Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Cerebellar circuit computations for predictive motor control

Abstract

The rise of the deep neural network as the workhorse of artificial intelligence has brought increased attention to how network architectures serve specialized functions. The cerebellum, with its largely shallow, feedforward architecture, provides a curious example of such a specialized network. Within the cerebellum, tiny supernumerary granule cells project to a monolayer of giant Purkinje neurons that reweight synaptic inputs under the instructive influence of a unitary synaptic input from climbing fibres. What might this predominantly feedforward organization confer computationally? Here we review evidence for and against the hypothesis that the cerebellum learns basic associative feedforward control policies to speed up motor control and learning. We contrast and link this feedforward control framework with another prominent set of theories proposing that the cerebellum computes internal models. Ultimately, we suggest that the cerebellum may implement control through mechanisms that resemble internal models but involve model-free implicit mappings of high-dimensional sensorimotor contexts to motor output.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Effects and use of sensory delays in motor control systems.
Fig. 2: Comparison between alternative control system models.
Fig. 3: Delay eyelid conditioning as a canonical cerebellar feedforward control paradigm.
Fig. 4: Resolving Purkinje cell coding diversity.
Fig. 5: Two models of the cerebellar control of movement.
Fig. 6: High-dimensional granule cell population codes give rise to diverse signals.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eccles, J. C., Ito, M. & Szentágothai, J. The Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine (Springer, 1967).

  2. Cisek, P. Evolution of behavioural control from chordates to primates. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 377, 20200522 (2022). This review discusses neural function through the lens of evolutionary transitions that require novel computations.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shadmehr, R. & Mussa-Ivaldi S. Biological Learning and Control (MIT Press, 2023). This book provides an invaluable introduction to computational approaches to studying biological motor control.

  4. Holmes, G. The Croonian Lectures on the clinical symptoms of cerebellar disease and their interpretation. Lecture I. 1922. Cerebellum 6, 142–147 (2007). This work presents a fascinating and thorough description of motor deficits that emerged in World War I soldiers who suffered gunshot wounds to the cerebellum.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shadmehr, R. Population coding in the cerebellum: a machine learning perspective. J. Neurophysiol. 124, 2022–2051 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Spong, M. W. & Fujita, M. in The Impact of Control Technology: Overview, Success Stories, and Research Challenges (eds Samad, T. and Annaswamy, A.) 49–56 (IEEE Control Systems Society, 2011).

  7. Wolpert, D. M. & Miall, R. C. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw. 9, 1265–1279 (1996). This paper beautifully describes how forward models can be used to solve many motor control problems common in biological systems.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C. & Kawato, M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2, 338–347 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shadmehr, R., Smith, M. A. & Krakauer, J. W. Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 33, 89–108 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cullen, K. E. Internal models of self-motion: neural computations by the vestibular cerebellum. Trends Neurosci. 46, 986–1002 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohyama, T., Nores, W. L., Murphy, M. & Mauk, M. D. What the cerebellum computes. Trends Neurosci. 26, 222–227 (2003). This perspective article proposes that feedforward control principles underlying DEC could be extended to other motor control domains.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Raymond, J. L., Lisberger, S. G. & Mauk, M. D. The cerebellum: a neuronal learning machine? Science 272, 1126–1131 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bastian, A. J. Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16, 645–649 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McCormick, D. A. & Thompson, R. F. Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response. Science 223, 296–299 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moyer, J. R., Deyo, R. A. & Disterhoft, J. F. Hippocampectomy disrupts trace eye-blink conditioning in rabbits. Behav. Neurosci. 129, 523–532 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalmbach, B. E., Ohyama, T., Kreider, J. C., Riusech, F. & Mauk, M. D. Interactions between prefrontal cortex and cerebellum revealed by trace eyelid conditioning. Learn. Mem. 16, 86–95 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Medina, J. F., Nores, W. L., Ohyama, T. & Mauk, M. D. Mechanisms of cerebellar learning suggested by eyelid conditioning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10, 717–724 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jirenhed, D.-A., Bengtsson, F. & Hesslow, G. Acquisition, extinction, and reacquisition of a cerebellar cortical memory trace. J. Neurosci. 27, 2493–2502 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jirenhed, D.-A. & Hesslow, G. Are Purkinje cell pauses drivers of classically conditioned blink responses? Cerebellum 15, 526–534 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Halverson, H. E., Khilkevich, A. & Mauk, M. D. Relating cerebellar Purkinje cell activity to the timing and amplitude of conditioned eyelid responses. J. Neurosci. 35, 7813–7832 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ten Brinke, M. M. et al. Dynamic modulation of activity in cerebellar nuclei neurons during Pavlovian eyeblink conditioning in mice. eLife 6, e28132 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Mauk, M. D. & Buonomano, D. V. The neural basis of temporal processing. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 307–340 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rasmussen, A., Jirenhed, D.-A., Wetmore, D. Z. & Hesslow, G. Changes in complex spike activity during classical conditioning. Front. Neural Circuits 8, 90 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohmae, S. & Medina, J. F. Climbing fibers encode a temporal-difference prediction error during cerebellar learning in mice. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1798–1803 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. ten Brinke, M. M. et al. Evolving models of Pavlovian conditioning: cerebellar cortical dynamics in awake behaving mice. Cell Rep. 13, 1977–1988 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Boele, H.-J. et al. Impact of parallel fiber to Purkinje cell long-term depression is unmasked in absence of inhibitory input. Sci. Adv. 4, eaas9426 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Vilis, T. & Hore, J. in Progress in Brain Research Vol. 64 (eds. Freund, H.-J., Büttner, U., Cohen, B. & Noth, J.) 207–215 (Elsevier, 1986).

  28. Flament, D., Hore, J. & Vilis, T. Braking of fast and accurate elbow flexions in the monkey. J. Physiol. 349, 195–202 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Vilis, T. & Hore, J. Effects of changes in mechanical state of limb on cerebellar intention tremor. J. Neurophysiol. 40, 1214–1224 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pasalar, S., Roitman, A. V., Durfee, W. K. & Ebner, T. J. Force field effects on cerebellar Purkinje cell discharge with implications for internal models. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1404–1411 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Robinson, D. A. The use of control systems analysis in the neurophysiology of eye movements. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 463–503 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Robinson, F. R. & Fuchs, A. F. The role of the cerebellum in voluntary eye movements. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 981–1004 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Smith, M. A., Brandt, J. & Shadmehr, R. Motor disorder in Huntington’s disease begins as a dysfunction in error feedback control. Nature 403, 544–549 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kawato, M. & Gomi, H. A computational model of four regions of the cerebellum based on feedback-error learning. Biol. Cybern. 68, 95–103 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Flash, T. & Sejnowski, T. J. Computational approaches to motor control. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 655–662 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Dean, P. & Porrill, J. Adaptive-filter models of the cerebellum: computational analysis. Cerebellum 7, 567–571 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Heiney, S. A., Wojaczynski, G. J. & Medina, J. F. Action-based organization of a cerebellar module specialized for predictive control of multiple body parts. Neuron 109, 2981–2994.e5 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Albus, J. S. A theory of cerebellar function. Math. Biosci. 10, 25–61 (1971). This impressive work presents a sweeping hypothesis of cerebellar control of movements that proves a useful framework more than 50 years later.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Safo, P. & Regehr, W. G. Timing dependence of the induction of cerebellar LTD. Neuropharmacology 54, 213–218 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Medina, J. F. & Mauk, M. D. Computer simulation of cerebellar information processing. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1205–1211 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Becker, M. I. & Person, A. L. Cerebellar control of reach kinematics for endpoint precision. Neuron 103, 335–348.e5 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Guo, J.-Z. et al. Disrupting cortico-cerebellar communication impairs dexterity. eLife 10, e65906 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Gao, Z. et al. Excitatory cerebellar nucleocortical circuit provides internal amplification during associative conditioning. Neuron 89, 645–657 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, X., Yu, S.-Y., Ren, Z., De Zeeuw, C. I. & Gao, Z. A FN–MdV pathway and its role in cerebellar multimodular control of sensorimotor behavior. Nat. Commun. 11, 6050 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Noda, H. et al. Saccadic eye movements evoked by microstimulation of the fastigial nucleus of macaque monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 60, 1036–1052 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sun, Z., Junker, M., Dicke, P. W. & Thier, P. Individual neurons in the caudal fastigial oculomotor region convey information on both macro- and microsaccades. Eur. J. Neurosci. 44, 2531–2542 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Özcan, O. O. et al. Differential coding strategies in glutamatergic and gabaergic neurons in the medial cerebellar nucleus. J. Neurosci. 40, 159–170 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Burton, J. E. & Onoda, N. Interpositus neuron discharge in relation to a voluntary movement. Brain Res. 121, 167–172 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fortier, P. A., Kalaska, J. F. & Smith, A. M. Cerebellar neuronal activity related to whole-arm reaching movements in the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 62, 198–211 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhai, P. et al. Whisker kinematics in the cerebellum. J. Physiol. 602, 153–181 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Brooks, J. X., Carriot, J. & Cullen, K. E. Learning to expect the unexpected: rapid updating in primate cerebellum during voluntary self-motion. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1310–1317 (2015). This study provides a pristine example of learning and reafference cancellation within the primate cerebellum.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Fuchs, A. F., Robinson, F. R. & Straube, A. Role of the caudal fastigial nucleus in saccade generation. I. Neuronal discharge pattern. J. Neurophysiol. 70, 1723–1740 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Low, A. Y. T. et al. Precision of discrete and rhythmic forelimb movements requires a distinct neuronal subpopulation in the interposed anterior nucleus. Cell Rep. 22, 2322–2333 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Thanawalla, A. R., Chen, A. I. & Azim, E. The cerebellar nuclei and dexterous limb movements. Neuroscience 450, 168–183 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Dacre, J. et al. A cerebellar–thalamocortical pathway drives behavioral context-dependent movement initiation. Neuron 109, 2326–2338.e8 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Nashef, A., Cohen, O., Harel, R., Israel, Z. & Prut, Y. Reversible block of cerebellar outflow reveals cortical circuitry for motor coordination. Cell Rep. 27, 2608–2619.e4 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Rispal-Padel, L., Cicirata, F. & Pons, C. Cerebellar nuclear topography of simple and synergistic movements in the alert baboon (Papio papio). Exp. Brain Res. 47, 365–380 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rispal-Padel, L., Cicirata, F. & Pons, C. Contribution of the dentato-thalamo-cortical system to control of motor synergy. Neurosci. Lett. 22, 137–144 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Thach, W. T. Cerebellar output: properties, synthesis and uses. Brain Res. 40, 89–97 (1972).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Apps, R. & Garwicz, M. Anatomical and physiological foundations of cerebellar information processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 297–311 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Brown, S. T. & Raman, I. M. Sensorimotor integration and amplification of reflexive whisking by well-timed spiking in the cerebellar corticonuclear circuit. Neuron 99, 564–575.e2 (2018). This study discovers conditions under which cerebellar output is coupled or decoupled from cerebellar cortical signalling, providing a precedent for considering how sensory and motor feedback are handled differently by the cerebellum.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Proville, R. D. et al. Cerebellum involvement in cortical sensorimotor circuits for the control of voluntary movements. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1233–1239 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Chen, S., Augustine, G. J. & Chadderton, P. Serial processing of kinematic signals by cerebellar circuitry during voluntary whisking. Nat. Commun. 8, 232 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Gaffield, M. A. & Christie, J. M. Movement rate is encoded and influenced by widespread, coherent activity of cerebellar molecular layer interneurons. J. Neurosci. 37, 4751–4765 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Gao, Z. et al. A cortico-cerebellar loop for motor planning. Nature 563, 113–116 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Chabrol, F. P., Blot, A. & Mrsic-Flogel, T. D. Cerebellar contribution to preparatory activity in motor neocortex. Neuron 103, 506–519.e4 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Jung, S. J. et al. Novel cerebello-amygdala connections provide missing link between cerebellum and limbic system. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 16, 879634 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Stoodley, C. J. & Tsai, P. T. Adaptive prediction for social contexts: the cerebellar contribution to typical and atypical social behaviors. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 44, 475–493 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Fallahnezhad, M. et al. Cerebellar control of a unitary head direction sense. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2214539120 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Chen, C. H. et al. A Purkinje cell to parabrachial nucleus pathway enables broad cerebellar influence over the forebrain. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 1929–1941 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Frontera, J. L. et al. Bidirectional control of fear memories by cerebellar neurons projecting to the ventrolateral periaqueductal grey. Nat. Commun. 11, 5207 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Schmahmann, J. D. Disorders of the cerebellum: ataxia, dysmetria of thought, and the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 16, 367–378 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Uusisaari, M., Obata, K. & Knöpfel, T. Morphological and electrophysiological properties of GABAergic and non-GABAergic cells in the deep cerebellar nuclei. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 901–911 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Heiney, S. A., Kim, J., Augustine, G. J. & Medina, J. F. Precise control of movement kinematics by optogenetic inhibition of Purkinje cell activity. J. Neurosci. 34, 2321–2330 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Garcia, K. S. & Mauk, M. D. Pharmacological analysis of cerebellar contributions to the timing and expression of conditioned eyelid responses. Neuropharmacology 37, 471–480 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Attwell, P. J. E., Ivarsson, M., Millar, L. & Yeo, C. H. Cerebellar mechanisms in eyeblink conditioning. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 978, 79–92 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Ebner, T. J. A role for the cerebellum in the control of limb movement velocity. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8, 762–769 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Fu, Q. G., Suarez, J. I. & Ebner, T. J. Neuronal specification of direction and distance during reaching movements in the superior precentral premotor area and primary motor cortex of monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 70, 2097–2116 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Hewitt, A. L., Popa, L. S., Pasalar, S., Hendrix, C. M. & Ebner, T. J. Representation of limb kinematics in Purkinje cell simple spike discharge is conserved across multiple tasks. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 2232–2247 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Herzfeld, D. J., Kojima, Y., Soetedjo, R. & Shadmehr, R. Encoding of action by the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. Nature 526, 439–442 (2015). This study invigorates the field of cerebellar cortical coding by identifying a population coding principle in which complex-spike tuning defines populations of Purkinje neurons that, despite heterogeneous individual tuning, as a group are exquisitely tuned to behaviour.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Herzfeld, D. J., Kojima, Y., Soetedjo, R. & Shadmehr, R. Encoding of error and learning to correct that error by the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 736–743 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Zobeiri, O. A. & Cullen, K. E. Cerebellar Purkinje cells in male macaques combine sensory and motor information to predict the sensory consequences of active self-motion. Nat. Commun. 15, 4003 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Raghavan, R. T. & Lisberger, S. G. Responses of Purkinje cells in the oculomotor vermis of monkeys during smooth pursuit eye movements and saccades: comparison with floccular complex. J. Neurophysiol. 118, 986–1001 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Calame, D. J., Becker, M. I. & Person, A. L. Cerebellar associative learning underlies skilled reach adaptation. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 1068–1079 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Thier, P., Dicke, P. W., Haas, R. & Barash, S. Encoding of movement time by populations of cerebellar Purkinje cells. Nature 405, 72–76 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Sedaghat-Nejad, E., Pi, J. S., Hage, P., Fakharian, M. A. & Shadmehr, R. Synchronous spiking of cerebellar Purkinje cells during control of movements. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2118954119 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Fakharian, M. A., Shoup, A. M., Hage, P., Elseweifi, H. Y. & Shadmehr, R. A vector calculus for neural computation in the cerebellum. Science 388, 869–875 (2025). This study discovers an organizational logic within cerebellar cortical population coding that implements output null and output potent signalling, suggesting that not all cerebellar activity exerts control.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Hage, P. et al. Control of tongue movements by the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. PLoS Biol. 23, e3003110 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Sawtell, N. B. Neural mechanisms for predicting the sensory consequences of behavior: insights from electrosensory systems. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 79, 381–399 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Wang, X., Novello, M., Gao, Z., Ruigrok, T. J. H. & De Zeeuw, C. I. Input and output organization of the mesodiencephalic junction for cerebro-cerebellar communication. J. Neurosci. Res. 100, 620–637 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Person, A. L. & Raman, I. M. Purkinje neuron synchrony elicits time-locked spiking in the cerebellar nuclei. Nature 481, 502–505 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Witter, L., Canto, C. B., Hoogland, T. M., de Gruijl, J. R. & De Zeeuw, C. I. Strength and timing of motor responses mediated by rebound firing in the cerebellar nuclei after Purkinje cell activation. Front. Neural Circuits 7, 133 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. De Zeeuw, C. I. Bidirectional learning in upbound and downbound microzones of the cerebellum. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 92–110 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Blot, F. G. C. et al. Purkinje cell microzones mediate distinct kinematics of a single movement. Nat. Commun. 14, 4358 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Ohmae, S., Ohmae, K., Heiney, S., Subramanian, D. & Medina, J. A recurrent circuit links antagonistic cerebellar modules during associative motor learning. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.16.468438 (2021).

  96. Khilkevich, A., Zambrano, J., Richards, M.-M. & Mauk, M. D. Cerebellar implementation of movement sequences through feedback. eLife 7, e37443 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Geminiani, A. et al. Mesoscale simulations predict the role of synergistic cerebellar plasticity during classical eyeblink conditioning. PLoS Comput. Biol. 20, e1011277 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. De Zeeuw, C. I., Koppen, J., Bregman, G. G., Runge, M. & Narain, D. Heterogeneous encoding of temporal stimuli in the cerebellar cortex. Nat. Commun. 14, 7581 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Raymond, J. L. & Medina, J. F. Computational principles of supervised learning in the cerebellum. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 41, 233–253 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Kozareva, V. et al. A transcriptomic atlas of mouse cerebellar cortex comprehensively defines cell types. Nature 598, 214–219 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Tang, T. et al. Heterogeneity of Purkinje cell simple spike–complex spike interactions: zebrin- and non-zebrin-related variations. J. Physiol. 595, 5341–5357 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Mauk, M. D., Steinmetz, J. E. & Thompson, R. F. Classical conditioning using stimulation of the inferior olive as the unconditioned stimulus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 5349–5353 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Steinmetz, J. E., Lavond, D. G., Thompson, R. F. Classical conditioning in rabbits using pontine nucleus stimulation as a conditioned stimulus and inferior olive stimulation as an unconditioned stimulus. Synapse 3, 225–233 (1989).

  104. Silva, N. T., Ramírez-Buriticá, J., Pritchett, D. L. & Carey, M. R. Climbing fibers provide essential instructive signals for associative learning. Nat. Neurosci. 27, 940–951 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Ito, M. Error detection and representation in the olivo-cerebellar system. Front. Neural Circuits 7, 1 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Yang, Y. & Lisberger, S. G. Purkinje-cell plasticity and cerebellar motor learning are graded by complex-spike duration. Nature 510, 529–532 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Medina, J. F. & Lisberger, S. G. Links from complex spikes to local plasticity and motor learning in the cerebellum of awake-behaving monkeys. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1185–1192 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Muller, S. Z. et al. Complex spikes perturb movements and reveal the sensorimotor map of Purkinje cells. Curr. Biol. 33, 4869–4879.e3 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Pi, J. S. et al. The olivary input to the cerebellum dissociates sensory events from movement plans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2318849121 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Popa, L. S., Streng, M. L., Hewitt, A. L. & Ebner, T. J. The errors of our ways: understanding error representations in cerebellar-dependent motor learning. Cerebellum 15, 93–103 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Hull, C. Prediction signals in the cerebellum: beyond supervised motor learning. eLife 9, e54073 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Kitazawa, S., Kimura, T. & Yin, P. B. Cerebellar complex spikes encode both destinations and errors in arm movements. Nature 392, 494–497 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Streng, M. L., Popa, L. S. & Ebner, T. J. Modulation of sensory prediction error in Purkinje cells during visual feedback manipulations. Nat. Commun. 9, 1099 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Popa, L. S., Streng, M. L. & Ebner, T. J. Purkinje cell representations of behavior: diary of a busy neuron. Neuroscientist 25, 241–257 (2019). This work presents a fantastic review of the complex field of Purkinje neuron tuning.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Bouvier, G. et al. Cerebellar learning using perturbations. eLife 7, e31599 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Heffley, W. et al. Coordinated cerebellar climbing fiber activity signals learned sensorimotor predictions. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1431–1441 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Bina, L., Romano, V., Hoogland, T. M., Bosman, L. W. J. & De Zeeuw, C. I. Purkinje cells translate subjective salience into readiness to act and choice performance. Cell Rep. 37, 110116 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Wagner, M. J. et al. A neural circuit state change underlying skilled movements. Cell 184, 3731–3747.e21 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Kostadinov, D., Beau, M., Pozo, M. B. & Häusser, M. Predictive and reactive reward signals conveyed by climbing fiber inputs to cerebellar Purkinje cells. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 950–962 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Imamizu, H. & Kawato, M. Neural correlates of predictive and postdictive switching mechanisms for internal models. J. Neurosci. 28, 10751–10765 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Streng, M. L. et al. Mesoscale Ca2+ imaging reveals networks of Purkinje cell dendritic and somatic modulation, with divergent roles of activity versus correlation during behavior. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.05.561090 (2023).

  122. Nguyen, V. & Stell, B. M. Rapid motor adaptation via population-level modulation of cerebellar error signals. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.03.574031 (2024).

  123. Ojakangas, C. L. & Ebner, T. J. Purkinje cell complex spike activity during voluntary motor learning: relationship to kinematics. J. Neurophysiol. 72, 2617–2630 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Mann-Metzer, P. & Yarom, Y. Electrotonic coupling interacts with intrinsic properties to generate synchronized activity in cerebellar networks of inhibitory interneurons. J. Neurosci. 19, 3298–3306 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Lefler, Y., Yarom, Y. & Uusisaari, M. Y. Cerebellar inhibitory input to the inferior olive decreases electrical coupling and blocks subthreshold oscillations. Neuron 81, 1389–1400 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Kim, O. A., Ohmae, S. & Medina, J. F. A cerebello-olivary signal for negative prediction error is sufficient to cause extinction of associative motor learning. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 1550–1554 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Hoang, H. et al. Electrical coupling controls dimensionality and chaotic firing of inferior olive neurons. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008075 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Hoang, H. et al. Dynamic organization of cerebellar climbing fiber response and synchrony in multiple functional components reduces dimensions for reinforcement learning. eLife 12, e86340 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Van Der Giessen, R. S. et al. Role of olivary electrical coupling in cerebellar motor learning. Neuron 58, 599–612 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Marr, D. A theory of cerebellar cortex. J. Physiol. 202, 437–470 (1969).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Ito, M. Cerebellar control of the vestibulo-ocular reflex—around the flocculus hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 275–296 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Nguyen-Vu, T. D. B. et al. Cerebellar Purkinje cell activity drives motor learning. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1734–1736 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Kimpo, R. R., Rinaldi, J. M., Kim, C. K., Payne, H. L. & Raymond, J. L. Gating of neural error signals during motor learning. eLife 3, e02076 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Rowan, M. J. M. et al. Graded control of climbing-fiber-mediated plasticity and learning by inhibition in the cerebellum. Neuron 99, 999–1015.e6 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. Jörntell, H. & Hansel, C. Synaptic memories upside down: bidirectional plasticity at cerebellar parallel fiber–Purkinje cell synapses. Neuron 52, 227–238 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Sejnowski, T. J. Storing covariance with nonlinearly interacting neurons. J. Math. Biol. 4, 303–321 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Suvrathan, A., Payne, H. L. & Raymond, J. L. Timing rules for synaptic plasticity matched to behavioral function. Neuron 92, 959–967 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Jayabal, S. et al. Experience alters the timing rules governing synaptic plasticity and learning. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.28.518128 (2024).

  139. Lang, E. J., Sugihara, I., Welsh, J. P. & Llinás, R. Patterns of spontaneous Purkinje cell complex spike activity in the awake rat. J. Neurosci. 19, 2728–2739 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Medina, J. F., Nores, W. L. & Mauk, M. D. Inhibition of climbing fibres is a signal for the extinction of conditioned eyelid responses. Nature 416, 330–333 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Mauk, M. D. & Donegan, N. H. A model of Pavlovian eyelid conditioning based on the synaptic organization of the cerebellum. Learn. Mem. 4, 130–158 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Zhang, K. et al. Molecular layer disinhibition unlocks climbing-fiber-instructed motor learning in the cerebellum. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.04.552059 (2023).

  143. Bonnan, A., Zhang, K., Gaffield, M. A. & Christie, J. M. Expression of a form of cerebellar motor memory requires learned alterations to the activity of inhibitory molecular layer interneurons. J. Neurosci. 43, 601–612 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. Gaffield, M. A., Rowan, M. J. M., Amat, S. B., Hirai, H. & Christie, J. M. Inhibition gates supralinear Ca2+ signaling in Purkinje cell dendrites during practiced movements. eLife 7, e36246 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Lackey, E. P. et al. Specialized connectivity of molecular layer interneuron subtypes leads to disinhibition and synchronous inhibition of cerebellar Purkinje cells. Neuron 112, 2333–2348.e6 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. Blot, A. & Barbour, B. Ultra-rapid axon–axon ephaptic inhibition of cerebellar Purkinje cells by the pinceau. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 289–295 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Mittmann, W., Koch, U. & Häusser, M. Feed-forward inhibition shapes the spike output of cerebellar Purkinje cells. J. Physiol. 563, 369–378 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Kennedy, A. et al. A temporal basis for predicting the sensory consequences of motor commands in an electric fish. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 416–422 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Narain, D., Remington, E. D., Zeeuw, C. I. D. & Jazayeri, M. A cerebellar mechanism for learning prior distributions of time intervals. Nat. Commun. 9, 469 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Wagner, M. J., Kim, T. H., Savall, J., Schnitzer, M. J. & Luo, L. Cerebellar granule cells encode the expectation of reward. Nature 544, 96–100 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Giovannucci, A. et al. Cerebellar granule cells acquire a widespread predictive feedback signal during motor learning. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 727–734 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  152. Knogler, L. D., Markov, D. A., Dragomir, E. I., Štih, V. & Portugues, R. Sensorimotor representations in cerebellar granule cells in larval zebrafish are dense, spatially organized, and non-temporally patterned. Curr. Biol. 27, 1288–1302 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Cayco-Gajic, N. A., Clopath, C. & Silver, R. A. Sparse synaptic connectivity is required for decorrelation and pattern separation in feedforward networks. Nat. Commun. 8, 1116 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. Litwin-Kumar, A., Harris, K. D., Axel, R., Sompolinsky, H. & Abbott, L. F. Optimal degrees of synaptic connectivity. Neuron 93, 1153–1164.e7 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. Lanore, F., Cayco-Gajic, N. A., Gurnani, H., Coyle, D. & Silver, R. A. Cerebellar granule cell axons support high-dimensional representations. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 1142–1150 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  156. Garcia-Garcia, M. G. et al. A cerebellar granule cell-climbing fiber computation to learn to track long time intervals. Neuron 112, 2749–2764.e7 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  157. Fleming, E. A., Field, G. D., Tadross, M. R. & Hull, C. Local synaptic inhibition mediates cerebellar granule cell pattern separation and enables learned sensorimotor associations. Nat. Neurosci. 27, 689–701 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  158. Thoroughman, K. A. & Shadmehr, R. Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407, 742–747 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. Huang, C.-C. et al. Convergence of pontine and proprioceptive streams onto multimodal cerebellar granule cells. eLife 2, e00400 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. Nguyen, T. M. et al. Structured cerebellar connectivity supports resilient pattern separation. Nature 613, 543–549 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Bengtsson, F. & Jörntell, H. Sensory transmission in cerebellar granule cells relies on similarly coded mossy fiber inputs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2389–2394 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. Jörntell, H. & Ekerot, C.-F. Properties of somatosensory synaptic integration in cerebellar granule cells in vivo. J. Neurosci. 26, 11786–11797 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. Rancz, E. A. et al. High-fidelity transmission of sensory information by single cerebellar mossy fibre boutons. Nature 450, 1245–1248 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  164. Billings, G., Piasini, E., Lőrincz, A., Nusser, Z. & Silver, R. A. Network structure within the cerebellar input layer enables lossless sparse encoding. Neuron 83, 960–974 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  165. Chabrol, F. P., Arenz, A., Wiechert, M. T., Margrie, T. W. & DiGregorio, D. A. Synaptic diversity enables temporal coding of coincident multisensory inputs in single neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 718–727 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  166. Fujita, M. Adaptive filter model of the cerebellum. Biol. Cybern. 45, 195–206 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Gilmer, J. I. et al. An emergent temporal basis set robustly supports cerebellar time-series learning. J. Neurophysiol. 129, 159–176 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Buonomano, D. V. & Maass, W. State-dependent computations: spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 113–125 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Barri, A., Wiechert, M. T., Jazayeri, M. & DiGregorio, D. A. Synaptic basis of a sub-second representation of time in a neural circuit model. Nat. Commun. 13, 7902 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  170. Straub, I. et al. Gradients in the mammalian cerebellar cortex enable fourier-like transformation and improve storing capacity. eLife 9, e51771 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  171. Huson, V. & Regehr, W. G. Realistic mossy fiber input patterns to unipolar brush cells evoke a continuum of temporal responses comprised of components mediated by different glutamate receptors. eLife 13, RP102618 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  172. Herzfeld, D. J. et al. Contributions of the cerebellum and the motor cortex to acquisition and retention of motor memories. NeuroImage 98, 147–158 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Xu-Wilson, M., Chen-Harris, H., Zee, D. S. & Shadmehr, R. Cerebellar contributions to adaptive control of saccades in humans. J. Neurosci. 29, 12930–12939 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  174. Miall, R. C., Weir, D. J., Wolpert, D. M. & Stein, J. F. Is the cerebellum a Smith predictor? J. Mot. Behav. 25, 203–216 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Miall, R. C., Christensen, L. O. D., Cain, O. & Stanley, J. Disruption of state estimation in the human lateral cerebellum. PLoS Biol. 5, e316 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  176. Pisella, L. et al. An ‘automatic pilot’ for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 729–736 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Desmurget, M. et al. Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 563–567 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Vilis, T., Hore, J., Meyer-Lohmann, J. & Brooks, V. B. Dual nature of the precentral responses to limb perturbations revealed by cerebellar cooling. Brain Res. 117, 336–340 (1976).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Bollu, T. et al. Cortex-dependent corrections as the tongue reaches for and misses targets. Nature 594, 82–87 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  180. Bollu, T. et al. Motor cortical inactivation impairs corrective submovements in mice performing a hold-still center-out reach task. J. Neurophysiol. 132, 829–848 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. Pruszynski, J. A. et al. Primary motor cortex underlies multi-joint integration for fast feedback control. Nature 478, 387–390 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  182. Desmurget, M. & Grafton, S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 423–431 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Schneider, D. M., Sundararajan, J. & Mooney, R. A cortical filter that learns to suppress the acoustic consequences of movement. Nature 561, 391–395 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  184. Holey, B. E. & Schneider, D. M. Sensation and expectation are embedded in mouse motor cortical activity. Cell Rep. 43, 114396 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  185. Mathis, M. W., Mathis, A. & Uchida, N. Somatosensory cortex plays an essential role in forelimb motor adaptation in mice. Neuron 93, 1493–1503.e6 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  186. Zimmet, A. M., Cao, D., Bastian, A. J. & Cowan, N. J. Cerebellar patients have intact feedback control that can be leveraged to improve reaching. eLife 9, e53246 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  187. Wagner, M. J. et al. Shared cortex–cerebellum dynamics in the execution and learning of a motor task. Cell 177, 669–682.e24 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  188. Diedrichsen, J., Hashambhoy, Y., Rane, T. & Shadmehr, R. Neural correlates of reach errors. J. Neurosci. 25, 9919–9931 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  189. Todorov, E. & Jordan, M. I. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 1226–1235 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  190. Sakaguchi, Y., Tanaka, M. & Inoue, Y. Adaptive intermittent control: a computational model explaining motor intermittency observed in human behavior. Neural Netw. 67, 92–109 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  191. Soetedjo, R. & Horwitz, G. D. Closed-loop optogenetic perturbation of macaque oculomotor cerebellum: evidence for an internal saccade model. J. Neurosci. 44, e1317232023 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  192. Low, A. Y. T. et al. Reverse-translational identification of a cerebellar satiation network. Nature 600, 269–273 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  193. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Mars exploration rovers: Spirit and Opportunity. NASA Science https://science.nasa.gov/mission/mars-exploration-rovers-spirit-and-opportunity/ (2024).

  194. Azim, E. & Alstermark, B. Skilled forelimb movements and internal copy motor circuits. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 33, 16–24 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank members of the Person laboratory and our three reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive suggestions. We also thank A. Haith for insightful conversations about motor policy learning. The authors acknowledge support to K.P.N. (NS134561) and A.L.P. (NS114430 and NS131839).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abigail L. Person.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Neuroscience thanks Michael Mauk and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Glossary

Adaptive filter

A neural circuit computation that adapts its outputs to changing inputs, achieving flexible goals.

Associative learning

A learning process that links together two stimuli. This term is often used in context of Pavlovian processes in which one stimulus predicts the occurrence of a second.

Cerebellar ataxia

A suite of motor discoordination profiles characteristic of cerebellar dysfunction.

Cerebellum proper

The cerebellum as distinct from cerebellar-like structures such as the dorsal cochlear nucleus or electrosensory lobule of the electric fish. The cerebellum proper is unique in that it possess climbing fibre inputs.

Classical conditioning

A Pavlovian learning paradigm in which a neutral ‘conditioning’ stimulus (CS) is repeatedly paired with a reflex-inducing ‘unconditioned’ stimulus (US). Animals learn to associate the CS with the US through the process of associative learning.

Complex spike

A burst of action potentials generated by Purkinje cells (PCs) in response to climbing fibre inputs. We use the term here to include dendritic Ca2+ events driven by climbing fibre inputs to PCs, even though these signals are mechanistically distinct from the spikelets emitted by the soma.

Control theory

A field of engineering that formalizes processes for generating a control variable to behave in a desired way by using inputs in various ways. These inputs can be feedback or copies of output commands, relevant examples for biological versions of controllers.

Efference copy

A copy of a motor command being sent to the periphery.

Eligibility trace

A hypothesized molecular mechanism that renders a synapse eligible for synaptic plasticity. Eligibility traces are thought to be labile in time and can be specific to individual synapses.

Internal models

Hypothesized frameworks in which the brain generates world-based and body-based models used for functions as diverse as motor control and social cognition.

Long-term depression

Use-dependent weakening of synaptic strength.

Long-term potentiation

Use-dependent strengthening of synaptic strength.

Lookup table

An engineering term depicting a discrete mapping of an input onto an output, as in a table indexed by rows and columns.

Microzone

A small cerebellar module defined by interconnected olivary climbing fibre projections to a subset of Purkinje cells (PCs), their convergent targets in the cerebellar nuclei and their projections back to the same olivary region.

Population coding

The principle that neurons encode information as ensembles with temporally evolving dynamics rather than individually.

Saccades

Brief, nearly ballistic eye movements from one target to another.

Simple spikes

An action potential type in Purkinje cells (PCs). Simple spikes are the typical type of sodium spike that propagates down the axon. They are in contrast to complex spikes, which have distinct characteristics.

Supervised learning

A machine learning perspective in which networks are trained through labelled instructive signals.

Temporal difference learning

A reinforcement learning algorithm that estimates future outcomes based on the difference between predicted and actual outcomes using intermediate cues. In the case of cerebellar learning, this refers to a condition stimulus becoming instructive through learned representation in the climbing fibre pathway.

Trace eyelid conditioning

A variation on a classical conditioning paradigm in which the end of the conditioned stimulus (CS) is separated in time from the unconditioned stimulus (US). By contrast, in delay eyelid conditioning (DEC) the CS and US co-occur.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, K.P., Person, A.L. Cerebellar circuit computations for predictive motor control. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 26, 538–553 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-025-00936-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-025-00936-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing