Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Rethinking microbial carbon use efficiency in soil models

Subjects

Soil models include a key parameter known as carbon use efficiency, which impacts estimates of global carbon storage by determining the flow of carbon into soil pools versus the atmosphere. Microbial-explicit versions of these models are due for an update that recasts carbon use efficiency as an output variable emerging from microbial metabolism.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Partitioning of soil carbon into microbial biomass versus carbon dioxide (CO2).

References

  1. Allison, S. D., Wallenstein, M. D. & Bradford, M. A. Nat. Geosci. 3, 336–340 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. He, X. et al. Nat. Commun. 15, 8010 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wieder, W. R., Bonan, G. B. & Allison, S. D. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 909–912 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tao, F. et al. Nature 618, 981–985 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. He, X. et al. Nature 627, E1–E3 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Manzoni, S. et al. Biogeosciences 15, 5929–5949 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sinsabaugh, R. L., Manzoni, S., Moorhead, D. L. & Richter, A. Ecol. Lett. 16, 930–939 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hagerty, S. B., Allison, S. D. & Schimel, J. P. Biogeochemistry 140, 269–283 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, B. & Allison, S. D. Ecosphere 12, e03562 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, Q. et al. Soil Biol. Biochem. 197, 109531 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nayfach, S. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 499–509 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Saifuddin, M., Bhatnagar, J. M., Segrè, D. & Finzi, A. C. Nat. Commun. 10, 3568 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Glassman, S. I. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 11994–11999 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Abs, E., Chase, A. B., Manzoni, S., Ciais, P. & Allison, S. D. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17268 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Varney, R. M., Chadburn, S. E., Burke, E. J. & Cox, P. M. Biogeosciences 19, 4671–4704 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven D. Allison.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author serves on the Scientific Advisory Board for Ginkgo Bioworks, Inc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allison, S.D. Rethinking microbial carbon use efficiency in soil models. Nat. Clim. Chang. 15, 10–12 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02217-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02217-6

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology