The human tendency to impose a single interpretation in ambiguous situations carries huge dangers in addressing COVID-19. We need to search actively for multiple interpretations, and governments need to choose policies that are robust if their preferred theory turns out to be wrong, argues Nick Chater.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Do we cope similarly with different adversities? COVID-19 versus armed conflict
BMC Public Health Open Access 23 November 2022
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Nick Chater is a paid member of the UK Committee on Climate Change and is co-founder and director of the research consultancy Decision Technology Ltd.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chater, N. Facing up to the uncertainties of COVID-19. Nat Hum Behav 4, 439 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0865-2
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0865-2
This article is cited by
-
Navigating a Context of Severe Uncertainty: The Effect of Industry Unsafety Signals on Employee Well-being During the COVID-19 Crisis
Occupational Health Science (2023)
-
Do we cope similarly with different adversities? COVID-19 versus armed conflict
BMC Public Health (2022)
-
Holistic Resilience Index: measuring the expected country resilience to pandemic
Quality & Quantity (2022)
-
Life before COVID-19: how was the World actually performing?
Quality & Quantity (2021)
