Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Cross-cultural research must prioritize equitable collaboration

Research centres in low- and middle-income countries are routinely circumvented in the production of cross-cultural research on human behaviour. Where local contributions are made, collaboration is rarely equitable and often uncredited in co-authorship. Efforts to decolonize the social sciences will remain inadequate until these norms are overturned.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Smith, L.T. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. (Zed Books, 2013).

  2. Fussy, D. S. High. Educ. 77, 283–299 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Magesa, S.M., Mwape, B. & Mboera, L.E.G. Tanzan. J. Health Res. https://doi.org/10.4314/thrb.v13i5.11 (2011).

  4. Wight, D. Soc. Sci. Med. 66, 110–116 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boum, Y. et al. BMJ Glob. Health 3, e000868 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abimbola, S. BMJ Glob. Health 4, e002068 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lancet Glob. Health 6, e593 (2018).

  8. Jumbam, D. T. BMJ Glob. Health 5, e003164 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Broesch, T. et al. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 287, 20201245 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nordling, L. Who gets to study whom? Sapiens https://www.sapiens.org/culture/anthropology-colonial-history/ (17 July 2020).

  11. Kalinga, C. J. Afr. Cult. Stud. 31, 270–272 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clancy, K. B. H. & Davis, J. L. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 48, 169–186 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. AlShebli, B. K., Rahwan, T. & Woon, W. L. Nat. Commun. 9, 5163 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. de Vos, A. The problem of ‘colonial science’. Scientific American https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-problem-of-colonial-science/ (1 July 2020).

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.U. and D.W.L. contributed equally and share first authorship. D.W.L. is supported by the National Science Foundation (award number: 1851317). M.A.G. and E.G. are supported by the British Academy (award number: HDV190133). P.M. is partially supported by the National Institutes for Health Fogarty International Center (award number: D43 TW010540).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mark Urassa or David W. Lawson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Human Behaviour thanks Johnson Muchunguzi Ishengoma, Ndukuyakhe Ndlovu, Andy Nobes, and Rebecca Sear for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Urassa, M., Lawson, D.W., Wamoyi, J. et al. Cross-cultural research must prioritize equitable collaboration. Nat Hum Behav 5, 668–671 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01076-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01076-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing