Extended Data Fig. 1: Model predictions for VO/VC difference between Glacial and Holocene [CO2]atm levels. | Nature Geoscience

Extended Data Fig. 1: Model predictions for VO/VC difference between Glacial and Holocene [CO2]atm levels.

From: Isotopic evidence for elevated photorespiration during the last glacial period

Extended Data Fig. 1: Model predictions for VO/VC difference between Glacial and Holocene [CO2]atm levels.

The difference between Glacial and Holocene VO/VC is predicted to be positive or negligible depending on assumptions regarding growing season photosynthesis temperature, the extent of glacial cooling, and the response of ci/ca to a change in pCO2. Orange, blue, and purple lines are model predictions assuming photosynthesis temperatures in the Last Glacial period were 3, 6, or 9 °C colder than in the Holocene. 3–9 °C spans the range of mean annual surface temperature differences observed in recent modeling efforts and proxy reconstructions21,22. Dotted lines use the FvCB model9 assuming a single set of Rubisco kinetics11, a temperature-dependent mesophyll conductance term48,49, and a fixed ci/ca of 0.713,30,84,85. Upper and lower bounds of envelopes use the same kinetics but assume that ci/ca was lower (0.6, upper bound)32,86 or higher (0.8, lower bound)33,87,88 during the Last Glacial period compared to the Holocene (0.7). Pentagons use the average output of P-model v.1.053 for all sample sites (see Methods, Extended Data Fig. 2). Grey line denotes no net change in VO/VC between Glacial and Holocene climate states.

Back to article page