Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Vaccines
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj vaccines
  3. articles
  4. article
Bivalent RSV prefusion F vaccination elicits effective neutralization of contemporary and monoclonal antibody-resistant RSV strains
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 March 2026

Bivalent RSV prefusion F vaccination elicits effective neutralization of contemporary and monoclonal antibody-resistant RSV strains

  • Wei Chen1,
  • Lyndsey T. Martinez1,
  • Larissa Falcao1,
  • Zhenghui Li1,
  • Andrew P. McKeen2,
  • Chaitanya Kurhade1,
  • Hélène Boigard1,
  • Vidia Roopchand1,
  • Imani Richardson1,
  • Trisha Dasgupta1 nAff3,
  • Katrina E. Llamera1,
  • Jing Colatat1,
  • Linda Goding Brock1,
  • Annaliesa S. Anderson1 &
  • …
  • Kena A. Swanson1 

npj Vaccines , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1756 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Immunology
  • Microbiology

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading global cause of serious respiratory disease in infants and an important respiratory pathogen in older adults. The RSV prefusion F protein (preF) is a major target of neutralizing antibodies shown to protect against RSV disease. The bivalent preF protein subunit vaccine (RSVpreF; Abrysvo®) contains stabilized preF antigens representing the two major RSV subgroups, RSV A and RSV B. Here, we characterized the neutralizing activity of adult RSVpreF immune sera against a panel of 65 contemporary, globally circulating RSV A and RSV B clinical isolates, containing various amino acid substitutions across the five major antigenic sites of RSV F (Ø, I, II, III, V). Monoclonal Ab-resistant mutant strains (MARMs) displaying in vitro resistance to nirsevimab, clesrovimab, and palivizumab (up to 300,000-fold resistance over the parental strain) were also evaluated. RSVpreF immune sera effectively neutralized both the panel of global clinical isolates and all MARMs tested. These findings demonstrate that the bivalent RSVpreF polyclonal response maintains robust neutralizing activity against circulating RSV A and B strains, including those that escape RSV F mAbs, and provides broad protective immunity against RSV.

Similar content being viewed by others

Respiratory syncytial virus infection and novel interventions

Article 12 July 2023

Immunogenicity of an AS01-adjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F (RSVPreF3) vaccine in animal models

Article Open access 29 September 2023

Correlates of risk of respiratory syncytial virus disease: a prospective cohort study

Article Open access 26 September 2025

Data availability

Primary nucleotide sequence data for the RSV A and RSV B clinical isolates analyzed in this study have been deposited to the NCBI SRA database under BioProject Accession PRJNA1308556. Materials or cell line requests should be submitted to the corresponding author and may be subject to approval by Pfizer or the vendor who generated the material/cells on behalf of Pfizer. All other data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials.

References

  1. Li, Y. et al. Global, regional, and national disease burden estimates of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in children younger than 5 years in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 399, 2047–2064 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shi, T. et al. Global disease burden estimates of respiratory syncytial virus-associated acute respiratory infection in older adults in 2015: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. Dis. 222, S577–s583 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Walsh, E. E. Respiratory syncytial virus infection: an illness for all ages. Clin. Chest Med. 38, 29–36 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Walsh, E. E. et al. A randomized phase 1/2 study of a respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F vaccine. J. Infect. Dis. 225, 1357–1366 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peterson, J. T. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F vaccine when coadministered with a tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine. J. Infect. Dis. 225, 2077–2086 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Falsey, A. R. et al. Phase 1/2 randomized study of the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of a respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F vaccine in adults with concomitant inactivated influenza vaccine. J. Infect. Dis. 225, 2056–2066 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baber, J. et al. A phase 1/2 study of a respiratory syncytial virus prefusion f vaccine with and without adjuvant in healthy older adults. J. Infect. Dis. 226, 2054–2063 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davis, M. et al. Bivalent RSVpreF vaccine in adults 18 to <60 years old with high-risk conditions. Clin. Infect. Dis. 80, 911–920 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Simoes, E. A. F. et al. Prefusion F protein-based respiratory syncytial virus immunization in pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 1615–1626 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kampmann, B. et al. Bivalent prefusion F vaccine in pregnancy to prevent RSV illness in infants. N. Engl. J. Med. 388, 1451–1464 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Walsh, E. E. et al. Efficacy and safety of a bivalent RSV prefusion F vaccine in older adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 388, 1465–1477 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Simoes, E. A. F. et al. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the MATISSE (Maternal Immunization Study for Safety and Efficacy) maternal respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein vaccine trial. Obstet. Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005816 (2025).

  13. Walsh, E. E. et al. Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of the bivalent RSV prefusion F (RSVpreF) vaccine in older adults over 2 RSV seasons. Clin. Infect. Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf061 (2025).

  14. Hammitt, L. L. et al. Nirsevimab for Prevention of RSV in Healthy Late-Preterm and Term Infants. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 837–846 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. FDA. FDA Approves New Drug to Prevent RSV in Babies and Toddlers, https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-new-drug-prevent-rsv-babies-and-toddlers (2023).

  16. Merck. U.S. FDA Approves Merck’s ENFLONSIA™ (clesrovimab-cfor) for Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Lower Respiratory Tract Disease in Infants Born During or Entering Their First RSV Season, https://www.merck.com/news/u-s-fda-approves-mercks-enflonsia-clesrovimab-cfor-for-prevention-of-respiratory-syncytial-virus-rsv-lower-respiratory-tract-disease-in-infants-born-during-or-entering-their-fir/ (2025).

  17. Houspie, L. et al. Circulation of HRSV in Belgium: from multiple genotype circulation to prolonged circulation of predominant genotypes. PLoS One 8, e60416 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bouzas, M. L. et al. Respiratory syncytial virus a and b display different temporal patterns in a 4-year prospective cross-sectional study among children with acute respiratory infection in a tropical city. Medicine 95, e5142 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Levine, S., Klaiber-Franco, R. & Paradiso, P. R. Demonstration that glycoprotein G is the attachment protein of respiratory syncytial virus. J. Gen. Virol. 68, 2521–2524 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wertz, G. W. et al. Nucleotide sequence of the G protein gene of human respiratory syncytial virus reveals an unusual type of viral membrane protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 4075–4079 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  21. McLellan, J. S. et al. Structure of RSV fusion glycoprotein trimer bound to a prefusion-specific neutralizing antibody. Science 340, 1113–1117 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Battles, M. B. & McLellan, J. S. Respiratory syncytial virus entry and how to block it. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 233–245 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. McLellan, J. S., Ray, W. C. & Peeples, M. E. Structure and function of respiratory syncytial virus surface glycoproteins. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 372, 83–104 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chang, A. & Dutch, R. E. Paramyxovirus fusion and entry: multiple paths to a common end. Viruses 4, 613–636 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Collins, P. L. & Mottet, G. Post-translational processing and oligomerization of the fusion glycoprotein of human respiratory syncytial virus. J. Gen. Virol. 72, 3095–3101 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  26. McLellan, J. S. Neutralizing epitopes on the respiratory syncytial virus fusion glycoprotein. Curr. Opin. Virol. 11, 70–75 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. McLellan, J. S., Yang, Y., Graham, B. S. & Kwong, P. D. Structure of respiratory syncytial virus fusion glycoprotein in the postfusion conformation reveals preservation of neutralizing epitopes. J. Virol. 85, 7788–7796 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Swanson, K. A. et al. Structural basis for immunization with postfusion respiratory syncytial virus fusion F glycoprotein (RSV F) to elicit high neutralizing antibody titers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9619–9624 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. FDA. SYNAGIS® (palivizumab) injection, for intramuscular use, 2014).

  30. Sun, M. et al. Monoclonal antibody for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus in infants and children: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Netw. Open 6, e230023 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wen, X. et al. Structural basis for antibody cross-neutralization of respiratory syncytial virus and human metapneumovirus. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 16272 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Graham, B. S. Immunological goals for respiratory syncytial virus vaccine development. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 59, 57–64 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Che, Y. et al. Rational design of a highly immunogenic prefusion-stabilized F glycoprotein antigen for a respiratory syncytial virus vaccine. Sci. Transl. Med. 15, eade6422 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hause, A. M. et al. Sequence variability of the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) fusion gene among contemporary and historical genotypes of RSV/A and RSV/B. PLoS One 12, e0175792 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Adhikari, B. et al. A multi-center study to determine genetic variations in the fusion gene of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) from children < 2 years of age in the U.S. J. Clin. Virol. 154, 105223 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bin, L. et al. Emergence of new antigenic epitopes in the glycoproteins of human respiratory syncytial virus collected from a US surveillance study, 2015-17. Sci. Rep. 9, 3898 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fu, Y. et al. A multi-center study on genetic variations in the fusion protein of respiratory syncytial virus from children with Acute Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in China during 2017-2021. Virol. Sin. 39, 727–736 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. No authors listed. Palivizumab, a humanized respiratory syncytial virus monoclonal antibody, reduces hospitalization from respiratory syncytial virus infection in high-risk infants. The IMpact-RSV Study Group. Pediatrics 102, 531-537 (1998).

  39. Zhao, M. et al. Discovery of a prefusion respiratory syncytial virus F-specific monoclonal antibody that provides greater in vivo protection than the murine precursor of palivizumab. J. Virol. 91 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00176-17 (2017).

  40. Tang, A. et al. A potent broadly neutralizing human RSV antibody targets conserved site IV of the fusion glycoprotein. Nat. Commun. 10, 4153 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dall’Acqua, W. F., Kiener, P. A. & Wu, H. Properties of human IgG1s engineered for enhanced binding to the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). J. Biol. Chem. 281, 23514–23524 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dall’Acqua, W. F. et al. Increasing the affinity of a human IgG1 for the neonatal Fc receptor: biological consequences. J. Immunol. 169, 5171–5180 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wu, H. et al. Development of motavizumab, an ultra-potent antibody for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infection in the upper and lower respiratory tract. J. Mol. Biol. 368, 652–665 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Simoes, E. A. F. et al. Suptavumab for the prevention of medically attended respiratory syncytial virus infection in preterm infants. Clin. Infect. Dis. 73, e4400–e4408 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Carbonell-Estrany, X. et al. Motavizumab for prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus in high-risk children: a noninferiority trial. Pediatrics 125, e35–e51 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhu, Q. et al. Prevalence and significance of substitutions in the fusion protein of respiratory syncytial virus resulting in neutralization escape from antibody MEDI8897. J. Infect. Dis. 218, 572–580 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sacconnay, L. et al. The RSVPreF3-AS01 vaccine elicits broad neutralization of contemporary and antigenically distant respiratory syncytial virus strains. Sci. Transl. Med. 15, eadg6050 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Duvvuri, V. R. et al. Genetic diversity and evolutionary insights of respiratory syncytial virus A ON1 genotype: global and local transmission dynamics. Sci. Rep. 5, 14268 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Trento, A. et al. Ten years of global evolution of the human respiratory syncytial virus BA genotype with a 60-nucleotide duplication in the G protein gene. J. Virol. 84, 7500–7512 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ahani, B. et al. Molecular and phenotypic characteristics of RSV infections in infants during two nirsevimab randomized clinical trials. Nat. Commun. 14, 4347 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Baker, J. et al. Equivalent immunogenicity across three RSVpreF vaccine lots in healthy adults 18-49 years of age: Results of a randomized phase 3 study. Vaccine 42, 3172–3179 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Griffin, M. P. et al. Single-dose nirsevimab for prevention of RSV in preterm infants. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 415–425 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Bates, J. T. et al. Escape from neutralization by the respiratory syncytial virus-specific neutralizing monoclonal antibody palivizumab is driven by changes in on-rate of binding to the fusion protein. Virology 454-455, 139–144 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fourati, S. et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characterisation of respiratory syncytial virus after nirsevimab breakthrough infections: a large, multicentre, observational, real-world study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 25, 301–311 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  55. EMA. Beyfortus: EPAR-Product Information. Annex I: Summary of Product Characteristics., https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/beyfortus-epar-product-information_en.pdf. (2023).

  56. Sullender, W. M. Respiratory syncytial virus genetic and antigenic diversity. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13, 1–15 (2000). table of contents.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wilkins, D. et al. Nirsevimab binding-site conservation in respiratory syncytial virus fusion glycoprotein worldwide between 1956 and 2021: an analysis of observational study sequencing data. Lancet Infect. Dis. 23, 856–866 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Tabor, D. E. et al. Global Molecular epidemiology of respiratory syncytial virus from the 2017-2018 INFORM-RSV Study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 59 https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01828-20 (2020).

  59. Adams, O. et al. Palivizumab-resistant human respiratory syncytial virus infection in infancy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 51, 185–188 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Guo, C. Y. et al. Comparative analysis of human respiratory syncytial virus evolutionary patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic and pre-pandemic periods. Front Microbiol 14, 1298026 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Walker, G. J. et al. Clinical, genomic, and immunological characterization of RSV surge in Sydney, Australia, 2022. Pediatrics 153 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2023-063667 (2024).

  62. Holland, L. A. et al. Genomic sequencing surveillance to identify respiratory syncytial virus Mutations, Arizona, USA. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 29, 2380–2382 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rios-Guzman, E. et al. Deviations in RSV epidemiological patterns and population structures in the United States following the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat. Commun. 15, 3374 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Perez Martin, J. J. & Zornoza Moreno, M. Implementation of the first respiratory syncytial (RSV) immunization campaign with nirsevimab in an autonomous community in Spain. Hum. Vaccin Immunother. 20, 2365804 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Assad, Z. et al. Nirsevimab and Hospitalization for RSV Bronchiolitis. N. Engl. J. Med 391, 144–154 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Jabagi, M., Cohen, J., Bertrand, M., Chalumeau, M. & Zureik, M. Rapport d’étude d’utilisation du Nirsévimab (Beyfortus®) en ville en France lors de la première campagne de prévention (saison 2023/2024, https://www.epi-phare.fr/rapports-detudes-et-publications/utilisation-beyfortus/ (2024).

  67. Fridman, A. et al. P-2334. Clesrovimab Binding Site Conservation on the RSV F Protein: An Evaluation of RSV Molecular Sequencing Data from 2019-2023 and GenBank Sequence Analysis. Open Forum Infectious Diseases 12 https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2486 (2025).

  68. Graham, B. S., Perkins, M. D., Wright, P. F. & Karzon, D. T. Primary respiratory syncytial virus infection in mice. J. Med Virol. 26, 153–162 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Grad, Y. H. et al. Within-host whole-genome deep sequencing and diversity analysis of human respiratory syncytial virus infection reveals dynamics of genomic diversity in the absence and presence of immune pressure. J. Virol. 88, 7286–7293 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Malboeuf, C. M. et al. Complete viral RNA genome sequencing of ultra-low copy samples by sequence-independent amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e13 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Zhu, Q. et al. A highly potent extended half-life antibody as a potential RSV vaccine surrogate for all infants. Sci. Transl. Med. 9 https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaj1928 (2017).

  72. Zhu, Q. et al. Analysis of respiratory syncytial virus preclinical and clinical variants resistant to neutralization by monoclonal antibodies palivizumab and/or motavizumab. J. Infect. Dis. 203, 674–682 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hotard, A. L. et al. A stabilized respiratory syncytial virus reverse genetics system amenable to recombination-mediated mutagenesis. Virology 434, 129–136 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Jo, W. K. et al. Reverse genetics systems for contemporary isolates of respiratory syncytial virus enable rapid evaluation of antibody escape mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026558118 (2021).

  75. Stobart, C. C., Hotard, A. L., Meng, J. & Moore, M. L. in Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus: Methods and Protocols Vol. 1442 (eds Ralph A. Tripp & Patricia A. Jorquera) Ch. 10, 141–153 (Springer Science+Business Media, 2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by Pfizer Inc. The authors would like to thank the following current and former Pfizer colleagues: Marcus Bolton, Jennifer Rutkowski, Brittney Cumbia, Minah Ramos, Aaron Yam, Sonia Mensah & Kate Moffat, for virus propagation, MARM generation and neutralization assays; Vaccines Cell Culture team for providing cells; Lubomira Andrew for the NGS support; and the Vaccines Antibody and Early BioProcess Development teams for generating nirsevimab and clesrovimab. The authors would also like to thank Summer Gamal Elsayed, Erik Larson, and Daniel Heindel for preparing samples, performing assays, and analyzing and verifying data to support the nirsevimab assessment in the RSV clinical neutralization assays. The authors would also like to acknowledge Kate Luisi for helpful review and the contributions of our collaborators who provided clinical isolates: we thank Dr. Federico Martinón-Torres at the Clinical University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Dr. Shabir A. Madhi at the University of the Witwatersrand, Dr. John DeVincenzo at the University of Tennessee, Dr. Anna Maria Contreras at the Catholic University of Chile, and Dr. Louis Bont at ReSViNET. Additionally, the authors thank Christina D’Arco for providing scientific writing and graphical support in accordance with GPP guidelines.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Trisha Dasgupta

    Present address: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vaccines, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, NY, USA

    Wei Chen, Lyndsey T. Martinez, Larissa Falcao, Zhenghui Li, Chaitanya Kurhade, Hélène Boigard, Vidia Roopchand, Imani Richardson, Trisha Dasgupta, Katrina E. Llamera, Jing Colatat, Linda Goding Brock, Annaliesa S. Anderson & Kena A. Swanson

  2. Data Sciences and Analytics, Pfizer Inc, Pearl River, NY, USA

    Andrew P. McKeen

Authors
  1. Wei Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lyndsey T. Martinez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Larissa Falcao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhenghui Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andrew P. McKeen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chaitanya Kurhade
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hélène Boigard
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Vidia Roopchand
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Imani Richardson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Trisha Dasgupta
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Katrina E. Llamera
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jing Colatat
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Linda Goding Brock
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Annaliesa S. Anderson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Kena A. Swanson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

W.C. contributed to writing of the original draft, data interpretation, investigation, and overall supervision and conceptualization of the work. L.T.M., L.F., and Z.L. contributed to the writing of the original draft, as well as investigation, visualization, data interpretation and analysis related to clinical isolates and MARMs. C.K., H.B., T.D. contributed to the methodology for MARM generation. V.R. and I.R. contributed to the methodology for isolate propagation. K.E.L. and J.C. contributed to NGS data interpretation and analysis. L.G.B. designed and lead the nirsevimab evaluation in the RSV clinical neutralization assay. A.P.M. contributed to statistical analysis. K.A.S. contributed to the writing of the original draft, data interpretation, investigation, and overall supervision and conceptualization of the work. A.S.A. contributed to overall supervision of the work. All authors contributed to review and development of the manuscript and have read and agreed to the published version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kena A. Swanson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

All authors are current or former employees of Pfizer Inc. and may be shareholders and/or hold stock options. Pfizer participated in the design, analysis and interpretation of the data as well as the writing of this report and the decision to publish. K.A.S. is an inventor on patents related to the RSVpreF vaccine. K.A.S., A.S.A., and W.C. are inventors on patents related to nucleic acid methodology or formulations for vaccines against RSV and/or other respiratory viruses.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Materials (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, W., Martinez, L.T., Falcao, L. et al. Bivalent RSV prefusion F vaccination elicits effective neutralization of contemporary and monoclonal antibody-resistant RSV strains. npj Vaccines (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-026-01418-8

Download citation

  • Received: 26 September 2025

  • Accepted: 24 February 2026

  • Published: 14 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-026-01418-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Vaccines (npj Vaccines)

ISSN 2059-0105 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology