Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Thesis
  • Published:

Drawing conclusions

Nature Chemistry volume 14, pages 1–2 (2022)Cite this article

Michelle Francl explores how chemists put line structures to work.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: A selection of chemical structures that may or may not have been deemed acceptable at some point over the past 100 years.

References

  1. Rocke, A. J. Brit. J. Hist. Sci. 14, 27–57 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooke, H. Learn. Publ. 17, 125–134 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dewar, J. Chemical News 23, 38–41 (1871).

    Google Scholar 

  4. McLeod, H. Chemical News 23, 49 (1871).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brecher, J. Pure Appl. Chem. 80, 277–410 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hepler-Smith, E. Ambix 62, 1–28 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fittig, R. & Mielch, W. H. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 152, 25–58 (1869).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marasse, S. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 152, 59–87 (1869).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Loew, O. Ann. Lyceum Nat. Hist. N. Y. 9, 325–329 (1870).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meinel. C. Models: The Third Dimension of Science (eds de Chadarevian, S. & Hopwood, N.) 242–275 (Stanford Univ. Press, 2004).

  11. Hoffmann, R. & Laszlo, P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 30, 1–16 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Armit, J. W. & Robinson, R. J. Chem. Soc. Trans. 127, 1604–1618 (1925).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lonsdale, K. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 123, 494–515 (1929).

  14. Robinson, E. A. & Bogert, M. T. J. Org. Chem. 1, 65–75 (1936).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pauling, L. General Chemistry 504–505 (W. H. Freeman, 1947).

  16. Chemical News 61, 26 (1890).

  17. Fieser, L. F. J. Chem. Educ. 44, 490–494 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dhatt, M. S. & Narang, K. S. J. Org. Chem. 20, 302–305 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. https://youtu.be/PhNUjg9X4g8

  20. Polanyi, M. Rev. Mod. Phys. 34, 601–616 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ball, P. Nature 469, 26–28 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Twitter: @MichelleFrancl

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry at Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA, USA

    Michelle Francl

  2. Vatican Observatory, Vatican City, Vatican City State

    Michelle Francl

Authors
  1. Michelle Francl
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Francl.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Francl, M. Drawing conclusions. Nat. Chem. 14, 1–2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00859-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00859-z

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing