Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Sperm DNA fragmentation and its influence on mammalian reproduction

Abstract

Sperm DNA fragmentation is a recognized factor in male infertility with direct implications for embryo development, implantation and pregnancy outcomes. Historically, standard semen analysis has not included assessments of DNA integrity, creating a clear need for advanced diagnostic tools. DNA damage can arise through pathways such as apoptosis, oxidative stress and exposure to environmental toxins, all of which compromise reproductive potential. Several methodologies exist for measuring sperm DNA fragmentation, including the sperm chromatin structure assay, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL), the Comet assay and sperm chromatin dispersion, each of which has unique advantages and limitations. Novel automated imaging platforms incorporating machine learning algorithms have emerged, enabling high-throughput, single-sperm assessment and reducing subjectivity associated with manual scoring. Species differences further complicate the understanding of DNA stability and sperm quality, especially in livestock and models of artificial insemination; nonetheless, physiological similarities between humans and species close to humans provide useful translational insights. Emerging sperm selection technologies, including microfluidics, hyaluronic acid affinity systems and magnetic-activated cell sorting, show promise in reducing DNA fragmentation, improving reproductive outcomes and decreasing pregnancy loss. As the field progresses toward increasingly personalized fertility treatments, measures of DNA integrity will remain central to optimizing assisted reproduction success rates across species.

Key points

  • Sperm DNA fragmentation is a major factor affecting male fertility, and can affect embryo development, embryo implantation and, ultimately, living offspring; none of these factors is usually defined by a standard semen analysis.

  • DNA damage can be induced by oxidative stress, apoptosis and environmental toxins, which contribute to sperm DNA fragmentation, which in turn reduces reproductive capability in both humans and livestock species.

  • Assays such as the sperm chromatin structure assay, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling, Comet and sperm chromatin dispersion are unique methodologies to identify sperm DNA fragmentation. Each has advantages, disadvantages and importance based on the clinical or research initiative.

  • Species-specific differences in sperm DNA integrity make it very difficult to use standard thresholds, particularly in artificial insemination and breeding programmes, but thresholds are relatively consistent within humans as a species.

  • New sperm selection techniques, particularly microfluidics and magnetic-activated cell sorting are now being used to enhance fertility outcomes in assisted reproduction, and can help to reduce sperm DNA fragmentation through enhanced selection of high-quality sperm with intact DNA.

  • New therapeutic approaches, such as extracellular vesicles, stem cell-derived components and specific antioxidant treatments, seem to have substantial promise in reducing sperm DNA fragmentation. These strategies work by improving sperm quality, decreasing oxidative stress and promoting mechanisms that repair DNA.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Major sources and mechanisms of clinically relevant sperm DNA fragmentation and their reproductive consequences.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: Reproductive traits across multiple species.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: Timeline of sperm DNA fragmentation testing methodologies.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4: Conventional sperm DFI assessment methods.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5: Sperm processing and isolation techniques.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eisenberg, M. L. et al. Male infertility. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 9, 49 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vallet-Buisan, M., Mecca, R., Jones, C., Coward, K. & Yeste, M. Contribution of semen to early embryo development: fertilization and beyond. Hum. Reprod. Update https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmad006 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Agarwal, A. et al. Male infertility. Lancet 397, 319–333 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khatun, A., Rahman, M. S. & Pang, M.-G. Clinical assessment of the male fertility. Obstet. Gynecol. Sci. 61, 179–191 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Barbăroșie, C., Agarwal, A. & Henkel, R. Diagnostic value of advanced semen analysis in evaluation of male infertility. Andrologia 53, e13625 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Esteves, S. C. Evolution of the World Health Organization semen analysis manual: where are we? Nat. Rev. Urol. 19, 439–446 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, Z. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation index and pregnancy outcome after IVF or ICSI: a meta-analysis. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 32, 17–26 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peng, T. et al. Machine learning-based clustering to identify the combined effect of the DNA fragmentation index and conventional semen parameters on in vitro fertilization outcomes. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 21, 26 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hungerford, A. J., Bakos, H. W. & Aitken, R. J. Addition of vitamin C mitigates the loss of antioxidant capacity, vitality and DNA integrity in cryopreserved human semen samples. Antioxidants 13, 247 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Aitken, R. J., Drevet, J. R., Moazamian, A. & Gharagozloo, P. Male infertility and oxidative stress: a focus on the underlying mechanisms. Antioxidants 11, 306 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang, W. et al. What sperm parameters effect blastocyst formation and quality during ICSI with severe male infertility. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 70, 218–227 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lismer, A. & Kimmins, S. Emerging evidence that the mammalian sperm epigenome serves as a template for embryo development. Nat. Commun. 14, 2142 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Vasilescu, S. A., Ding, L., Parast, F. Y., Nosrati, R. & Warkiani, M. E. Sperm quality metrics were improved by a biomimetic microfluidic selection platform compared to swim-up methods. Microsyst. Nanoengineering 9, 37 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pacey, A. Environmental and lifestyle factors associated with sperm DNA damage. Hum. Fertil. 13, 189–193 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Radwan, M. et al. Sperm DNA damage — the effect of stress and everyday life factors. Int. J. Impot. Res. 28, 148–154 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lewis, S. & Aitken, R. DNA damage to spermatozoa has impacts on fertilization and pregnancy. Cell Tissue Res. 322, 33–41 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Finelli, R., Moreira, B. P., Alves, M. G. & Agarwal, A. Unraveling the molecular impact of sperm DNA damage on human reproduction. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1358, 77–113 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Horta, F., Catt, S., Ramachandran, P., Vollenhoven, B. & Temple-Smith, P. Female ageing affects the DNA repair capacity of oocytes in IVF using a controlled model of sperm DNA damage in mice. Hum. Reprod. 35, 529–544 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vaughan, D., Tirado, E., Garcia, D., Datta, V. & Sakkas, D. DNA fragmentation of sperm: a radical examination of the contribution of oxidative stress and age in 16 945 semen samples. Hum. Reprod. 35, 2188–2196 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Robertson, M. J., Chambers, C., Spanner, E. A., de Graaf, S. P. & Rickard, J. P. The assessment of sperm DNA integrity: implications for assisted reproductive technology fertility outcomes across livestock species. Biology 13, 539 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumaresan, A., Das Gupta, M., Datta, T. K. & Morrell, J. M. Sperm DNA integrity and male fertility in farm animals: a review. Front. Veterinary Sci. 7, 321 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rajska, I. Freeze drying as a method of long-term conservation of mammalian semen — a review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 21, 1209–1234 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kölle, S. Sperm–oviduct interactions: key factors for sperm survival and maintenance of sperm fertilizing capacity. Andrology 10, 837–843 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Saint-Dizier, M. et al. Sperm interactions with the female reproductive tract: a key for successful fertilization in mammals. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 516, 110956 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, S. & Winuthayanon, W. Oviduct: roles in fertilization and early embryo development. J. Endocrinol. 232, R1–R26 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ellington, J. E. et al. Higher-quality human sperm in a sample selectively attach to oviduct (fallopian tube) epithelial cells in vitro. Fertil. Steril. 71, 924–929 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nagaki, C. A. P., Hamilton, T. R.dS. & D’Avila Assumpção, M. E. O. What is known so far about bull sperm protamination: a review. Anim. Reprod. 19, e20210109 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Dogan, S. et al. Sperm protamine-status correlates to the fertility of breeding bulls. Biol. Reprod. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.114.124255 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chłopik, A. & Wysokińska, A. Canine spermatozoa — What do we know about their morphology and physiology? An overview. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 55, 113–126 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hungerford, A., Bakos, H. W. & Aitken, R. J. Sperm cryopreservation: current status and future developments. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 35, 265–281 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yánez-Ortiz, I., Catalán, J., Rodríguez-Gil, J. E., Miró, J. & Yeste, M. Advances in sperm cryopreservation in farm animals: cattle, horse, pig and sheep. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 246, 106904 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Peris-Frau, P. et al. Sperm cryodamage in ruminants: understanding the molecular changes induced by the cryopreservation process to optimize sperm quality. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 2781 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Oldenbroek, J. K. & Windig, J. J. Opportunities of genomics for the use of semen cryo-conserved in gene banks. Front. Genet. 13, 907411 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Tamburrino, L. et al. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa: functional, molecular and clinical aspects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 4656 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Fertility preservation and reproduction in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies: a committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 100, 1224–1231 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Di Santo, M., Tarozzi, N., Nadalini, M. & Borini, A. Human sperm cryopreservation: update on techniques, effect on DNA integrity, and implications for ART. Adv. Urol. 2012, 854837 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pavlovych, O. et al. Ultrastructural and functional characteristics of human spermatozoa after cryopreservation by vitrification. Probl. Cryobiol. Cryomed. 30, 24–33 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yurchuk, T., Petrushkо, M., Gapon, A., Piniaiev, V. & Kuleshova, L. The impact of cryopreservation on the morphology of spermatozoa in men with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia. Cryobiology 100, 117–124 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gunes, S., Al-Sadaan, M. & Agarwal, A. Spermatogenesis, DNA damage and DNA repair mechanisms in male infertility. Reprod. Biomed. Online 31, 309–319 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Henkel, R. & Leisegang, K. in Male Infertility: Contemporary Clinical Approaches, andrologyA ART and Antioxidants (eds Parekattil, S. J., Esteves, S. C. & Agarwal, A.) 361–375 (Springer, 2020).

  41. Okada, Y. Sperm chromatin condensation: epigenetic mechanisms to compact the genome and spatiotemporal regulation from inside and outside the nucleus. Genes. Genet. Syst. 97, 41–53 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu, T. et al. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of apoptosis during dissociated spermatogenesis. Front. Physiol. 8, 188 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Fok, K. L., Chen, H., Ruan, Y. C. & Chan, H. C. Novel regulators of spermatogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 29, 31–42 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Napoletano, F. et al. p53-dependent programmed necrosis controls germ cell homeostasis during spermatogenesis. PLoS Genet. 13, e1007024 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hussain, T. et al. Unraveling the harmful effect of oxidative stress on male fertility: a mechanistic insight. Front. Endocrinol. 14, 1070692 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pardiñas, M. L. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation and microfluidics: a new era in human sperm selection. Me. Reprod. Embryol. Clin. 9, 100121 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Aziz, N., Said, T., Paasch, U. & Agarwal, A. The relationship between human sperm apoptosis, morphology and the sperm deformity index. Hum. Reprod. 22, 1413–1419 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jiang, H. & Huang, C.-J. Aberrant protamination in sperm correlates to anomalous nuclear and cytoplasmic architectures in infertile males with sperm dysmorphology. Asian J. Androl. 26, 183–188 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. O’Donnell, L. Mechanisms of spermiogenesis and spermiation and how they are disturbed. Spermatogenesis 4, e979623 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hao, S.-L., Ni, F.-D. & Yang, W.-X. The dynamics and regulation of chromatin remodeling during spermiogenesis. Gene 706, 201–210 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sakkas, D. & Alvarez, J. G. Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis. Fertil. Steril. 93, 1027–1036 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. O’Donnell, L., Nicholls, P. K., O’Bryan, M. K., McLachlan, R. I. & Stanton, P. G. Spermiation: the process of sperm release. Spermatogenesis 1, 14–35 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Kaur Gill-Sharma, M., Choudhuri, J. & D’Souza, S. Sperm chromatin protamination: an endocrine perspective. Protein Peptide Lett. 18, 786–801 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rathke, C., Baarends, W. M., Awe, S. & Renkawitz-Pohl, R. Chromatin dynamics during spermiogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1839, 155–168 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Crapster, J. A. et al. HIPK4 is essential for murine spermiogenesis. elife 9, e50209 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Ni, K., Spiess, A. N., Schuppe, H. C. & Steger, K. The impact of sperm protamine deficiency and sperm DNA damage on human male fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrology 4, 789–799 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Oliva, R. & Ballescà, J. L. Altered histone retention and epigenetic modifications in the sperm of infertile men. Asian J. Androl. 14, 239–240 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Miller, D., Brinkworth, M. & Iles, D. Paternal DNA packaging in spermatozoa: more than the sum of its parts? DNA, histones, protamines and epigenetics. Reproduction 139, 287–301 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Meyer, R. G., Ketchum, C. C. & Meyer-Ficca, M. L. Heritable sperm chromatin epigenetics: a break to remember. Biol. Reprod. 97, 784–797 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Moritz, L. & Hammoud, S. S. The art of packaging the sperm genome: molecular and structural basis of the histone-to-protamine exchange. Front. Endocrinol. 13, 895502 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Leduc, F., Maquennehan, V., Nkoma, G. B. & Boissonneault, G. DNA damage response during chromatin remodeling in elongating spermatids of mice. Biol. Reprod. 78, 324–332 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Cavé, T., Desmarais, R., Lacombe-Burgoyne, C. & Boissonneault, G. Genetic instability and chromatin remodeling in spermatids. Genes 10, 40 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Gosálvez, J., Fernández, C. L., Johnston, S. D. & Bartolomé-Nebreda, J. Role of DNase activity in human sperm DNA fragmentation. Biomolecules 14, 304 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Liu, K.-S., Mao, X.-D., Pan, F. & An, R. F. Effect and mechanisms of reproductive tract infection on oxidative stress parameters, sperm DNA fragmentation, and semen quality in infertile males. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 19, 97 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Wang, K. et al. Role of oxidative stress in varicocele. Front. Genet. 13, 850114 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Sciorio, R. et al. Potential effects of environmental toxicants on sperm quality and potential risk for fertility in humans. Front. Endocrinol. 16, 1545593 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Virant-Klun, I., Imamovic-Kumalic, S. & Pinter, B. From oxidative stress to male infertility: review of the associations of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (bisphenols, phthalates, and parabens) with human semen quality. Antioxidants 11, 1617 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Mendes, S. et al. The role of ROS as a double-edged sword in (in)fertility: the impact of cancer treatment. Cancers 14, 1585 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Newman, H., Catt, S., Vining, B., Vollenhoven, B. & Horta, F. DNA repair and response to sperm DNA damage in oocytes and embryos, and the potential consequences in ART: a systematic review. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 28, gaab071 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Ménézo, Y., Dale, B. & Cohen, M. DNA damage and repair in human oocytes and embryos: a review. Zygote 18, 357–365 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Stringer, J. M., Winship, A., Liew, S. H. & Hutt, K. The capacity of oocytes for DNA repair. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 75, 2777–2792 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Esquerré-Lamare, C. et al. Sperm aneuploidy and DNA fragmentation in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss: a multicenter case-control study. Basic Clin. Androl. 28, 4 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Kurpisz, M., Havryluk, A., Nakonechnyj, A., Chopyak, V. & Kamieniczna, M. Cryptorchidism and long-term consequences. Reprod. Biol. 10, 19–35 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Silva, C. A., Cocuzza, M., Borba, E. F. & Bonfá, E. Cutting-edge issues in autoimmune orchitis. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 42, 256–263 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Fawzy, F., Hussein, A., Eid, M. M., Kashash, A. M. E. & Salem, H. K. Cryptorchidism and fertility. Clin. Med. Insights Reprod. Health 9, 39–43 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Bujan, L. et al. Impact of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for testicular germ cell tumors on spermatogenesis and sperm DNA: a multicenter prospective study from the CECOS network. Fertil. Steril. 100, 673–680.e2 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Paoli, D. et al. Testicular cancer and sperm DNA damage: short-and long-term effects of antineoplastic treatment. Andrology 3, 122–128 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Meistrich, M. L. Effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy on spermatogenesis in humans. Fertil. Steril. 100, 1180–1186 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Meistrich, M. L. Risks of genetic damage in offspring conceived using spermatozoa produced during chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Andrology 8, 545–558 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Wang, Y. et al. Research progress on the role and mechanism of DNA damage repair in germ cell development. Front. Endocrinol. 14, 1234280 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Takeshima, T., Kuroda, S. & Yumura, Y. Cancer chemotherapy and chemiluminescence detection of reactive oxygen species in human semen. Antioxidants 8, 449 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Esquerré-Lamare, C., Isus, F., Moinard, N. & Bujan, L. Sperm DNA fragmentation after radioiodine treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer. Basic. Clin. Androl. 25, 8 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Lambrot, R. et al. High radiosensitivity of germ cells in human male fetus. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 92, 2632–2639 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Georgakopoulos, I. et al. Radiotherapy and testicular function: a comprehensive review of the radiation-induced effects with an emphasis on spermatogenesis. Biomedicines 12, 1492 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Lai, P. M. & Chan, K. M. Roles of histone H2A variants in cancer development, prognosis, and treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 3144 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Maselli, J. Chemotherapeutic Agents Used to Treat Testicular Cancer Affect the Sperm Proteome, Male Fertility and Progeny Outcome. Thesis, McGill University (2013).

  87. Wo, J. Y. & Viswanathan, A. N. Impact of radiotherapy on fertility, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes in female cancer patients. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 73, 1304–1312 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Meirow, D. & Schiff, E. Appraisal of chemotherapy effects on reproductive outcome according to animal studies and clinical data. J. Natl Cancer Inst. Monogr. 2005, 21–25 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Rabaca, A. et al. Use of antioxidant could ameliorate the negative impact of etoposide on human sperm DNA during chemotherapy. Reprod. Biomed. Online 40, 856–866 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Ståhl, O. et al. Sperm DNA integrity in cancer patients: the effect of disease and treatment. Int. J. Androl. 32, 695–703 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Abou-El-Naga, A. M., Abdraboh, M. E., El-Magd, M. A., Mansour, S. & Mansour, H. A. E.-H. Impact of cryopreservation agents on sperm quality, DNA fragmentation, and apoptotic markers in fertile and infertile males. Sci. Rep. 15, 30072 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Aitken, R. J. Sperm DNA integrity: a special issue exploring the causes, consequences, and treatment of DNA damage in human spermatozoa. Andrology 11, 1541–1544 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Velez, D. & Ohlander, S. Medical therapies causing iatrogenic male infertility. Fertil. Steril. 116, 618–624 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Mima, M., Greenwald, D. & Ohlander, S. Environmental toxins and male fertility. Curr. Urol. Rep. 19, 50 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Gil-Guzman, E. et al. Differential production of reactive oxygen species by subsets of human spermatozoa at different stages of maturation. Hum. Reprod. 16, 1922–1930 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Agarwal, A., Said, T. M., Bedaiwy, M. A., Banerjee, J. & Alvarez, J. G. Oxidative stress in an assisted reproductive techniques setting. Fertil. Steril. 86, 503–512 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Pan, J., Liu, P., Yu, X., Zhang, Z. & Liu, J. The adverse role of endocrine disrupting chemicals in the reproductive system. Front. Endocrinol. 14, 1324993 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Chianese, R. & Pierantoni, R. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production alters sperm quality. Antioxidants 10, 92 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Mahfouz, R. Z. et al. Sperm viability, apoptosis, and intracellular reactive oxygen species levels in human spermatozoa before and after induction of oxidative stress. Fertil. Steril. 93, 814–821 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Ménézo, Y. J. et al. Antioxidants to reduce sperm DNA fragmentation: an unexpected adverse effect. Reprod. Biomed. Online 14, 418–421 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Alvarez, J. G. & Gosalvez, J. in Studies on Men’s Health and Fertility (eds Agarwal, A., Aitken, R. J. & Alvarez, J. G.) 221–235 (Humana, 2012).

  102. D’Amours, O. et al. Evidences of biological functions of biliverdin reductase A in the bovine epididymis. J. Cell. Physiol. 231, 1077–1089 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Goss, D. M., Vasilescu, S. A., Sacks, G., Gardner, D. K. & Warkiani, M. E. Microfluidics facilitating the use of small extracellular vesicles in innovative approaches to male infertility. Nat. Rev. Urol. 20, 66–95 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Aitken, R. J. et al. Electrophilic aldehydes generated by sperm metabolism activate mitochondrial reactive oxygen species generation and apoptosis by targeting succinate dehydrogenase. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 33048–33060 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Wang, Y., Fu, X. & Li, H. Mechanisms of oxidative stress-induced sperm dysfunction. Front. Endocrinol. 16, 1520835 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Panner Selvam, M. K., Ambar, R. F., Agarwal, A. & Henkel, R. Etiologies of sperm DNA damage and its impact on male infertility. Andrologia 53, e13706 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Surai, P. et al. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant protection in avian semen — review. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 14, 1024–1050 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Collodel, G., Castellini, C., Lee, J. C.-Y. & Signorini, C. Relevance of fatty acids to sperm maturation and quality. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 7038124 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Collodel, G., Moretti, E., Noto, D., Corsaro, R. & Signorini, C. Oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids as a promising area of research in infertility. Antioxidants 11, 1002 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Sailer, B. L., Sarkar, L. J., Bjordahl, J. A., Jost, L. K. & Evenson, D. P. Effects of heat stress on mouse testicular cells and sperm chromatin structure. J. Androl. 18, 294–301 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Budzinska, M. et al. The role of the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis in human ejaculated sperm damage under a state of scrotal heat stress. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 41, 99–108 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Ho, C. L. T. et al. The relationship between genitourinary microorganisms and oxidative stress, sperm DNA fragmentation and semen parameters in infertile men. Andrologia 54, e14322 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Takalani, N. B. et al. Role of oxidative stress in male infertility. Reprod. Fertil. 4, e230024 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Homa, S. T. et al. A comparison between two assays for measuring seminal oxidative stress and their relationship with sperm DNA fragmentation and semen parameters. Genes 10, 236 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Ko, E. Y., Sabanegh, E. S. Jr & Agarwal, A. Male infertility testing: reactive oxygen species and antioxidant capacity. Fertil. Steril. 102, 1518–1527 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Aib, H., Parvez, M. S. & Czédli, H. M. Pharmaceuticals and microplastics in aquatic environments: a comprehensive review of pathways and distribution, toxicological and ecological effects. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 22, 799 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Gautam, R., Priyadarshini, E., Nirala, J. & Rajamani, P. in Environmental Radiobiology (eds Schofield, P. N. & Mothersill, C. E.) 67–77 (CRC Press, 2023).

  118. Katole, S. B., Kumar, P. & Patil, R. D. Environmental pollutants and livestock health: a review. Veterinary Res. Int. 1, 1–13 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  119. Wrzecińska, M., Kowalczyk, A., Cwynar, P. & Czerniawska-Piątkowska, E. Disorders of the reproductive health of cattle as a response to exposure to toxic metals. Biology 10, 882 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Krzastek, S. C., Farhi, J., Gray, M. & Smith, R. P. Impact of environmental toxin exposure on male fertility potential. Transl. Androl. Urol. 9, 2797–2813 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Godswill, A. C. & Godspel, A. C. Physiological effects of plastic wastes on the endocrine system (bisphenol A, phthalates, bisphenol S, PBDEs, TBBPA). Int. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 4, 11–29 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  122. Madhu, N. R. et al. in Oxidative Stress and Toxicity in Reproductive Biology and Medicine: A Comprehensive Update on Male Infertility Volume II (eds Roychoudhury, S. & Kesari, K. K.) 33–58 (Springer, 2022).

  123. Baloch, S., Kazi, T. G., Baig, J. A., Afridi, H. I. & Arain, M. B. Occupational exposure of lead and cadmium on adolescent and adult workers of battery recycling and welding workshops: adverse impact on health. Sci. Total. Environ. 720, 137549 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Mukherjee, A. et al. Arsenic and other geogenic contaminants in global groundwater. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 5, 312–328 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Crump, K. L. & Trudeau, V. L. Mercury-induced reproductive impairment in fish. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 28, 895–907 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Donkor, A. K., Ghoveisi, H. & Bonzongo, J.-C. J. Use of metallic mercury in artisanal gold mining by amalgamation: a review of temporal and spatial trends and environmental pollution. Minerals 14, 555 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. do Carmo Cupertino, M. et al. Cadmium-induced testicular damage is associated with mineral imbalance, increased antioxidant enzymes activity and protein oxidation in rats. Life Sci. 175, 23–30 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Zhang, T. et al. Effects of low lead exposure on sperm quality and sperm DNA methylation in adult men. Cell Biosci. 11, 150 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Yeung, B. H., Wan, H. T., Law, A. Y. & Wong, C. K. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: multiple effects on testicular signaling and spermatogenesis. Spermatogenesis 1, 231–239 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Rato, L. & Sousa, A. C. The impact of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in male fertility: focus on the action of obesogens. J. Xenobiotics 11, 163–196 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Sikka, S. C. & Wang, R. Endocrine disruptors and estrogenic effects on male reproductive axis. Asian J. Androl. 10, 134–145 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Amir, S. et al. Endocrine disruptors acting on estrogen and androgen pathways cause reproductive disorders through multiple mechanisms: a review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 1464 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Kleshchev, M., Osadchuk, A. & Osadchuk, L. Impaired semen quality, an increase of sperm morphological defects and DNA fragmentation associated with environmental pollution in urban population of young men from Western Siberia, Russia. PLoS ONE 16, e0258900 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Rubes, J. et al. Genetic polymorphisms influence the susceptibility of men to sperm DNA damage associated with exposure to air pollution. Mutat. Res. 683, 9–15 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Omolaoye, T. S. et al. Implications of exposure to air pollution on male reproduction: the role of oxidative stress. Antioxidants 13, 64 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Calogero, A. et al. Environmental car exhaust pollution damages human sperm chromatin and DNA. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 34, e139–e143 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Estill, M. S. & Krawetz, S. A. The epigenetic consequences of paternal exposure to environmental contaminants and reproductive toxicants. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 3, 202–213 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Menezo, Y., Dale, B. & Elder, K. The negative impact of the environment on methylation/epigenetic marking in gametes and embryos: a plea for action to protect the fertility of future generations. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 86, 1273–1282 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Brehm, E. & Flaws, J. A. Transgenerational effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals on male and female reproduction. Endocrinology 160, 1421–1435 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Parelho, C., Bernardo, F., Camarinho, R., Rodrigues, A. S. & Garcia, P. Testicular damage and farming environments — an integrative ecotoxicological link. Chemosphere 155, 135–141 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Hamlin, H. J. & Guillette, L. J. in Environmental Impacts on Reproductive Health and Fertility Ch. 7 (eds Woodruff, T. J. et al.) 92–102 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).

  142. Aitken, R. J., De Iuliis, G. N., Finnie, J. M., Hedges, A. & McLachlan, R. I. Analysis of the relationships between oxidative stress, DNA damage and sperm vitality in a patient population: development of diagnostic criteria. Hum. Reprod. 25, 2415–2426 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Gualtieri, R. et al. Sperm oxidative stress during in vitro manipulation and its effects on sperm function and embryo development. Antioxidants 10, 1025 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. Kou, Z. et al. Boar seminal plasma improves sperm quality by enhancing its antioxidant capacity during liquid storage at 17 C. Zygote 30, 695–703 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Catalán, J. et al. Impact of seminal plasma antioxidants on DNA fragmentation and lipid peroxidation of frozen–thawed horse sperm. Antioxidants 13, 322 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. Gualtieri, R. et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress caused by cryopreservation in reproductive cells. Antioxidants 10, 337 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Kumar, A., Prasad, J., Srivastava, N. & Ghosh, S. Strategies to minimize various stress-related freeze–thaw damages during conventional cryopreservation of mammalian spermatozoa. Biopreserv. Biobank. 17, 603–612 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Yelumalai, S. et al. Clinician-induced (iatrogenic) damage incurred during human infertility treatment: detrimental effects of sperm selection methods and cryopreservation upon the viability, DNA integrity, and function of human sperm. Asian Pac. J. Reprod. 1, 69–75 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Simon, L., Zini, A., Dyachenko, A., Ciampi, A. & Carrell, D. T. A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of sperm DNA damage on in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Asian J. Androl. 19, 80–90 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Esteves, S. C., Roque, M., Bedoschi, G., Haahr, T. & Humaidan, P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection for male infertility and consequences for offspring. Nat. Rev. Urol. 15, 535–562 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Wang, Y. et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in-vitro fertilisation for couples with infertility with non-severe male factor: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 403, 924–934 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Chou, C.-W., Chen, S.-U., Chang, C.-H., Tsai, Y.-Y. & Huang, C.-C. Aggressive sperm immobilization improves reproductive outcomes in patients with suboptimal semen parameters and previous ICSI fertilization failure. Sci. Rep. 14, 5363 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Avendaño, C. et al. Fragmentation of DNA in morphologically normal human spermatozoa. Fertil. Steril. 91, 1077–1084 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Avendaño, C. & Oehninger, S. DNA fragmentation in morphologically normal spermatozoa: how much should we be concerned in the ICSI era? J. Androl. 32, 356–363 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Leahy, T. & Gadella, B. M. Sperm surface changes and physiological consequences induced by sperm handling and storage. Reproduction 142, 759–778 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Delaroche, L., Besnard, L., Ouary, V., Bazin, F. & Cassuto, G. Disposables used cumulatively in routine IVF procedures could display toxicity. Hum. Reprod. 39, 936–954 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  157. Kaltsas, A. et al. Oxidative-stress-mediated epigenetic dysregulation in spermatogenesis: implications for male infertility and offspring health. Genes 16, 93 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  158. Vasilescu, S. A. et al. A biomimetic sperm selection device for routine sperm selection. Reprod. Biomed. Online 50, 104433 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. El-Sakka, A. I. Routine assessment of sperm DNA fragmentation in clinical practice: commentary and perspective. Transl. Androl. Urol. 6, S640–S643 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. Balawender, K. & Orkisz, S. The impact of selected modifiable lifestyle factors on male fertility in the modern world. Cent. Eur. J. Urol. 73, 563–568 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. Bisht, S., Faiq, M., Tolahunase, M. & Dada, R. Oxidative stress and male infertility. Nat. Rev. Urol. 14, 470–485 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Tesarik, J. Lifestyle and environmental factors affecting male fertility, individual predisposition, prevention, and intervention. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 26, 2797 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. Anifandis, G. et al. The impact of cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption on sperm parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) measured by Halosperm®. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 290, 777–782 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Hammadeh, M., Hamad, M., Montenarh, M. & Fischer-Hammadeh, C. Protamine contents and P1/P2 ratio in human spermatozoa from smokers and non-smokers. Hum. Reprod. 