Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

The gut microbiome and ageing trajectories: mechanisms and clinical implications

Abstract

This Review discusses the current state of knowledge on the contribution of the gut microbiome as a potential key actor in defining how we age. The gut microbiome is a complex ecosystem that establishes lifelong dynamic interactions with the host at multiple levels (several gut–organ axes), differently influencing ageing patterns and age-related disease onset and progression across populations. Accordingly, the definition of a ‘normative’ gut microbiome remains elusive, depending largely on the interaction with the external environment. In this complex scenario, the causal role of the gut microbiome in defining the ageing trajectory and its precise contribution to various organ-specific age-related diseases is still uncertain in clinical terms and could be context specific. Multiparametric and uniqueness indexes within a given population have shown a certain capacity for predicting disability and mortality. However, the gut microbiome is shaped over time by exposure to different intrinsic and environmental factors, resulting in a high degree of inter-individual variability, a key phenomenon that should be considered to develop novel personalized strategies to counteract age-related disease and frailty.

Key points

  • Ageing is associated with a reconfiguration of the gut microbial communities towards dysbiosis. This process is influenced by life-long environmental exposures and is highly individualized, resulting in elevated inter-individual microbiome variability.

  • Gut microbiome reconfiguration during ageing is influenced by gastrointestinal cell senescence and provides a great amount of antigenic stimulation to the senescent immune system, fuelling inflammageing and favouring trajectories towards the frailty syndrome.

  • The gut microbiome of centenarians shows an exceptional capacity of adaptation to the pathophysiological processes leading to inflammageing, with persistence of a set of bacterial taxa with anti-inflammatory properties.

  • The dynamic interaction among lifestyle, gut microbiome and cell and organ senescence could influence the adaptation of each individual to the biological mechanisms of ageing, resulting in different clinical trajectories towards health or disease.

  • Modulation of the gut microbiome with diet, exercise and nutritional supplements containing probiotics, prebiotics or food bioactives could represent an effective strategy to improve the ageing trajectory in older individuals.

  • Microbiome-centred interventions should be personalized and take into account the inter-individual variability of microbial responses. Microbiome profiling and metabotyping should be increased to enable more efficient translation of microbiome science into clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Factors shaping gut microbiome composition.
Fig. 2: Role of the gut microbiome in inflammageing and clinical consequences.
Fig. 3: The vicious cycle among cellular senescence, microbiome dysbiosis and organ ageing.
Fig. 4: Microbiome metabotypes in biotransformation of food bioactives.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berg, B. et al. Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome 8, 103 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. de Vos, W. M., Tilg, H., Van Hul, M. & Cani, P. D. Gut microbiome and health: mechanistic insights. Gut 71, 1020–1032 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Joos, R. et al. Examining the healthy human microbiome concept. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 23, 192–205 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Posteraro, B., De Maio, F. & Gasbarrini, A. Profiling the gastrointestinal microbiota. Methods Mol. Biol. 2283, 83–92 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Joseph, T. A. & Pe’er, I. An introduction to whole-metagenome shotgun sequencing studies. Methods Mol. Biol. 2243, 107–122 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jurburg, S. D. et al. The community ecology perspective of omics data. Microbiome 10, 225 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Xiao, L. & Zhao, F. Microbial transmission, colonisation and succession: from pregnancy to infancy. Gut 72, 772–786 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dominguez-Bello, M. G. et al. Partial restoration of the microbiota of caesarean-born infants via vaginal microbial transfer. Nat. Med. 22, 250–253 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bogaert, D. et al. Mother-to-infant microbiota transmission and infant microbiota development across multiple body sites. Cell Host Microbe 31, 447–460.e6 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart, C. J. et al. Temporal development of the gut microbiome in early childhood from the TEDDY study. Nature 562, 583–588 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rothschild, D. et al. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature 555, 210–215 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilde, J., Slack, E. & Foster, K. R. Host control of the microbiome: mechanisms, evolution, and disease. Science 385, eadi3338 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bäcked, F. et al. Dynamics and stabilization of the human gut microbiome during the first year of life. Cell Host Microbe 17, 690–703 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gacesa, R. et al. Environmental factors shaping the gut microbiome in a Dutch population. Nature 604, 732–739 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhernakova, A. et al. Population-based metagenomics analysis reveals markers for gut microbiome composition and diversity. Science 352, 565–569 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mancabelli, L. et al. Taxonomic and metabolic development of the human gut microbiome across life stages: a worldwide metagenomic investigation. mSystems 9, e0129423 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurilshikov, A. et al. Large-scale association analyses identify host factors influencing human gut microbiome composition. Nat. Genet. 53, 156–165 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, G. D. et al. Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science 334, 105–108 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Asnicar, F. et al. Microbiome connections with host metabolism and habitual diet from 1,098 deeply phenotyped individuals. Nat. Med. 27, 321–332 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lynch, S. V. & Pedersen, O. The human intestinal microbiome in health and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 2369–2379 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sommer, F., Moltzau Anderson, J. M., Bharti, R., Raes, J. & Rosenstiel, P. The resilience of the intestinal microbiota influences health and disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 630–638 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwartz, D. J., Langdon, A. E. & Dantas, G. Understanding the impact of antibiotic perturbation on the human microbiome. Genome Med. 12, 82 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Fragiadakis, G. K. et al. Long-term dietary intervention reveals resilience of the gut microbiota despite changes in diet and weight. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 111, 1127–1136 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ross, F. C. et al. The interplay between diet and the gut microbiome: implications for health and disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 22, 671–686 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. David, L. A. et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 505, 559–563 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bhattarai, S. K. et al. Commensal antimicrobial resistance mediates microbiome resilience to antibiotic disruption. Sci. Transl. Med. 16, eadi9711 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tiffany, C. R. & Bäumler, A. J. Dysbiosis: from fiction to function. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 317, G602–G608 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ling, Z. et al. Gut microbiota and aging. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 62, 3509–3534 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kroemer, G. et al. From geroscience to precision geromedicine: understanding and managing aging. Cell 188, 2043–2062 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Haran, J. P. & McCormick, B. A. Aging, frailty, and the microbiome — how dysbiosis influences human aging and disease. Gastroenterology 160, 507–523 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bradley, E. & Haran, J. P. The human gut microbiome and aging. Gut Microbes 16, 2359677 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Fan, Y. & Pedersen, O. Gut microbiota in human metabolic health and disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 55–71 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jackson, M. A. et al. Gut microbiota associations with common diseases and prescription medications in a population-based cohort. Nat. Commun. 9, 2655 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Schmidt, T. S. B., Raes, J. & Bork, P. The human gut microbiome: from association to modulation. Cell 172, 1198–1215 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tilg, H., Adolph, T. E. & Trauner, M. Gut–liver axis: pathophysiological concepts and clinical implications. Cell Metab. 34, 1700–1718 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cryan, J. F. et al. The microbiota–gut–brain axis. Physiol. Rev. 99, 1877–2013 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Stavropoulou, E. et al. Focus on the gut–kidney axis in health and disease. Front. Med. 7, 620102 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ticinesi, A. et al. Aging gut microbiota at the cross-road between nutrition, physical frailty, and sarcopenia: is there a gut–muscle axis? Nutrients 9, 1303 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ticinesi, A., Siniscalchi, C., Meschi, T. & Nouvenne, A. Gut microbiome and bone health: update on mechanisms, clinical correlations and possible treatment strategies. Osteoporos. Int. 36, 167–191 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, L. et al. The bidirectional gut–lung axis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 207, 1145–1160 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Blaak, E. E. et al. Short chain fatty acids in human gut and metabolic health. Benef. Microbes 11, 411–455 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Belcheva, A. et al. Gut microbial metabolism drives transformation of Msh2-deficient colon epithelial cells. Cell 158, 288–299 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Singh, V. et al. Dysregulated microbial fermentation of soluble fibers induces cholestatic liver cancer. Cell 175, 679–694 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Okumura, S. et al. Gut bacteria identified in colorectal cancer patients promote tumourigenesis via butyrate secretion. Nat. Commun. 12, 5674 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Strasser, B., Wolters, M., Weyh, C., Krüger, K. & Ticinesi, A. The effects of lifestyle and diet on gut microbiota composition, inflammation and muscle performance in our aging society. Nutrients 13, 2045 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Conway, J. & Duggal, N. A. Ageing of the gut microbiome: potential influences on immune senescence and inflammageing. Ageing Res. Rev. 68, 101323 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Maynard, C. & Weinkove, D. The gut microbiota and ageing. Subcell. Biochem. 90, 351–371 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. O’Toole, P. W. & Shiels, P. G. The role of the microbiota in sedentary lifestyle disorders and ageing: lessons from the animal kingdom. J. Intern. Med. 287, 271–282 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Touvier, M. Health effects of ultra-processed food: uncovering causal mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 22, 66–67 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Minnis, H. et al. The bio-exposome: intracellular processes, stress physiology and the environment. Nat. Ment. Health 2, 132–140 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kontele, I. et al. Socio-demographic determinants of Mediterranean diet adherence: results of the EU-National Health Interview Survey (EHIS3). J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 38, e70023 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Maugeri, A. et al. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet partially mediates socioeconomic differences in leukocyte LINE-1 methylation: evidence from a cross-sectional study in Italian women. Sci. Rep. 10, 14360 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Shanahan, F., Ghosh, T. S. & O’Toole, P. W. The healthy microbiome — what is the definition of a healthy gut microbiome? Gastroenterology 160, 483–494 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Van Hul, M. et al. What defines a healthy gut microbiome? Gut 73, 1893–1908 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Najmanová, L., Vídeňská, P. & Cahová, M. Healthy microbiome — a mere idea or a sound concept? Physiol. Res. 71, 719–738 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Wilmanski, T., Rappaport, N., Diener, C., Gibbons, S. M. & Price, N. D. From taxonomy to metabolic output: what factors define gut microbiome health? Gut Microbes 13, e1907270 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. De Siqueira, M. K. et al. Infection-elicited microbiota promotes host adaptation to nutrient restriction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2214484120 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Carter, M. M. et al. Ultra-deep sequencing of Hadza hunter-gatherers recovers vanishing gut microbes. Cell 186, 3111–3124.e13 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Vandeputte, D. et al. Temporal variability in quantitative human gut microbiome profiles and implications for clinical research. Nat. Commun. 12, 6740 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Nishijima, S. et al. Fecal microbial load is a major determinant of gut microbiome variation and a confounder for disease associations. Cell 188, 222–236 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Gupta, V. K. et al. A predictive index for health status using species-level gut microbiome profiling. Nat. Commun. 11, 4635 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Salosensaari, A. et al. Taxonomic signatures of cause-specific mortality risk in human gut microbiome. Nat. Commun. 12, 2671 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Wilmanski, T. et al. Gut microbiome pattern reflects healthy ageing and predicts survival in humans. Nat. Metab. 3, 274–286 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Si, J. et al. Long-term life history predicts current gut microbiome in a population-based cohort study. Nat. Aging 2, 885–895 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Ghosh, T. S., Das, M., Jeffery, I. B. & O’Toole, P. W. Adjusting for age improves identification of gut microbiome alterations in multiple diseases. eLife 9, e50240 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Claesson, M. J. et al. Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly. Nature 488, 178–184 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Rahayu, E. S. et al. Gut microbiota profile in healthy Indonesians. World J. Gastroenterol. 25, 1478–1491 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Xu, Y. et al. Altered fecal microbiota composition in older adults with frailty. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11, 696186 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Haran, J. P. et al. The nursing home older adult gut microbiome composition shows time-dependent dysbiosis and is influenced by medication exposures, age, environment, and frailty. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 76, 1930–1938 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Ghosh, T. S., Shanahan, F. & O’Toole, P. W. Toward an improved definition of a healthy microbiome for healthy aging. Nat. Aging 2, 1054–1069 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Ferrucci, L. et al. Measuring biological aging in humans: a quest. Aging Cell 19, e13080 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Fong, S. et al. Principal component-based clinical aging clocks identify signatures of healthy aging and targets for clinical intervention. Nat. Aging 4, 1137–1152 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Drewelies, J. et al. Using blood test parameters to define biological age among older adults: association with morbidity and mortality independent of chronological age validated in two separate birth cohorts. Geroscience 44, 2685–2699 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Kwon, D. & Belsky, D. W. A toolkit for quantification of biological age from blood chemistry and organ function test data: bioage. Geroscience 43, 2795–2808 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Gems, D., Virk, R. S. & de Magalhaes, J. P. Epigenetic clocks and programmatic aging. Ageing Res. Rev. 101, 102546 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Prattichizzo, F. et al. Organ-specific biological clocks: ageotyping for personalized anti-aging medicine. Ageing Res. Rev. 96, 102253 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Apsley, A. T. et al. Cross-tissue comparison of epigenetic aging clocks in humans. Aging Cell 24, e14451 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Huang, S. et al. Human skin, oral, and gut microbiomes predict chronological age. mSystems 5, e00630-19 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Galkin, F. et al. Human gut microbiome aging clock based on taxonomic profiling and deep learning. iScience 23, 101199 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Gopu, S. et al. An accurate aging clock developed from large-scale gut microbiome and human gene expression data. iScience 27, 108538 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Wang, H. et al. A gut aging clock using microbiome multi-view profiles is associated with health and frail risk. Gut Microbes 16, 2297852 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Wang, T. et al. Divergent age-associated and metabolism-associated gut microbiome signatures modulate cardiovascular disease risk. Nat. Med. 30, 1722–1731 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Sayed, N. et al. An inflammatory aging clock (iAge) based on deep learning tracks multimorbidity, immunosenescence, frailty and cardiovascular aging. Nat. Aging 1, 598–615 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Kim, D. H. & Rockwood, K. Frailty in older adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 391, 538–548 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Picca, A., Coelho-Junior, H. J., Calvani, R., Marzetti, E. & Vetrano, D. L. Biomarkers shared by frailty and sarcopenia in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev. 73, 101530 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Boehme, M. et al. Microbiota from young mice counteracts selective age-associated behavioral deficits. Nat. Aging 1, 666–676 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Mo, X. et al. Faecal microbiota transplantation from young rats attenuates age-related sarcopenia revealed by multiomics analysis. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 14, 2168–2183 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Zhu, M. et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation attenuates frailty via gut–muscle axis in old mice. Aging Dis. 16, 1180–1198 (2024).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Fielding, R. A. et al. Muscle strength is increased in mice that are colonized with microbiota from high-functioning older adults. Exp. Gerontol. 127, 110722 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Farsijani, S. et al. Associations between walking speed and gut microbiome composition in older men from the MrOS Study. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 79, glae030 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Guo, Y. et al. Serum metabolome and gut microbiome alterations are associated with low handgrip strength in older adults. Aging 16, 2368–2656 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Lapauw, L. et al. Associations between gut microbiota and sarcopenia or its defining parameters in older adults: a systematic review. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 15, 2190–2207 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Almeida, H. M., Sardeli, A. V., Conway, J., Duggal, N. D. & Cavaglieri, C. R. Comparison between frail and non-frail older adults’ gut microbiota: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev. 82, 101773 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Jackson, M. A. et al. Signatures of early frailty in the gut microbiota. Genome Med. 8, 8 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Verdi, S. et al. An investigation into physical frailty as a link between the gut microbiome and cognitive health. Front. Aging Neurosci. 10, 398 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Lim, M. Y., Hong, S., Kim, J. H. & Nam, Y. D. Association between gut microbiome and frailty in the older adult population in Korea. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 76, 1362–1368 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Pu, Y. et al. Gut microbial features and circulating metabolomic signatures of frailty in older adults. Nat. Aging 4, 1249–1262 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Fulop, T. et al. Immunology of aging: the birth of inflammaging. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 64, 109–122 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Ferrucci, L. & Fabbri, E. Inflammageing: chronic inflammation in ageing, cardiovascular disease, and frailty. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 15, 505–522 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Fulop, T. et al. Immunosenescence is both functional/adaptive and dysfunctional/maladaptive. Semin. Immunopathol. 42, 521–536 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Franceschi, C., Olivieri, F., Moskalev, A., Ivanchenko, M. & Santoro, A. Towards precision interventions and metrics of inflammaging. Nat. Aging 5, 1441–1454 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Franck, M. et al. Nonuniversality of inflammaging across human populations. Nat. Aging 5, 1481–1490 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Olivieri, F. et al. Antifragility and antiinflammaging: can they play a role for a healthy longevity? Ageing Res. Rev. 84, 101836 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Gensous, N. et al. Targeted epigenetic clock for the prediction of biological age. Cells 11, 4044 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Franceschi, C. et al. Inflammaging: a new immune-metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 14, 576–590 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Franceschi, C. et al. Immunobiography and the heterogeneity of immune responses in the elderly: a focus on inflammaging and trained immunity. Front. Immunol. 8, 982 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Untersmayr, E. et al. The intestinal barrier dysfunction as driving factor of inflammaging. Nutrients 14, 949 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Witkowski, J. M. et al. Immunosenescence and COVID-19. Mech. Ageing Dev. 204, 111672 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Domínguez-Andrés, J. et al. Trained immunity: adaptation within innate immune mechanisms. Physiol. Rev. 103, 313–343 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Blacher, E. et al. Aging disrupts circadian age regulation and function in macrophages. Nat. Immun. 23, 229–236 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Carrasco, E. et al. The role of T cells in age-related diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 97–111 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Guedj, A. et al. Gut microbiota shape ‘inflamm-ageing’ cytokines and account for age-dependent decline in DNA damage repair. Gut 69, 1064–1075 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Bashir, H. et al. Age-mediated gut microbiota dysbiosis promotes the loss of dendritic cells tolerance. Aging Cell 22, e13838 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Koeth, R. A. et al. L-carnitine in omnivorous diets induces an atherogenic gut microbial pathway in humans. J. Clin. Invest. 129, 373–387 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Song, Y. et al. Gut microbiota-dependent phyenylacetylglutamine in cardiovascular disease: current knowledge and new insights. Front. Med. 18, 31–45 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Zhang, L., Yu, F. & Xia, J. Trimethylamine-N-oxide: role in cell senescence and age-related diseases. Eur. J. Nutr. 62, 525–541 (2023).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Yang, H. et al. Gut microbial-derived phenylacetylglutamine accelerates host cellular senescence. Nat. Aging 5, 401–418 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Liu, Y. et al. Dietary polyphenols as anti-aging agents: targeting the hallmarks of aging. Nutrients 16, 3305 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Zumerle, S. et al. Targeting senescence induced by age or chemotherapy with a polyphenol-rich natural extract improves longevity and healthspan in mice. Nat. Aging 4, 1231–1248 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Santoro, A. et al. Gut microbiota changes in the extreme decades of human life: a focus on centenarians. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 75, 129–148 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Wang, J. et al. The landscape in the gut microbiome of long-lived families reveals new insights on longevity and aging — relevant neural and immune function. Gut Microbes 14, e2107288 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Li, C. et al. Deep insights into the gut microbial community of extreme longevity in south Chinese centenarians by ultra-deep metagenomics and large-scale culturomics. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 8, 28 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Johansen, J. et al. Centenarians have a diverse gut virome with the potential to modulate metabolism and promote healthy lifespan. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 1064–1078 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Pu, L. et al. The gut mycobiome signatures in long-lived populations. iScience 27, 110412 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Chen, S. et al. Consistent signatures in the human gut microbiome of longevous populations. Gut Microbes 16, 2393756 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Pang, S. et al. Longevity of centenarians is reflected by the gut microbiome with youth-associated signatures. Nat. Aging 3, 436–449 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Rampelli, S. et al. Shotgun metagenomics of gut microbiota in humans with up to extreme longevity and the increasing role of xenobiotic degradation. mSystems 5, e00124-20 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Sato, Y. et al. Novel bile acid biosynthetic pathways are enriched in the microbiome of centenarians. Nature 599, 458–464 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Tavella, T., Turroni, S., Brigidi, P., Candela, M. & Rampelli, S. The human gut resistome up to extreme longevity. mSphere 6, e00691–21 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Lu, C. et al. Antimicrobial peptides from the gut microbiome of the centenarians: diversification of biosynthesis and youthful development of resistance genes. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 79, glae218 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Santos-Pujol, E. et al. The multiomics blueprint of the individual with the most extreme lifespan. Cell Rep. Med. 6, 102368 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Jang, D. H. et al. The connection between aging, cellular senescence and gut microbiome alterations: a comprehensive review. Aging Cell 23, e14315 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Kawamoto, S. & Hara, E. Crosstalk between gut microbiota and cellular senescence: a vicious cycle leading to aging gut. Trends Cell Biol. 34, 626–634 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Kawamoto, S. et al. Bacterial induction of B cell senescence promotes age-related changes in the gut microbiota. Nat. Cell Biol. 25, 865–876 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. Di Vincenzo, F., Del Gaudio, A., Petito, V., Lopetuso, L. R. & Scaldaferri, F. Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, and systemic inflammation: a narrative review. Intern. Emerg. Med. 19, 275–293 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Zhang, D. et al. Neutrophil ageing is regulated by the microbiome. Nature 525, 528–532 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Shoshkes-Carmel, M. Telocytes in the luminal GI tract. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 17, 697–701 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. Ahmad Fadzuli, N. I. et al. Faecal intestinal permeability and intestinal inflammatory markers in older adults with age-related disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev. 101, 102506 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Boschetti, E. et al. Serum zonulin levels are increased in Alzheimer’s disease but not in vascular dementia. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 35, 1835–1843 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Palermo, F. et al. Investigating gut alterations in Alzheimer’s disease: in-depth analysis with micro- and nano-3D X-ray phase contrast tomography. Sci. Adv. 11, eadr8511 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. Carloni, S. et al. Identification of a choroid plexus vascular barrier closing during intestinal inflammation. Science 374, 439–448 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Carloni, S. & Rescigno, M. The gut–brain vascular axis in neuroinflammation. Semin. Immunol. 69, 101802 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Mustafa, M. A. et al. The gut–brain axis in Alzheimer’s disease: exploring microbial influences and therapeutic strategies. Mol. Neurobiol. 63, 151 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Ahmed, H. et al. Microbiota-derived metabolites as drivers of gut–brain communication. Gut Microbes 14, 2102878 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Borbolis, F., Mytilinaiou, E. & Palikaras, K. The crosstalk between microbiome and mitochondrial homeostasis in neurodegeneration. Cells 12, 429 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. Miller, B. C., Mathai, M., Yadav, H. & Jain, S. Geroprotective potential of microbiome modulators in the Caenorhabditis elegans model. Geroscience 46, 129–151 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Liu, C. et al. Understanding the gut microbiota and sarcopenia: a systematic review. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 12, 1393–1407 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. de Rijke, T. J. et al. A systematic review on the effects of different types of probiotics in animal Alzheimer’s disease studies. Front. Psychiatry 13, 879491 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Herisson, F. M. et al. Targeting the gut–heart axis improves cardiac remodeling in a clinical scale model of cardiometabolic syndrome. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 10, 1–15 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Lazou-Ahrén, I. et al. Probiotic-reduced inflammaging in older adults : a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Probiot. Antimicrob. Prot. 17, 3429–3439 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Castro-Herrera, V. M. et al. Combination of the probiotics Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, BB-12 has limited effect on biomarkers of immunity and inflammation in older people resident in care homes: results from the Probiotics to Reduce Infections iN CarE home reSidentS randomized controlled trial. Front. Immunol. 12, 643321 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. Besora-Moreno, M., Llauradò, E., Valls, R. M., Pedret, R. & Solà, R. Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on sarcopenia parameters in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr. Rev. 83, e1693–e1708 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Lapauw, L. et al. Effect of host and gut microbiota-altering interventions on sarcopenia or its defining parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of nutrition-based intervention studies. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 38, 17 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. Karim, A. et al. A multistrain probiotic reduces sarcopenia by modulating Wnt signaling biomarkers in patients with chronic heart failure. J. Cardiol. 80, 449–455 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Karim, A. et al. A multistrain probiotic improves handgrip strength and functional capacity in patients with COPD: a randomized controlled trial. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 102, 140721 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Nistor-Cseppento, C. et al. The contribution of diet therapy and probiotics in the treatment of sarcopenia induced by prolonged immobilization caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Nutrients 14, 4701 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. Rondanelli, M. et al. Effect of a novel food composed of leucine, omega-3 fatty acids and probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei PS23 for the treatment of sarcopenia in elderly subjects: a 2-month randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Nutrients 14, 4566 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. Qaisar, R. et al. Probiotics supplements improve the sarcopenia-related quality of life in older adults with age-related muscle decline. Calcif. Tissue Int. 114, 583–591 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. Zhang, Z. et al. Bifidobacterium animalis Probio-M8 improves sarcopenia physical performance by mitigating creatine restrictions imposed by microbial metabolites. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 10, 144 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. Kang, C. H. et al. Pasteurized Akkermansia muciniphila HB05 (HB05P) improves muscle strength and function: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Nutrients 16, 4037 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. Román, E. et al. Home exercise, branched-chain amino acids, and probiotics improve frailty in cirrhosis: a randomized clinical trial. Hepatol. Commun. 8, e0443 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. Buigues, C. et al. Effect of a prebiotic formulation on frailty syndrome: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 932 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. Theou, O. et al. Can a prebiotic formulation reduce frailty levels in older people? J. Frailty Aging 8, 48–52 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  164. Tominaga, K. et al. Increase in muscle mass associated with the prebiotic effects of 1-kestose in super-elderly patients with sarcopenia. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health 40, 150–155 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  165. Yang, J. et al. Probiotics improve frailty status in community-dwelling older individuals in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. J. Clin. Invest. 134, e176507 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  166. Ni Lochlainn, M. et al. Effect of gut microbiome modulation on muscle function and cognition: the PROMOTe randomised controlled trial. Nat. Commun. 15, 1859 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  167. Liu, X., Ning, L., Fan, W., Jia, C. & Ge, L. Probiotics and cognitive-related health outcomes: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Nutr. Rev. 83, 2144–2158 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Guo, H. Q. et al. Effects of probiotics on cognitive function across the human lifespan: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 80, 46–61 (2026).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Calzada-Gonzales, N. et al. Efficacy and safety of probiotic supplements on cognitive function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 25, 432 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  170. Guarente, L., Sinclair, D. A. & Kroemer, G. Human trials exploring anti-aging medicines. Cell Metab. 36, 354–376 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  171. Rolland, Y., Ticinesi, A., Sokol, H. & De Souto Barreto, P. Therapeutic perspectives of pre-, pro-, post-biotics in the treatment of sarcopenia. J. Nutr. Health Aging 28, 100298 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  172. Tran, T. T. T. et al. Prebiotic supplementation in frail older people affects specific gut microbiota taxa but not global diversity. Microbiome 7, 39 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  173. Salvesi, C. et al. Impact of a probiotic diet on well-being of healthy senior: THE PROBIOSENIOR PROJECT. J. Appl. Microbiol. 133, 2941–2953 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  174. Di Giosia, P. et al. The role of nutrition in inflammaging. Ageing Res. Rev. 77, 101596 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Ticinesi, A., Nouvenne, A., Cerundolo, N., Parise, A., Mena, P. & Meschi, T. The interaction between Mediterranean diet and intestinal microbiome: relevance for preventive strategies against frailty in older individuals. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 36, 58 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  176. Ghosh, T. S. et al. Mediterranean diet intervention alters the gut microbiome in older people reducing frailty and improving health status: the NU-AGE 1-year dietary intervention across five European countries. Gut 69, 1218–1228 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  177. Muralidharan, J. et al. Effect on gut microbiota of a 1-y lifestyle intervention with Mediterranean diet compared with energy-reduced Mediterranean diet and physical activity promotion: PREDIMED-Plus Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 114, 1148–1158 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  178. Sbierski-Kind, J. et al. Effects of caloric restriction on the gut microbiome are linked with immune senescence. Microbiome 10, 57 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  179. Gensous, N. et al. One-year Mediterranean diet promotes epigenetic rejuvenation with country- and sex-specific effects: a pilot study from the NU-AGE project. Geroscience 42, 687–701 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  180. Waziry, R. et al. Effect of long-term caloric restriction on DNA methylation measures of biological aging in healthy adults from the CALERIE trial. Nat. Aging 3, 248–257 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  181. Nagpal, R. et al. Modified Mediterranean-ketogenic diet modulates the gut microbiome and short-chain fatty acids in association with Alzheimer’s disease markers in subjects with mild cognitive impairment: a pilot study. eBioMedicine 59, 102950 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. Dilmore, A. H. et al. Effect of a ketogenic and low-fat diet on the human metabolome, microbiome, and foodome in adults at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 19, 4805–4816 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  183. Ford, A. L. et al. Microbiota stability and gastrointestinal tolerance in response to a high-protein diet with and without a prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in older women. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 120, 500–516 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. Allen, J. M. et al. Exercise alters gut microbiota composition and function in lean and obese humans. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 50, 747–757 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. Grosicki, G. J. et al. Gut check: unveiling the influence of acute exercise on the gut microbiota. Exp. Physiol. 108, 1466–1480 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  186. Qi, X., Kong, H., Li, J. & Chen, C. The relationship between insomnia and multidimensional frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 129, 105661 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  187. Estaki, M. et al. Association of subjective and objective measures of sleep with gut microbiota composition and diversity in older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 78, 1925–1932 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  188. Palmnäs, M. et al. Perspective: metabotyping-a potential personalized nutrition strategy for precision prevention of cardiometabolic disease. Adv. Nutr. 11, 524–532 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  189. Calderón-Pérez, L. et al. A single-blinded, randomized, parallel intervention to evaluate genetics and omics-based personalized nutrition in general population via an e-commerce tool: the PREVENTOMICS e-commerce study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 120, 129–144 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  190. Quinn-Bohmann, N. et al. Microbial community-scale metabolic modelling predicts personalized short-chain fatty acid production profiles in the human gut. Nat. Microbiol. 9, 1700–1712 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  191. Cortés-Martín, A. et al. Where to look into the puzzle of polyphenols and health? The postbiotics and gut microbiota associated with human metabotypes. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 64, 1900952 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  192. Favari, C. et al. Factors driving the inter-individual variability in the metabolism and bioavailability of (poly)phenolic metabolites: a systematic review of human studies. Redox Biol. 71, 103095 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  193. Tosi, N. et al. Unravelling phenolic metabotypes in the frame of the COMBAT study, a randomized, controlled trial with cranberry supplementation. Food Res. Int. 172, 113187 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  194. Cortés-Martín, A. et al. The gut microbiota urolithin metabotypes revisited: the human metabolism of ellagic acid is mainly determined by aging. Food Funct. 9, 4100–4106 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  195. Meroño, T. et al. The relevance of urolithins-based metabotyping for assessing the effects of a polyphenol-rich dietary intervention on intestinal permeability: a post-hoc analysis of the MaPLE trial. Food Res. Int. 159, 11632 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  196. Ratiner, K., Ciocan, D., Abdeen, S. K. & Elinav, E. Utilization of the microbiome in personalized medicine. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 22, 291–308 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  197. Tian, S. et al. A designed synthetic microbiota provides insight to community function in Clostridioides difficile resistance. Cell Host Microbe 33, 1–15 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.T. and C.F. researched data for the article. S.M., G.Z., A.N. and C.F. contributed substantially to discussion of the content. A.T. wrote the article. S.M., G.Z., A.N. and C.F. reviewed and/or edited the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Ticinesi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Endocrinology thanks Cristina Menni, who co-reviewed with Ruth Bowyer, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ticinesi, A., Maggi, S., Nouvenne, A. et al. The gut microbiome and ageing trajectories: mechanisms and clinical implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-026-01236-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-026-01236-x

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology