Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Large-scale quantum dot–lithium niobate hybrid integrated photonic circuits enabling on-chip quantum networking

Abstract

Hybrid integrated quantum photonics offers a scalable route to chip-based quantum networks by combining solid-state quantum dots (QDs) with low-loss and reconfigurable photonic circuits. However, limited integration scalability, spectral inhomogeneity of QD emissions and the challenge of achieving quantum interference between independent sources have impeded progress towards this goal. Here we demonstrate a hybrid lithium niobate photonic platform integrating arrays of QD-containing waveguides with 20 deterministic single-photon sources. Leveraging the piezoelectric properties of thin-film lithium niobate, we develop a circuit-compatible local strain-tuning technique that enables on-chip spectral tuning of individual QDs by up to 7.7 meV. This capability allows quantum interference with a visibility of 0.73 between two spatially separated waveguide-coupled QD single-photon sources, thereby establishing a functional on-chip quantum network. The large-scale integration of tunable and interconnected QD-based single-photon sources within low-loss lithium niobate circuits paves the way for realizing compact and scalable quantum networks on a photonic chip.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Large-scale chip-based quantum network on a hybrid photonic platform.
Fig. 2: Anisotropic strain tuning of QD emission in hybrid III–V/LN waveguides.
Fig. 3: Statistics of strain-dependent energy change of QD emission in hybrid III–V/LN waveguides.
Fig. 4: Hybrid integration of scalable spectrally tunable III–V SPSs for on-chip quantum networking.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

References

  1. O’Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A. & Vučković, J. Photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Photon. 3, 687–695 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Madsen, L. S. et al. Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor. Nature 606, 75–81 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Luo, W. et al. Recent progress in quantum photonic chips for quantum communication and internet. Light Sci. Appl. 12, 175 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bao, J. et al. Very-large-scale integrated quantum graph photonics. Nat. Photon. 17, 573–581 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, J. et al. Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics. Science 360, 285–291 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Silverstone, J. W., Bonneau, D., O’Brien, J. L. & Thompson, M. G. Silicon quantum photonics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 22, 390–402 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, J., Sciarrino, F., Laing, A. & Thompson, M. G. Integrated photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Photon. 14, 273–284 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Senellart, P., Solomon, G. & White, A. High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 1026–1039 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, H. et al. Towards optimal single-photon sources from polarized microcavities. Nat. Photon. 13, 770–775 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, J.-H. et al. Hybrid integration of solid-state quantum emitters on a silicon photonic chip. Nano Lett. 17, 7394–7400 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Larocque, H. et al. Tunable quantum emitters on large-scale foundry silicon photonics. Nat. Commun. 15, 5781 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Davanco, M. et al. Heterogeneous integration for on-chip quantum photonic circuits with single quantum dot devices. Nat. Commun. 8, 889 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chanana, A. et al. Ultra-low loss quantum photonic circuits integrated with single quantum emitters. Nat. Commun. 13, 7693 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu, Y. et al. Hybrid integration of deterministic quantum dot-based single-photon sources with CMOS-compatible silicon carbide photonics. Laser Photon. Rev. 16, 2200172 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu, Y. et al. A hybrid single quantum dot coupled cavity on a CMOS-compatible SiC photonic chip for Purcell-enhanced deterministic single-photon emission. Light Sci. Appl. 14, 86 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Aghaeimeibodi, S. et al. Integration of quantum dots with lithium niobate photonics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 221102 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grim, J. Q. et al. Scalable in operando strain tuning in nanophotonic waveguides enabling three-quantum-dot superradiance. Nat. Mater. 18, 963–969 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel, R. B. et al. Two-photon interference of the emission from electrically tunable remote quantum dots. Nat. Photon. 4, 632–635 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jin, T. et al. Generation of polarization-entangled photons from self-assembled quantum dots in a hybrid quantum photonic chip. Nano Lett. 22, 586–593 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Elshaari, A. W. et al. Strain-tunable quantum integrated photonics. Nano Lett. 18, 7969–7976 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Tao, L. et al. On-chip integration of energy-tunable quantum dot based single-photon sources via strain tuning of GaAs waveguides. ACS Photonics 7, 2723–2730 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim, J.-H., Aghaeimeibodi, S., Richardson, C. J. K., Leavitt, R. P. & Waks, E. Super-radiant emission from quantum dots in a nanophotonic waveguide. Nano Lett. 18, 4734–4740 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Katsumi, R., Ota, Y., Kakuda, M., Iwamoto, S. & Arakawa, Y. Transfer-printed single-photon sources coupled to wire waveguides. Optica 5, 691–694 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Osada, A. et al. Strongly coupled single-quantum-dot-cavity system integrated on a CMOS-processed silicon photonic chip. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 24071 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Katsumi, R. et al. Quantum-dot single-photon source on a CMOS silicon photonic chip integrated using transfer printing. APL Photonics 4, 036105 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Katsumi, R. et al. In situ wavelength tuning of quantum-dot single-photon sources integrated on a CMOS-processed silicon waveguide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 041103 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Papon, C. et al. Independent operation of two waveguide-integrated quantum emitters. Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, L061003 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wan, N. H. et al. Large-scale integration of artificial atoms in hybrid photonic circuits. Nature 583, 226–231 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Li, L. et al. Heterogeneous integration of spin-photon interfaces with a CMOS platform. Nature 630, 70–76 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Islam, M. S. & Beamish, J. Piezoelectric creep in LiNbO3, PMN-PT and PZT-5A at low temperatures. J. Appl. Phys. 126, 204101 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lu, H. et al. Electrical tunability of domain wall conductivity in LiNbO3 thin films. Adv. Mater. 31, 1902890 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Newnham, R. E. Properties of Materials Anisotropy, Symmetry, Structure (Oxford Univ. Press, 2004).

