Table 3 Results for Analysis 2: the impact of experimental manipulation on applicant quality
From: A field study of the impacts of workplace diversity on the recruitment of minority group members
Term | F | P | Ī·p2 (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
White men applicants (Nā=ā281) | |||
Racial/ethnic diversity | 0.58 | 0.446 | 0.002 (0, 0.026) |
Gender diversity | 0.02 | 0.889 | <0.001 (0, 0.003) |
Racial/ethnicāĆāgender diversity | 1.00 | 0.317 | 0.004 (0, 0.031) |
Non-white men applicants (Nā=ā316) | |||
Racial/ethnic diversity | 0.72 | 0.398 | 0.002 (0, 0.019) |
Gender diversity | 0.35 | 0.557 | 0.001 (0, 0.015) |
Racial/ethnicāĆāgender diversity | 0.27 | 0.604 | 0.001 (0, 0.014) |
White women applicants (Nā=ā168) | |||
Racial/ethnic diversity | 0.30 | 0.586 | 0.002 (0, 0.027) |
Gender diversity | 1.43 | 0.234 | 0.009 (0, 0.046) |
Racial/ethnicāĆāgender diversity | 0.46 | 0.500 | 0.003 (0, 0.031) |
Non-white women applicants (Nā=ā157) | |||
Racial/ethnic diversity | 10.47 | 0.001 | 0.064 (0.015, 0.134) |
Gender diversity | 5.16 | 0.025 | 0.033 (0.002, 0.090) |
Racial/ethnicāĆāgender diversity | 2.65 | 0.105 | 0.017 (0, 0.065) |
