Abstract
Interphase chemistry between electrodes and electrolytes plays a key role in the performance of secondary batteries. Recent studies have revealed that interphase chemistry is closely correlated to the evolution of the interfacial solvation structure (ISS). However, complex ion–solvent interactions in the interfacial region in practical batteries make it challenging to understand the dynamics of the ISS using classical electric double layer models. Here we examine the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of the ISS, including the interfacial coordination structure, ion migration and desolvation behaviour. By regulating these properties, the construction of anion- and additive-rich ISSs can facilitate the formation of highly conductive and robust solid–electrolyte interphases in moderately concentrated electrolytes, improving the Coulombic efficiency, stability windows and desolvation kinetics, even under extreme operating conditions. We highlight how interdisciplinary strategies that combine advanced characterization techniques with computational simulations powerfully resolve the dynamic evolution of the ISS at an atomistic level. Lessons from electrocatalysis, where electrolyte effects and interfacial structuring have been successfully deciphered, further illustrate how such approaches can inspire progress in understanding and harnessing the ISS for next-generation batteries.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stamenkovic, V. R., Strmcnik, D., Lopes, P. P. & Markovic, N. M. Energy and fuels from electrochemical interfaces. Nat. Mater. 16, 57–69 (2017).
Fong, R., von Sacken, U. & Dahn, J. R. Studies of lithium intercalation into carbons using nonaqueous electrochemical cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 2009 (1990).
Xu, K. Electrolytes, Interfaces and Interphases: Fundamentals and Applications in Batteries (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2023).
Winter, M. The solid electrolyte interphase – the most important and the least understood solid electrolyte in rechargeable Li batteries. Z. Phys. Chem. 223, 1395–1406 (2009).
Smith, G. D., Borodin, O., Russo, S. P., Rees, R. J. & Hollenkamp, A. F. A molecular dynamics simulation study of LiFePO4/electrolyte interfaces: structure and Li+ transport in carbonate and ionic liquid electrolytes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 9884–9897 (2009).
Stern, O. Zur Theorie der elektrolytischen Doppelschicht. Z. Elektrochem. Angew. Phys. Chem. 30, 508–516 (1924).
Wu, Q. & Qi, Y. Revealing heterogeneous electric double layer (EDL) structures of localized high-concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) and their impact on solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation in lithium batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 18, 3036–3046 (2025).
Zhou, Y. et al. Real-time mass spectrometric characterization of the solid–electrolyte interphase of a lithium-ion battery. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 224–230 (2020).
Chen, C. et al. Local reaction environment in electrocatalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 53, 2022–2055 (2024).
Chazalviel, J.-N. Electrochemical aspects of the generation of ramified metallic electrodeposits. Phys. Rev. A 42, 7355–7367 (1990).
Vatamanu, J., Borodin, O. & Smith, G. D. Molecular dynamics simulation studies of the structure of a mixed carbonate/LiPF6 electrolyte near graphite surface as a function of electrode potential. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 1114–1121 (2012).
Xu, J. et al. Electrolyte design for Li-ion batteries under extreme operating conditions. Nature 614, 694–700 (2023).
Suo, L. et al. “Water-in-salt” electrolyte enables high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion chemistries. Science 350, 938–943 (2015).
Yamada, Y. et al. Unusual stability of acetonitrile-based superconcentrated electrolytes for fast-charging lithium-ion batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 5039–5046 (2014).
Yao, Y.-X. et al. Regulating interfacial chemistry in lithium-ion batteries by a weakly solvating electrolyte. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 4090–4097 (2021).
Tu, S. et al. Fast-charging capability of graphite-based lithium-ion batteries enabled by Li3P-based crystalline solid–electrolyte interphase. Nat. Energy 8, 1365–1374 (2023).
Yu, L. et al. Preferential adsorption of solvents on the cathode surface of lithium ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 5753–5756 (2013).
Ji, Y. et al. Anion adsorption at the inner-Helmholtz plane directs cathode electrolyte interphase formation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 64, e202425535 (2025).
Wan, H., Xu, J. & Wang, C. Designing electrolytes and interphases for high-energy lithium batteries. Nat. Rev. Chem. 8, 30–44 (2024).
Chen, J. et al. Electrolyte design for LiF-rich solid–electrolyte interfaces to enable high-performance microsized alloy anodes for batteries. Nat. Energy 5, 386–397 (2020).
Zhang, S. et al. Oscillatory solvation chemistry for a 500 Wh kg−1 Li-metal pouch cell. Nat. Energy 9, 1285–1296 (2024).
Wang, J. et al. Visualizing and regulating dynamic evolution of interfacial electrolyte configuration during de-solvation process on lithium-metal anode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63, e202400254 (2024).
Wu, Q., McDowell, M. T. & Qi, Y. Effect of the electric double layer (EDL) in multicomponent electrolyte reduction and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation in lithium batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 2473–2484 (2023).
Holoubek, J. et al. Tailoring electrolyte solvation for Li metal batteries cycled at ultra-low temperature. Nat. Energy 6, 303–313 (2021).
Cheng, K. et al. Material–electrolyte interfacial interaction enabling the formation of an inorganic-rich solid electrolyte interphase for fast-charging Si-based lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 17, 2631–2641 (2024).
Zhang, Q. et al. Synergetic effects of inorganic components in solid electrolyte interphase on high cycle efficiency of lithium ion batteries. Nano Lett. 16, 2011–2016 (2016).
Wang, X. et al. Benchmarking corrosion with anionic polarity index for stable and fast aqueous batteries even in low-concentration electrolyte. Adv. Mater. 37, 2501049 (2025).
Heo, J., Dong, D., Wang, Z., Chen, F. & Wang, C. Electrolyte design for aqueous Zn batteries. Joule 9, 101844 (2025).
Yu, X. et al. Deciphering multi-dimensional interfacial mechanisms via organic cosolvent engineering for sustainable zinc metal batteries. Nat. Commun. 16, 3820 (2025).
Zhang, S.-J. et al. Coordination chemistry toward advanced Zn–I2 batteries with four-electron I−/I0/I+ conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 16350–16361 (2025).
Wang, L. et al. Tandem chemistry with Janus mesopores accelerator for efficient aqueous batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 6199–6208 (2024).
Zhang, X. et al. Li+(ionophore) nanoclusters engineered aqueous/non-aqueous biphasic electrolyte solutions for high-potential lithium-based batteries. Nat. Nanotechnol. 20, 798–806 (2025).
Luo, H. et al. Revealing the dynamic evolution of electrolyte configuration on the cathode–electrolyte interface by visualizing (de) solvation processes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63, e202412214 (2024).
Yang, G. et al. Electrolyte solvation structure at solid–liquid interface probed by nanogap surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. ACS Nano 12, 10159–10170 (2018).
Rakov, D. A. et al. Engineering high-energy-density sodium battery anodes for improved cycling with superconcentrated ionic-liquid electrolytes. Nat. Mater. 19, 1096–1101 (2020).
Yamagishi, Y. et al. Molecular-resolution imaging of interfacial solvation of electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries by frequency modulation atomic force microscopy. Nano Lett. 22, 9907–9913 (2022).
Bonagiri, L. K. S. et al. Real-space charge density profiling of electrode–electrolyte interfaces with angstrom depth resolution. ACS Nano 16, 19594–19604 (2022).
Lai, J., Zhang, H., Xu, K. & Shi, F. Linking interfacial structure and electrochemical behaviors of batteries by high-resolution electrocapillarity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 22257–22265 (2024).
Borodin, O. et al. Modeling insight into battery electrolyte electrochemical stability and interfacial structure. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 2886–2894 (2017).
Yao, N., Chen, X., Fu, Z.-H. & Zhang, Q. Applying classical, ab initio, and machine-learning molecular dynamics simulations to the liquid electrolyte for rechargeable batteries. Chem. Rev. 122, 10970–11021 (2022).
Zeng, L. et al. Constant charge method or constant potential method: which is better for molecular modeling of electrical double layers? J. Energy Chem. 94, 54–60 (2024).
Wang, Z. et al. Constant-potential modeling of electrical double layers accounting for electron spillover. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 046201 (2025).
Li, P. et al. Hydrogen bond network connectivity in the electric double layer dominates the kinetic pH effect in hydrogen electrocatalysis on Pt. Nat. Catal. 5, 900–911 (2022).
Bui, J. C. et al. Engineering catalyst–electrolyte microenvironments to optimize the activity and selectivity for the electrochemical reduction of CO2 on Cu and Ag. Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 484–494 (2022).
Wu, H. et al. Aqueous zinc-iodine batteries with ultra-high loading and advanced performance. Joule 9, 102000 (2025).
Shen, W., Ye, Y., Xia, Q. & Xi, P. Progress in in situ characterization of electrocatalysis. EES Catal. 3, 10–31 (2025).
Henschel, J. et al. Clarification of decomposition pathways in a state-of-the-art lithium ion battery electrolyte through 13C-labeling of electrolyte components. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 6128–6137 (2020).
Yu, L., Wang, J. & Xu, Z. J. A perspective on the behavior of lithium anodes under a magnetic field. Small Struct. 2, 2000043 (2021).
Wang, H. et al. Underpotential lithium plating on graphite anodes caused by temperature heterogeneity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 29453–29461 (2020).
Lansford, J. L. & Vlachos, D. G. Infrared spectroscopy data- and physics-driven machine learning for characterizing surface microstructure of complex materials. Nat. Commun. 11, 1513 (2020).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported financially by the Australian Research Council (CE230100032, IL230100039, DP220102596, IC230100042 and DE230101011). We thank J. Shan, Y. Zheng and J. Xu for their valuable discussions on the topic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.-Z.Q. proposed the topic, wrote, corrected and reviewed the article before submission. C.Y., S.T., S.-J.Z. and C.W. wrote and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Energy thanks Fang Liu and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ye, C., Tu, S., Zhang, SJ. et al. Harnessing interfacial solvation structure for next-generation secondary batteries. Nat Energy 11, 167–175 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-025-01937-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-025-01937-z
