Fig. 4: Design rules to improve the VOC in TOSCs.

a, Schematic illustration of the morphologic effect of the guest component on the host binary blends in TOSCs. b,c, Strategies to improve the VOC in Case-1 TOSCs: the changes on the VOCrad should be minimized, and the improved VOC can be reached by reducing the ΔVnr (b); under the thermal equilibrium (described by the black arrows), reduced ΔVnr can be realized by exploiting the thermal population of the more emissive states related with the guest component, where the luminescent efficiencies of different states are represented by the thickness of the coloured arrows (c). From the perspective of the device performance, the guest binary device should have higher EQEEL than the host binary device (that is, EQEELG > EQEELH). In addition, to fully make use of the CTG and LEG without sacrificing the VOCrad, the CTG energy should be close to the CTH energy (that is, \({E}_{{{\rm{CT}}}_{{\rm{H}}}}\cong{E}_{{{\rm{CT}}}_{{\rm{G}}}}\)). d,e, Strategies to improve the VOC in Case-2 TOSCs: the improved VOC can result from both increased VOCrad and reduced ΔVnr (d); the guest component suppresses the aggregation of the host binary blends, leading to increased LEH and CTH energies and thus increased VOCrad (e). In addition, suppressed aggregation of the host binary blend also reduces the ACQ effect, enhancing the luminescent efficiencies of both LEH and CTH and thus reducing the ΔVnr. Black arrows in e describe the thermal equilibrium condition; the thickness of the coloured arrows represents the luminescent efficiencies of different states; the dashed lines represent the initial conditions of the host binary blend; and the solid lines represent the conditions of the host binary blend after adding the guest component.