  33. Tarumi, R., Matsuhisa, T. & Shibutani, Y. Temperature elastic constants and piezoelectric coefficients of LiNbO3 and LiTaO3: resonant ultrasound spectroscopy measurement and lattice dynamics analysis. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 51, 07GA02 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sun, Y., Thompson, S. E. & Nishida, T. Strain Effect in Semiconductors (Springer, 2010).

  35. Kuhlmann, A. V. et al. Transform-limited single photons from a single quantum dot. Nat. Commun. 6, 8204 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Thyrrestrup, H. et al. Quantum optics with near-lifetime-limited quantum-dot transitions in a nanophotonic waveguide. Nano Lett. 18, 1801–1806 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim, J.-H., Richardson, C. J., Leavitt, R. P. & Waks, E. Two-photon interference from the far-field emission of chip-integrated cavity-coupled emitters. Nano Lett. 16, 7061–7066 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ou, Z.-Y. J. Multi-Photon Quantum Interference (Springer, 2007).

  39. Stevenson, R. M. et al. Quantum teleportation of laser-generated photons with an entangled-light-emitting diode. Nat. Commun. 4, 2859 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Patel, R. B. et al. Postselective two-photon interference from a continuous nonclassical stream of photons emitted by a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 207405 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bommer, S. P. et al. Transfer printing micro-assembly of silicon photonic crystal cavity arrays: beating the fabrication tolerance limit. Nat. Commun. 16, 994 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Palm, K. J. et al. A thin film lithium niobate near-infrared platform for multiplexing quantum nodes. Nat. Commun. 15, 10459 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Assumpção, D. et al. Modular chip-integrated photonic control of artificial atoms in diamond waveguides. Optica 10, 634–641 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sund, P. I. et al. High-speed thin-film lithium niobate quantum processor driven by a solid-state quantum emitter. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg7268 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Lukin, D. M. et al. 4H-silicon-carbide-on-insulator for integrated quantum and nonlinear photonics. Nat. Photon. 14, 330–334 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Greentree, A. D., Fairchild, B. A., Hossain, F. M. & Prawer, S. Diamond integrated quantum photonics. Mater. Today 11, 22–31 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Peyskens, F., Chakraborty, C., Muneeb, M., Van Thourhout, D. & Englund, D. Integration of single photon emitters in 2D layered materials with a silicon nitride photonic chip. Nat. Commun. 10, 4435 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Palacios-Berraquero, C. et al. Large-scale quantum-emitter arrays in atomically thin semiconductors. Nat. Commun. 8, 15093 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Lomonte, E. et al. Single-photon detection and cryogenic reconfigurability in lithium niobate nanophotonic circuits. Nat. Commun. 12, 6847 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Varnava, M., Browne, D. E. & Rudolph, T. How good must single photon sources and detectors be for efficient linear optical quantum computation? Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 060502 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ding, X. et al. High-efficiency single-photon source above the loss-tolerant threshold for efficient linear optical quantum computing. Nat. Photon. 19, 387–391 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Jia, Y., Wang, L. & Chen, F. Ion-cut lithium niobate on insulator technology: recent advances and perspectives. Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 011307 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Makhonin, M. N. et al. Waveguide coupled resonance fluorescence from on-chip quantum emitter. Nano Lett. 14, 6997 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Trotta, R. et al. Nanomembrane quantum-light-emitting diodes integrated onto piezoelectric actuators. Adv. Mater. 24, 2668 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang, J. et al. A nanomembrane-based wavelength-tunable high-speed single-photon-emitting diode. Nano Lett. 13, 5808 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge financial support from the National Key R&D Program of China (grant number 2022YFA1404604), the Chinese Academy of Sciences Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research (grant number YSBR-112), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 12074400, 62474168, 62293521 and 62474168), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant number XDB0670303), the Autonomous Deployment Project of the State Key Laboratory of Materials for Integrated Circuits (grant number SKLJC-Z2024-B03) and the State Key Laboratory of Advanced Optical Communication Systems and Networks (grant number 2024GZKF11). We thank the ShanghaiTech Material and Device Lab for providing the nanofabrication facilities used in the preparation of GaAs photonic devices and LN integrated photonic chips.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.Z., X.O., J.L. and Y.H. conceived the idea and experiments. J.Z. and X.W. developed the hybrid quantum photonic chip based on III–V and LNOI. X.W. fabricated the hybrid photonic chip and carried out the optical measurements. X.W. and J.Z. performed the numerical calculations. R.L. and Y.H. grew the QD sample by molecular-beam epitaxy. X.W., X.Z. and Y.Q. designed and fabricated the GaAs nanophotonic waveguides. X.W. and B.C. fabricated the LNOI photonic chip in collaboration with Y.Z., J.C., L.D., J.W. and Q.Z. L.D. and Y.Q. performed the wide-field fluorescence imaging of the hybrid quantum photonic chip. J.Z. and X.O. led the project. X.W. and J.Z. wrote the paper with inputs from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yongheng Huo, Jin Liu, Xin Ou or Jiaxiang Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Materials thanks Alberto Peruzzo and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (download PDF )

Supplementary Figs. 1–16, Notes 1–4 and Tables 1 and 2.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Zhang, X., Chen, B. et al. Large-scale quantum dot–lithium niobate hybrid integrated photonic circuits enabling on-chip quantum networking. Nat. Mater. 24, 1898–1905 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-025-02398-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-025-02398-1

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing