Fig. 5: Temperature dependence of trans(A)–cis(B) and cis(B)–trans(A) photoisomerization kinetics. | Nature Chemistry

Fig. 5: Temperature dependence of trans(A)–cis(B) and cis(B)–trans(A) photoisomerization kinetics.

From: Optical control of ultrafast structural dynamics in a fluorescent protein

Fig. 5: Temperature dependence of trans(A)–cis(B) and cis(B)–trans(A) photoisomerization kinetics.The alt text for this image may have been generated using AI.

a, Potentials are shown as adiabatic states that contain the A1 (PDB 7QLM and 7QLJ) and A2 (PDB 7QLN and 7QLO) off-state and B1 (PDB 7QLK) and B2 (PDB 7QLL and 7QLI) on-state structures as shown. The protonated anionic BH state is a putative intermediate that connects the photocycle (Fig. 1). Cryo-trapping of the unrelaxed on state resolved the double-well structural features of the B1 and B2 on states (Supplementary Sections 9 and 11 provide crystallographic details and full thermodynamic modelling, respectively). b, Arrhenius plots for the on→off (black) and off→on (red, with low-temperature on→off pre-conversion; blue, with on→off pre-conversion at 296 K) kinetics under continuous illumination at 473 nm and 405 nm, respectively, showing convex behaviour in both directions. The off→on kinetics that included high-temperature annealing before conversion (blue) showed significantly reduced kinetics and shifting of the transition temperature to higher values. Both high- and low-temperature regions involved photoisomerization in both on→off and off→on directions, as shown from X-ray-crystal structural analysis (Supplementary Section 9). The error bars in b are the standard error.

Back to article page