Abstract
The increasing prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) represents an important global public health crisis, often referred to as the ‘opioid epidemic’. Opioids are known for their potent pain-relieving effects, but also have serious side effects, including OUD and respiratory depression, which can lead to fatal overdoses. To address this growing concern, we require a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying OUD, which typically begins with either medical or recreational opioid use and evolves into a complex and chronic brain disorder. In this Review, we highlight recent advances in our understanding of opioid receptors and the neural circuits in which they operate (including the broad network of circuits involved in reward and relief processing), focusing on the changes that follow long-term opioid exposure, abstinence and withdrawal. Additionally, we discuss recent findings that highlight the importance of the local cellular environment in shaping responses to these drugs. Overall, we aim to provide an updated overview of the field that may give us new insights into the multifaceted landscape of OUD.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout




Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandyopadhyay, S. An 8,000-year history of use and abuse of opium and opioids: how that matters for a successful control of the epidemic? (P4.9-055). Neurology 92, 4–9–055 (2019).
Jesus, A. A morphometric approach to track opium poppy domestication. Sci. Rep. 11, 9778 (2021).
Machado, R. S. R. et al. The origins and spread of the opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.) revealed by genomics and seed morphometrics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 380, 20240198 (2025).
Kalita, R. C., Sharma, S., Samanta, S. & Patle, D. Narcotics through time: exploring historical origins, synthetic advances, and clinical progress. Future Med. Chem. 17, 1587–1599 (2025).
Patocka, J. et al. Fentanyl and its derivatives: pain-killers or man-killers? Heliyon 10, e28795 (2024).
Chou, R. The effectiveness and risks of long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review for a National Institutes of Health pathways to prevention workshop. Ann. Intern. Med. 162, 276–286 (2015).
Sullivan, M. D. Trends in use of opioids for non-cancer pain conditions 2000–2005 in commercial and Medicaid insurance plans: the TROUP study. Pain 138, 440 (2008).
C.D.C. Opioid dispensing rate maps. Overdose Prevention https://www.cdc.gov/overdose-prevention/data-research/facts-stats/opioid-dispensing-rate-maps.html (2024).
European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. European Drug Report 2023: Trends and Developments https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/european-drug-report/2023_en (2023).
Strang, J. Opioid use disorder. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 6, 3 (2020).
Koob, G. F. & Volkow, N. D. Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 3, 760–773 (2016).
Jones, C. M., Han, B., Baldwin, G. T., Einstein, E. B. & Compton, W. M. Use of medication for opioid use disorder among adults with past-year opioid use disorder in the US, 2021. JAMA Netw. Open 6, 2327488 (2023).
Vowles, K. E. Rates of opioid misuse, abuse, and addiction in chronic pain: a systematic review and data synthesis. Pain 156, 569–576 (2015).
Adhikary, S. & Williams, J. T. Cellular tolerance induced by chronic opioids in the central nervous system. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 16, 937126 (2022).
Christie, M. J. Cellular neuroadaptations to chronic opioids: tolerance, withdrawal and addiction. Br. J. Pharmacol. 154, 384–396 (2008).
Sakloth, F., Polizu, C., Bertherat, F. & Zachariou, V. Regulators of G protein signaling in analgesia and addiction. Mol. Pharmacol. 98, 739–750 (2020).
Gomes, I. et al. Biased signaling by endogenous opioid peptides. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 11820–11828 (2020).
Matthes, H. W. et al. Loss of morphine-induced analgesia, reward effect and withdrawal symptoms in mice lacking the mu-opioid-receptor gene. Nature 383, 819–823 (1996).
Shenoy, S. S. & Lui, F. StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing, 2025).
Stein, C. Opioid receptors. Annu. Rev. Med. 67, 433–451 (2016).
Winters, B. L. et al. Endogenous opioids regulate moment-to-moment neuronal communication and excitability. Nat. Commun. 8, 14611 (2017).
Sjostedt, E. et al. An atlas of the protein-coding genes in the human, pig, and mouse brain. Science 367, eaay5947 (2020).
Uhlen, M. et al. A human protein atlas for normal and cancer tissues based on antibody proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteom. 4, 1920–1932 (2005).
Francois, A. & Scherrer, G. Delta opioid receptor expression and function in primary afferent somatosensory neurons. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 247, 87–114 (2018).
Kalyuzhny, A. E., Arvidsson, U., Wu, W. & Wessendorf, M. W. mu-Opioid and delta-opioid receptors are expressed in brainstem antinociceptive circuits: studies using immunocytochemistry and retrograde tract-tracing. J. Neurosci. 16, 6490–6503 (1996).
Ochandarena, N. E., Niehaus, J. K., Tassou, A. & Scherrer, G. Cell-type specific molecular architecture for mu opioid receptor function in pain and addiction circuits. Neuropharmacology 238, 109597 (2023).
Erbs, E. et al. A mu-delta opioid receptor brain atlas reveals neuronal co-occurrence in subcortical networks. Brain Struct. Funct. 220, 677–702 (2015).
Darcq, E. & Kieffer, B. L. Opioid receptors: drivers to addiction? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 499–514 (2018).
Klenowski, P., Morgan, M. & Bartlett, S. E. The role of delta-opioid receptors in learning and memory underlying the development of addiction. Br. J. Pharmacol. 172, 297–310 (2015).
Lalanne, L., Ayranci, G., Kieffer, B. L. & Lutz, P. E. The kappa opioid receptor: from addiction to depression, and back. Front. Psychiatry 5, 170 (2014).
Gales, C. et al. Probing the activation-promoted structural rearrangements in preassembled receptor-G protein complexes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 778–786 (2006).
Al-Hasani, R. & Bruchas, M. R. Molecular mechanisms of opioid receptor-dependent signaling and behavior. Anesthesiology 115, 1363–1381 (2011).
Belcheva, M. M., Szucs, M., Wang, D., Sadee, W. & Coscia, C. J. mu-Opioid receptor-mediated ERK activation involves calmodulin-dependent epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 33847–33853 (2001).
Halls, M. L. et al. Plasma membrane localization of the mu-opioid receptor controls spatiotemporal signaling. Sci. Signal. 9, ra16 (2016).
Matsui, A. & Williams, J. T. Activation of micro-opioid receptors and block of Kir3 potassium channels and NMDA receptor conductance by L- and D-methadone in rat locus coeruleus. Br. J. Pharmacol. 161, 1403–1413 (2010).
Torrecilla, M. et al. G-protein-gated potassium channels containing Kir3.2 and Kir3.3 subunits mediate the acute inhibitory effects of opioids on locus ceruleus neurons. J. Neurosci. 22, 4328–4334 (2002).
Olive, M. F., Anton, B., Micevych, P., Evans, C. J. & Maidment, N. T. Presynaptic versus postsynaptic localization of mu and delta opioid receptors in dorsal and ventral striatopallidal pathways. J. Neurosci. 17, 7471–7479 (1997).
Coutens, B. & Ingram, S. L. Key differences in regulation of opioid receptors localized to presynaptic terminals compared to somas: relevance for novel therapeutics. Neuropharmacology 226, 109408 (2023).
Alvarez, V. A. et al. mu-Opioid receptors: ligand-dependent activation of potassium conductance, desensitization, and internalization. J. Neurosci. 22, 5769–5776 (2002).
Williams, J. T. et al. Regulation of mu-opioid receptors: desensitization, phosphorylation, internalization, and tolerance. Pharmacol. Rev. 65, 223–254 (2013).
Jullie, D., Benitez, C., Knight, T. A., Simic, M. S. & von Zastrow, M. Endocytic trafficking determines cellular tolerance of presynaptic opioid signaling. eLife 11, e81298 (2022).
Kunselman, J. M., Zajac, A. S., Weinberg, Z. Y. & Puthenveedu, M. A. Homologous regulation of mu opioid receptor recycling by G (betagamma), protein kinase C, and receptor phosphorylation. Mol. Pharmacol. 96, 702–710 (2019).
Nagi, K. & Pineyro, G. Regulation of opioid receptor signalling: implications for the development of analgesic tolerance. Mol. Brain 4, 25 (2011).
Tanowitz, M. & von Zastrow, M. A novel endocytic recycling signal that distinguishes the membrane trafficking of naturally occurring opioid receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 45978–45986 (2003).
Stoeber, M. et al. A genetically encoded biosensor reveals location bias of opioid drug action. Neuron 98, 963–976.e5 (2018).
Lamberts, J. T. & Traynor, J. R. Opioid receptor interacting proteins and the control of opioid signaling. Curr. Pharm. Des. 19, 7333–7347 (2013).
Senese, N. B., Kandasamy, R., Kochan, K. E. & Traynor, J. R. Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) protein modulation of opioid receptor signaling as a potential target for pain management. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 13, 5 (2020).
Hollinger, S. & Hepler, J. R. Cellular regulation of RGS proteins: modulators and integrators of G protein signaling. Pharmacol. Rev. 54, 527–559 (2002).
Mitsi, V. et al. RGS9-2-controlled adaptations in the striatum determine the onset of action and efficacy of antidepressants in neuropathic pain states. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E5088–E5097 (2015).
Stratinaki, M. et al. Regulator of G protein signaling 4 [corrected] is a crucial modulator of antidepressant drug action in depression and neuropathic pain models. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8254–8259 (2013).
Gaspari, S. et al. Suppression of RGSz1 function optimizes the actions of opioid analgesics by mechanisms that involve the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E2085–E2094 (2018).
Sutton, L. P. et al. Regulator of G-protein signaling 7 regulates reward behavior by controlling opioid signaling in the striatum. Biol. Psychiatry 80, 235–245 (2016).
Blumer, J. B., Smrcka, A. V. & Lanier, S. M. Mechanistic pathways and biological roles for receptor-independent activators of G-protein signaling. Pharmacol. Ther. 113, 488–506 (2007).
Fan, P., Jiang, Z., Diamond, I. & Yao, L. Up-regulation of AGS3 during morphine withdrawal promotes cAMP superactivation via adenylyl cyclase 5 and 7 in rat nucleus accumbens/striatal neurons. Mol. Pharmacol. 76, 526–533 (2009).
Yao, L. et al. Activator of G protein signaling 3 regulates opiate activation of protein kinase A signaling and relapse of heroin-seeking behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 8746–8751 (2005).
Iversen, L. L. How does morphine work? Nature 383, 759–760 (1996).
Huang, W. et al. Structural insights into micro-opioid receptor activation. Nature 524, 315–321 (2015).
Manglik, A. et al. Structure-based discovery of opioid analgesics with reduced side effects. Nature 537, 185–190 (2016).
Kreek, M. J., Reed, B. & Butelman, E. R. Current status of opioid addiction treatment and related preclinical research. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax9140 (2019).
Novick, D. M., Salsitz, E. A., Joseph, H. & Kreek, M. J. Methadone medical maintenance: an early 21st-century perspective. J. Addict. Dis. 34, 226–237 (2015).
Schmid, C. L. et al. Bias factor and therapeutic window correlate to predict safer opioid analgesics. Cell 171, 1165–1175.e13 (2017).
Bohn, L. M., Gainetdinov, R. R., Lin, F. T., Lefkowitz, R. J. & Caron, M. G. Mu-opioid receptor desensitization by beta-arrestin-2 determines morphine tolerance but not dependence. Nature 408, 720–723 (2000).
Bohn, L. M. et al. Enhanced morphine analgesia in mice lacking beta-arrestin 2. Science 286, 2495–2498 (1999).
Chen, X. T. et al. Structure–activity relationships and discovery of a G protein biased mu opioid receptor ligand, [(3-methoxythiophen-2-yl)methyl](2-[(9R)-9-(pyridin-2-yl)-6-oxaspiro-[4.5]decan-9-yl]ethyl)amine (TRV130), for the treatment of acute severe pain. J. Med. Chem. 56, 8019–8031 (2013).
Bossert, J. M. et al. In a rat model of opioid maintenance, the G protein-biased Mu opioid receptor agonist TRV130 decreases relapse to oxycodone seeking and taking and prevents oxycodone-induced brain hypoxia. Biol. Psychiatry 88, 935–944 (2020).
Brzezinski, M. et al. Low incidence of opioid-induced respiratory depression observed with oliceridine regardless of age or body mass index: exploratory analysis from a phase 3 open-label trial in postsurgical pain. Pain Ther. 10, 457–473 (2021).
Breault, E., Brouillette, R. L., Hebert, T. E., Sarret, P. & Besserer-Offroy, E. Opioid analgesics: rise and fall of ligand biased signaling and future perspectives in the quest for the holy grail. CNS Drugs 39, 565–581 (2025).
Kandasamy, R. et al. Positive allosteric modulation of the mu-opioid receptor produces analgesia with reduced side effects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2000017118 (2021).
O’Brien, E. S. et al. A micro-opioid receptor modulator that works cooperatively with naloxone. Nature 631, 686–693 (2024).
Basbaum, A. I., Bautista, D. M., Scherrer, G. & Julius, D. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pain. Cell 139, 267–284 (2009).
Fink, E. A. et al. Structure-based discovery of nonopioid analgesics acting through the alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor. Science 377, eabn7065 (2022).
Gahbauer, S. et al. Docking for EP4R antagonists active against inflammatory pain. Nat. Commun. 14, 8067 (2023).
Singh, I. et al. Structure-based discovery of conformationally selective inhibitors of the serotonin transporter. Cell 186, 2160–2175.e17 (2023).
Yu, X. et al. Dorsal root ganglion macrophages contribute to both the initiation and persistence of neuropathic pain. Nat. Commun. 11, 264 (2020).
Koob, G. F. & Volkow, N. D. Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 217–238 (2010).
Mathis, V. & Kenny, P. J. From controlled to compulsive drug-taking: the role of the habenula in addiction. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 106, 102–111 (2018).
Volkow, N. D., Koob, G. F. & McLellan, A. T. Neurobiologic advances from the brain disease model of addiction. N. Engl. J. Med. 374, 363–371 (2016).
Swendsen, J. Mental disorders as risk factors for substance use, abuse and dependence: results from the 10-year follow-up of the National Comorbidity Survey. Addiction 105, 1117–1128 (2010).
Swendsen, J. D. & Merikangas, K. R. The comorbidity of depression and substance use disorders. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 20, 173–189 (2000).
Cochran, B. N. Factors predicting development of opioid use disorders among individuals who receive an initial opioid prescription: mathematical modeling using a database of commercially-insured individuals. Drug Alcohol Depend. 138, 202–208 (2014).
Edlund, M. J. Risks for opioid abuse and dependence among recipients of chronic opioid therapy: results from the TROUP study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 112, 90–98 (2010).
Morgan, M. M. & Christie, M. J. Analysis of opioid efficacy, tolerance, addiction and dependence from cell culture to human. Br. J. Pharmacol. 164, 1322–1334 (2011).
Chu, L. F., Angst, M. S. & Clark, D. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in humans: molecular mechanisms and clinical considerations. Clin. J. Pain 24, 479–496 (2008).
Roeckel, L. A., Le Coz, G. M., Gavériaux-Ruff, C. & Simonin, F. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: cellular and molecular mechanisms. Neuroscience 338, 160–182 (2016).
Higgins, C., Smith, B. H. & Matthews, K. Evidence of opioid-induced hyperalgesia in clinical populations after chronic opioid exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Anaesth. 122, 114–126 (2019).
Lee, M., Silverman, S., Hansen, H., Patel, V. & Manchikanti, L. A comprehensive review of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Pain Physician 4, 145–161 (2011).
Nutt, D. J., Lingford-Hughes, A., Erritzoe, D. & Stokes, P. R. A. The dopamine theory of addiction: 40 years of highs and lows. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 305–312 (2015).
Volkow, N. D. & Morales, M. The brain on drugs: from reward to addiction. Cell 162, 712–725 (2015).
Koob, G. F. Drug addiction: hyperkatifeia/negative reinforcement as a framework for medications development. Pharmacol. Rev. 73, 163–201 (2021).
Shurman, J., Koob, G. F. & Gutstein, H. B. O. Pain, the brain, and hyperkatifeia: a framework for the rational use of opioids for pain. Pain Med. 11, 1092–1098 (2010).
Ozdemir, D., Allain, F., Kieffer, B. L. & Darcq, E. Advances in the characterization of negative affect caused by acute and protracted opioid withdrawal using animal models. Neuropharmacology 232, 109524 (2023).
Pergolizzi, J. V. Jr, Raffa, R. B. & Rosenblatt, M. H. Opioid withdrawal symptoms, a consequence of chronic opioid use and opioid use disorder: current understanding and approaches to management. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 45, 892–903 (2020).
Frank, J. W. Patients’ perspectives on tapering of chronic opioid therapy: a qualitative study. Pain Med. 17, 1838–1847 (2016).
Oliva, E. M., Maisel, N. C., Gordon, A. J. & Harris, A. H. S. Barriers to use of pharmacotherapy for addiction disorders and how to overcome them. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 13, 374–381 (2011).
Weiss, R. D. Reasons for opioid use among patients with dependence on prescription opioids: the role of chronic pain. J. Subst. Abus. Treat. 47, 140–145 (2014).
Kakko, J. Craving in opioid use disorder: from neurobiology to clinical practice. Front. Psychiatry 10, 592 (2019).
Nicolas, C. Sex differences in opioid and psychostimulant craving and relapse: a critical review. Pharmacol. Rev. 74, 119–140 (2022).
Sayette, M. A. et al. The measurement of drug craving. Addiction 95 (Suppl. 2), S189–S210 (2000).
Drummond, D. C. Theories of drug craving, ancient and modern. Addiction 96, 33–46 (2001).
Pickens, C. L. Neurobiology of the incubation of drug craving. Trends Neurosci. 34, 411–420 (2011).
Tiffany, S. T. & Wray, J. M. The clinical significance of drug craving. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1248, 1–17 (2012).
Murphy, S. M. The cost of opioid use disorder and the value of aversion. Drug Alcohol Depend. 217, 108382 (2020).
Venniro, M., Banks, M. L., Heilig, M., Epstein, D. H. & Shaham, Y. Improving translation of animal models of addiction and relapse by reverse translation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 625–643 (2020).
Berridge, K. C. & Robinson, T. E. What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 28, 309–369 (1998).
Cameron, J. D., Chaput, J. P., Sjödin, A. M. & Goldfield, G. S. Brain on fire: incentive salience, hedonic hot spots, dopamine, obesity, and other hunger games. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 37, 183–205 (2017).
Robinson, T. E. & Berridge, K. C. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 18, 247–291 (1993).
Koob, G. F. & Le Moal, M. Addiction and the brain antireward system. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 29–53 (2008).
Wise, R. A. Dopamine, learning and motivation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 483–494 (2004).
Koob, G. F. A role for brain stress systems in addiction. Neuron 59, 11–34 (2008).
Wise, R. A. & Koob, G. F. The development and maintenance of drug addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 39, 254–262 (2014).
Kieffer, B. L. & Gavériaux-Ruff, C. Exploring the opioid system by gene knockout. Prog. Neurobiol. 66, 285–306 (2002).
Simonin, F. Disruption of the κ-opioid receptor gene in mice enhances sensitivity to chemical visceral pain, impairs pharmacological actions of the selective κ-agonist U-50,488H and attenuates morphine withdrawal. EMBO J. 17, 886–897 (1998).
Zhu, Y. Retention of supraspinal delta-like analgesia and loss of morphine tolerance in δ opioid receptor knockout mice. Neuron 24, 243–252 (1999).
Mercer Lindsay, N., Chen, C., Gilam, G., Mackey, S. & Scherrer, G. Brain circuits for pain and its treatment. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, 7360 (2021).
Legrain, V., Iannetti, G. D., Plaghki, L. & Mouraux, A. The pain matrix reloaded: a salience detection system for the body. Prog. Neurobiol. 93, 111–124 (2011).
Tracey, I. & Mantyh, P. W. The cerebral signature for pain perception and its modulation. Neuron 55, 377–391 (2007).
Apkarian, A. V., Bushnell, M. C., Treede, R. D. & Zubieta, J. K. Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease. Eur. J. Pain 9, 463–463 (2005).
Kucyi, A. & Davis, K. D. The dynamic pain connectome. Trends Neurosci. 38, 86–95 (2015).
Waung, M. W. A diencephalic circuit in rats for opioid analgesia but not positive reinforcement. Nat. Commun. 13, 764 (2022).
Koob, G. F. Hedonic homeostatic dysregulation as a driver of drug-seeking behavior. Drug Discov. Today Dis. Model. 5, 207–215 (2008).
Lecca, S., Meye, F. J. & Mameli, M. The lateral habenula in addiction and depression: an anatomical, synaptic and behavioral overview. Eur. J. Neurosci. 39, 1170–1178 (2014).
Valentinova, K. Morphine withdrawal recruits lateral habenula cytokine signaling to reduce synaptic excitation and sociability. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1053–1056 (2019).
Fatt, M. P. Morphine-responsive neurons that regulate mechanical antinociception. Science 385, 6593 (2024).
Haber, S. N. & Knutson, B. The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 4–26 (2010).
Schultz, W. Multiple reward signals in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 199–207 (2000).
Roesch, M. R. & Olson, C. R. Neuronal activity related to reward value and motivation in primate frontal cortex. Science 304, 307–310 (2004).
Cromwell, H. C. & Schultz, W. Effects of expectations for different reward magnitudes on neuronal activity in primate striatum. J. Neurophysiol. 89, 2823–2838 (2003).
Adcock, R. A., Thangavel, A., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Knutson, B. & Gabrieli, J. D. Reward-motivated learning: mesolimbic activation precedes memory formation. Neuron 50, 507–517 (2006).
Schultz, W. Getting formal with dopamine and reward. Neuron 36, 241–263 (2002).
Schultz, W., Tremblay, L. & Hollerman, J. R. Reward processing in primate orbitofrontal cortex and basal ganglia. Cereb. Cortex 10, 272–284 (2000).
Kravitz, A. V., Tye, L. D. & Kreitzer, A. C. Distinct roles for direct and indirect pathway striatal neurons in reinforcement. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 816–818 (2012).
Yager, L. M., Garcia, A. F., Wunsch, A. M. & Ferguson, S. M. The ins and outs of the striatum: role in drug addiction. Neuroscience 301, 529–541 (2015).
Lutz, P. E. & Kieffer, B. L. Opioid receptors: distinct roles in mood disorders. Trends Neurosci. 36, 195–206 (2013).
Maldonado, R., Baños, J. E. & Cabañero, D. Usefulness of knockout mice to clarify the role of the opioid system in chronic pain. Br. J. Pharmacol. 175, 2791 (2018).
Mechling, A. E. et al. Deletion of the mu opioid receptor gene in mice reshapes the reward–aversion connectome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11603–11608 (2016).
Valentino, R. J. & Volkow, N. D. Untangling the complexity of opioid receptor function. Neuropsychopharmacol 43, 2514–2520 (2018).
Filliol, D. et al. Mice deficient for delta- and mu-opioid receptors exhibit opposing alterations of emotional responses. Nat. Genet. 25, 195–200 (2000).
Le Merrer, J., Becker, J. A. J., Befort, K. & Kieffer, B. L. Reward processing by the opioid system in the brain. Physiol. Rev. 89, 1379–1412 (2009).
Glass, M. J., Billington, C. J. & Levine, A. S. Opioids and food intake: distributed functional neural pathways? Neuropeptides 33, 360–368 (1999).
Nogueiras, R. et al. The opioid system and food intake: homeostatic and hedonic mechanisms. Obes. Facts 5, 196–207 (2012).
Marks-Kaufman, R. Increased fat consumption induced by morphine administration in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 16, 949–955 (1982).
Marks-Kaufman, R. & Kanarek, R. B. Modifications of nutrient selection induced by naloxone in rats. Psychopharmacology 74, 321–324 (1981).
Sayar-Atasoy, N. et al. Opioidergic signaling contributes to food-mediated suppression of AgRP neurons. Cell Rep. 43, 113630 (2024). This study showed that opioidergic signalling mediates food-induced suppression of AgRP neurons, linking endogenous opioids to hypothalamic feeding.
Dong, C. et al. Unlocking opioid neuropeptide dynamics with genetically encoded biosensors. Nat. Neurosci. 27, 1844–1857 (2024).
Castro, D. C. et al. An endogenous opioid circuit determines state-dependent reward consumption. Nature 598, 646–651 (2021). This study linked opioid signalling to adaptive motivated behaviour using state-of-the-art methods.
Welsch, L. Mu opioid receptors-expressing neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus are involved in reward processing and affective behaviors. Biol. Psychiatry 94, 842–851 (2023).
Brewer, K. M., Brewer, K. K., Richardson, N. C. & Berbari, N. F. Neuronal cilia in energy homeostasis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 1082141 (2022).
Wang, Y. et al. Melanocortin 4 receptor signals at the neuronal primary cilium to control food intake and body weight. J. Clin. Invest. 131, e142064 (2021).
Fagan, R. R. et al. Selective targeting of mu opioid receptors to primary cilia. Cell Rep. 43, 114164 (2024). This study revealed a subcellular compartmentalization of the μ-opioid receptor at the level of primary cilia.
Chiara, G. Nucleus accumbens shell and core dopamine: differential role in behavior and addiction. Behav. Brain Res. 137, 75–114 (2002).
Johnson, D. W. & Glick, S. D. Dopamine release and metabolism in nucleus accumbens and striatum of morphine-tolerant and nontolerant rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 46, 341–347 (1993).
Pontieri, F. E., Tanda, G. & Chiara, G. Intravenous cocaine, morphine, and amphetamine preferentially increase extracellular dopamine in the ‘shell’ as compared with the ‘core’ of the rat nucleus accumbens. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 12304–12308 (1995).
Spielewoy, C. Increased rewarding properties of morphine in dopamine-transporter knockout mice. Eur. J. Neurosci. 12, 1827 (2000).
Johnson, S. & North, R. Opioids excite dopamine neurons by hyperpolarization of local interneurons. J. Neurosci. 12, 483–488 (1992).
Matsui, A. & Williams, J. T. Opioid-sensitive GABA inputs from rostromedial tegmental nucleus synapse onto midbrain dopamine neurons. J. Neurosci. 31, 17729–17735 (2011).
Fenu, S., Spina, L., Rivas, E., Longoni, R. & Chiara, G. Morphine-conditioned single-trial place preference: role of nucleus accumbens shell dopamine receptors in acquisition, but not expression. Psychopharmacology 187, 143–153 (2006).
Graziane, N. M. Opposing mechanisms mediate morphine- and cocaine-induced generation of silent synapses. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 915–925 (2016).
Hearing, M., Graziane, N., Dong, Y. & Thomas, M. J. Opioid and psychostimulant plasticity: targeting overlap in nucleus accumbens glutamate signaling. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 39, 276–294 (2018).
Madayag, A. C. Cell-type and region-specific nucleus accumbens AMPAR plasticity associated with morphine reward, reinstatement, and spontaneous withdrawal. Brain Struct. Funct. 224, 2311 (2019).
Torregrossa, M. M. & Kalivas, P. W. Microdialysis and the neurochemistry of addiction. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 90, 261 (2007).
Hnasko, T. S., Sotak, B. N. & Palmiter, R. D. Morphine reward in dopamine-deficient mice. Nature 438, 854–857 (2005).
Pettit, H. O., Ettenberg, A., Bloom, F. E. & Koob, G. F. Destruction of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens selectively attenuates cocaine but not heroin self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 84, 167–173 (1984).
Kalivas, P. W. The glutamate homeostasis hypothesis of addiction. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 561–572 (2009).
Madayag, A. et al. Repeated N-acetylcysteine administration alters plasticity-dependent effects of cocaine. J. Neurosci. 27, 13968–13976 (2007).
Moran, M. M., McFarland, K., Melendez, R. I., Kalivas, P. W. & Seamans, J. K. Cystine/glutamate exchange regulates metabotropic glutamate receptor presynaptic inhibition of excitatory transmission and vulnerability to cocaine seeking. J. Neurosci. 25, 6389–6393 (2005).
Koob, G. F. Addiction is a reward deficit and stress surfeit disorder. Front. Psychiatry 4, 72 (2013).
Smith, A. C. W. et al. A master regulator of opioid reward in the ventral prefrontal cortex. Science 384, eadn0886 (2024). This study showed that MOR-expressing neurons in the dorsal peduncular nucleus projecting to the parabrachial nucleus mediate oxycodone reward and highlighted the DPN as a key substrate for opioid abuse.
Kebschull, J. M. High-throughput mapping of single-neuron projections by sequencing of barcoded RNA. Neuron 91, 975–987 (2016).
Chaudun, F. et al. Distinct mu-opioid ensembles trigger positive and negative fentanyl reinforcement. Nature 630, 141–148 (2024). This study showed that MORs in the VTA drive fentanyl’s positive reinforcement, whereas CeA MORs mediate withdrawal-induced negative reinforcement, defining separate circuits for opioid addiction.
Schuckit, M. A. Treatment of opioid-use disorders. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 357–368 (2016).
Fredriksson, I. Animal models of drug relapse and craving after voluntary abstinence: a review. Pharmacol. Rev. 73, 1050–1083 (2021).
Ozdemir, D., Meyer, J., Kieffer, B. L. & Darcq, E. Model of negative affect induced by withdrawal from acute and chronic morphine administration in male mice. Sci. Rep. 14, 9767 (2024).
Sourty, M. et al. Chronic morphine leaves a durable fingerprint on whole-brain functional connectivity. Biol. Psychiatry 96, 708–716 (2024). In this study, rs-fMRI in morphine-abstinent mice revealed lasting brain-wide connectivity changes, centred on the retrosplenial cortex and amygdala, that alter responses to acute opioid challenge.
Welsch, L. et al. Mu opioid receptor-positive neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus are impaired by morphine abstinence. Biol. Psychiatry 94, 852–862 (2023). In this study, morphine abstinence reduced MOR function in dorsal raphe neurons, promoting abnormal self-stimulation of DRN-MOR opto-activation and addictive-like behaviours.
Bailly, J. et al. Habenular neurons expressing mu opioid receptors promote negative affect in a projection-specific manner. Biol. Psychiatry 93, 1108–1117 (2023). This study showed that MOR-expressing habenula neurons drive negative affect via distinct projections to the interpeduncular and dorsal raphe nuclei, mediating despair-like behaviour and anxiety, respectively.
Yalcin, B. et al. Myelin plasticity in the ventral tegmental area is required for opioid reward. Nature 630, 677–685 (2024).
Raehal, K. M., Schmid, C. L., Groer, C. E. & Bohn, L. M. Functional selectivity at the mu-opioid receptor: implications for understanding opioid analgesia and tolerance. Pharmacol. Rev. 63, 1001–1019 (2011).
Pradhan, A. A., Smith, M. L., Kieffer, B. L. & Evans, C. J. Ligand-directed signalling within the opioid receptor family. Br. J. Pharmacol. 167, 960–969 (2012).
Bennett, D. B., Spain, J. W., Laskowski, M. B., Roth, B. L. & Coscia, C. J. Stereospecific opiate-binding sites occur in coated vesicles. J. Neurosci. 5, 3010–3015 (1985).
Roth, B. L., Laskowski, M. B. & Coscia, C. J. Microsomal opiate receptors differ from synaptic membrane receptors in proteolytic sensitivity. Brain Res. 250, 101–109 (1982).
Radoux-Mergault, A., Oberhauser, L., Aureli, S., Gervasio, F. L. & Stoeber, M. Subcellular location defines GPCR signal transduction. Sci. Adv. 9, eadf6059 (2023). This study showed that opioid receptor signalling is subcellularly compartmentalized: Golgi-localized receptors couple to Gαi/o but not to β-arrestin, producing distinct transcriptional and phosphorylation responses compared with plasma membrane receptors.
Civciristov, S. et al. Ligand-dependent spatiotemporal signaling profiles of the mu-opioid receptor are controlled by distinct protein-interaction networks. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 16198–16213 (2019).
Finn, A. K. & Whistler, J. L. Endocytosis of the mu opioid receptor reduces tolerance and a cellular hallmark of opiate withdrawal. Neuron 32, 829–839 (2001).
Lobingier, B. T. et al. An approach to spatiotemporally resolve protein interaction networks in living cells. Cell 169, 350–360.e12 (2017).
Polacco, B. J. et al. Profiling the proximal proteome of the activated mu-opioid receptor. Nat. Chem. Biol. 20, 1133–1143 (2024). In this study, proteomics of activated MOR revealed agonist-specific proximal networks and identified EYA4 and KCTD12 as novel regulators of G protein signalling, highlighting previously unrecognized modulators of MOR function.
Che, T. et al. Nanobody-enabled monitoring of kappa opioid receptor states. Nat. Commun. 11, 1145 (2020).
Oberhauser, L. & Stoeber, M. Biosensors monitor ligand-selective effects at kappa opioid receptors. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 271, 65–82 (2022).
Crilly, S. E., Ko, W., Weinberg, Z. Y. & Puthenveedu, M. A. Conformational specificity of opioid receptors is determined by subcellular location irrespective of agonist. eLife 10, e67478 (2021). This study showed that MORs have distinct active conformations depending on their subcellular location, enabling the same ligand to engage different effectors at the Golgi versus the plasma membrane.
Fisher, N. M. & von Zastrow, M. Opioid receptors reveal a discrete cellular mechanism of endosomal G protein activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2420623122 (2025). In this study, MOR triggered prolonged endosomal Gi/o signalling via trafficking of activated G proteins, independent of receptor internalization, revealing a distinct mechanism of endosomal GPCR signalling.
Irannejad, R. et al. Conformational biosensors reveal GPCR signalling from endosomes. Nature 495, 534–538 (2013).
Kunselman, J. M., Gupta, A., Gomes, I., Devi, L. A. & Puthenveedu, M. A. Compartment-specific opioid receptor signaling is selectively modulated by different dynorphin peptides. eLife 10, e60270 (2021).
Jimenez-Vargas, N. N. et al. Endosomal signaling of delta opioid receptors is an endogenous mechanism and therapeutic target for relief from inflammatory pain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 15281–15292 (2020).
Murphy, J. E., Padilla, B. E., Hasdemir, B., Cottrell, G. S. & Bunnett, N. W. Endosomes: a legitimate platform for the signaling train. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 17615–17622 (2009).
Jullie, D. et al. A discrete presynaptic vesicle cycle for neuromodulator receptors. Neuron 105, 663–677 e668 (2020).
Avasthi, P. et al. A chemical screen identifies class a G-protein coupled receptors as regulators of cilia. ACS Chem. Biol. 7, 911–919 (2012).
Marley, A., Choy, R. W. & von Zastrow, M. GPR88 reveals a discrete function of primary cilia as selective insulators of GPCR cross-talk. PLoS ONE 8, e70857 (2013).
Fitzsimons, L. A. et al. The nociceptor primary cilium contributes to mechanical nociceptive threshold and inflammatory and neuropathic pain. J. Neurosci. 44, e1265242024 (2024).
Falconnier, C., Caparros-Roissard, A., Decraene, C. & Lutz, P. E. Functional genomic mechanisms of opioid action and opioid use disorder: a systematic review of animal models and human studies. Mol. Psychiatry 28, 4568–4584 (2023).
Browne, C. J. et al. Transcriptional signatures of heroin intake and relapse throughout the brain reward circuitry in male mice. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg8558 (2023).
Pryce, K. D. et al. Oxycodone withdrawal induces HDAC1/HDAC2-dependent transcriptional maladaptations in the reward pathway in a mouse model of peripheral nerve injury. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 1229–1244 (2023).
Muir, J., Anguiano, M. & Kim, C. K. Neuromodulator and neuropeptide sensors and probes for precise circuit interrogation in vivo. Science 385, eadn6671 (2024).
Chen, J. et al. Endogenous opioids facilitate stress-induced binge eating via an insular cortex–claustrum pathway. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.10.598168 (2024).
Wang, H. et al. Prefrontal cortical dynorphin peptidergic transmission constrains threat-driven behavioral and network states. Neuron 112, 2062–2078.e7 (2024).
Zhou, X. et al. Development of a genetically encoded sensor for probing endogenous nociceptin opioid peptide release. Nat. Commun. 15, 5353 (2024). In this study, NOPLight, a genetically encoded sensor, enabled high-resolution detection of endogenous nociceptin/orphanin-FQ release in brain tissue and freely behaving animals, revealing dynamic opioid peptide signalling in vivo.
Wang, L. et al. A high-performance genetically encoded fluorescent indicator for in vivo cAMP imaging. Nat. Commun. 13, 5363 (2022).
Zhang, J. F. et al. An ultrasensitive biosensor for high-resolution kinase activity imaging in awake mice. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 39–46 (2021).
Zhang, Y. et al. Fast and sensitive GCaMP calcium indicators for imaging neural populations. Nature 615, 884–891 (2023).
Yu, J. et al. Structural basis of mu-opioid receptor targeting by a nanobody antagonist. Nat. Commun. 15, 8687 (2024).
Salimando, G. J. et al. Human OPRM1 and murine Oprm1 promoter driven viral constructs for genetic access to mu-opioidergic cell types. Nat. Commun. 14, 5632 (2023). This study provided an MOR promoter-based viral toolkit enabling selective genetic access to MOR-expressing neurons across species (mouse and human), enabling functional manipulation of circuits underlying pain, analgesia and addiction.
Bailly, J. et al. Targeting morphine-responsive neurons: generation of a knock-in mouse line expressing Cre recombinase from the mu-opioid receptor gene locus. eNeuro 7, ENEURO.0433-19.2020 (2020). This study reports on the generation of an MOR-Cre knock-in mouse, enabling precise genetic access to MOR-expressing neurons, preserving receptor function and enabling circuit mapping and manipulation of opioid-responsive pathways underlying analgesia and addiction.
Chen, C. et al. Characterization of a knock-in mouse line expressing a fusion protein of kappa opioid receptor conjugated with tdTomato: 3-dimensional brain imaging via CLARITY. eNeuro 7, ENEURO.0028-20.2020 (2020).
Degrandmaison, J. et al. In vivo mapping of a GPCR interactome using knockin mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 13105–13116 (2020).
Ehrlich, A. T. et al. Biased signaling of the mu opioid receptor revealed in native neurons. iScience 14, 47–57 (2019).
Gardon, O. et al. Expression of mu opioid receptor in dorsal diencephalic conduction system: new insights for the medial habenula. Neuroscience 277, 595–609 (2014).
Scherrer, G. et al. Knockin mice expressing fluorescent delta-opioid receptors uncover G protein-coupled receptor dynamics in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9691–9696 (2006).
Zamfir, M. et al. Distinct and sex-specific expression of mu opioid receptors in anterior cingulate and somatosensory S1 cortical areas. Pain 164, 703–716 (2023).
McClain, S. P. et al. In vivo photopharmacology with light-activated opioid drugs. Neuron 111, 3926–3940.e10 (2023).
Su, D. et al. One-step generation of mice carrying a conditional allele together with an HA-tag insertion for the delta opioid receptor. Sci. Rep. 7, 44476 (2017).
Siuda, E. R. et al. Spatiotemporal control of opioid signaling and behavior. Neuron 86, 923–935 (2015).
Nehme, R. et al. Mini-G proteins: novel tools for studying GPCRs in their active conformation. PLoS ONE 12, e0175642 (2017).
Ma, X. et al. In vivo photopharmacology with a caged mu opioid receptor agonist drives rapid changes in behavior. Nat. Methods 20, 682–685 (2023).
Granier, S. et al. Structure of the delta-opioid receptor bound to naltrindole. Nature 485, 400–404 (2012).
Manglik, A. et al. Crystal structure of the micro-opioid receptor bound to a morphinan antagonist. Nature 485, 321–326 (2012).
Thompson, A. A. et al. Structure of the nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor in complex with a peptide mimetic. Nature 485, 395–399 (2012).
Wu, H. et al. Structure of the human kappa-opioid receptor in complex with JDTic. Nature 485, 327–332 (2012).
Janicot, R., Park, J. C. & Garcia-Marcos, M. Detecting GPCR signals with optical biosensors of Galpha-GTP in cell lines and primary cell cultures. Curr. Protoc. 3, e796 (2023).
Degrandmaison, J., Rochon-Hache, S., Parent, J. L. & Gendron, L. Knock-in mouse models to investigate the functions of opioid receptors in vivo. Front. Cell Neurosci. 16, 807549 (2022).
Palkovic, B., Marchenko, V., Zuperku, E. J., Stuth, E. A. E. & Stucke, A. G. Multi-level regulation of opioid-induced respiratory depression. Physiology 35, 391–404 (2020).
Pattinson, K. T. S. Opioids and the control of respiration. Br. J. Anaesth. 100, 747–758 (2008).
Kosten, T. R. & George, T. P. The neurobiology of opioid dependence: implications for treatment. Sci. Pract. Perspect. 1, 13–20 (2002).
Koob, G. F. & Bloom, F. E. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of drug dependence. Science 242, 715–723 (1988).
Koob, G. F. & Moal, M. L. Drug abuse: hedonic homeostatic dysregulation. Science 278, 52–58 (1997).
Hasin, D. S. et al. DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders: recommendations and rationale. Am. J. Psychiatry 170, 834–851 (2013).
World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (WHO, 2022).
Acknowledgements
The authors sincerely thank B. L. Kieffer for her support throughout various stages of their careers and for inspiring them with her ardent passion for opioid research. The authors acknowledge the permanent support of INSERM and University of Strasbourg (UNISTRA, France). This work was also supported by the University of Strasbourg Initiative of Excellence (to E.D.), the National Institutes of Mental Health (K01MH123757 to A.T.E.), Agence National de la recherche (ANR-23-CE16-0016 to E.D. and ANR-24-CE37-3736 to E.D.), Institut pour la Recherche en Santé Publique (SPAV1-22-018 to E.D. and IRESP-AAP-2023-SPA-3 to V.M.) and NEUROSTRA (9R25016SXBSXB to V.M.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Neuroscience thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Related links
NIDA Genetic Repository: https://nidagenetics.org/
The Douglas Brain Bank: https://douglasbrainbank.ca/
The University of Maryland Brain and Tissue Bank: https://www.medschool.umaryland.edu/btbank/
Glossary
- Anti-reward system activation
-
The recruitment of brain circuits that at first would limit consumption but in the cycle of OUD might enhance negative emotional states during withdrawal, driving the need for opioids to alleviate discomfort.
- Between-system interactions
-
Interactions between brain systems (groups of brain regions implicated in specific functions) outside the reward pathway that become recruited to counterbalance the overactivation caused by drugs. These are mostly the stress and ’anti-reward’ systems.
- Biased signalling
-
A response shaped by the specific conformation of the drug–receptor–effector complex, which selectively activates only a subset of intracellular effectors. A drug inducing biased signalling is referred to as a biased agonist.
- Craving
-
Drug craving has generally been defined as a desire and urgent need to use a drug. It reflects the desire to feel the effect of a drug (subjective) as well as the intention to use the drug (action).
- Escalation of drug intake
-
A progressive increase in the quantity of a drug consumed over time.
- Incentive salience
-
The process by which an opioid heightens its perceived desirability, even when its consumption is no longer pleasurable.
- Liking versus wanting
-
A divergence whereby the pleasurable effects of opioids (liking) diminish over time, whereas the compulsive desire to seek them (wanting) intensifies.
- Location bias
-
Receptor signalling that is determined by the availability of effectors in the precise location of the receptor, such as a cellular membrane compartment (surface, endosome, primary cilium or Golgi).
- Myelin plasticity
-
The ability of myelin to adapt structurally and functionally in response to neuronal activity and environmental changes.
- Opioid-induced hyperalgesia
-
A paradoxical phenomenon in which, rather than alleviating pain as intended, chronic opioid exposure leads to pain perception in response to otherwise non-painful stimuli.
- Tolerance
-
The weakening of a drug’s effects with repeated exposure. This effect is observable for many substances and not restricted to substances of abuse.
- Withdrawal
-
The symptoms a person experiences when not using a substance. Usual opioid withdrawal symptoms are agitation, anxiety, sleep disturbances, abdominal cramping, nausea, diarrhoea, sweating and muscle aches.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mathis, V.P., Ehrlich, A.T. & Darcq, E. The neural circuits and signalling pathways of opioid use disorder. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 26, 778–797 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-025-00982-7
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-025-00982-7
This article is cited by
-
Can the incentive-sensitization theory of addiction incorporate addiction to opioid drugs?
Psychopharmacology (2026)


