 2.5% lower

p65 degradation 5% higher

Specie (molecule number)

HER2

Unstable

TN

HER2

Unstable

TN

HER2

Unstable

TN

p50

32491.3

76472

150491

33968.8

68630.7

156382

30449.1

96943

133008

p65

115566

260132

535271

123303

239395

573457

103958

316153

444084

NFkB

5893.33

31221.9

126429

6573.79

25786.8

140751

4968.14

48103.6

92705,9

RNAp50

104.38

245.66

483.44

109.12

220.47

502.36

97.82

311.42

427.28

RNAp65

134.99

303.86

625.25

140.43

272.65

653.11

127.50

387.76

544.67

p50 variation (%)

 

4.55

−10.25

3.91

−6.29

26.77

−11.62

p65 variation (%)

 

6.69

−7.97

7.13

−10.04

21.54

−17.04

NFkB variation (%)

 

11.55

−17.41

11.33

−15.70

54.07

−26.67

RNAp50 variation (%)

 

4.55

−10.25

3.91

−6.29

26.77

−11.62

RNAp65 variation (%)

 

4.03

−10.27

4.46

−5.55

27.61

−12.89

HER2-to-instable distance

151108.01

121156.10

222369.42

TN-to-instable distance

284921.54

345395.01

132917.36

HER2-to-unstable distance variation (%)

 

−19.82

47.16

TN-to-unstable distance variation (%)

 

21.22

−53.35

  1. The table presents the percentage variation in stationary concentrations of NF-κB and its subunits p50 and p65 due to changes in the p65 degradation rate. Additionally, it details the changes in distances from the HER2+ and TNBC stationary states to the unstable states.
  2. A comparison between wild-type and mutant stationary states.