Online interactions with artificial intelligence (AI) characters pose serious risks to humans who begin to trust them. Currently, there is a low barrier to access AI characters, and regulations fail to adequately protect users online. We discuss the specific risks of AI characters, the regulatory framework and potential avenues for mitigating harm.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Laestadius, L. et al. New Media Soc. 26, 5923–5941 (2024).
Adam, D. Nature 641, 296–298 (2025).
Boine, C. MIT Case Stud. Soc. Ethic. Responsibilities Comput. https://doi.org/10.21428/2c646de5.db67ec7f (2023).
de Borst, A. W. & de Gelder, B. Front. Psychol. 6, 576 (2015).
Slater, M. et al. PLoS ONE 1, e39 (2006).
Darcy, A., Daniels, J., Salinger, D., Wicks, P. & Robinson, A. JMIR Form. Res. 5, e27868 (2021).
Lucas, G. M. et al. Comput. Human Behav. 37, 94–100 (2014).
Zhang, R. et al. The dark side of AI companionship: a taxonomy of harmful algorithmic behaviors in human-AI relationships. In Proc. 2025 CHI Conference Human Factors Comp. Systems. (eds Yamashita, N. et al.) 1–17 (ACM, 2025).
Gilbert, S., Harvey, H., Melvin, T., Vollebregt, E. & Wicks, P. Nat. Med. 29, 2396–2398 (2023).
Parks, A. et al. J. Particp. Med. 17, e69534 (2025).
Wiest, I. C. et al. Br. J. Psychiatry 225, 532–537 (2024).
Chim, J. et al. Overview of the CLPsych 2024 Shared Task: leveraging large language models to identify evidence of suicidality risk in online posts. In Proc. 9th Workshop Comp. Linguist. Clin. Psychol. (eds Yates, A. et al.) 177–190 (ACL, 2024).
Acknowledgements
F.G.V. was supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (PATH, 16KISA100k).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Human Behaviour thanks Carmel Shachar and Renwen Zhang for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duffourc, M.N., Verhees, F.G. & Gilbert, S. Artificial intelligence characters are dangerous without legal guardrails. Nat Hum Behav (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02375-3
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02375-3