Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Primer
  • Published:

Pancreatic cancer

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains one of the deadliest malignancies, characterized by late diagnosis, aggressive biology and limited therapeutic success. Advances in multiagent chemotherapy have improved outcomes across disease stages, whereas precision medicine approaches are reshaping treatment paradigms. Personalized RNA vaccines and oncogenic KRAS-directed agents represent emerging immunological and molecular frontiers. Multimodal treatment regimens and surgical innovations, including vessel-oriented and minimally invasive techniques, have enhanced complete resection rates and enabled conversion of initially unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer into resectable disease. Increasingly, multidisciplinary, biology-guided strategies define resectability and the sequence of systemic and local therapies. The tumour microenvironment’s complex stromal and immune ecology remains central to therapeutic resistance but also offers opportunities for rational combination therapy. Early detection and risk-adapted surveillance for high-risk individuals are advancing, as are artificial intelligence-assisted imaging and liquid biopsy approaches. Despite persistent challenges, the convergence of mechanistic insights, precision therapeutics and supportive care provides a framework for transforming pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from an inevitably lethal disease towards a better manageable condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Global incidence and mortality rates of pancreatic cancer.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: The roads to PDAC.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: Tumour-promoting functional heterogeneity of cancer-associated fibroblasts in PDAC primary tumours.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4: Infiltrating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5: Histopathology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 6: CT and MRI imaging for pancreatic cancer staging.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 7: Diagnostic imaging of pancreatic cancer.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 8: Pancreatic cancer stages.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 9: Detection of liver metastasis on CT and MRI imaging.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 10: Resection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Halbrook, C. J., Lyssiotis, C. A., Pasca di Magliano, M. & Maitra, A. Pancreatic cancer: advances and challenges. Cell 186, 1729–1754 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 74, 229–263 (2024).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Grünwald, B. T. et al. Spatially confined sub-tumor microenvironments in pancreatic cancer. Cell 184, 5577–5592.e18 (2021). This study reveals that pancreatic TME heterogeneity is organized into distinct fibroblast-driven ‘subTMEs’ with defined immune and treatment-response patterns.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sherman, M. H. & Pasca di Magliano, M. Cancer-associated fibroblasts: lessons from pancreatic cancer. Annu. Rev. Cancer Biol. 7, 43–55 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Steele, N. G. et al. Multimodal mapping of the tumor and peripheral blood immune landscape in human pancreatic cancer. Nat. Cancer 1, 1097–1112 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Yousuf, S. et al. Spatially resolved multi-omics single-cell analyses inform mechanisms of immune dysfunction in pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 165, 891–908.e14 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Isaji, S. et al. International consensus on definition and criteria of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 2017. Pancreatology 18, 2–11 (2018). This international consensus defined pancreatic cancer resectability, shaping patient management and trial design.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Conroy, T. et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 1817–1825 (2011). This trial shows that FOLFIRINOX results in significantly longer overall and progression-free survival than gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, although with higher toxicity.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Von Hoff, D. D. et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 1691–1703 (2013). This study demonstrates that nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine is associated with longer survival and higher response rates than gemcitabine alone in metastatic pancreatic cancer, but with higher rates of neuropathy and myelosuppression.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wainberg, Z. A. et al. NALIRIFOX versus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in treatment-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (NAPOLI 3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 402, 1272–1281 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rojas, L. A. et al. Personalized RNA neoantigen vaccines stimulate T cells in pancreatic cancer. Nature 618, 144–150 (2023). This phase I trial shows that a personalized mRNA neoantigen vaccine combined with immunotherapy and chemotherapy induces strong neoantigen-specific T cell responses and is associated with delayed recurrence of resected pancreatic cancer.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sethna, Z. et al. RNA neoantigen vaccines prime long-lived CD8 + T cells in pancreatic cancer. Nature 639, 1042–1051 (2025). This follow-up study (to the study of Rojas et al. (2023)) corroborates that the personalized mRNA neoantigen vaccine autogene cevumeran induces durable CD8+ T cells that persist for years and correlate with prolonged recurrence-free survival in pancreatic cancer.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Pant, S. et al. Lymph-node-targeted, mKRAS-specific amphiphile vaccine in pancreatic and colorectal cancer: the phase 1 AMPLIFY-201 trial. Nat. Med. 30, 531–542 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wainberg, Z. A. et al. Lymph node-targeted, mKRAS-specific amphiphile vaccine in pancreatic and colorectal cancer: phase 1 AMPLIFY-201 trial final results. Nat. Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03876-4 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Isermann, T., Sers, C., Der, C. J. & Papke, B. KRAS inhibitors: resistance drivers and combinatorial strategies. Trends Cancer 11, 91–116 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Siegel, R. L., Kratzer, T. B., Wagle, N. S., Sung, H. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2026. CA Cancer J. Clin. 76, e70043 (2026).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Klein, A. P. Pancreatic cancer epidemiology: understanding the role of lifestyle and inherited risk factors. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18, 493–502 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Cause for concern: the rising incidence of early-onset pancreatic cancer. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8, 287 (2023).

  19. GBD 2017 Pancreatic Cancer Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of pancreatic cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 4, 934–947 (2019). This work demonstrates that global incidence, deaths and disability-adjusted life-years from pancreatic cancer have more than doubled over the past three decades, mainly due to ageing and modifiable risks.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Klein, A. P. Pancreatic cancer: a growing burden. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 4, 895–896 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bosetti, C. et al. Cigarette smoking and pancreatic cancer: an analysis from the International Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium (Panc4). Ann. Oncol. 23, 1880–1888 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Genkinger, J. M. et al. Alcohol intake and pancreatic cancer risk: a pooled analysis of fourteen cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 18, 765–776 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Naudin, S. et al. Lifetime and baseline alcohol intakes and risk of pancreatic cancer in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition study. Int. J. Cancer 143, 801–812 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Genkinger, J. M. et al. A pooled analysis of 14 cohort studies of anthropometric factors and pancreatic cancer risk. Int. J. Cancer 129, 1708–1717 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pang, Y. et al. Diabetes, plasma glucose and incidence of pancreatic cancer: a prospective study of 0.5 million Chinese adults and a meta-analysis of 22 cohort studies. Int. J. Cancer 140, 1781–1788 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chari, S. T. et al. Probability of pancreatic cancer following diabetes: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 129, 504–511 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Gupta, S. et al. New-onset diabetes and pancreatic cancer. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 4, 1366–1372 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Duell, E. J. et al. Pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer risk: a pooled analysis in the International Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium (PanC4). Ann. Oncol. 23, 2964–2970 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, F. et al. Analysis of heritability and genetic architecture of pancreatic cancer: A PanC4 study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 28, 1238–1245 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lichtenstein, P. et al. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer — analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N. Engl. J. Med. 343, 78–85 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hu, C. et al. Prevalence of pathogenic mutations in cancer predisposition genes among pancreatic cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 25, 207–211 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shindo, K. et al. Deleterious germline mutations in patients with apparently sporadic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 35, 3382–3390 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yurgelun, M. B. et al. Germline cancer susceptibility gene variants, somatic second hits, and survival outcomes in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Genet. Med. 21, 213–223 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Guidelines: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, Pancreatic, and Prostate Version 2.2026 https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=2&id=1545 (NCCN, 2026).

  35. Klein, A. P. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies five new susceptibility loci for pancreatic cancer. Nat. Commun. 9, 556 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lin, Y. et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis identifies GP2 gene risk variants for pancreatic cancer. Nat. Commun. 11, 3175 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Low, S. K. et al. Genome-wide association study of pancreatic cancer in Japanese population. PLoS ONE 5, e11824 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu, C. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies five loci associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer in Chinese populations. Nat. Genet. 44, 62–66 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lopez de Maturana, E. et al. A multilayered post-GWAS assessment on genetic susceptibility to pancreatic cancer. Genome Med. 13, 15 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Agerskov, R. H. & Nyeng, P. Innervation of the pancreas in development and disease. Development 151, dev202254 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fernandez, A. et al. A single-cell atlas of the murine pancreatic ductal tree identifies novel cell populations with potential implications in pancreas regeneration and exocrine pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 167, 944–960.e15 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ardalan, B. et al. Distinct molecular and clinical features of specific variants of KRAS codon 12 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 31, 1082–1090 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Nusrat, F. et al. The clinical implications of KRAS mutations and variant allele frequencies in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Med. 13, 2103 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, S. et al. The molecular biology of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: translational challenges and clinical perspectives. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 6, 249 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Waddell, N. et al. Whole genomes redefine the mutational landscape of pancreatic cancer. Nature 518, 495–501 (2015). This landmark study mapped the mutational landscape of pancreatic cancer, identifying four structural variation-based subtypes: stable, locally rearranged, scattered and unstable.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Bailey, P. et al. Genomic analyses identify molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer. Nature 531, 47–52 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic characterization of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell 32, 185–203.e13 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Longnecker, D. S. & Suriawinata, A. A. Incidence of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia in an autopsy series. Pancreas 51, 305–309 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Carpenter, E. S. et al. Analysis of donor pancreata defines the transcriptomic signature and microenvironment of early neoplastic lesions. Cancer Discov. 13, 1324–1345 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Sipos, B., Frank, S., Gress, T., Hahn, S. & Kloppel, G. Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia revisited and updated. Pancreatology 9, 45–54 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Stoop, T. F. et al. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 405, 1182–1202 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kanda, M. et al. Presence of somatic mutations in most early-stage pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Gastroenterology 142, 730–733.e9 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Peters, M. L. B. et al. Progression to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: results of a simulation model. Pancreatology 18, 928–934 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Hidalgo, M. Pancreatic cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 1605–1617 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Storz, P. & Crawford, H. C. Carcinogenesis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 158, 2072–2081 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Roth, S. et al. Evolution of the immune landscape during progression of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms to invasive cancer. EBioMedicine 54, 102714 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Enzler, T. et al. A comparison of spatial and phenotypic immune profiles of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its precursor lesions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 2953 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Vogelstein, B. & Kinzler, K. W. Cancer genes and the pathways they control. Nat. Med. 10, 789–799 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Soto, A. M. & Sonnenschein, C. Emergentism as a default: cancer as a problem of tissue organization. J. Biosci. 30, 103–118 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ferreira, R. M. M. et al. Duct- and acinar-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas show distinct tumor progression and marker expression. Cell Rep. 21, 966–978 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Lee, A. Y. L. et al. Cell of origin affects tumour development and phenotype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gut 68, 487–498 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Morris, J. P., Cano, D. A., Sekine, S., Wang, S. C. & Hebrok, M. β-Catenin blocks Kras-dependent reprogramming of acini into pancreatic cancer precursor lesions in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 508–520 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Neuhofer, P. et al. Acinar cell clonal expansion in pancreas homeostasis and carcinogenesis. Nature 597, 715–719 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Del Poggetto, E. et al. Epithelial memory of inflammation limits tissue damage while promoting pancreatic tumorigenesis. Science 373, eabj0486 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Falvo, D. J. et al. A reversible epigenetic memory of inflammatory injury controls lineage plasticity and tumor initiation in the mouse pancreas. Dev. Cell 58, 2959–2973.e7 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Braxton, A. M. et al. 3D genomic mapping reveals multifocality of human pancreatic precancers. Nature 629, 679–687 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Grimont, A., Leach, S. D. & Chandwani, R. Uncertain beginnings: acinar and ductal cell plasticity in the development of pancreatic cancer. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 13, 369–382 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Moffitt, R. A. et al. Virtual microdissection identifies distinct tumor- and stroma-specific subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nat. Genet. 47, 1168–1178 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Chan-Seng-Yue, M. et al. Transcription phenotypes of pancreatic cancer are driven by genomic events during tumor evolution. Nat. Genet. 52, 231–240 (2020). This single-cell study shows that pancreatic cancer heterogeneity arises from continuous genomic instability, with molecular subtypes co-existing within individual tumours.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Collisson, E. A. et al. Subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and their differing responses to therapy. Nat. Med. 17, 500–503 (2011). Based on transcriptional profiles this study identifies three molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer associated with distinct clinical outcomes and therapeutic responses: classical, quasimesenchymal and exocrine-like.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. O’Kane, G. M. et al. GATA6 expression distinguishes classical and basal-like subtypes in advanced pancreatic cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 26, 4901–4910 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Knox, J. J. et al. PASS-01: randomized phase II trial of modified FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel and molecular correlatives for previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 43, 3355–3368 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Williams, H. L. et al. Spatially resolved single-cell assessment of pancreatic cancer expression subtypes reveals co-expressor phenotypes and extensive intratumoral heterogeneity. Cancer Res. 83, 441–455 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Somerville, T. D. D. et al. TP63-mediated enhancer reprogramming drives the squamous subtype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cell Rep. 25, 1741–1755.e7 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Tu, M. et al. TNF-α-producing macrophages determine subtype identity and prognosis via AP1 enhancer reprogramming in pancreatic cancer. Nat. Cancer 2, 1185–1203 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Raghavan, S. et al. Microenvironment drives cell state, plasticity, and drug response in pancreatic cancer. Cell 184, 6119–6137.e26 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Klein, L. et al. Spatial tumor immune heterogeneity facilitates subtype co-existence and therapy response in pancreatic cancer. Nat. Commun. 16, 335 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Flowers, B. M. et al. Cell of origin influences pancreatic cancer subtype. Cancer Discov. 11, 660–677 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Biffi, G. et al. IL1-induced JAK/STAT signaling is antagonized by TGFβ to shape CAF heterogeneity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov. 9, 282–301 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Elyada, E. et al. Cross-species single-cell analysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma reveals antigen-presenting cancer-associated fibroblasts. Cancer Discov. 9, 1102–1123 (2019). This work defines CAF subtype gene signatures and identifies a novel major histocompatibility complex class II-expressing, antigen-presenting CAF, highlighting immune-modulatory roles in pancreatic cancer.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Ohlund, D. et al. Distinct populations of inflammatory fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in pancreatic cancer. J. Exp. Med. 214, 579–596 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Dominguez, C. X. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals stromal evolution into LRRC15+ myofibroblasts as a determinant of patient response to cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Discov. 10, 232–253 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Sahai, E. et al. A framework for advancing our understanding of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20, 174–186 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Cukierman, E., Pankov, R., Stevens, D. R. & Yamada, K. M. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 294, 1708–1712 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Hosein, A. N., Brekken, R. A. & Maitra, A. Pancreatic cancer stroma: an update on therapeutic targeting strategies. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 17, 487–505 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Francescone, R., Crawford, H. C. & Vendramini-Costa, D. B. Rethinking the roles of cancer-associated fibroblasts in pancreatic cancer. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 17, 737–743 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Bayne, L. J. et al. Tumor-derived granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor regulates myeloid inflammation and T cell immunity in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell 21, 822–835 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Pylayeva-Gupta, Y., Lee, K. E., Hajdu, C. H., Miller, G. & Bar-Sagi, D. Oncogenic Kras-induced GM-CSF production promotes the development of pancreatic neoplasia. Cancer Cell 21, 836–847 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Zhang, Y. et al. Regulatory T-cell depletion alters the tumor microenvironment and accelerates pancreatic carcinogenesis. Cancer Discov. 10, 422–439 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Jang, J. E. et al. Crosstalk between regulatory T cells and tumor-associated dendritic cells negates anti-tumor immunity in pancreatic cancer. Cell Rep. 20, 558–571 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Gulhati, P. et al. Targeting T cell checkpoints 41BB and LAG3 and myeloid cell CXCR1/CXCR2 results in antitumor immunity and durable response in pancreatic cancer. Nat. Cancer 4, 62–80 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. O’Hara, M. H. et al. CD40 agonistic monoclonal antibody APX005M (sotigalimab) and chemotherapy, with or without nivolumab, for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an open-label, multicentre, phase 1b study. Lancet Oncol. 22, 118–131 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Guillaumond, F. et al. Strengthened glycolysis under hypoxia supports tumor symbiosis and hexosamine biosynthesis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3919–3924 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Son, J. et al. Glutamine supports pancreatic cancer growth through a KRAS-regulated metabolic pathway. Nature 496, 101–105 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Ying, H. et al. Oncogenic Kras maintains pancreatic tumors through regulation of anabolic glucose metabolism. Cell 149, 656–670 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Nwosu, Z. C. et al. Uridine-derived ribose fuels glucose-restricted pancreatic cancer. Nature 618, 151–158 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Roeyen, G. et al. Expert opinion on management of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in pancreatic cancer. ESMO Open 7, 100386 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Phillips, M. E. et al. Consensus for the management of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency: UK practical guidelines. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 8, e000643 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Argiles, J. M., Lopez-Soriano, F. J., Stemmler, B. & Busquets, S. Cancer-associated cachexia — understanding the tumour macroenvironment and microenvironment to improve management. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 20, 250–264 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Ferrer, M. et al. Cachexia: a systemic consequence of progressive, unresolved disease. Cell 186, 1824–1845 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Wang, D. et al. GDF15 promotes weight loss by enhancing energy expenditure in muscle. Nature 619, 143–150 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Petruzzelli, M. et al. Early neutrophilia marked by aerobic glycolysis sustains host metabolism and delays cancer cachexia. Cancers 14, 963 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Tsilimigras, D. I. et al. Liver metastases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 7, 27 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Iacobuzio-Donahue, C. A. et al. DPC4 gene status of the primary carcinoma correlates with patterns of failure in patients with pancreatic cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 1806–1813 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Bellomo, G. et al. Chemotherapy-induced infiltration of neutrophils promotes pancreatic cancer metastasis via Gas6/AXL signalling axis. Gut 71, 2284–2299 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Mucciolo, G. et al. EGFR-activated myofibroblasts promote metastasis of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell 42, 101–118.e11 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Bojmar, L. et al. Multi-parametric atlas of the pre-metastatic liver for prediction of metastatic outcome in early-stage pancreatic cancer. Nat. Med. 30, 2170–2180 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Patras, L., Shaashua, L., Matei, I. & Lyden, D. Immune determinants of the pre-metastatic niche. Cancer Cell 41, 546–572 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Peinado, H. et al. Pre-metastatic niches: organ-specific homes for metastases. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 302–317 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Kersten, K., de Visser, K. E., van Miltenburg, M. H. & Jonkers, J. Genetically engineered mouse models in oncology research and cancer medicine. EMBO Mol. Med. 9, 137–153 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Wakefield, L., Agarwal, S. & Tanner, K. Preclinical models for drug discovery for metastatic disease. Cell 186, 1792–1813 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Pérez-Mancera, P. A., Guerra, C., Barbacid, M. & Tuveson, D. A. What we have learned about pancreatic cancer from mouse models. Gastroenterology 142, 1079–1092 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Schönhuber, N. et al. A next-generation dual-recombinase system for time- and host-specific targeting of pancreatic cancer. Nat. Med. 20, 1340–1347 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Hingorani, S. R. et al. Preinvasive and invasive ductal pancreatic cancer and its early detection in the mouse. Cancer Cell 4, 437–450 (2003). This work presents the original GEMM model of pancreatic cancer initiation and progression, which has served as the basis for many subsequent models.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Day, C. P., Merlino, G. & Van Dyke, T. Preclinical mouse cancer models: a maze of opportunities and challenges. Cell 163, 39–53 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Gopinathan, A., Morton, J. P., Jodrell, D. I. & Sansom, O. J. GEMMs as preclinical models for testing pancreatic cancer therapies. Dis. Model. Mech. 8, 1185–1200 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Orlen, M. et al. T-cell dependency of tumor regressions and complete responses with RAS(ON) multi-selective inhibition in preclinical models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov. 15, 1697–1716 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Buque, A. & Galluzzi, L. Modeling tumor immunology and immunotherapy in mice. Trends Cancer 4, 599–601 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Boj, S. F. et al. Organoid models of human and mouse ductal pancreatic cancer. Cell 160, 324–338 (2015). This work is the first, to our knowledge, to describe human and mouse pancreatic ductal organoids, opening new research avenues in pancreatic cancer.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Papargyriou, A. et al. Heterogeneity-driven phenotypic plasticity and treatment response in branched-organoid models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 9, 836–864 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Li, Y. et al. A pancreatic cancer organoid biobank links multi-omics signatures to therapeutic response and clinical evaluation of statin combination therapy. Cell Stem Cell 32, 1369–1389.e14 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Boilève, A. et al. Organoids for functional precision medicine in advanced pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 167, 961–976.e13 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Francescone, R. et al. Netrin G1 promotes pancreatic tumorigenesis through cancer-associated fibroblast-driven nutritional support and immunosuppression. Cancer Discov. 11, 446–479 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Rothwell, P. M. et al. Effect of daily aspirin on long-term risk of death due to cancer: analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 377, 31–41 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Laeeq, T., Ahmed, M., Sattar, H., Zeeshan, M. H. & Ali, M. B. Role of SGLT2 inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, and metformin in pancreatic cancer prevention. Cancers 16, 1325 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Bagheri, H., Adeli, O.-A., Heidari-Soureshjani, S., Azadegan-Dehkordi, Z. & Sherwin, C. M. T. The relationship between statin intake and risk of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr. Drug. Res. Rev. 17, 311–321 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Blackford, A. L. et al. Pancreatic cancer surveillance and survival of high-risk individuals. JAMA Oncol. 10, 1087–1096 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Dbouk, M. et al. The multicenter cancer of pancreas screening study: impact on stage and survival. J. Clin. Oncol. 40, 3257–3266 (2022). The CAPS study shows that pancreatic surveillance in high-risk individuals detects most cancers at stage I, improving long-term survival compared with cancers diagnosed outside surveillance.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for pancreatic cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement. JAMA 322, 438–444 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Ikemoto, J. et al. Clinical analysis of early-stage pancreatic cancer and proposal for a new diagnostic algorithm: a multicenter observational study. Diagnostics 11, 287 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Hanada, K. et al. Effective screening for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 29, 929–939 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Molina-Montes, E. et al. Risk of pancreatic cancer associated with family history of cancer and other medical conditions by accounting for smoking among relatives. Int. J. Epidemiol. 47, 473–483 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Overbeek, K. A. et al. Timeline of development of pancreatic cancer and implications for successful early detection in high-risk individuals. Gastroenterology 162, 772–785.e4 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Molina-Montes, E. et al. Deciphering the complex interplay between pancreatic cancer, diabetes mellitus subtypes and obesity/BMI through causal inference and mediation analyses. Gut 70, 319–329 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Gonda, T. A., Everett, J. N., Wallace, M. & Simeone, D. M. Recommendations for a more organized and effective approach to the early detection of pancreatic cancer from the PRECEDE (Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection) Consortium. Gastroenterology 161, 1751–1757 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Goggins, M. et al. Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium. Gut 69, 7–17 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Fung, A. et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: Screening, Locoregional Assessment, and Surveillance of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/3099847/Narrative/ (American College of Radiology, 2025).

  138. Dbouk, M. et al. Diagnostic performance of a tumor marker gene test to personalize serum CA19-9 reference ranges. Clin. Cancer Res. 29, 4178–4185 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Wong, D. et al. Early cancer detection in Li-Fraumeni syndrome with cll-free DNA. Cancer Discov. 14, 104–119 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Cao, K. et al. Large-scale pancreatic cancer detection via non-contrast CT and deep learning. Nat. Med. 29, 3033–3043 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. Kuwahara, T. et al. Artificial intelligence using deep learning analysis of endoscopic ultrasonography images for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic masses. Endoscopy 55, 140–149 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Ribeiro, A., Peng, J., Casas, C. & Fan, Y. S. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration with fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in 104 patients with pancreatic mass. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 29, 1654–1658 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Thompson, E. D., Zhang, M. L. & VandenBussche, C. J. The diagnostic challenge of evaluating small biopsies from the pancreatobiliary system. Surg. Pathol. Clin. 15, 435–453 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Eloubeidi, M. A. et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of patients with solid pancreatic neoplasia. Gastrointest. Endosc. 83, 17–28 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Dumonceau, J. M. et al. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline — updated January 2017. Endoscopy 49, 695–714 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Khan, M. A. et al. A meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration compared to endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle biopsy: diagnostic yield and the value of onsite cytopathological assessment. Endosc. Int. Open 5, E363–E375 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Conti Bellocchi, M. C. et al. EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB in pancreatic solid lesions ≤15 mm. Diagnostics 14, 427 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. Poruk, K. E. et al. The clinical utility of CA 19-9 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: diagnostic and prognostic updates. Curr. Mol. Med. 13, 340–351 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Conroy, T. et al. Pancreatic cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 34, 987–1002 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Wei, L., Yao, K., Gan, S. & Suo, Z. Clinical utilization of serum- or plasma-based miRNAs as early detection biomarkers for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis up to now. Medicine 97, e12132 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Stoecklein, N. H. et al. Ultra-sensitive CTC-based liquid biopsy for pancreatic cancer enabled by large blood volume analysis. Mol. Cancer 22, 181 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  152. Nikiforova, M. N. et al. A combined DNA/RNA-based next-generation sequencing platform to improve the classification of pancreatic cysts and early detection of pancreatic cancer arising from pancreatic cysts. Ann. Surg. 278, e789–e797 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Genco, E. et al. A single-molecule bioelectronic portable array for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer precursors. Adv. Mater. 35, e2304102 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Chu, L. C., Goggins, M. G. & Fishman, E. K. Diagnosis and detection of pancreatic cancer. Cancer J. 23, 333–342 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Toft, J. et al. Imaging modalities in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy. Eur. J. Radiol. 92, 17–23 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Guidelines: Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Version 2.2025 https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1455 (NCCN, 2025).

  157. Altmayer, S. et al. MRI with DWI improves detection of liver metastasis and selection of surgical candidates with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Radiol. 34, 106–114 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Hong, S. B. et al. Meta-analysis of MRI for the diagnosis of liver metastasis in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 51, 1737–1744 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Amin, M. B. et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J. Clin. 67, 93–99 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Mohile, S. G. et al. Practical assessment and management of vulnerabilities in older patients receiving chemotherapy: ASCO Guideline for Geriatric Oncology. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 2326–2347 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Neoptolemos, J. P. et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 1200–1210 (2004). This large trial established adjuvant chemotherapy as a standard of care for pancreatic cancer.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Oettle, H. et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. JAMA 310, 1473–1481 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Conroy, T. et al. Five-year outcomes of FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 8, 1571–1578 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  164. Conroy, T. et al. FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 2395–2406 (2018). This RCT demonstrates that multiagent adjuvant therapy (mFOLFIRINOX) improves survival compared with gemcitabine in resected pancreatic cancer.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Neoptolemos, J. P. et al. Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 389, 1011–1024 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Uesaka, K. et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01). Lancet 388, 248–257 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Valle, J. W. et al. Optimal duration and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after definitive surgery for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: ongoing lessons from the ESPAC-3 study. J. Clin. Oncol. 32, 504–512 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Ghaneh, P. et al. Immediate surgery compared with short-course neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus capecitabine, FOLFIRINOX, or chemoradiotherapy in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (ESPAC5): a four-arm, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8, 157–168 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Reni, M. et al. Preoperative mFOLFIRINOX versus PAXG for stage I–III resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PACT-21 CASSANDRA): results of the first randomisation analysis of a randomised, open-label, 2 × 2 factorial phase 3 trial. Lancet 406, 2945–2956 (2026).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Reni, M. & Orsi, G. Lessons and open questions in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8, 101–102 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Versteijne, E. et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus immediate surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: results of the Dutch randomized phase III PREOPANC trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 1763–1773 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  172. Versteijne, E. et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus upfront surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: long-term results of the Dutch randomized PREOPANC trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 40, 1220–1230 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Janssen, Q. P. et al. Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC-2): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 26, 1346–1356 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Unno, M. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer: results of the randomized phase II/III Prep-02/JSAP05 trial. Ann. Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006730 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  175. Bai, X. et al. Neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by modified FOLFIRINOX for resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial. Cancer Cell 43, 2259–2267.e2 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Labori, K. J. et al. Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic head cancer (NORPACT-1): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 9, 205–217 (2024). This trial shows that neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX does not improve survival compared with upfront surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Eade, A. V. et al. ALLIANCE A021806: a phase iii trial of perioperative versus adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 31, 6373–6374 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. van Dam, J. L. et al. Perioperative or adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX for resectable pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC-3): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer 23, 728 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  179. Reames, B. N. et al. Management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: results of an international survey of current practice. Ann. Surg. 273, 1173–1181 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. Kunzmann, V. et al. Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by FOLFIRINOX induction chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (NEOLAP-AIO-PAK-0113): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 6, 128–138 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. Hackert, T. et al. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer: neoadjuvant therapy with Folfirinox results in resectability in 60% of the patients. Ann. Surg. 264, 457–463 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Hammel, P. et al. Effect of chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer controlled after 4 months of gemcitabine with or without erlotinib: the LAP07 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 315, 1844–1853 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Fietkau, R. et al. Benefit of chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy after induction therapy for conversion of unresectable into resectable pancreatic cancer: the randomized CONKO-007 trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 43, 3266–3278 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. Barcellini, A. et al. Preoperative chemo-CIRT in Re/BRe pancreatic cancer: insights from a multicenter prospective phase II clinical study (NCT03822936. Tumori 110, 470–474 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. Zhang, G. et al. Prospective phase 2 clinical trial of carbon ion radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 123, 1061–1070 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  186. Liermann, J. et al. Effectiveness of carbon ion radiation in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Front. Oncol. 11, 708884 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  187. Timmer, F. E. F. et al. MRI-guided stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy versus CT-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (CROSSFIRE): a single-centre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 9, 448–459 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  188. Frigerio, I. et al. Open radiofrequency ablation as upfront treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: requiem from a randomized controlled trial. Pancreatology 21, 1342–1348 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  189. Seelen, L. W. F. et al. Radiofrequency ablation and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (the PELICAN trial): an international randomized controlled trial. HPB 26, S36–S37 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  190. Babiker, H. M. et al. Tumor treating fields with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: randomized, open-label, pivotal phase III PANOVA-3 study. J. Clin. Oncol. 43, 2350–2360 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  191. Augustinus, S. et al. Nationwide impact of centralization, neoadjuvant therapy, minimally invasive surgery, and standardized pathology reporting on R0 resection and overall survival in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 30, 5051–5060 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  192. Tummers, W. S. et al. Impact of resection margin status on recurrence and survival in pancreatic cancer surgery. Br. J. Surg. 106, 1055–1065 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  193. Leonhardt, C. S. et al. Prognostic relevance of the revised R status definition in pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis. BJS Open 6, zrac010 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  194. Lidsky, M. E. et al. Going the extra mile: improved survival for pancreatic cancer patients traveling to high-volume centers. Ann. Surg. 266, 333–338 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  195. Ahola, R. et al. Effect of centralization on long-term survival after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Br. J. Surg. 104, 1532–1538 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  196. Latenstein, A. E. J. et al. Effect of centralization and regionalization of pancreatic surgery on resection rates and survival. Br. J. Surg. 108, 826–833 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  197. Groot, V. P. et al. Patterns, timing, and predictors of recurrence following pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 267, 936–945 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  198. Loos, M. et al. Arterial resection in pancreatic cancer surgery: effective after a learning curve. Ann. Surg. 275, 759–768 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  199. Kirkegard, J. et al. Multicentre study of multidisciplinary team assessment of pancreatic cancer resectability and treatment allocation. Br. J. Surg. 106, 756–764 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  200. Bachellier, P. et al. Is the need for an arterial resection a contraindication to pancreatic resection for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma? A case-matched controlled study. J. Surg. Oncol. 103, 75–84 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  201. Michelakos, T. et al. Predictors of resectability and survival in patients with borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX. Ann. Surg. 269, 733–740 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  202. Truty, M. J. et al. Factors predicting response, perioperative outcomes, and survival following total neoadjuvant therapy for borderline/locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann. Surg. 273, 341–349 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  203. Tsai, S. et al. Importance of normalization of CA19-9 levels following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Ann. Surg. 271, 740–747 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  204. Perri, G. et al. Radiographic and serologic predictors of pathologic major response to preoperative therapy for pancreatic cancer. Ann. Surg. 273, 806–813 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  205. Hank, T. et al. Oncological outcome of conversion surgery after preoperative chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann. Surg. 277, e1089–e1098 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  206. Gemenetzis, G. et al. Survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection. Ann. Surg. 270, 340–347 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  207. Weitz, J., Rahbari, N., Koch, M. & Büchler, M. W. The “artery first” approach for resection of pancreatic head cancer. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 210, e1–e4 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  208. Sanjay, P., Takaori, K., Govil, S., Shrikhande, S. V. & Windsor, J. A. ‘Artery-first’ approaches to pancreatoduodenectomy. Br. J. Surg. 99, 1027–1035 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  209. Inoue, Y. et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy with systematic mesopancreas dissection using a supracolic anterior artery-first approach. Ann. Surg. 262, 1092–1101 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  210. Hackert, T., Werner, J., Weitz, J., Schmidt, J. & Büchler, M. W. Uncinate process first — a novel approach for pancreatic head resection. Langenbeck’s Arch. Surg. 395, 1161–1164 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  211. Ironside, N. et al. Meta-analysis of an artery-first approach versus standard pancreatoduodenectomy on perioperative outcomes and survival. Br. J. Surg. 105, 628–636 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  212. Hackert, T. et al. The TRIANGLE operation — radical surgery after neoadjuvant treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer: a single arm observational study. HPB 19, 1001–1007 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  213. Chen, J. H. et al. TRIANGLE operation, combined with adequate adjuvant chemotherapy, can improve the prognosis of pancreatic head cancer: a retrospective study. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 16, 1773–1786 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  214. Strasberg, S. M., Drebin, J. A. & Linehan, D. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery 133, 521–527 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  215. Fancellu, A. et al. The Impact on survival and morbidity of portal-mesenteric resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Cancers 12, 1976 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  216. Hackert, T. et al. Portal vein resection in pancreatic cancer surgery: risk of thrombosis and radicality determine survival. Ann. Surg. 277, e1291–e1298 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  217. Heckler, M. et al. Temporary portal vein bypass for resection of pancreatic neoplasms. Ann. Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006662 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  218. Cai, B. et al. Sub-adventitial divestment technique for resecting artery-involved pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 406, 691–701 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  219. Bachellier, P., Addeo, P., Faitot, F., Nappo, G. & Dufour, P. Pancreatectomy with arterial resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: how can it be done safely and with which outcomes?: A single institution’s experience with 118 patients. Ann. Surg. 271, 932–940 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  220. Del Chiaro, M. et al. Pancreatectomy with arterial resection is superior to palliation in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. HPB 21, 219–225 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  221. de Rooij, T. et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 269, 2–9 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  222. Korrel, M. et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy: an individual patient data meta-analysis of two randomized controlled trials. HPB 23, 323–330 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  223. van Hilst, J. et al. Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 45, 719–727 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  224. van Hilst, J. et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a pan-European propensity score matched study. Ann. Surg. 269, 10–17 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  225. van Hilst, J. et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 4, 199–207 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  226. Wang, M. et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 6, 438–447 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  227. Klotz, R. et al. Robotic versus open partial pancreatoduodenectomy (EUROPA): a randomised controlled stage 2b trial. Lancet Reg. Health Eur. 39, 100864 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  228. Liu, Q. et al. Effect of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy on postoperative length of hospital stay and complications for pancreatic head or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 9, 428–437 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  229. Wang-Gillam, A. et al. Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous gemcitabine-based therapy (NAPOLI-1): a global, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 387, 545–557 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  230. Oettle, H. et al. Second-line oxaliplatin, folinic acid, and fluorouracil versus folinic acid and fluorouracil alone for gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer: outcomes from the CONKO-003 trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 32, 2423–2429 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  231. Gill, S. et al. PANCREOX: a randomized phase III study of fluorouracil/leucovorin with or without oxaliplatin for second-line advanced pancreatic cancer in patients who have received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 3914–3920 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  232. De La Fouchardière, C. et al. Gemcitabine and paclitaxel versus gemcitabine alone after 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase III PRODIGE 65-UCGI 36-GEMPAX UNICANCER study. J. Clin. Oncol. 42, 1055–1066 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  233. Golan, T. et al. Maintenance olaparib for germline BRCA-mutated metastatic pancreatic cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 317–327 (2019). This biomarker-based trial showed that maintenance treatment with olaparib prolongs progression-free survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer harbouring germline BRCA mutations after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  234. Pishvaian, M. J. et al. Entrectinib in TRK and ROS1 fusion-positive metastatic pancreatic cancer. JCO Precis. Oncol. 2, 1–7 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  235. Hong, D. S. et al. Larotrectinib in patients with TRK fusion-positive solid tumours: a pooled analysis of three phase 1/2 clinical trials. Lancet Oncol. 21, 531–540 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  236. Schram, A. M. et al. Zenocutuzumab, a HER2xHER3 bispecific antibody, is effective therapy for tumors driven by NRG1 gene rearrangements. Cancer Discov. 12, 1233–1247 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  237. Drizyte-Miller, K., Talabi, T., Somasundaram, A., Cox, A. D. & Der, C. J. KRAS: the Achilles’ heel of pancreas cancer biology. J. Clin. Invest. 135, e191939 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  238. Wolpin, B. M. et al. Trial in progress: RASolute 302—A phase 3, multicenter, global, open-label, randomized study of daraxonrasib (RMC-6236), a RAS(ON) multi-selective inhibitor, versus standard of care chemotherapy in patients with previously treated metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). J. Clin. Oncol. 43, TPS4230 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  239. Schumacher, T. N. & Schreiber, R. D. Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy. Science 348, 69–74 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  240. Joyce, J. A. & Fearon, D. T. T cell exclusion, immune privilege, and the tumor microenvironment. Science 348, 74–80 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  241. Luchini, C. et al. Comprehensive characterisation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with microsatellite instability: histology, molecular pathology and clinical implications. Gut 70, 148–156 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  242. Le, D. T. et al. Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade. Science 357, 409–413 (2017). This study establishes that mismatch repair deficiency correlates with response to PD1 blockade, regardless of tumour type.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  243. O’Connor, C. A. et al. Lynch syndrome and somatic mismatch repair variants in pancreas cancer. JAMA Oncol. 10, 1511–1518 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  244. Bailey, P. et al. Exploiting the neoantigen landscape for immunotherapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Sci. Rep. 6, 35848 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  245. Balli, D., Rech, A. J., Stanger, B. Z. & Vonderheide, R. H. Immune cytolytic activity stratifies molecular subsets of human pancreatic cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 3129–3138 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  246. Luksza, M. et al. Neoantigen quality predicts immunoediting in survivors of pancreatic cancer. Nature 606, 389–395 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  247. Balachandran, V. P. et al. Identification of unique neoantigen qualities in long-term survivors of pancreatic cancer. Nature 551, 512–516 (2017). This study identifies neoantigen quality as a key determinant of T cell responses and long-term survival in pancreatic cancer.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  248. Guasp, P., Reiche, C., Sethna, Z. & Balachandran, V. P. RNA vaccines for cancer: principles to practice. Cancer Cell 42, 1163–1184 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  249. Beatty, G. L. et al. Activity of mesothelin-specific chimeric antigen receptor t cells against pancreatic carcinoma metastases in a phase 1 trial. Gastroenterology 155, 29–32 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  250. Leidner, R. et al. Neoantigen T-cell receptor gene therapy in pancreatic cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 2112–2119 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  251. Padron, L. J. et al. Sotigalimab and/or nivolumab with chemotherapy in first-line metastatic pancreatic cancer: clinical and immunologic analyses from the randomized phase 2 PRINCE trial. Nat. Med. 28, 1167–1177 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  252. Meric-Bernstam, F. et al. Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-expressing solid tumors: primary results from the DESTINY-PanTumor02 phase II trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 42, 47–58 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  253. Canon, J. et al. The clinical KRAS(G12C) inhibitor AMG 510 drives anti-tumour immunity. Nature 575, 217–223 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  254. Moral, J. A. et al. ILC2s amplify PD-1 blockade by activating tissue-specific cancer immunity. Nature 579, 130–135 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  255. Amisaki, M. et al. IL-33-activated ILC2s induce tertiary lymphoid structures in pancreatic cancer. Nature 638, 1076–1084 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  256. Labanieh, L. & Mackall, C. L. CAR immune cells: design principles, resistance and the next generation. Nature 614, 635–648 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  257. Yamamoto, K. et al. Autophagy promotes immune evasion of pancreatic cancer by degrading MHC-I. Nature 581, 100–105 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  258. Hegde, S. et al. Dendritic cell paucity leads to dysfunctional immune surveillance in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell 37, 289–307.e9 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  259. Sherman, M. H. & Beatty, G. L. Tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer pathogenesis and therapeutic resistance. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 18, 123–148 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  260. Sedrak, M. S. et al. Older adult participation in cancer clinical trials: a systematic review of barriers and interventions. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71, 78–92 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  261. White, M. N., Dotan, E., Catalano, P. J., Cardin, D. B. & Berlin, J. D. Advanced pancreatic cancer clinical trials: the continued underrepresentation of older patients. J. Geriatr. Oncol. 10, 540–546 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  262. Mohile, S. G. et al. Evaluation of geriatric assessment and management on the toxic effects of cancer treatment (GAP70+): a cluster-randomised study. Lancet 398, 1894–1904 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  263. Li, D. et al. Geriatric assessment-driven intervention (GAIN) on chemotherapy-related toxic effects in older adults with cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 7, e214158 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  264. Dale, W. et al. Practical assessment and management of vulnerabilities in older patients receiving systemic cancer therapy: ASCO guideline update. J. Clin. Oncol. 41, 4293–4312 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  265. Dotan, E. et al. NCCN Guidelines insights: older adult oncology, version 1.2021. J. Natl Compr. Cancer Netw. 19, 1006–1019 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  266. Soubeyran, P. et al. Screening for vulnerability in older cancer patients: the ONCODAGE prospective multicenter cohort study. PLoS ONE 9, e115060 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  267. Hurria, A. et al. Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 3457–3465 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  268. Extermann, M. et al. Predicting the risk of chemotherapy toxicity in older patients: the chemotherapy risk assessment scale for high-age patients (CRASH) score. Cancer 118, 3377–3386 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  269. Groen, J. V. et al. Treatment and survival of elderly patients with stage I-II pancreatic cancer: a report of the EURECCA Pancreas Consortium. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 27, 5337–5346 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  270. Huang, L. et al. Resection of pancreatic cancer in Europe and USA: an international large-scale study highlighting large variations. Gut 68, 130–139 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  271. Elias, R. et al. Real-world impact of age at diagnosis on treatment patterns and survival outcomes of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncologist 27, 469–475 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  272. Mizrahi, J. D. et al. Modified FOLFIRINOX in pancreatic cancer patients age 75 or older. Pancreatology 20, 501–504 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  273. Baldini, C. et al. Safety and efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in elderly patients with metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis. Pancreatology 17, 146–149 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  274. Macarulla, T. et al. Phase I/II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer and an ECOG performance status of 2. J. Clin. Oncol. 37, 230–238 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  275. Dotan, E. et al. The GIANT trial (ECOG-ACRIN EA2186) methods paper: a randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel compared with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and liposomal irinotecan in older patients with treatment-naive metastatic pancreatic cancer - defining a new treatment option for older vulnerable patients. J. Geriatr. Oncol. 14, 101474 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  276. Dotan, E. et al. A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel compared with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and liposomal irinotecan in older patients with treatment-naïve metastatic pancreatic cancer (GIANT): ECOG-ACRIN EA2186. J. Clin. Oncol. 42, 4003 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  277. Chong, E., Crowe, L., Mentor, K., Pandanaboyana, S. & Sharp, L. Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer. Support. Care Cancer 31, 74 (2022).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  278. Mackay, T. M. et al. The impact of cancer treatment on quality of life in patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. HPB 24, 443–451 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  279. Amin, S. et al. Health-related quality of life scores of metastatic pancreatic cancer patients responsive to first line chemotherapy compared to newly derived EORTC QLQ-C30 reference values. BMC Cancer 22, 563 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  280. Cella, D. et al. Validity of the FACT Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire for assessing disease-related symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Qual. Life Res. 22, 1105–1112 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  281. Fitzsimmons, D. et al. Development of a disease specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaire module to supplement the EORTC core cancer QoL questionnaire, the QLQ-C30 in patients with pancreatic cancer. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur. J. Cancer 35, 939–941 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  282. Reni, M. et al. Evaluation of minimal important difference and responder definition in the EORTC QLQ-PAN26 module for assessing health-related quality of life in patients with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 28, 7545–7554 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  283. Joseph, N. et al. A multicentre prospective evaluation of health-related quality of life and patient related outcomes in pancreatic and peripancreatic cancer: PROMCAN study. HPB 26, 648–655 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  284. Seelen, L. W. F. et al. Quality of life among patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a prospective nationwide multicenter study. J. Natl Compr. Cancer Netw. 23, 97–104 (2025).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  285. Gourgou-Bourgade, S. et al. Impact of FOLFIRINOX compared with gemcitabine on quality of life in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: results from the PRODIGE 4/ACCORD 11 randomized trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 23–29 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  286. Maltoni, M. et al. Systematic versus on-demand early palliative care: results from a multicentre, randomised clinical trial. Eur. J. Cancer 65, 61–68 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  287. Mukherjee, S. et al. Radiomics-based machine-learning models can detect pancreatic cancer on prediagnostic computed tomography scans at a substantial lead time before clinical diagnosis. Gastroenterology 163, 1435–1446.e3 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  288. Pishvaian, M. J. et al. Overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving matched therapies following molecular profiling: a retrospective analysis of the Know Your Tumor registry trial. Lancet Oncol. 21, 508–518 (2020). This study shows that patients with pancreatic cancer receiving molecularly matched therapies for actionable alterations have longer overall survival than those receiving unmatched treatments.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  289. Lin, Z. et al. Early detection of pancreatic cancer: current advances and future opportunities. Biomedicines 13, 1733 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  290. Krautz, C., Nimptsch, U., Weber, G. F., Mansky, T. & Grützmann, R. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital morbidity and mortality following pancreatic surgery in Germany. Ann. Surg. 267, 411–417 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  291. Bramhall, S. R. et al. Treatment and survival in 13,560 patients with pancreatic cancer, and incidence of the disease, in the West Midlands: an epidemiological study. Br. J. Surg. 82, 111–115 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  292. Birkmeyer, J. D. et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 1128–1137 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  293. Barnes, O. & Johnston, I. The cost of cracking cancer: what the $1tn race for a cure leaves behind. Financial Times (27 Aug 2024).

  294. Jacobs, E. J. et al. Family history of cancer and risk of pancreatic cancer: a pooled analysis from the Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium (PanScan). Int. J. Cancer 127, 1421–1428 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  295. Porter, N. et al. Risk of pancreatic cancer in the long-term prospective follow-up of familial pancreatic cancer kindreds. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 114, 1681–1688 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  296. Goggins, M. et al. Germline BRCA2 gene mutations in patients with apparently sporadic pancreatic carcinomas. Cancer Res. 56, 5360–5364 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  297. Hu, C. et al. Association between inherited germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes and risk of pancreatic cancer. JAMA 319, 2401–2409 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  298. Mocci, E. et al. Risk of pancreatic cancer in breast cancer families from the breast cancer family registry. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 22, 803–811 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  299. Roberts, N. J. et al. Whole genome sequencing defines the genetic heterogeneity of familial pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov. 6, 166–175 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  300. Jones, S. et al. Exomic sequencing identifies PALB2 as a pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene. Science 324, 217 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  301. Tischkowitz, M. D. et al. Analysis of the gene coding for the BRCA2-interacting protein PALB2 in familial and sporadic pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 137, 1183–1186 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  302. Axilbund, J. E. et al. Absence of germline BRCA1 mutations in familial pancreatic cancer patients. Cancer Biol. Ther. 8, 131–135 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  303. Holter, S. et al. Germline BRCA mutations in a large clinic-based cohort of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 3124–3129 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  304. Zhen, D. B. et al. BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and CDKN2A mutations in familial pancreatic cancer: a PACGENE study. Genet. Med. 17, 569–577 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  305. Hsu, F. C. et al. Risk of pancreatic cancer among individuals with pathogenic variants in the ATM gene. JAMA Oncol. 7, 1664–1668 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  306. Roberts, N. J. et al. ATM mutations in patients with hereditary pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov. 2, 41–46 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  307. Giardiello, F. M. et al. Very high risk of cancer in familial Peutz–Jeghers syndrome. Gastroenterology 119, 1447–1453 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  308. Goldstein, A. M., Struewing, J. P., Fraser, M. C., Smith, M. W. & Tucker, M. A. Prospective risk of cancer in CDKN2A germline mutation carriers. J. Med. Genet. 41, 421–424 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  309. McWilliams, R. R. et al. Prevalence of CDKN2A mutations in pancreatic cancer patients: implications for genetic counseling. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 19, 472–478 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  310. Vasen, H. F. et al. Risk of developing pancreatic cancer in families with familial atypical multiple mole melanoma associated with a specific 19 deletion of p16 (p16-Leiden). Int. J. Cancer 87, 809–811 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  311. Vitone, L. J., Greenhalf, W., Howes, N. R. & Neoptolemos, J. P. Hereditary pancreatitis and secondary screening for early pancreatic cancer. Rocz. Akad. Med. Białymst. 50, 73–84 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  312. Kastrinos, F. et al. Risk of pancreatic cancer in families with Lynch syndrome. JAMA 302, 1790–1795 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  313. Lynch, H. T., Snyder, C. L., Shaw, T. G., Heinen, C. D. & Hitchins, M. P. Milestones of Lynch syndrome: 1895–2015. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15, 181–194 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  314. Møller, P. et al. Incidence of and survival after subsequent cancers in carriers of pathogenic MMR variants with previous cancer: a report from the prospective Lynch syndrome database. Gut 66, 1657–1664 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  315. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Cancer Today: Data Visualization Tools for Exploring the Global Cancer Burden in 2022 https://gco.iarc.who.int/today (WHO, 2025).

  316. Springfeld, C. et al. Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 20, 318–337 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge M. Gerberding for his editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Introduction (C.W.M. and S.R.); Epidemiology (S.R. and A.P.K.); Mechanisms/pathophysiology (S.R., F.X.R., B.T.G., G.B., E.C., D.S. and M.A.); Diagnosis, screening and prevention (S.R., I.E., N.M., D.S. and M.K.); Management (C.W.M., S.R., E.M.O’R., T.C., J.T.S., V.P.B. and E.D.); Quality of life (C.W.M., S.R., E.M.O’R. and T.C.); Outlook (C.W.M., S.R. and M.J.P.); overview of Primer (C.W.M. and S.R.).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph W. Michalski.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.P.K. has received grant support from the National Cancer Institute and support from the Lustgarten Foundation. J.T.S. has received honoraria as a consultant or for continuing medical education presentations from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Immunocore, MSD Sharp Dohme, Novartis, Roche/Genentech and Servier; declares research funding to his institution from Abalos Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisbach Bio, Oncolytics Biotech and Roche/Genentech; and holds ownership in FAPI Holding (<3%). M.J.P. acts as a consultant or ad hoc advisor to AstraZeneca, Merus, Merck, Moderna, Serna Bio, Revolution Medicines, Theriva Biologic and Boerhinger Ingelheim; is a member of the Steering Committee or Advisory Board for Astellas and RenovoRx; declares travel, accommodation and expenses support from Astellas, RenovoRx, Merus, Revolution Medicines; declares stock ownership in Perthera; and declares research funding to his institution from Tesaro, Arcus Bio, Ideaya, Repare Tx, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Tizonia, Biomed Valley Discoveries, Amgen, RenovoRx, Boerhinger Ingelheim, Astellas, Hutchinson Medipharma, Takeda, Actuate, MEI Pharma, Elevation Oncology, Recursion Pharma, Eli Lilly and Parabalis. E.D. declares research funding to his institution from Ipsen, Lutris and Relay; is a member of the advisory board for TME Therapeutics, Amgen, Abbvie, Agenus, Merck, Merus and Ipsen; acts a consultant to Lutris and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; and declares non-financial interests as a member of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, on the NCI Pancreatic Task Force, and as a member of the PanCan Scientific Advisory Committee. E.M.O’R. declares research funding to her institution from Genentech/Roche, BioNTech, AstraZeneca, Arcus, Elicio Therapeutics, Parker Institute, NIH/NCI, Digestive Care, Break Through Cancer, Agenus, Amgen and Revolution Medicines; acts as a consultant or as a member of Data Safety Monitoring Boards (uncompensated) for Arcus, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Ability Pharma, Alligator BioSciences, Pfizer, Agenus, BioNTech, Ipsen, Ikena, Merck, Immuneering, Moma Therapeutics, Novartis, Astellas, BMS, Revolution Medicines, Regeneron and Tango Therapeutics; has received travel expenses from BioNTech and Arcus; declares other interests in relation to the American Association for Cancer Research, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Imedex, Research To Practice and Stand Up To Cancer (SU2C); and acknowledges NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant/Core Grant P30 CA008748, NCI/NIH P50 CA257881-01A1. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Disease Primers thanks M. Besselink, I. Endo, R. T. Shroff and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roth, S., Apte, M., Balachandran, V.P. et al. Pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 12, 23 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-026-00699-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-026-00699-6

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer