PhD students and early career researchers are severely underfunded, explains Yuki Yamada, an Associate Professor in Psychology. Paired with biased selection criteria and unreasonable demands, this not only harms Japan’s young scientists, but presents a threat to academia itself.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
A psychological perspective towards understanding the objective and subjective gray zones in predatory publishing
Quality & Quantity Open Access 13 January 2022
-
The Gender Gap in Brazilian Entomology: an Analysis of the Academic Scenario
Neotropical Entomology Open Access 12 November 2021
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamada, Y. Publish but perish regardless in Japan. Nat Hum Behav 3, 1035 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0729-9
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0729-9
This article is cited by
-
A psychological perspective towards understanding the objective and subjective gray zones in predatory publishing
Quality & Quantity (2022)
-
The Gender Gap in Brazilian Entomology: an Analysis of the Academic Scenario
Neotropical Entomology (2021)