Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Systems Biology and Applications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj systems biology and applications
  3. articles
  4. article
Effects of feeding strategies on culture performance and product quality in NISTCHO
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 March 2026

Effects of feeding strategies on culture performance and product quality in NISTCHO

  • Veronika Schäpertöns1 na1,
  • Larissa Hofer2 na1,
  • Thomas Berger1 na1,
  • Jerneja Štor2,
  • Nicolas Marx2,
  • Wolfgang Esser-Skala1,
  • Thomas Rauter1,
  • Dominik Hofreither3,
  • Laura Liesinger3,
  • Peter Filzmoser4,
  • Ruth Birner-Gruenberger3,
  • Christian G. Huber1,5,
  • Nicole Borth2 na2 &
  • …
  • Nikolaus Fortelny1,5 na2 

npj Systems Biology and Applications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1377 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biochemistry
  • Biological techniques
  • Biotechnology

Abstract

Monoclonal antibody N-glycosylation is a critical quality attribute influencing therapeutic safety and efficacy, and is strongly influenced by bioprocess design. NISTCHO, a publicly available Chinese hamster ovary producer cell line, is increasingly encouraged for use as a reference system. However, the impact of feeding strategies on cellular performance and N-glycosylation has not been assessed. Here, we applied multivariate analysis of compositional N-glycan data to assess how feeding strategies influence N-glycan composition of cNISTmAb. We varied feeding strategies in frequency, glucose supply, and galactose/manganese supplementation. Feeding frequency had minimal impact on quality attributes but strongly affected culture performance, with every-other-day feeding improving titers and cell-specific productivity. High glucose availability supported growth and productivity. Low glucose strategies reduced titers and shifted N-glycosylation towards non-galactosylated and fucosylated species, despite lactate accumulation remaining within favorable ranges. Galactose and manganese consistently increased antibody galactosylation, with galactose additionally serving as an auxiliary carbon source, extending cell viability. Importantly, mAb glycation remained stable across all feeding strategies at harvest. Overall, these results demonstrate that feed composition and timing can be used to tune both cellular performance and mAb glycosylation, establishing NISTCHO as a robust benchmark for standardized process-quality studies.

Similar content being viewed by others

Multiplexed engineering glycosyltransferase genes in CHO cells via targeted integration for producing antibodies with diverse complex-type N-glycans

Article Open access 21 June 2021

Optimizing effector functions of monoclonal antibodies via tailored N-glycan engineering using a dual landing pad CHO targeted integration platform

Article Open access 20 September 2023

Global mapping of GalNAc-T isoform-specificities and O-glycosylation site-occupancy in a tissue-forming human cell line

Article Open access 21 October 2022

Data availability

All raw data generated during the bioprocess analyses, including raw mass spectrometry files and a detailed fed-batch protocol (for all feeding strategies), have been deposited in Zenodo and are publicly available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17046013.

Code availability

Full analysis code for analysis reproducibility is available at https://github.com/csbg/DGTX_feeding_strategies_nistcho.

References

  1. Walsh, G. & Walsh, E. Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2022. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1722–1760 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. NIST. NISTCHO reference cell line https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/nistcho (2016).

  3. Dahodwala, H. et al. Development and characterization of the NISTCHO reference cell line. Biotechnol. J. 20, e70012 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Böttinger, K. et al. Small is beautiful—examining reliable determination of low-abundant therapeutic antibody glycovariants. J. Pharm. Anal. 14, 100982 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fratz-Berilla, E. J., Azer, N., Bush, X., Kim, J. & Kohnhorst, C. Process development for production of non-originator NISTmAb from CHO and NS0 cell lines. MAbs. 17, 2505088 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li, F., Vijayasankaran, N., Shen, A. Y., Kiss, R. & Amanullah, A. Cell culture processes for monoclonal antibody production. MAbs. 2, 466–479 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Walsh, I. et al. Toward machine learning-guided CHO bioprocess and media optimization for improved titer and glycosylation. Biotechnol. J. 20, e70149 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sumit, M. et al. Dissecting N-glycosylation dynamics in Chinese hamster ovary cells fed-batch cultures using time course omics analyses. iScience 12, 102–120 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, H.-Y., Fan, Z.-L. & Wang, T.-Y. Advances of glycometabolism engineering in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 774175 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kildegaard, H. F., Fan, Y., Sen, J. W., Larsen, B. & Andersen, M. R. Glycoprofiling effects of media additives on IgG produced by CHO cells in fed-batch bioreactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 113, 359–366 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gramer, M. J. et al. Modulation of antibody galactosylation through feeding of uridine, manganese chloride, and galactose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 108, 1591–1602 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. St. Amand, M., Radhakrishnan, D., Robinson, A. & Ogunnaike, B. Identification of manipulated variables for a glycosylation control strategy. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 111, 1957–1970 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gyorgypal, A., Fratz-Berilla, E., Kohnhorst, C., Powers, D. N. & Chundawat, S. P. S. Temporal galactose-manganese feeding in fed-batch and perfusion bioreactors modulates udp-galactose pools for enhanced mAb glycosylation homogeneity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 122, 1710–1723 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pranomphon, R., Gialamoidou, S., Yamabhai, M., Jiménez Del Val, I. & Sharfstein, S. T. Modulation of antibody glycosylation in Chinese hamster ovary cells: experimental and computational analyses provide mechanistic insights. Biotechnol. J. 20, e70143 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thaysen-Andersen, M., Mysling, S. & Højrup, P. Site-specific glycoprofiling of N-linked glycopeptides using MALDI-TOF MS: Strong correlation between signal strength and glycoform quantities. Anal. Chem. 81, 3933–3943 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Edwards, E. et al. Strategies to control therapeutic antibody glycosylation during bioprocessing: synthesis and separation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 119, 1343–1358 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jefferis, R. Recombinant antibody therapeutics: the impact of glycosylation on mechanisms of action. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 30, 356–362 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hodoniczky, J., Zheng, Y. Z. & James, D. C. Control of recombinant monoclonal antibody effector functions by Fc N-glycan remodeling in vitro. Biotechnol. Prog. 21, 1644–1652 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thomann, M., Reckermann, K., Reusch, D., Prasser, J. & Tejada, M. L. Fc-galactosylation modulates antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of therapeutic antibodies. Mol. Immunol. 73, 69–75 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shields, R. L. et al. Lack of fucose on human IgG1 N-linked oligosaccharide improves binding to human FcγRIII and antibody-dependent cellular toxicity. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 26733–26740 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Niwa, R. et al. Defucosylated chimeric anti-CC chemokine receptor 4 IgG1 with enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity shows potent therapeutic activity to T-cell leukemia and lymphoma. Cancer Res. 64, 2127–2133 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, B. et al. The availability of glucose to CHO cells affects the intracellular lipid-linked oligosaccharide distribution, site occupancy and the N-glycosylation profile of a monoclonal antibody. J. Biotechnol. 170, 17–27 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Villacrés, C., Tayi, V. S., Lattová, E., Perreault, H. & Butler, M. Low glucose depletes glycan precursors, reduces site occupancy and galactosylation of a monoclonal antibody in CHO cell culture. Biotechnol. J. 10, 1051–1066 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pappenreiter, M., Lhota, G., Vorauer-Uhl, K. & Sissolak, B. Antibody glycation during a Chinese hamster ovary fed-batch process is following a constrained second order reaction. Biotechnol. Prog. 38, 1–13 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wei, B., Berning, K., Quan, C. & Zhang, Y. T. Glycation of antibodies: modification, methods and potential effects on biological functions. MAbs 9, 586–594 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Esser-Skala, W., Wohlschlager, T., Regl, C. & Huber, C. G. A simple strategy to eliminate hexosylation bias in the relative quantification of N-glycosylation in biopharmaceuticals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 16225–16232 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gagnon, M. et al. High-end ph-controlled delivery of glucose effectively suppresses lactate accumulation in CHO fed-batch cultures. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 108, 1328–1337 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Aitchison, J. The statistical analysis of compositional data. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. 44, 139–160 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Egozcue, J. J. & Tolosana-Delgado, R. Modelling and Analysis of Compositional Data (John Wiley & Sons, 2015).

  30. Filzmoser, P., Hron, K. & Templ, M. Applied Compositional Data Analysis (Springer, 2018).

  31. Torres, M., Altamirano, C. & Dickson, A. J. Process and metabolic engineering perspectives of lactate production in mammalian cell cultures. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 22, 184–190 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Altamirano, C. et al. Analysis of CHO cells metabolic redistribution in a glutamate-based defined medium in continuous culture. Biotechnol. Prog. 17, 1032–1041 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mulukutla, B. C. et al. Metabolic engineering of Chinese hamster ovary cells towards reduced biosynthesis and accumulation of novel growth inhibitors in fed-batch cultures. Metab. Eng. 54, 54–68 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vergara, M. et al. High glucose and low specific cell growth but not mild hypothermia improve specific r-protein productivity in chemostat culture of CHO cells. PLoS ONE 13, e0202098 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Li, J., Wong, C. L., Vijayasankaran, N., Hudson, T. & Amanullah, A. Feeding lactate for CHO cell culture processes: impact on culture metabolism and performance. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 109, 1173–1186 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Prabhu, A., Shanmugam, D. & Gadgil, M. Engineering nucleotide sugar synthesis pathways for independent and simultaneous modulation of N-glycan galactosylation and fucosylation in CHO cells. Metab. Eng. 74, 61–71 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, L. et al. Combined effects of glycosylation precursors and lactate on the glycoprofile of IgG produced by CHO cells. J. Biotechnol. 289, 71–79 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Quan, C. et al. A study in glycation of a therapeutic recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody: where it is, how it got there, and how it affects charge-based behavior. Anal. Biochem. 373, 179–191 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Miller, A. K., Hambly, D. M., Kerwin, B. A., Treuheit, M. J. & Gadgil, H. S. Characterization of site-specific glycation during process development of a human therapeutic monoclonal antibody. J. Pharm. Sci. 100, 2543–2550 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Alhuthali, S., Kotidis, P. & Kontoravdi, C. Osmolality effects on CHO cell growth, cell volume, antibody productivity and glycosylation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 3290 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Böttinger, K., Esser-Skala, W., Segl, M., Herwig, C. & Huber, C. G. At-line quantitative profiling of monoclonal antibody products during bioprocessing using HPLC-MS. Anal. Chim. Acta. 1207, 339813 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Merck. Technical brief: Ex-cell glycosylation adjust (gal+) https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/AT/de/technical-documents/technical-article/protein-biology/protein-expression/ex-cell-glycosylation-adjust (2025).

  43. Merck. Technical brief: speeding biosimilar development using glycosylation control technology from Safc https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/AT/de/technical-documents/technical-article/cell-culture-and-cell-culture-analysis/cell-culture-for-manufacturing/biosimilar-development-using-glycosylation (2025).

  44. Surve, T. & Gadgil, M. Manganese increases high mannose glycoform on monoclonal antibody expressed in CHO when glucose is absent or limiting: implications for use of alternate sugars. Biotechnol. Prog. 31, 460–467 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hills, A. E., Patel, A., Boyd, P. & James, D. C. Metabolic control of recombinant monoclonal antibody N-glycosylation in Gs-Ns0 cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 75, 239–251 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kotidis, P. et al. CHOGlycoNET: comprehensive glycosylation reaction network for CHO cells. Metab. Eng. 76, 87–96 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ehret, J., Zimmermann, M., Eichhorn, T. & Zimmer, A. Impact of cell culture media additives on IgG glycosylation produced in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 116, 816–830 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Villacrés, C., Tayi, V. S. & Butler, M. Strategic feeding of NS0 and CHO cell cultures to control glycan profiles and immunogenic epitopes of monoclonal antibodies. J. Biotechnol. 333, 49–62 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Cleveland, M. H. et al. Recommended nomenclature convention for the NISTCHO cell line and its product monoclonal antibody, cNISTmAb. mAbs. 17, 2490789 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Regl, C. et al. Dilute-and-shoot analysis of therapeutic monoclonal antibody variants infermentation broth: a method capability study. mAbs. 11, 569–582 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Di Marco, F. et al. Simultaneous monitoring of monoclonal antibody variants by strong cation-exchange chromatography hyphenated to mass spectrometry to assess quality attributes of rituximab-based biotherapeutics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 9072 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Blondeel, E. J. & Aucoin, M. G. Supplementing glycosylation: a review of applying nucleotide-sugar precursors to growth medium to affect therapeutic recombinant protein glycoform distributions. Biotechnol. Adv. 36, 1505–1523 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lim, N. et al. Curation of over 10 000 transcriptomic studies to enable data reuse. Database 00, 1–23 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for rna-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Julian Rabl for the initial measurements of the test data as part of his practical lab training. The authors want to thank Christof Regl for providing valuable commentary to the manuscript. We would like to acknowledge Anja Horger and Andreas Fellner for scientific guidance of the manganese and galactose measurements. Thanks to Markus Riedl for help in data visualization. The Biolayer interferometer– Octet RED96e (Sartorius) device was kindly provided by the Connective Base GmbH, and the project was supported by the BOKU Core Facility Biomolecular Cellular Analysis. Lastly, the authors would like to thank Alexandar Paunovic and Ursula Kiesswetter for their excellent technical support. This research was funded in whole or in part by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) 10.55776/FG12 [”DigiTherapeutX”]. For open access purposes, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any author accepted manuscript version arising from this submission. The authors acknowledge the use of OpenAI’s ChatGPT (GPT-5) to assist in language polishing and formatting of the manuscript. All intellectual content, analysis, and conclusions are the authors’ own responsibility.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Veronika Schäpertöns, Larissa Hofer, Thomas Berger.

  2. These authors jointly supervised this work: Nicole Borth and Nikolaus Fortelny.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biosciences and Medical Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

    Veronika Schäpertöns, Thomas Berger, Wolfgang Esser-Skala, Thomas Rauter, Christian G. Huber & Nikolaus Fortelny

  2. Department of Biotechnology and Food Science, Institute of Animal Cell Technology and Systems Biology, BOKU University, Vienna, Austria

    Larissa Hofer, Jerneja Štor, Nicolas Marx & Nicole Borth

  3. Faculty of Technical Chemistry, Institute of Chemical Technologies and Analytics, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria

    Dominik Hofreither, Laura Liesinger & Ruth Birner-Gruenberger

  4. Institute of Statistics and Mathematical Methods in Economics, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria

    Peter Filzmoser

  5. Center for Tumor Biology and Immunology (CTBI), University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

    Christian G. Huber & Nikolaus Fortelny

Authors
  1. Veronika Schäpertöns
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Larissa Hofer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas Berger
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jerneja Štor
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nicolas Marx
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wolfgang Esser-Skala
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Thomas Rauter
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dominik Hofreither
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Laura Liesinger
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Peter Filzmoser
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ruth Birner-Gruenberger
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Christian G. Huber
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Nicole Borth
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Nikolaus Fortelny
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: V.S., L.H., T.B., J.Š., N.M., T.R., W.E.S., D.H., L.L., P.F., R.B.G., C.G.H., N.B., and N.F. Methodology: V.S., L.H., T.B., and P.F. Formal analysis: V.S. and L.H. Investigation: L.H. and T.B. Resources: V.S., L.H., and T.B. Data curation: V.S. and L.H. Writing—Original Draft: V.S., L.H., and T.B. Writing—review and editing: V.S., L.H., T.B., J.Š., N.M., T.R., W.E.S., D.H., L.L., P.F., R.B.G., C.G.H., N.B., and N.F. Visualization: V.S. and L.H. Supervision: V.S., R.B.G., C.G.H., N.B., and N.F. Project administration: V.S., R.B.G., C.G.H., N.B., and N.F. Funding acquisition: R.B.G., C.G.H., N.B., and N.F.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikolaus Fortelny.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schäpertöns, V., Hofer, L., Berger, T. et al. Effects of feeding strategies on culture performance and product quality in NISTCHO. npj Syst Biol Appl (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-026-00686-3

Download citation

  • Received: 20 October 2025

  • Accepted: 05 March 2026

  • Published: 19 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-026-00686-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Systems Biology and Applications (npj Syst Biol Appl)

ISSN 2056-7189 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research