Abstract
The clinical success of gene therapy depends critically on the development of delivery platforms capable of achieving precise, efficient and tissue-specific delivery of genetic payloads in vivo. A diverse array of carriers, including viral, non-viral, synthetic and natural vectors, have been explored to address this challenge. Among them, adeno-associated viruses, lipid nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles have emerged as leading candidates, each offering distinct advantages and translational hurdles. Here we provide a comparative analysis of these delivery modalities, highlighting their respective design principles, targeting capabilities, immunogenicity profiles and clinical progress. We survey preclinical and clinically adopted delivery strategies and explore how the three delivery platforms can be tailored for gene therapeutics in different diseases. Finally, we discuss emerging strategies to overcome current limitations and outline future directions for the rational design of next-generation gene delivery platforms that combine safety, scalability and functional precision.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout




Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dunbar, C. E. et al. Gene therapy comes of age. Science 359, eaan4672 (2018).
Schambach, A. et al. A new age of precision gene therapy. Lancet 403, 568–582 (2024).
Mitchell, M. J. et al. Engineering precision nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 101–124 (2021).
Wang, D., Stevens, G. & Flotte, T. R. Gene therapy then and now: a look back at changes in the field over the past 25 years. Mol. Ther. 33, 1889–1902 (2025).
Kuzmin, D. A. et al. The clinical landscape for AAV gene therapies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 173–174 (2021).
Bulcha, J. T., Wang, Y., Ma, H., Tai, P. W. L. & Gao, G. Viral vector platforms within the gene therapy landscape. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 6, 53 (2021).
Hou, X. C., Zaks, T., Langer, R. & Dong, Y. Z. Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 1078–1094 (2021).
Herrmann, I. K., Wood, M. J. A. & Fuhrmann, G. Extracellular vesicles as a next-generation drug delivery platform. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 748–759 (2021).
Cheng, L. S. & Hill, A. F. Therapeutically harnessing extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21, 379–399 (2022).
Di Ianni, E., Obuchi, W., Breyne, K. & Breakefield, X. O. Extracellular vesicles for the delivery of gene therapy. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 3, 360–373 (2025).
Ylä-Herttuala, S. Endgame: Glybera finally recommended for approval as the first gene therapy drug in the European Union. Mol. Ther. 20, 1831–1832 (2012).
Maguire, A. M. et al. Efficacy, safety, and durability of voretigene neparvovec-rzyl in RPE65 mutation-associated inherited retinal dystrophy: results of phase 1 and 3 trials. Ophthalmology 126, 1273–1285 (2019).
Mendell, J. R. et al. Single-dose gene-replacement therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 1713–1722 (2017).
Anguela, X. M. & High, K. A. Hemophilia B and gene therapy: a new chapter with etranacogene dezaparvovec. Blood Adv. 8, 1796–1803 (2024).
Ozelo, M. C. et al. Valoctocogene roxaparvovec gene therapy for hemophilia A. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 1013–1025 (2022).
Mendell, J. R. et al. AAV gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: the EMBARK phase 3 randomized trial. Nat. Med. 31, 332–341 (2025).
Cuker, A. et al. Gene therapy with fidanacogene elaparvovec in adults with hemophilia B. N. Engl. J. Med. 391, 1108–1118 (2024).
Golikeri, A., Yi, S. & Fashoyin-Aje, L. Eladocagene exuparvovec for aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 333, 1449–1450 (2025).
Baden, L. R. et al. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 403–416 (2021).
Polack, F. P. et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 2603–2615 (2020).
Adams, D. et al. Patisiran, an RNAi therapeutic, for hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 11–21 (2018).
Sheridan, C. The world’s first CRISPR therapy is approved: who will receive it? Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 3–4 (2024).
Dhungel, B. P. et al. Understanding AAV vector immunogenicity: from particle to patient. Theranostics 14, 1260–1288 (2024).
Davis, J. R. et al. Efficient prime editing in mouse brain, liver and heart with dual AAVs. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 253–264 (2024).
Levy, J. M. et al. Cytosine and adenine base editing of the brain, liver, retina, heart and skeletal muscle of mice via adeno-associated viruses. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 97–110 (2020).
Pupo, A. et al. AAV vectors: the Rubik’s cube of human gene therapy. Mol. Ther. 30, 3515–3541 (2022).
Zhi, S. et al. Dual-AAV delivering split prime editor system for in vivo genome editing. Mol. Ther. 30, 283–294 (2022).
Davis, J. R. et al. Efficient in vivo base editing via single adeno-associated viruses with size-optimized genomes encoding compact adenine base editors. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 6, 1272–1283 (2022).
Wang, D., Tai, P. W. L. & Gao, G. Adeno-associated virus vector as a platform for gene therapy delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 18, 358–378 (2019).
El Moukhtari, S. H. et al. Lipid nanoparticles for siRNA delivery in cancer treatment. J. Control. Release 361, 130–146 (2023).
Bobba, C. M. et al. Nanoparticle delivery of microRNA-146a regulates mechanotransduction in lung macrophages and mitigates injury during mechanical ventilation. Nat. Commun. 12, 289 (2021).
Xu, S. et al. Tumor-tailored ionizable lipid nanoparticles facilitate IL-12 circular RNA delivery for enhanced lung cancer immunotherapy. Adv. Mater. 36, 2400307 (2024).
Patel, M. N. et al. Safer non-viral DNA delivery using lipid nanoparticles loaded with endogenous anti-inflammatory lipids. Nat. Biotechnol. 44, 79–89 (2026).
Swingle, K. L. et al. Placenta-tropic VEGF mRNA lipid nanoparticles ameliorate murine pre-eclampsia. Nature 637, 412–421 (2025).
Ramos da Silva, J. et al. Single immunizations of self-amplifying or non-replicating mRNA–LNP vaccines control HPV-associated tumors in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 15, eabn3464 (2023).
Blakney, A. K., McKay, P. F., Yus, B. I., Aldon, Y. & Shattock, R. J. Inside out: optimization of lipid nanoparticle formulations for exterior complexation and in vivo delivery of saRNA. Gene Ther. 26, 363–372 (2019).
Jeppesen, D. K. et al. Reassessment of exosome composition. Cell 177, 428–445.e18 (2019).
Ma, Y. et al. Engineering therapeutical extracellular vesicles for clinical translation. Trends Biotechnol. 43, 61–82 (2025).
Murphy, D. E. et al. Natural or synthetic RNA delivery: a stoichiometric comparison of extracellular vesicles and synthetic nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 21, 1888–1895 (2021).
You, Y. et al. Intradermally delivered mRNA-encapsulating extracellular vesicles for collagen-replacement therapy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 887–900 (2023).
Ma, Y. et al. Exosomal mRNAs for angiogenic–osteogenic coupled bone repair. Adv. Sci. 10, 2302622 (2023).
Dong, S. et al. Adaptive design of mRNA-loaded extracellular vesicles for targeted immunotherapy of cancer. Nat. Commun. 14, 6610 (2023).
Liu, M., Hu, S., Yan, N., Popowski, K. D. & Cheng, K. Inhalable extracellular vesicle delivery of IL-12 mRNA to treat lung cancer and promote systemic immunity. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 565–575 (2024).
You, Y. et al. Extracellular vesicle-mediated VEGF-A mRNA delivery rescues ischaemic injury with low immunogenicity. Eur. Heart J. 46, 1662–1676 (2025).
Yang, Z. et al. Large-scale generation of functional mRNA-encapsulating exosomes via cellular nanoporation. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 69–83 (2020).
Bader, J. et al. Loading of extracellular vesicles with nucleic acids via hybridization with non-lamellar liquid crystalline lipid nanoparticles. Adv. Sci. 12, 2404860 (2025).
Wang, D. et al. Treatment of hemophilic arthropathy by immunomodulatory extracellular vesicle delivered by liposome hybrid nanoparticles. Bioact. Mater. 40, 47–63 (2024).
Ivanova, A. et al. Barcoded hybrids of extracellular vesicles and lipid nanoparticles for multiplexed analysis of tissue distribution. Adv. Sci. 12, 2407850 (2025).
Pareja Tello, R. et al. Hybrid lipid nanoparticles derived from human mesenchymal stem cell extracellular vesicles by microfluidic sonication for collagen I mRNA delivery to human tendon progenitor stem cells. Biomater. Sci. 13, 2066–2081 (2025).
Manzari, M. T. et al. Targeted drug delivery strategies for precision medicines. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 351–370 (2021).
Goertsen, D. et al. AAV capsid variants with brain-wide transgene expression and decreased liver targeting after intravenous delivery in mouse and marmoset. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 106–115 (2022).
Issa, S. S., Shaimardanova, A. A., Solovyeva, V. V. & Rizvanov, A. A. Various AAV serotypes and their applications in gene therapy: an overview. Cells 12, 785 (2023).
Thomsen, G. et al. Biodistribution of onasemnogene abeparvovec DNA, mRNA and SMN protein in human tissue. Nat. Med. 27, 1701–1711 (2021).
Yin, L. et al. Revolution of AAV in drug discovery: from delivery system to clinical application. J. Med. Virol. 97, e70447 (2025).
Bryant, D. H. et al. Deep diversification of an AAV capsid protein by machine learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 691–696 (2021).
Eid, F.-E. et al. Systematic multi-trait AAV capsid engineering for efficient gene delivery. Nat. Commun. 15, 6602 (2024).
Kim, J., Eygeris, Y., Ryals, R. C., Jozić, A. & Sahay, G. Strategies for non-viral vectors targeting organs beyond the liver. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 428–447 (2024).
Cheng, Q. et al. Selective organ targeting (SORT) nanoparticles for tissue-specific mRNA delivery and CRISPR–Cas gene editing. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 313–320 (2020).
Kim, M. et al. Dual SORT LNPs for multi-organ base editing. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02675-z (2025).
Wang, X. et al. Preparation of selective organ-targeting (SORT) lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) using multiple technical methods for tissue-specific mRNA delivery. Nat. Protoc. 18, 265–291 (2023).
Vaidya, A. et al. Expanding RNAi to kidneys, lungs, and spleen via selective organ targeting (SORT) siRNA lipid nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 36, 2313791 (2024).
Wei, T. et al. Lung SORT LNPs enable precise homology-directed repair mediated CRISPR/Cas genome correction in cystic fibrosis models. Nat. Commun. 14, 7322 (2023).
Wang, Y. et al. Realveolarization with inhalable mucus-penetrating lipid nanoparticles for the treatment of pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Sci. Adv. 10, eado4791 (2024).
Maniyamgama, N. et al. Muco-penetrating lipid nanoparticles having a liquid core for enhanced intranasal mRNA delivery. Adv. Sci. 12, 2407383 (2025).
Zeng, S. et al. Recent advances and prospects for lipid-based nanoparticles as drug carriers in the treatment of human retinal diseases. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 199, 114965 (2023).
Carou-Senra, P. et al. Inkjet printing of pharmaceuticals. Adv. Mater. 36, 2309164 (2024).
Wang, Y. et al. Age-associated disparity in phagocytic clearance affects the efficacy of cancer nanotherapeutics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 255–263 (2024).
Vulpis, E. et al. The possible role of sex as an important factor in development and administration of lipid nanomedicine-based COVID-19 vaccine. Mol. Pharmaceutics 18, 2448–2453 (2021).
Hallal, S., Tűzesi, Á, Grau, G. E., Buckland, M. E. & Alexander, K. L. Understanding the extracellular vesicle surface for clinical molecular biology. J. Extracell. Vesicles 11, e12260 (2022).
Nawaz, M. et al. Targeted delivery of mRNA to the heart via extracellular vesicles or lipid nanoparticles. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.25.634881 (2025).
Marar, C., Starich, B. & Wirtz, D. Extracellular vesicles in immunomodulation and tumor progression. Nat. Immunol. 22, 560–570 (2021).
Ma, Y. et al. Extracellular vesicles: an emerging nanoplatform for cancer therapy. Front. Oncol. 10, 606906 (2021).
Liam-Or, R. et al. Cellular uptake and in vivo distribution of mesenchymal-stem-cell-derived extracellular vesicles are protein corona dependent. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 846–855 (2024).
Dietz, L. et al. Uptake of extracellular vesicles into immune cells is enhanced by the protein corona. J. Extracell. Vesicles 12, e12399 (2023).
Chiang, C.-L. et al. Dual targeted extracellular vesicles regulate oncogenic genes in advanced pancreatic cancer. Nat. Commun. 14, 6692 (2023).
Wiklander, O. P. B. et al. Antibody-displaying extracellular vesicles for targeted cancer therapy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 8, 1453–1468 (2024).
Stranford, D. M. et al. Genetically encoding multiple functionalities into extracellular vesicles for the targeted delivery of biologics to T cells. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 8, 397–414 (2024).
Riyad, J. M. & Weber, T. Intracellular trafficking of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors: challenges and future directions. Gene Ther. 28, 683–696 (2021).
Cabanes-Creus, M. et al. Restoring the natural tropism of AAV2 vectors for human liver. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eaba3312 (2020).
Smith, T. J., Fusco Robert, M., Elmore Zachary, C. & Asokan, A. Interplay between furin and sialoglycans in modulating adeno-associated viral cell entry. J. Virol. 97, e0009323 (2023).
Pillay, S. et al. An essential receptor for adeno-associated virus infection. Nature 530, 108–112 (2016).
Chatterjee, S., Kon, E., Sharma, P. & Peer, D. Endosomal escape: a bottleneck for LNP-mediated therapeutics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2307800120 (2024).
Liu, S. et al. Charge-assisted stabilization of lipid nanoparticles enables inhaled mRNA delivery for mucosal vaccination. Nat. Commun. 15, 9471 (2024).
Suk, J. S., Xu, Q., Kim, N., Hanes, J. & Ensign, L. M. PEGylation as a strategy for improving nanoparticle-based drug and gene delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 99, 28–51 (2016).
Rubinstein, E., Théry, C. & Zimmermann, P. Tetraspanins affect membrane structures and the trafficking of molecular partners: what impact on extracellular vesicles? Biochem. Soc. Trans. 53, 371–382 (2025).
Murphy, D. E. et al. Extracellular vesicle-based therapeutics: natural versus engineered targeting and trafficking. Exp. Mol. Med. 51, 1–12 (2019).
Richter, M., Vader, P. & Fuhrmann, G. Approaches to surface engineering of extracellular vesicles. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 173, 416–426 (2021).
Huang, X. et al. Reactive oxygen species enhance rAAV transduction by promoting its escape from late endosomes. Virol. J. 20, 2 (2023).
Xiao, P.-J. & Samulski, R. J. Cytoplasmic trafficking, endosomal escape, and perinuclear accumulation of adeno-associated virus type 2 particles are facilitated by microtubule network. J. Virol. 86, 10462–10473 (2012).
Dhungel, B. P., Bailey, C. G. & Rasko, J. E. J. Journey to the center of the cell: tracing the path of AAV transduction. Trends Mol. Med. 27, 172–184 (2021).
Gilleron, J. et al. Image-based analysis of lipid nanoparticle–mediated siRNA delivery, intracellular trafficking and endosomal escape. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 638–646 (2013).
Mrksich, K., Padilla, M. S. & Mitchell, M. J. Breaking the final barrier: evolution of cationic and ionizable lipid structure in lipid nanoparticles to escape the endosome. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 214, 115446 (2024).
Xu, Y., Golubovic, A., Xu, S., Pan, A. & Li, B. Rational design and combinatorial chemistry of ionizable lipids for RNA delivery. J. Mater. Chem. B 11, 6527–6539 (2023).
Han, X. et al. In situ combinatorial synthesis of degradable branched lipidoids for systemic delivery of mRNA therapeutics and gene editors. Nat. Commun. 15, 1762 (2024).
Chen, Z. et al. Modular design of biodegradable ionizable lipids for improved mRNA delivery and precise cancer metastasis delineation in vivo. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 24302–24314 (2023).
Zhao, S. et al. Acid-degradable lipid nanoparticles enhance the delivery of mRNA. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 1702–1711 (2024).
Pei, D. & Buyanova, M. Overcoming endosomal entrapment in drug delivery. Bioconjug. Chem. 30, 273–283 (2019).
Berger, A. G. et al. Poly(β-aminoester) physicochemical properties govern the delivery of siRNA from electrostatically assembled coatings. Biomacromolecules 25, 2934–2952 (2024).
Brown, D. W. et al. Safe and effective in vivo delivery of DNA and RNA using proteolipid vehicles. Cell 187, 5357–5375.e24 (2024).
Maugeri, M. et al. Linkage between endosomal escape of LNP–mRNA and loading into EVs for transport to other cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 4333 (2019).
Joshi, B. S., de Beer, M. A., Giepmans, B. N. G. & Zuhorn, I. S. Endocytosis of extracellular vesicles and release of their cargo from endosomes. ACS Nano 14, 4444–4455 (2020).
Gu, W. et al. Extracellular vesicles incorporating retrovirus-like capsids for the enhanced packaging and systemic delivery of mRNA into neurons. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 8, 415–426 (2024).
Liang, X. et al. Engineering of extracellular vesicles for efficient intracellular delivery of multimodal therapeutics including genome editors. Nat. Commun. 16, 4028 (2025).
Wu, X. et al. Calcium phosphate nanoparticle-immobilized macrophage-derived extracellular vesicle nanohybrid facilitates diabetic bone regeneration. Adv. Mater. 38, e09410 (2026).
Kelich, J. M. et al. Super-resolution imaging of nuclear import of adeno-associated virus in live cells. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2, 15047 (2015).
Hoad, M. et al. Structural basis for nuclear import of adeno-associated virus serotype 6 capsid protein. J. Virol. 99, e0134524 (2024).
Zhang, H. et al. Algorithm for optimized mRNA design improves stability and immunogenicity. Nature 621, 396–403 (2023).
Lasse, H., David, C. J., Olivia, M. M. & Benjamin, W. Endosomal escape mechanisms of extracellular vesicle-based drug carriers: lessons for lipid nanoparticle design. Extracell. Vesicles Circ. Nucl. Acids 5, 344–357 (2024).
Bader, J., Brigger, F. & Leroux, J.-C. Extracellular vesicles versus lipid nanoparticles for the delivery of nucleic acids. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 215, 115461 (2024).
Calcedo, R., Vandenberghe, L. H., Gao, G., Lin, J. & Wilson, J. M. Worldwide epidemiology of neutralizing antibodies to adeno-associated viruses. J. Infect. Dis. 199, 381–390 (2009).
Chhabra, A. et al. Global seroprevalence of neutralizing antibodies against adeno-associated virus serotypes used for human gene therapies. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 32, 101273 (2024).
Boutin, S. et al. Prevalence of serum IgG and neutralizing factors against adeno-associated virus (AAV) types 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, and 9 in the healthy population: implications for gene therapy using AAV vectors. Hum. Gene Ther. 21, 704–712 (2010).
Verma, S. et al. Seroprevalence of adeno-associated virus neutralizing antibodies in males with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Hum. Gene Ther. 34, 430–438 (2022).
Wang, X. et al. Seroprevalence of binding and neutralizing antibodies against 18 adeno-associated virus types in patients with neuromuscular disorders. Front. Immunol. 15, 1450858 (2024).
Duan, D. Lethal immunotoxicity in high-dose systemic AAV therapy. Mol. Ther. 31, 3123–3126 (2023).
Lek, A. et al. Death after high-dose rAAV9 gene therapy in a patient with Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy. N. Engl. J. Med. 389, 1203–1210 (2023).
High-dose AAV gene therapy deaths. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 910 (2020).
Sarepta Therapeutics shares safety update on ELEVIDYS. Sarepta Therapeutics https://investorrelations.sarepta.com/static-files/0d505d91-6722-4528-aae0-1e99fcbc37e5 (2025).
Sarepta provides safety update for ELEVIDYS and initiates steps to strengthen safety in non-ambulatory individuals with Duchenne. Sarepta Therapeutics https://investorrelations.sarepta.com/node/24426/pdf (2025).
Calcedo, R. et al. Adeno-associated virus antibody profiles in newborns, children, and adolescents. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 18, 1586–1588 (2011).
Ogbonmide, T. et al. Gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA): a review of current challenges and safety considerations for onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma). Cureus 15, e36197 (2023).
Earley, J., Piletska, E., Ronzitti, G. & Piletsky, S. Evading and overcoming AAV neutralization in gene therapy. Trends Biotechnol. 41, 836–845 (2023).
Cheng, M. et al. Probing aspects of extracellular vesicle associated AAV allows increased vector yield and insight into its transduction and immune-evasive properties. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 33, 101407 (2025).
Kwak, G. et al. Extracellular vesicles enhance pulmonary transduction of stably associated adeno-associated virus following intratracheal administration. J. Extracell. Vesicles 12, 12324 (2023).
Li, X. et al. Extracellular vesicle-encapsulated adeno-associated viruses for therapeutic gene delivery to the heart. Circulation 148, 405–425 (2023).
Lee, Y., Jeong, M., Park, J., Jung, H. & Lee, H. Immunogenicity of lipid nanoparticles and its impact on the efficacy of mRNA vaccines and therapeutics. Exp. Mol. Med. 55, 2085–2096 (2023).
Liu, Y. et al. Generation of tolerogenic antigen-presenting cells in vivo via the delivery of mRNA encoding PDL1 within lipid nanoparticles. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 9, 1320–1334 (2025).
Gong, N. et al. Mannich reaction-based combinatorial libraries identify antioxidant ionizable lipids for mRNA delivery with reduced immunogenicity. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 9, 2181–2195 (2025).
Szebeni, J. et al. Applying lessons learned from nanomedicines to understand rare hypersensitivity reactions to mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 337–346 (2022).
Luozhong, S. et al. Poly(carboxybetaine) lipids enhance mRNA therapeutics efficacy and reduce their immunogenicity. Nat. Mater. 24, 1852–1861 (2025).
Holick, C. T. et al. Poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (POx) as poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-lipid substitute for lipid nanoparticle formulations. Small 21, 2411354 (2025).
Kang, D. D. et al. Engineering LNPs with polysarcosine lipids for mRNA delivery. Bioact. Mater. 37, 86–93 (2024).
Wang, C., Zhao, C., Wang, W., Liu, X. & Deng, H. Biomimetic noncationic lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2311276120 (2023).
Minnaert, A.-K. et al. Strategies for controlling the innate immune activity of conventional and self-amplifying mRNA therapeutics: getting the message across. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 176, 113900 (2021).
Xue, Y. et al. LNP–RNA-engineered adipose stem cells for accelerated diabetic wound healing. Nat. Commun. 15, 739 (2024).
Beissert, T. et al. Improvement of in vivo expression of genes delivered by self-amplifying RNA using vaccinia virus immune evasion proteins. Hum. Gene Ther. 28, 1138–1146 (2017).
Bérouti, M. et al. Pseudouridine RNA avoids immune detection through impaired endolysosomal processing and TLR engagement. Cell 188, 4880–4895.e15 (2025).
Dousis, A., Ravichandran, K., Hobert, E. M., Moore, M. J. & Rabideau, A. E. An engineered T7 RNA polymerase that produces mRNA free of immunostimulatory byproducts. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 560–568 (2023).
Chen, Y. et al. Leveraging nature’s nanocarriers: translating insights from extracellular vesicles to biomimetic synthetic vesicles for biomedical applications. Sci. Adv. 11, eads5249 (2025).
Xia, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, G. & Wolfram, J. Immunogenicity of extracellular vesicles. Adv. Mater. 36, 2403199 (2024).
Elsharkasy, O. M. et al. Extracellular vesicles as drug delivery systems: why and how? Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 159, 332–343 (2020).
Li, C. & Samulski, R. J. Engineering adeno-associated virus vectors for gene therapy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 255–272 (2020).
Wang, J.-H., Gessler, D. J., Zhan, W., Gallagher, T. L. & Gao, G. Adeno-associated virus as a delivery vector for gene therapy of human diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 9, 78 (2024).
Korneyenkov, M. A. & Zamyatnin, A. A. Next step in gene delivery: modern approaches and further perspectives of AAV tropism modification. Pharmaceutics 13, 750 (2021).
Faust, S. M. et al. CpG-depleted adeno-associated virus vectors evade immune detection. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 2994–3001 (2013).
Chan, Y. K. et al. Engineering adeno-associated viral vectors to evade innate immune and inflammatory responses. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabd3438 (2021).
Maurer, A. C. et al. Double-strand break repair pathways differentially affect processing and transduction by dual AAV vectors. Nat. Commun. 16, 1532 (2025).
McClements, M. E. & MacLaren, R. E. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) dual vector strategies for gene therapy encoding large transgenes. Yale J. Biol. Med. 90, 611–623 (2017).
Shi, Y. et al. Chemically modified platforms for better RNA therapeutics. Chem. Rev. 124, 929–1033 (2024).
Eygeris, Y., Gupta, M., Kim, J. & Sahay, G. Chemistry of lipid nanoparticles for RNA delivery. Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 2–12 (2022).
Liu, Z. et al. Engineered multi-domain lipid nanoparticles for targeted delivery. Chem. Soc. Rev. 54, 5961–5994 (2025).
Warminski, M., Mamot, A., Depaix, A., Kowalska, J. & Jemielity, J. Chemical modifications of mRNA ends for therapeutic applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 56, 2814–2826 (2023).
Wang, W. et al. Artificial intelligence-driven rational design of ionizable lipids for mRNA delivery. Nat. Commun. 15, 10804 (2024).
Xu, Y. et al. AGILE platform: a deep learning powered approach to accelerate LNP development for mRNA delivery. Nat. Commun. 15, 6305 (2024).
Li, B. et al. Accelerating ionizable lipid discovery for mRNA delivery using machine learning and combinatorial chemistry. Nat. Mater. 23, 1002–1008 (2024).
Piffoux, M. et al. Engineering and loading therapeutic extracellular vesicles for clinical translation: a data reporting frame for comparability. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 178, 113972 (2021).
Molina, E. et al. Insights in AAV-mediated antigen-specific immunity and a strategy for AAV vaccine dose reduction through AAV–extracellular vesicle association. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 32, 101358 (2024).
Lee, J. H. et al. In vivo genome editing for hemophilia B therapy by the combination of rebalancing and therapeutic gene knockin using a viral and non-viral vector. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 32, 161–172 (2023).
Lugin, M. L., Lee, R. T. & Kwon, Y. J. Synthetically engineered adeno-associated virus for efficient, safe, and versatile gene therapy applications. ACS Nano 14, 14262–14283 (2020).
Sato, Y. T. et al. Engineering hybrid exosomes by membrane fusion with liposomes. Sci. Rep. 6, 21933 (2016).
Mondal, J. et al. Hybrid exosomes, exosome-like nanovesicles and engineered exosomes for therapeutic applications. J. Control. Release 353, 1127–1149 (2023).
Son, G., Song, J., Park, J. C., Kim, H. N. & Kim, H. Fusogenic lipid nanoparticles for rapid delivery of large therapeutic molecules to exosomes. Nat. Commun. 16, 4799 (2025).
BioMarin presents five-year phase 3 results reinforcing long-term efficacy and safety of ROCTAVIAN® (valoctocogene roxaparvovec-rvox) at International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2025 Congress. BioMarin.com https://www.biomarin.com/news/press-releases/biomarin-presents-five-year-phase-3-results-reinforcing-long-term-efficacy-and-safety-of-roctavian-valoctocogene-roxaparvovec-rvox-at-international-society-on-thrombosis-and-haemostasis-2025-c/ (2025).
Han, I. C. et al. Retinal tropism and transduction of adeno-associated virus varies by serotype and route of delivery (intravitreal, subretinal, or suprachoroidal) in rats. Hum. Gene Ther. 31, 1288–1299 (2020).
Kurosaki, F. et al. Optimization of adeno-associated virus vector-mediated gene transfer to the respiratory tract. Gene Ther. 24, 290–297 (2017).
Ye, D., Chukwu, C., Yang, Y., Hu, Z. & Chen, H. Adeno-associated virus vector delivery to the brain: technology advancements and clinical applications. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 211, 115363 (2024).
Pinto, M. S.-L. et al. Polymer-based coating of adeno-associated viral particles as a new strategy to evade immune response for DMD treatment. J. Control. Release 384, 113896 (2025).
Kurashina, Y. et al. Adeno-associated virus-encapsulated alginate microspheres loaded in collagen gel carriers for localized gene transfer. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 13, 2303546 (2024).
Cheng, M. H. Y. et al. Liposomal lipid nanoparticles for extrahepatic delivery of mRNA. Nat. Commun. 16, 4135 (2025).
Gupta, D., Zickler, A. M. & El Andaloussi, S. Dosing extracellular vesicles. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 178, 113961 (2021).
Popowski, K. D. et al. Inhalable dry powder mRNA vaccines based on extracellular vesicles. Matter 5, 2960–2974 (2022).
Bao, H. et al. Exosome-loaded degradable polymeric microcapsules for the treatment of vitreoretinal diseases. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 8, 1436–1452 (2024).
Huang, X. et al. Oral delivery of liquid mRNA therapeutics by an engineered capsule for treatment of preclinical intestinal disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 17, eadu1493 (2025).
Amondarain, M. et al. The role of microfluidics and 3D-bioprinting in the future of exosome therapy. Trends Biotechnol. 41, 1343–1359 (2023).
Guideline on the Quality, Non-clinical and Clinical Aspects of Gene Therapy Medicinal Products (EMA, 2018); https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-quality-non-clinical-and-clinical-aspects-gene-therapy-medicinal-products_en.pdf
Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control (CMC) Information for Human Gene Therapy Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs) (FDA, 2020); https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/chemistry-manufacturing-and-control-cmc-information-human-gene-therapy-investigational-new-drug
Human Gene Therapy Products Incorporating Human Genome Editing (FDA, 2024); https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/human-gene-therapy-products-incorporating-human-genome-editing
Liu, S. et al. Systematic comparison of rAAV vectors manufactured using large-scale suspension cultures of Sf9 and HEK293 cells. Mol. Ther. 32, 74–83 (2024).
ICH Topic Q5D—Quality of Biotechnological Products: Derivation and Characterisation of Cell Substrates Used for Production of Biotechnological/Biological Products (EMA, 1998); https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-q-5-d-derivation-and-characterisation-cell-substrates-used-production-biotechnologicalbiological-products-step-5_en.pdf
Content and Review of Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control (CMC) Information for Human Somatic Cell Therapy Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs) (FDA, 2008); https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/content-and-review-chemistry-manufacturing-and-control-cmc-information-human-somatic-cell-therapy
Wang, Y. et al. Efficient, high-quality engineering of therapeutic extracellular vesicles on an integrated nanoplatform. ACS Nano 18, 32421–32437 (2024).
Welsh, J. A. et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles (MISEV2023): from basic to advanced approaches. J. Extracell. Vesicles 13, e12404 (2024).
Humbert, C. et al. GMP-compliant process for the manufacturing of an extracellular vesicles-enriched secretome product derived from cardiovascular progenitor cells suitable for a phase I clinical trial. J. Extracell. Vesicles 14, e70145 (2025).
Takakura, Y. et al. Quality and safety considerations for therapeutic products based on extracellular vesicles. Pharm. Res. 41, 1573–1594 (2024).
Leibiger, T. M., Min, L. & Lee, K. H. Quantitative proteomic analysis of residual host cell protein retention across adeno-associated virus affinity chromatography. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 32, 101383 (2024).
Yu, Z. et al. TPP combined with DGUC as an economic and universal process for large-scale purification of AAV vectors. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 17, 34–48 (2020).
Meierrieks, F. et al. A novel and simplified anion exchange flow-through polishing approach for the separation of full from empty adeno-associated virus capsids. Biotechnol. J. 19, e202400430 (2024).
Baiersdörfer, M. et al. A facile method for the removal of dsRNA contaminant from in vitro-transcribed mRNA. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 15, 26–35 (2019).
Zhong, Z. et al. Corticosteroids and cellulose purification improve, respectively, the in vivo translation and vaccination efficacy of sa-mRNAs. Mol. Ther. 29, 1370–1381 (2021).
Gandham, S. et al. Technologies and standardization in research on extracellular vesicles. Trends Biotechnol. 38, 1066–1098 (2020).
Buschmann, D., Mussack, V. & Byrd, J. B. Separation, characterization, and standardization of extracellular vesicles for drug delivery applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 174, 348–368 (2021).
Meng, W. et al. Prospects and challenges of extracellular vesicle-based drug delivery system: considering cell source. Drug Deliv. 27, 585–598 (2020).
Théry, C. et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles 7, 1535750 (2018).
Lötvall, J. et al. Minimal experimental requirements for definition of extracellular vesicles and their functions: a position statement from the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles. J. Extracell. Vesicles 3, 26913 (2014).
Ducrot, C. et al. Hybrid extracellular vesicles for drug delivery. Cancer Lett. 558, 216107 (2023).
Geng, T., Paek, S. Y., Leung, E., Chamley, L. W. & Wu, Z. Comparing extracellular vesicles from four different cell origins for intracellular drug delivery to pancreatic cancer cells: small or large vesicles? J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 93, 105416 (2024).
Chan, A., Maturana, C. J. & Engel, E. A. Optimized formulation buffer preserves adeno-associated virus-9 infectivity after 4 °C storage and freeze/thawing cycling. J. Virol. Methods 309, 114598 (2022).
Thomas, S. P. et al. Analysis of the impact of pluronic acid on the thermal stability and infectivity of AAV6.2FF. BMC Biotechnol. 24, 22 (2024).
More flexible storage conditions for BioNTech/Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. EMA https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/more-flexible-storage-conditions-biontech-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine (2021).
Evaluation of the Quality, Safety and Efficacy of Messenger RNA Vaccines for the Prevention of Infectious Diseases: Regulatory Considerations (WHO, 2022); https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/biologicals/vaccine-standardization/annex-3---mrna-vaccines_who_trs_1039_web-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6e31a112_1&download=true
Concept Paper on the Development of a Guideline on the Quality Aspects of mRNA Vaccines (EMA, 2023); https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/concept-paper-development-guideline-quality-aspects-mrna-vaccines_en.pdf
Guideline on the Quality Aspects of mRNA Vaccines (EMA, 2025); https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/draft-guideline-quality-aspects-mrna-vaccines_en.pdf
Barbier, A. J., Jiang, A. Y., Zhang, P., Wooster, R. & Anderson, D. G. The clinical progress of mRNA vaccines and immunotherapies. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 840–854 (2022).
Zhao, P. et al. Long-term storage of lipid-like nanoparticles for mRNA delivery. Bioact. Mater. 5, 358–363 (2020).
Lőrincz, Á. M. et al. Effect of storage on physical and functional properties of extracellular vesicles derived from neutrophilic granulocytes. J. Extracell. Vesicles 3, 25465 (2014).
Görgens, A. et al. Identification of storage conditions stabilizing extracellular vesicles preparations. J. Extracell. Vesicles 11, e12238 (2022).
Bosch, S. et al. Trehalose prevents aggregation of exosomes and cryodamage. Sci. Rep. 6, 36162 (2016).
Paganini, C. et al. Scalable production and isolation of extracellular vesicles: available sources and lessons from current industrial bioprocesses. Biotechnol. J. 14, 1800528 (2019).
Mehta, M. et al. Lipid-based nanoparticles for drug/gene delivery: an overview of the production techniques and difficulties encountered in their industrial development. ACS Mater. Au 3, 600–619 (2023).
Mizoguchi, H. et al. Regulatory systems and requirements for clinical trials of AAV-based gene therapies — perspectives from six Asian countries or regions: report from the 6th Asia Partnership Conference of Regenerative Medicine – April 20, 2023. Regen. Ther. 26, 334–345 (2024).
Q5A(R2) Viral Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology Products Derived from Cell Lines of Human or Animal Origin (FDA, 2024); https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/q5ar2-viral-safety-evaluation-biotechnology-products-derived-cell-lines-human-or-animal-origin
Bhagchandani, S., Johnson, J. A. & Irvine, D. J. Evolution of Toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist therapeutics and their delivery approaches: from antiviral formulations to vaccine adjuvants. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 175, 113803 (2021).
Lener, T. et al. Applying extracellular vesicles based therapeutics in clinical trials—an ISEV position paper. J. Extracell. Vesicles 4, 30087 (2015).
Santos, S., Robinson, T. M. & Trueman, D. Valoctocogene roxaparvovec estimated long-term durability of treatment effect: an extrapolation of the most recent clinical data. Blood 144, 4958 (2024).
Coppens, M. et al. Etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy for haemophilia B (HOPE-B): 24-month post-hoc efficacy and safety data from a single-arm, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 11, e265–e275 (2024).
Breda, L. et al. In vivo hematopoietic stem cell modification by mRNA delivery. Science 381, 436–443 (2023).
Shi, D., Toyonaga, S. & Anderson, D. G. In vivo RNA delivery to hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells via targeted lipid nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 23, 2938–2944 (2023).
Monte, M. T. et al. Delivery of gene writers in vivo to hematopoietic stem cells and T cells using targeted and untargeted lipid nanoparticles (LNP). Blood 144, 2197 (2024).
Editas Medicine reports new in vivo data highlighting the potential of Editas’ gene upregulation strategy in HSCs at the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Annual Meeting. Editas Medicine https://ir.editasmedicine.com/news-releases/news-release-details/editas-medicine-reports-new-vivo-data-highlighting-potential (2025).
Gillmore, J. D. et al. CRISPR–Cas9 in vivo gene editing for transthyretin amyloidosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 493–502 (2021).
Longhurst, H. J. et al. CRISPR–Cas9 in vivo gene editing of KLKB1 for hereditary angioedema. N. Engl. J. Med. 390, 432–441 (2024).
Cohn, D. M. et al. CRISPR-based therapy for hereditary angioedema. N. Engl. J. Med. 392, 458–467 (2025).
Horie, T. & Ono, K. VERVE-101: a promising CRISPR-based gene editing therapy that reduces LDL-C and PCSK9 levels in HeFH patients. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacother. 10, 89–90 (2024).
Musunuru, K. et al. Patient-specific in vivo gene editing to treat a rare genetic disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 392, 2235–2243 (2025).
Capricor therapeutics provides regulatory update on deramiocel program for Duchenne muscular dystrophy following type A meeting. Capricor Therapeutics https://www.capricor.com/investors/news-events/press-releases/detail/326/capricor-therapeutics-provides-regulatory-update-on (2025).
Pan, Y. et al. 124I-labelled BMSC-derived extracellular vesicles deliver CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins with a GFP-reporter system to inhibit osteosarcoma proliferation and metastasis. J. Extracell. Vesicles 14, e70130 (2025).
Osteikoetxea, X. et al. Engineered Cas9 extracellular vesicles as a novel gene editing tool. J. Extracell. Vesicles 11, e12225 (2022).
Ilahibaks, N. F. et al. Extracellular vesicle-mediated delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (Pcsk9) in primary mouse hepatocytes. J. Extracell. Vesicles 13, 12389 (2024).
You, H. et al. Engineered bacterial outer membrane vesicles-based doxorubicin and CD47-siRNA co-delivery nanoplatform overcomes immune resistance to potentiate the immunotherapy of glioblastoma. Adv. Mater. 37, 2418053 (2025).
Liu, Y. et al. Engineered extracellular vesicles for delivery of an IL-1 receptor antagonist promote targeted repair of retinal degeneration. Small 19, 2302962 (2023).
Pollalis, D. et al. Intraocular RGD-engineered exosomes and active targeting of choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Cells 11, 2573 (2022).
Huang, Q. et al. An AAV capsid reprogrammed to bind human transferrin receptor mediates brain-wide gene delivery. Science 384, 1220–1227 (2024).
Han, E. L. et al. Predictive high-throughput platform for dual screening of mRNA lipid nanoparticle blood–brain barrier transfection and crossing. Nano Lett. 24, 1477–1486 (2024).
Han, E. L. et al. Peptide-functionalized lipid nanoparticles for targeted systemic mRNA delivery to the brain. Nano Lett. 25, 800–810 (2025).
Wang, C. et al. Blood–brain-barrier-crossing lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery to the central nervous system. Nat. Mater. 24, 1653–1663 (2025).
Rowe, S. M. et al. Inhaled mRNA therapy for treatment of cystic fibrosis: interim results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 clinical study. J. Cyst. Fibros. 22, 656–664 (2023).
Xie, M. et al. Membrane fusion-mediated loading of therapeutic siRNA into exosome for tissue-specific application. Adv. Mater. 36, 2403935 (2024).
Wang, W. et al. Intravitreal injection of an exosome-associated adeno-associated viral vector enhances retinoschisin 1 gene transduction in the mouse retina. Hum. Gene Ther. 32, 707–716 (2021).
Hudry, E. et al. Exosome-associated AAV vector as a robust and convenient neuroscience tool. Gene Ther. 23, 380–392 (2016).
Soens, M. et al. A phase 3 randomized safety and immunogenicity trial of mRNA-1010 seasonal influenza vaccine in adults. Vaccine 50, 126847 (2025).
Wilson, E. et al. Efficacy and safety of an mRNA-based RSV preF vaccine in older adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 389, 2233–2244 (2023).
Mayer, E. F. et al. Safety tolerability and immunogenicity of mRNA-1345 in adults at increased risk for RSV disease aged 18 to 59 years. Clin. Infect. Dis. 81, e708–e716 (2025).
Fierro, C. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a messenger RNA-based cytomegalovirus vaccine in healthy adults: results from a phase 1 randomized clinical trial. J. Infect. Dis. 230, e668–e678 (2024).
Essink, B. et al. The safety and immunogenicity of two Zika virus mRNA vaccine candidates in healthy flavivirus baseline seropositive and seronegative adults: the results of two randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, phase 1 clinical trials. Lancet Infect. Dis. 23, 621–633 (2023).
Rojas, L. A. et al. Personalized RNA neoantigen vaccines stimulate T cells in pancreatic cancer. Nature 618, 144–150 (2023).
Weber, J. S. et al. Individualised neoantigen therapy mRNA-4157 (V940) plus pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab monotherapy in resected melanoma (KEYNOTE-942): a randomised, phase 2b study. Lancet 403, 632–644 (2024).
Casazza, J. P. et al. Safety and tolerability of AAV8 delivery of a broadly neutralizing antibody in adults living with HIV: a phase 1, dose-escalation trial. Nat. Med. 28, 1022–1030 (2022).
Ardeshir, A. et al. Determinants of successful AAV-vectored delivery of HIV-1 bNAbs in early life. Nature 645, 1020–1028 (2025).
Van Lieshout, L. P. et al. AAV-monoclonal antibody expression protects mice from Ebola virus without impeding the endogenous antibody response to heterologous challenge. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 26, 505–518 (2022).
Lende, S. S. F. et al. Vectored long-term co-delivery of antibodies for SARS-CoV-2, RSV and influenza prophylaxis. Virology 610, 110573 (2025).
Escudier, B. et al. Vaccination of metastatic melanoma patients with autologous dendritic cell (DC) derived-exosomes: results of thefirst phase I clinical trial. J. Transl. Med. 3, 10 (2005).
Morse, M. A. et al. A phase I study of dexosome immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J. Transl. Med. 3, 9 (2005).
Hunter, T. L. et al. In vivo CAR T cell generation to treat cancer and autoimmune disease. Science 388, 1311–1317 (2025).
Xiao, Y., Zhu, T., Chen, Z. & Huang, X. Lung metastasis and recurrence is mitigated by CAR macrophages, in-situ-generated from mRNA delivered by small extracellular vesicles. Nat. Commun. 16, 7166 (2025).
Belhadj, Z., Qie, Y., Carney, R. P., Li, Y. & Nie, G. Current advances in non-viral gene delivery systems: liposomes versus extracellular vesicles. BMEMat 1, e12018 (2023).
Yom-Tov, N., Guy, R. & Offen, D. Extracellular vesicles over adeno-associated viruses: advantages and limitations as drug delivery platforms in precision medicine. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 190, 114535 (2022).
Kulkarni, J. A. et al. The current landscape of nucleic acid therapeutics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 630–643 (2021).
Piffoux, M., Volatron, J., Silva, A. K. A. & Gazeau, F. Thinking quantitatively of RNA-based information transfer via extracellular vesicles: lessons to learn for the design of RNA-loaded EVs. Pharmaceutics 13, 1931 (2021).
Sharifi, S. et al. The role of sex as a biological variable in the efficacy and toxicity of therapeutic nanomedicine. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 174, 337–347 (2021).
Han, S.-O. et al. Comparisons of infant and adult mice reveal age effects for liver depot gene therapy in Pompe disease. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 17, 133–142 (2020).
Madla, C. M. et al. Let’s talk about sex: differences in drug therapy in males and females. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 175, 113804 (2021).
Liu, K. et al. Multiomics analysis of naturally efficacious lipid nanoparticle coronas reveals high-density lipoprotein is necessary for their function. Nat. Commun. 14, 4007 (2023).
Greenberg, Z. F., Graim, K. S. & He, M. Towards artificial intelligence-enabled extracellular vesicle precision drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 199, 114974 (2023).
Teufel, F. et al. SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1023–1025 (2022).
Chatterjee, S., Bhattacharya, M., Lee, S.-S. & Chakraborty, C. Can artificial intelligence-strengthened ChatGPT or other large language models transform nucleic acid research? Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 33, 205–207 (2023).
Bhattacharya, M., Pal, S., Chatterjee, S., Lee, S.-S. & Chakraborty, C. Large language model to multimodal large language model: a journey to shape the biological macromolecules to biological sciences AND medicine. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 35, 102255 (2024).
Wang, Y. et al. A generative artificial intelligence copilot for biomedical nanoengineering. ACS Nano 19, 19394–19407 (2025).
Wang, Y. et al. Multi-omics approaches to decipher the interactions of nanoparticles and biological systems. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 3, 333–348 (2025).
Reardon, S. ‘It’s a vote for hope’: first gene therapy for muscular dystrophy nears approval, but will it work? Nature 618, 451–453 (2023).
Kohn, D. B., Chen, Y. Y. & Spencer, M. J. Successes and challenges in clinical gene therapy. Gene Ther. 30, 738–746 (2023).
Roadmap to Reducing Animal Testing in Preclinical Safety Studies (FDA, 2025); https://www.fda.gov/files/newsroom/published/roadmap_to_reducing_animal_testing_in_preclinical_safety_studies.pdf
FDA announces plan to phase out animal testing requirement for monoclonal antibodies and other drugs. FDA https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-announces-plan-phase-out-animal-testing-requirement-monoclonal-antibodies-and-other-drugs (2025).
Han, J. J. FDA Modernization Act 2.0 allows for alternatives to animal testing. Artif. Organs 47, 449–450 (2023).
Considerations for the Use of Artificial Intelligence to Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Drug and Biological Products (FDA, 2025); https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/considerations-use-artificial-intelligence-support-regulatory-decision-making-drug-and-biological
Zhang, L. et al. Effect of mRNA–LNP components of two globally-marketed COVID-19 vaccines on efficacy and stability. npj Vaccines 8, 156 (2023).
Maeki, M. et al. Development of polymer–lipid hybrid nanoparticles for large-sized plasmid DNA transfection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 2110–2119 (2024).
Nele, V., Campani, V., Alia Moosavian, S. & De Rosa, G. Lipid nanoparticles for RNA delivery: self-assembling vs driven-assembling strategies. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 208, 115291 (2024).
Casmil, I. C. et al. The advent of clinical self-amplifying RNA vaccines. Mol. Ther. 33, 2565–2582 (2025).
Nawaz, M. et al. Lipid nanoparticles deliver the therapeutic VEGFA mRNA in vitro and in vivo and transform extracellular vesicles for their functional extensions. Adv. Sci. 10, 2206187 (2023).
Stahnke, S. et al. Intrinsic phospholipase A2 activity of adeno-associated virus is involved in endosomal escape of incoming particles. Virology 409, 77–83 (2011).
Mingozzi, F. & High, K. A. Immune responses to AAV vectors: overcoming barriers to successful gene therapy. Blood 122, 23–36 (2013).
Garcia-Dominguez, D. et al. Altering the mRNA-1273 dosing interval impacts the kinetics, quality, and magnitude of immune responses in mice. Front. Immunol. 13, 2022 (2022).
Akinc, A. et al. The Onpattro story and the clinical translation of nanomedicines containing nucleic acid-based drugs. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 1084–1087 (2019).
Kimbrel, E. A. & Lanza, R. Next-generation stem cells—ushering in a new era of cell-based therapies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 19, 463–479 (2020).
Jiang, D., He, J. & Yu, L. The migrasome, an organelle for cell–cell communication. Trends Cell Biol. 35, 205–216 (2025).
Meehan, B., Rak, J. & Di Vizio, D. Oncosomes—large and small: what are they, where they came from? J. Extracell. Vesicles 5, 33109 (2016).
Jiang, W., Kim, B. Y. S., Rutka, J. T. & Chan, W. C. W. Nanoparticle-mediated cellular response is size-dependent. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 145–150 (2008).
Bilardo, R., Traldi, F., Vdovchenko, A. & Resmini, M. Influence of surface chemistry and morphology of nanoparticles on protein corona formation. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 14, e1788 (2022).
Samulski, R. J. & Muzyczka, N. AAV-mediated gene therapy for research and therapeutic purposes. Annu. Rev. Virol. 1, 427–451 (2014).
Xu, L. et al. Lipid nanoparticles for drug delivery. Adv. NanoBiomed Res. 2, 2100109 (2022).
Hassett, K. J. et al. Impact of lipid nanoparticle size on mRNA vaccine immunogenicity. J. Control. Release 335, 237–246 (2021).
Han, X. et al. An ionizable lipid toolbox for RNA delivery. Nat. Commun. 12, 7233 (2021).
Zeng, C., Moller-Tank, S., Asokan, A. & Dragnea, B. Probing the link among genomic cargo, contact mechanics, and nanoindentation in recombinant adeno-associated virus 2. J. Phys. Chem. B 121, 1843–1853 (2017).
Pacouret, S. et al. AAV-ID: a rapid and robust assay for batch-to-batch consistency evaluation of AAV preparations. Mol. Ther. 25, 1375–1386 (2017).
Guo, P. et al. Nanoparticle elasticity directs tumor uptake. Nat. Commun. 9, 130 (2018).
Vorselen, D. et al. Multilamellar nanovesicles show distinct mechanical properties depending on their degree of lamellarity. Nanoscale 10, 5318–5324 (2018).
Sorkin, R. et al. Nanomechanics of extracellular vesicles reveals vesiculation pathways. Small 14, 1801650 (2018).
Singh, P. K. et al. Mechanical property estimation of sarcoma-relevant extracellular vesicles using transmission electron microscopy. J. Extracell. Biol. 3, e158 (2024).
Manno, M., Bongiovanni, A., Margolis, L., Bergese, P. & Arosio, P. The physico-chemical landscape of extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 3, 68–82 (2025).
Francia, V., Schiffelers, R. M., Cullis, P. R. & Witzigmann, D. The biomolecular corona of lipid nanoparticles for gene therapy. Bioconjug. Chem. 31, 2046–2059 (2020).
Ezzat, K. et al. The viral protein corona directs viral pathogenesis and amyloid aggregation. Nat. Commun. 10, 2331 (2019).
Pei, X. et al. AAV8 virions hijack serum proteins to increase hepatocyte binding for transduction enhancement. Virology 518, 95–102 (2018).
Denard, J. et al. AAV-8 and AAV-9 vectors cooperate with serum proteins differently than AAV-1 and AAV-6. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 10, 291–302 (2018).
Denard, J., Jenny, C., Blouin, V., Moullier, P. & Svinartchouk, F. Different protein composition and functional properties of adeno-associated virus-6 vector manufactured from the culture medium and cell lysates. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 1, 14031 (2014).
Miao, L. et al. Synergistic lipid compositions for albumin receptor mediated delivery of mRNA to the liver. Nat. Commun. 11, 2424 (2020).
Dilliard, S. A. et al. The interplay of quaternary ammonium lipid structure and protein corona on lung-specific mRNA delivery by selective organ targeting (SORT) nanoparticles. J. Control. Release 361, 361–372 (2023).
Yang, K., Mesquita, B., Horvatovich, P. & Salvati, A. Tuning liposome composition to modulate corona formation in human serum and cellular uptake. Acta Biomater. 106, 314–327 (2020).
Esmaeili, A., Baghaban Eslaminejad, M. & Hosseini, S. Biomolecular corona potential in extracellular vesicle engineering for therapeutic applications. Biomed. Pharmacother. 188, 118202 (2025).
Buzas, E. I. Opportunities and challenges in studying the extracellular vesicle corona. Nat. Cell Biol. 24, 1322–1325 (2022).
Busatto, S. et al. Brain metastases-derived extracellular vesicles induce binding and aggregation of low-density lipoprotein. J. Nanobiotechnol. 18, 162 (2020).
Singh, P. et al. Removal and identification of external protein corona members from RBC-derived extracellular vesicles by surface manipulating antimicrobial peptides. J. Extracell. Biol. 2, e78 (2023).
Van Haasteren, J., Li, J., Scheideler, O. J., Murthy, N. & Schaffer, D. V. The delivery challenge: fulfilling the promise of therapeutic genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 845–855 (2020).
Harmatz, P. et al. First-in-human in vivo genome editing via AAV-zinc-finger nucleases for mucopolysaccharidosis I/II and hemophilia B. Mol. Ther. 30, 3587–3600 (2022).
She, K. et al. Dual-AAV split prime editor corrects the mutation and phenotype in mice with inherited retinal degeneration. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 8, 57 (2023).
Wan, T. et al. Exosome-mediated delivery of Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes for tissue-specific gene therapy of liver diseases. Sci. Adv. 8, eabp9435 (2022).
Billingsley, M. M. et al. In vivo mRNA CAR T cell engineering via targeted ionizable lipid nanoparticles with extrahepatic tropism. Small 20, 2304378 (2024).
Li, Y.-R., Zhu, Y., Halladay, T. & Yang, L. In vivo CAR engineering for immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 25, 725–744 (2025).
Safarzadeh Kozani, P. & Safarzadeh Kozani, P. Preventing secondary primary malignancies (SPMs) in CAR-T cell therapy through site-specific transgene integration into genomic safe harbors (GSHs). J. Transl. Med. 23, 1155 (2025).
Fu, W. et al. CAR exosomes derived from effector CAR-T cells have potent antitumour effects and low toxicity. Nat. Commun. 10, 4355 (2019).
Acknowledgements
We thank C. Wogan of MD Anderson’s Division of Radiation Oncology for editing the paper. This work was supported in part by the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (grants RP240493 and RP250191 to W.J.), James P. Allison Institute (to B.Y.S.K.) and Andrew Sabin Family Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.M., A.S.L., W.J. and B.Y.S.K. conceived of the project and were responsible for all phases of paper preparation. All authors searched for literature and wrote and edited the paper. Y.M. and S.D. designed the figures and tables.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Biomedical Engineering thanks Xucheng Hou, Daniel Stone, Yuyan Wang and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, Y., Dong, S., Wu, A. et al. Engineering challenges and translational opportunities in emerging gene delivery platforms. Nat. Biomed. Eng (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-026-01643-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-026-01643-5


