Extended Data Fig. 2: Comparison of chemotactic ability of V. cholerae wild-type and ΔbsrV strains. | Nature Microbiology

Extended Data Fig. 2: Comparison of chemotactic ability of V. cholerae wild-type and ΔbsrV strains.

From: d-amino acids signal a stress-dependent run-away response in Vibrio cholerae

Extended Data Fig. 2: Comparison of chemotactic ability of V. cholerae wild-type and ΔbsrV strains.

a, Chemotactic ability of ΔbsrV mutant. Both chemotactic bias and swimming speed were analysed in presence of several known chemoeffectors to compare the behaviour of wild-type (wt) and ΔbsrV mutant cells. Chemotaxis was measured in microfluidic devices, monitoring cell motion from a reservoir filled with cells in motility buffer to a reservoir filled only with 100 µM of indicated compound in motility buffer. Blank, no attractant in second reservoir; L-Arg, L-arginine; AiBu, α-aminoisobutiric acid; GABA, γ-aminobutyric acid; Succ, succinate. Each data point represents the average over the 3 time points for a given experiment (n = 4) and the line represents the mean. Significant differences (unpaired t-test) are indicated by *** (p < 0.001) and was evaluated relative to the blank for the given strains. b, Swimming speed analysis of V. cholerae grown in presence of D-Arg. Cells were grown in TB (± 500 μM D-Arg) and transferred to fresh TB for swimming speed measurements. Each point represents the mean and error bars indicate the SD over 3 biological replicates. c, Motility analysis of non-chemotactic V. cholerae cells in presence and absence of D-Arg. Relative motility on soft-agar plates supplemented or not with 5 mM D-Arg of several strains compared to wild-type (wt). ΔbsrV and ΔcheY3 strains are included as controls. Error bars in c represent mean values ± SD of 3 biologically independent replicates. Significant differences (unpaired t-test, adjusted for multiple comparison using Bonferroni-Dunn method) are indicated by *** (p < 0.001). See source data.

Source data

Back to article page