Table 5 Comparative performance between representative bio-based cation-binding membranes/filters for Li+ and Fe3+
Membrane/Filter Material | Active Sites | Target cations | Operating Mode | Flux (L·m-2 ·h-1)a | pH | IECmax (mmol·g-1) | q,maxb (mg·g⁻¹) | Regenerability (cycles) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MA- and SA-treated wood (MSp/SSp) | -COO- | Li+ Fe3+ | Gravity-driven, dead-end filtration | MSp: 264 ± 125 SSp: 215 ± 63 MSp: 173 ± 69 SSp: 230 ± 69 | 5–6.5 | MSp:2.69 SSp: 2.04 | MSp: 14 (Li+) SSp: 19 (Li+) MSp: 32 (Fe3+) SSp: 50 (Fe3+) | MSp: Stable (3) SSp: Varies (3) | This work |
HMO/cellulose | HMO | Li+ | Diffusion cell (no external force) | –– | 6–7 | 3.1 | 21.6 | Stable (8) | |
Cross-linked phosphorylated cellulose | PO43- | Li+ | Batch, dynamic packed-bed column | 390–1559 | –– | 3.6 – 4.9 | ~25–34 | –– | |
Sulfonated cellulose microspheres | –SO₃⁻ | Li+ | Batch/column adsorption | 5400 | 4–10 | 2.35 | 16 | Stable ( < 5) | |
Amine-modified chitosan resins | DETA and TEPA polyamines | Fe3+ | Column adsorption | 764 | 2.5 | DETA: 1.4 TEPA: 3.2 | DETA: 78 TEPA: 179 | –– | |
Chitosan derivatives | ECH, GLA, EGDE | Fe3+ | Batch adsorption | –– | 3 | Unmod: 1.67 ECH: 1.29 GLA: 0.92 EGDE: 0.82 | Unmod: 91 ECH: 73 GLA: 52 EGDE: 46. | –– | |
Nafion™ 117 | PFSA (fixed –SO3-) | Na+ | Electro-chemical/ electro-dialytic processes | –– | 0-14 | 0.95–1.01[c] | 6 (Li+) 17 (Fe3+) | Stable (high) | |
DOWEX™ 50WX8 | Sty–DVB gel resin (fixed –SO3-) | Na+ | Packed-bed ion exchange | –– | 0–14 | 4.24-5.05[d] | 30–35 (Li+) 79–94 (Fe3+) | Stable (high) |