Table 2 Comparative reduction of EDCs with ferrate oxidation and ozonation.
From: Preliminarily comparative performance of removing bisphenol-S by ferrate oxidation and ozonation
Ferrate oxidation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
EDC | Sample condition | Ferrate dosage | Removal (%) | Reference |
Tetrabromobisphenol-A | Deionised water 0.018 mM | 0.025 mM | 100 | |
17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) | Deionized water 0.01 mM | 0.05 mM | 99 | |
Bisphenol-A | Deionised water 0.002 mM | 0.002 mM | >95 | |
Octylphenol | Natural water 7.5 μM | 0.7 μM | 100 | |
Bisphenol-S | Natural water 10 µg L−1 100 µg L−1 | 36 μM | 99.95 99.99 | This study |
Ozonation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemicals | Sample condition | Ozone dosage | Removal (%) | Reference |
Sulfolane | Spiked groundwater 20 mg.L−1 | 200 mg.L−1 | 82 | |
Bisphenol-A | Spiked Milli-Q water 0.9 mg.L−1 | 1.4 mg.L−1 | 99 | |
Spiked distilled water 0.509 mM | 0.35 mM | 87 | ||
levonorgestrel | Spiked natural water 2.3 μg.L−1 | 2 mg.L−1 | 88 | |
Bisphenol-S | Natural water 10 µg L−1 100 µg L−1 | 36 μM | 99.99 99.99 | This study |
