Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Vaccines
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj vaccines
  3. articles
  4. article
A new mRNA antigen vaccine induces potent B and T cell responses and in vivo protection against SARS-CoV-2
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 24 March 2026

A new mRNA antigen vaccine induces potent B and T cell responses and in vivo protection against SARS-CoV-2

  • Jing Wen1 na1,
  • Jaesu Moon1 na1,
  • Luca Tucciarone2,
  • Te-Hsuan Bu1,
  • Amanda Y. Sun1,
  • Robyn Miller3,
  • Julia Timis3,
  • Lujing Wu1,
  • Davey M. Smith4,
  • Sujan Shresta2,3,
  • Kyle J. Gaulton2 &
  • …
  • Tariq M. Rana1,2 

npj Vaccines , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1645 Accesses

  • 15 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Immunology
  • Microbiology

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine provides effective protection against viral infection and severe disease by inducing efficient adaptive immunity. However, vaccine efficacy is decreased against emerging variants, and immune memory is relatively short-lived. Here, we added new T cell epitopes to the RBD (receptor-binding domain) mRNA vaccine and identified a SARS-CoV-2 membrane epitope that significantly improved vaccine-induced immunity and protection in vivo. That new vaccine, designated G1-C, induced 8.2-fold higher levels of RBD-specific antibodies than did RBD and enhanced spike-specific T cell and B cell responses. Remarkably, the G1-C modulated hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) differentiation and increased levels of B and NK cells by regulating multiple signaling pathways in bone marrow potentially via Fos, Klf4, and Klf6 transcription factors. Altogether, these findings identify a new vaccine candidate to control viral infection by affecting the lymphoid-myeloid lineage bias and suggest the potential role of T cell epitopes in vaccine design and development.

Similar content being viewed by others

Memory CD8+ T cell diversity and B cell responses correlate with protection against SARS-CoV-2 following mRNA vaccination

Article 22 September 2022

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines induce persistent human germinal centre responses

Article 28 June 2021

Heterologous immunization with inactivated vaccine followed by mRNA-booster elicits strong immunity against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant

Article Open access 13 May 2022

Data availability

Single-cell RNA sequencing data are deposited on GEO: GSE281662. The code used for data analysis is available on GitHub: https://github.com/jingw1072/mice-BM-scRNAseq-analysis-code.

Code availability

Single-cell RNA sequencing data are deposited on GEO: GSE281662. The code used for data analysis is available on GitHub: https://github.com/jingw1072/mice-BM-scRNAseq-analysis-code.

References

  1. Hu, B., Guo, H., Zhou, P. & Shi, Z. L. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 141–154 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jackson, C. B., Farzan, M., Chen, B. & Choe, H. Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 3–20 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Almanza, G. et al. Structure-selected RBM immunogens prime polyclonal memory responses that neutralize SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. PLoS Pathog. 18, e1010686 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fiolet, T., Kherabi, Y., MacDonald, C. J., Ghosn, J. & Peiffer-Smadja, N. Comparing COVID-19 vaccines for their characteristics, efficacy and effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern: a narrative review. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 28, 202–221 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tregoning, J. S., Flight, K. E., Higham, S. L., Wang, Z. & Pierce, B. F. Progress of the COVID-19 vaccine effort: viruses, vaccines and variants versus efficacy, effectiveness and escape. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 626–636 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alter, G. et al. Immunogenicity of Ad26.COV2.S vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 variants in humans. Nature 596, 268–272 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Emary, K. R. W. et al. Efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/01 (B.1.1.7): an exploratory analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 397, 1351–1362 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jones, I. & Roy, P. Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccine candidate appears safe and effective. Lancet 397, 642–643 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baden, L. R. et al. Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 403–416 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lyke, K. E. et al. Immunogenicity of NVX-CoV2373 heterologous boost against SARS-CoV-2 variants. NPJ Vaccines 8, 98 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ryzhikov, A. B. et al. Assessment of safety and prophylactic efficacy of the EpiVacCorona Peptide vaccine for COVID-19 prevention (Phase III). Vaccines 11, https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11050998 (2023).

  12. Hadj Hassine, I. Covid-19 vaccines and variants of concern: a review. Rev. Med. Virol. 32, e2313 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chi, W. Y. et al. COVID-19 vaccine update: vaccine effectiveness, SARS-CoV-2 variants, boosters, adverse effects, and immune correlates of protection. J. Biomed. Sci. 29, 82 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ying, B. et al. Protective activity of mRNA vaccines against ancestral and variant SARS-CoV-2 strains. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabm3302 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scheaffer, S. M. et al. Bivalent SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines increase breadth of neutralization and protect against the BA.5 Omicron variant in mice. Nat. Med. 29, 247–257 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Netea, M. G., Schlitzer, A., Placek, K., Joosten, L. A. B. & Schultze, J. L. Innate and adaptive immune memory: an evolutionary continuum in the host’s response to pathogens. Cell Host Microbe 25, 13–26 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Primorac, D. et al. Adaptive immune responses and immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Front. Immunol. 13, 848582 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moss, P. The T cell immune response against SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Immunol. 23, 186–193 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sette, A., Sidney, J. & Crotty, S. T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 41, 343–373 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Almendro-Vazquez, P., Laguna-Goya, R. & Paz-Artal, E. Defending against SARS-CoV-2: the T cell perspective. Front. Immunol. 14, 1107803 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Altmann, D. M. & Boyton, R. J. SARS-CoV-2 T cell immunity: Specificity, function, durability, and role in protection. Sci. Immunol. 5, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.abd6160 (2020).

  22. Reynolds, C. J. et al. Strong CD4 T cell responses to Zika virus antigens in a cohort of Dengue virus immune mothers of congenital Zika virus syndrome infants. Front. Immunol. 11, 185 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yin, K. et al. Long COVID manifests with T cell dysregulation, inflammation and an uncoordinated adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Immunol. 25, 218–225 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sette, A. & Crotty, S. Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Cell 184, 861–880 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vardhana, S., Baldo, L., Morice, W. G. 2nd & Wherry, E. J. Understanding T cell responses to COVID-19 is essential for informing public health strategies. Sci. Immunol. 7, eabo1303 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Grifoni, A. et al. Targets of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in humans with COVID-19 disease and unexposed individuals. Cell 181, 1489–1501.e1415 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tarke, A. et al. Comprehensive analysis of T cell immunodominance and immunoprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 epitopes in COVID-19 cases. Cell Rep. Med. 2, 100204 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heitmann, J. S. et al. A COVID-19 peptide vaccine for the induction of SARS-CoV-2 T cell immunity. Nature 601, 617–622 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Addetia, A. et al. Neutralization, effector function and immune imprinting of Omicron variants. Nature 621, 592–601 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Arieta, C. M. et al. The T-cell-directed vaccine BNT162b4 encoding conserved non-spike antigens protects animals from severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell 186, 2392–2409.e2321 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Arts, R. J. W. et al. BCG vaccination protects against experimental viral infection in humans through the induction of cytokines associated with trained immunity. Cell Host Microbe 23, 89–100.e105 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Walk, J. et al. Outcomes of controlled human malaria infection after BCG vaccination. Nat. Commun. 10, 874 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ciarlo, E. et al. Trained immunity confers broad-spectrum protection against bacterial infections. J. Infect. Dis. 222, 1869–1881 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kalafati, L. et al. Innate immune training of granulopoiesis promotes anti-tumor activity. Cell 183, 771–785.e712 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Koeken, V., Verrall, A. J., Netea, M. G., Hill, P. C. & van Crevel, R. Trained innate immunity and resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 25, 1468–1472 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sun, W. et al. The self-assembled nanoparticle-based trimeric RBD mRNA vaccine elicits robust and durable protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in mice. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 6, 340 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tai, W. et al. A novel receptor-binding domain (RBD)-based mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Cell Res. 30, 932–935 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yang, J. et al. A vaccine targeting the RBD of the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 induces protective immunity. Nature 586, 572–577 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Liang, Q. et al. RBD trimer mRNA vaccine elicits broad and protective immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants. iScience 25, 104043 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhao, H. et al. Long-term stability and protection efficacy of the RBD-targeting COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in nonhuman primates. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 6, 438 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Uraki, R. et al. An mRNA vaccine encoding the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain protects mice from various Omicron variants. NPJ Vaccines 9, 4 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yarmarkovich, M., Warrington, J. M., Farrel, A. & Maris, J. M. Identification of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine epitopes predicted to induce long-term population-scale immunity. Cell Rep. Med. 1, 100036 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pan, K. et al. Mass spectrometric identification of immunogenic SARS-CoV-2 epitopes and cognate TCRs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2111815118 (2021).

  44. Saini, S. K. et al. SARS-CoV-2 genome-wide T cell epitope mapping reveals immunodominance and substantial CD8(+) T cell activation in COVID-19 patients. Sci. Immunol. 6, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.abf7550 (2021).

  45. Hare, J. et al. Direct identification of HLA-presented CD8 T cell epitopes from transmitted founder HIV-1 variants. Proteomics 21, e2100142 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mohan, T., Sharma, C., Bhat, A. A. & Rao, D. N. Modulation of HIV peptide antigen specific cellular immune response by synthetic alpha- and beta-defensin peptides. Vaccine 31, 1707–1716 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Naz, A. et al. Designing multi-epitope vaccines to combat emerging coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by employing immuno-informatics approach. Front. Immunol. 11, 1663 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Verbeke, R., Lentacker, I., De Smedt, S. C. & Dewitte, H. The dawn of mRNA vaccines: the COVID-19 case. J. Control Rel. 333, 511–520 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Park, J. W., Lagniton, P. N. P., Liu, Y. & Xu, R. H. mRNA vaccines for COVID-19: what, why and how. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 17, 1446–1460 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tarke, A. et al. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination induces immunological T cell memory able to cross-recognize variants from Alpha to Omicron. Cell 185, 847–859.e811 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Steiner, S. et al. Reactive T cells in convalescent COVID-19 patients with negative SARS-CoV-2 antibody serology. Front. Immunol. 12, 687449 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Thieme, C. J. et al. Robust T cell response toward spike, membrane, and nucleocapsid SARS-CoV-2 proteins is not associated with recovery in critical COVID-19 patients. Cell Rep. Med. 1, 100092 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang, Z. et al. Humoral and cellular immune memory to four COVID-19 vaccines. Cell 185, 2434–2451.e2417 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Laidlaw, B. J. & Ellebedy, A. H. The germinal centre B cell response to SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 7–18 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Inoue, T., Shinnakasu, R. & Kurosaki, T. Generation of high quality memory B cells. Front. Immunol. 12, 825813 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Akkaya, M., Kwak, K. & Pierce, S. K. B cell memory: building two walls of protection against pathogens. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 229–238 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Baccin, C. et al. Combined single-cell and spatial transcriptomics reveal the molecular, cellular and spatial bone marrow niche organization. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 38–48 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Blank, U. & Karlsson, S. TGF-beta signaling in the control of hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 125, 3542–3550 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Molnarfi, N., Bjarnadottir, K., Benkhoucha, M., Juillard, C. & Lalive, P. H. Activation of human B cells negatively regulates TGF-beta1 production. J. Neuroinflammation 14, 13 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Regis, S., Dondero, A., Caliendo, F., Bottino, C. & Castriconi, R. NK cell function regulation by TGF-beta-induced epigenetic mechanisms. Front. Immunol. 11, 311 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Tamayo, E., Alvarez, P. & Merino, R. TGFbeta superfamily members as regulators of B cell development and function-implications for autoimmunity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123928 (2018).

  62. Staal, F. J. & Sen, J. M. The canonical Wnt signaling pathway plays an important role in lymphopoiesis and hematopoiesis. Eur. J. Immunol. 38, 1788–1794 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Haseeb, M., Pirzada, R. H., Ain, Q. U. & Choi, S. Wnt signaling in the regulation of immune cell and cancer therapeutics. Cells 8, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8111380 (2019).

  64. Bertoli, C., Skotheim, J. M. & de Bruin, R. A. Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 518–528 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Duronio, R. J. & Xiong, Y. Signaling pathways that control cell proliferation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a008904 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Dalton, S. Linking the cell cycle to cell fate decisions. Trends Cell Biol. 25, 592–600 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Liu, L., Michowski, W., Kolodziejczyk, A. & Sicinski, P. The cell cycle in stem cell proliferation, pluripotency and differentiation. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 1060–1067 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Whately, K. M. et al. Spon1+ inflammatory monocytes promote collagen remodeling and lung cancer metastasis through lipoprotein receptor 8 signaling. JCI Insight 9, https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.168792 (2024).

  69. Soriano-Romani, L., Contreras-Ruiz, L., Lopez-Garcia, A., Diebold, Y. & Masli, S. Topical application of TGF-beta-activating peptide, KRFK, prevents inflammatory manifestations in the TSP-1-deficient mouse model of chronic ocular inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20010009 (2018).

  70. Wu, H. et al. The development of a novel transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) inhibitor that disrupts ligand-receptor interactions. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 189, 112042 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wen, J. et al. Pharmacological suppression of glycogen synthase kinase-3 reactivates HIV-1 from latency via activating Wnt/beta-catenin/TCF1 axis in CD4(+) T cells. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 11, 391–405 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Huang, X., Zhong, L., Hendriks, J., Post, J. N. & Karperien, M. The effects of the WNT-signaling modulators BIO and PKF118-310 on the chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020561 (2018).

  73. Hwang, S. Y. et al. Direct targeting of beta-catenin by a small molecule stimulates proteasomal degradation and suppresses oncogenic Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Cell Rep. 16, 28–36 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Netea, M. G. et al. Defining trained immunity and its role in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 375–388 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Almas, T. et al. Epidemiology, clinical ramifications, and cellular pathogenesis of COVID-19 mRNA-vaccination-induced adverse cardiovascular outcomes: a state-of-the-heart review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 149, 112843 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Trougakos, I. P. et al. Adverse effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: the spike hypothesis. Trends Mol. Med. 28, 542–554 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ndeupen, S. et al. The mRNA-LNP platform’s lipid nanoparticle component used in preclinical vaccine studies is highly inflammatory. bioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.04.430128 (2021).

  78. Cosentino, M. & Marino, F. The spike hypothesis in vaccine-induced adverse effects: questions and answers. Trends Mol. Med. 28, 797–799 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Kuhn, C. C. et al. Direct Cryo-ET observation of platelet deformation induced by SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Nat. Commun. 14, 620 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Amini, A. et al. MAIT and other innate-like T cells integrate adaptive immune responses to modulate interval-dependent reactogenicity to mRNA vaccines. Sci. Immunol. 10, eadu3337 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Kristen Jepsen of the Institute of Genomic Medicine at UCSD for help with scRNA-seq, Dr. Neal Sekiya and Ms. Tara Rambled at the Center for AIDS Research at UCSD for flow cytometry analysis, and members of the Rana lab for helpful discussions and advice. This publication includes data generated at the UC San Diego IGM Genomics Center utilizing an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 purchased with funding from a National Institutes of Health SIG grant (#S10 OD026929). This work was supported in part by institutional funds and from grants from the National Institutes of Health (AI125103, CA177322, CA030199, DA046171).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Jing Wen, Jaesu Moon.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

    Jing Wen, Jaesu Moon, Te-Hsuan Bu, Amanda Y. Sun, Lujing Wu & Tariq M. Rana

  2. Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

    Luca Tucciarone, Sujan Shresta, Kyle J. Gaulton & Tariq M. Rana

  3. Center for Vaccine Innovation, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA, USA

    Robyn Miller, Julia Timis & Sujan Shresta

  4. Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

    Davey M. Smith

Authors
  1. Jing Wen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jaesu Moon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luca Tucciarone
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Te-Hsuan Bu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Amanda Y. Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Robyn Miller
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Julia Timis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lujing Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Davey M. Smith
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sujan Shresta
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Kyle J. Gaulton
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Tariq M. Rana
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.W. designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript draft; J.M. designed and performed experiments, and analyzed data; L.T. and S.B. analyzed the scRNA-seq data; A.S., R.M., J.T., and L.W. performed experiments; D.M.S. provided reagents, S.S. and K.G. participated in experimental design, data analysis and interpretation; T.M.R. conceived and planned the project and participated in experimental design, data analysis, data interpretation, and manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tariq M. Rana.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wen, J., Moon, J., Tucciarone, L. et al. A new mRNA antigen vaccine induces potent B and T cell responses and in vivo protection against SARS-CoV-2. npj Vaccines (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-026-01421-z

Download citation

  • Received: 17 July 2025

  • Accepted: 02 March 2026

  • Published: 24 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-026-01421-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial policies
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Vaccines (npj Vaccines)

ISSN 2059-0105 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology