Posterior nerve-sparing modifications during radical prostatectomy aim to improve preservation of the cavernous nerves and microvasculature to enhance postoperative erectile recovery. Current techniques for this are associated with varied functional outcomes and have a number of key anatomical and technical considerations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Agochukwu-Mmonu, N. et al. Patient- and surgeon-level variation in patient-reported sexual function outcomes following radical prostatectomy over 2 years: results from a statewide surgical improvement collaborative. JAMA Surg. 157, 136–144 (2022).
Stolzenburg, J.-U. et al. A comparison of outcomes for interfascial and intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Urology 76, 743–748 (2010).
Zheng, T. et al. A matched-pair comparison between bilateral intrafascial and interfascial nerve-sparing techniques in extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Asian J. Androl. 15, 513–517 (2013).
Potdevin, L., Ercolani, M., Jeong, J. & Kim, I. Y. Functional and oncologic outcomes comparing interfascial and intrafascial nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. J. Endourol. 23, 1479–1484 (2009).
Menon, M. et al. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J. Urol. 174, 2291–2296 (2005).
Wald, G. et al. Posterior approach to endopelvic neurovascular total sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy improves recovery of erectile function. JU Open Plus https://doi.org/10.1097/JU9.0000000000000394 (2025).
Nielsen, M. E., Schaeffer, E. M., Marschke, P. & Walsh, P. C. High anterior release of the levator fascia improves sexual function following open radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 180, 2557–2564 (2008).
Ko, Y. H. et al. Retrograde versus antegrade nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better for achieving early functional recovery? Eur. Urol. 63, 169–177 (2013).
Wenger, H., Razmaria, A., Eggener, S. & Raman, J. D. Nerve bundle hydrodissection and sexual function after robot prostatectomy. JSLS 21, e2017.00068 (2017).
Neill, M. G., Louie-Johnsun, M., Chabert, C. & Eden, C. Does intrafascial dissection during nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compromise cancer control? BJU Int. 104, 1730–1733 (2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gangidi, S., Wald, G. & Hu, J.C. Technical modifications to improve erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy. Nat Rev Urol (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-025-01115-6
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-025-01115-6