25, 2708–2720 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Hamad, M., Shelko, N., Kartarius, S., Montenarh, M. & Hammadeh, M. Impact of cigarette smoking on histone (H2B) to protamine ratio in human spermatozoa and its relation to sperm parameters. Andrology 2, 666–677 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Yu, B. et al. Cigarette smoking is associated with abnormal histone-to-protamine transition in human sperm. Fertil. Steril. 101, 51–57.e1 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Nkpaa, K. W., Amadi, B. A., Adedara, I. A., Wegwu, M. O. & Farombi, E. O. Ethanol exacerbates manganese-induced functional alterations along the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis of male rats. Neurosci. Lett. 684, 47–54 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Dupont, C. et al. Obesity leads to higher risk of sperm DNA damage in infertile patients. Asian J. Androl. 15, 622–625 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. Sciorio, R., Tramontano, L., Adel, M. & Fleming, S. Decrease in sperm parameters in the 21st century: obesity, lifestyle, or environmental factors? An updated narrative review. J. Pers. Med. 14, 198 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  170. Peel, A., Saini, A., Deluao, J. C. & McPherson, N. O. Sperm DNA damage: the possible link between obesity and male infertility, an update of the current literature. Andrology 11, 1635–1652 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Banerjee, A. et al. Altered composition of high-lipid diet may generate reactive oxygen species by disturbing the balance of antioxidant and free radicals. J. Basic. Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 31, 20190141 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  172. Nguyen, N. D., Le, M. T., Tran, N. Q. T., Nguyen, Q. H. V. & Cao, T. N. Micronutrient supplements as antioxidants in improving sperm quality and reducing DNA fragmentation. Basic. Clin. Androl. 33, 23 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  173. Nowotny, K., Jung, T., Höhn, A., Weber, D. & Grune, T. Advanced glycation end products and oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biomolecules 5, 194–222 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  174. Ramalho-Santos, J., Amaral, S. & Oliveira, P. J. Diabetes and the impairment of reproductive function: possible role of mitochondria and reactive oxygen species. Curr. Diabetes Rev. 4, 46–54 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Li, H. et al. Physical activity, sedentary time, and sperm DNA fragmentation index in healthy Japanese men. Reprod. Biomed. Online 51, 105015 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Manna, P. & Jain, S. K. Obesity, oxidative stress, adipose tissue dysfunction, and the associated health risks: causes and therapeutic strategies. Metab. Syndr. Relat. Disord. 13, 423–444 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  177. Sharma, A., Minhas, S., Dhillo, W. S. & Jayasena, C. N. Male infertility due to testicular disorders. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 106, e442–e459 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Spanoudaki, M. et al. Exercise as a promising agent against cancer: evaluating its anti-cancer molecular mechanisms. Cancers 15, 5135 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  179. García-Manso, J. M. & Valverde Esteve, T. in Exercise and Human Reproduction: Induced Fertility Disorders and Possible Therapies (eds Vaamonde, D., du Plessis, S. S. & Agarwal, A.) 153–165 (Springer, 2016).

  180. Fiala, O., Hanzlova, M., Borska, L., Fiala, Z. & Holmannova, D. Beyond physical exhaustion: understanding overtraining syndrome through the lens of molecular mechanisms and clinical manifestation. Sports Med. Health Sci. 7, 237–248 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  181. Slattery, K., Bentley, D. & Coutts, A. J. The role of oxidative, inflammatory and neuroendocrinological systems during exercise stress in athletes: implications of antioxidant supplementation on physiological adaptation during intensified physical training. Sports Med. 45, 453–471 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Albano, G. D. et al. Adverse effects of anabolic-androgenic steroids: a literature review. Healthcare 9, 97 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  183. Shokri, S. et al. Combination of running exercise and high dose of anabolic androgenic steroid, nandrolone decanoate, increases protamine deficiency and DNA damage in rat spermatozoa. Andrologia 46, 184–190 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. Vaamonde, D., Algar-Santacruz, C., Abbasi, A. & García-Manso, J. M. Sperm DNA fragmentation as a result of ultra-endurance exercise training in male athletes. Andrologia 50, e12793 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  185. Lucassen, E. A. & Cizza, G. The hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, obesity, and chronic stress exposure: sleep and the HPA axis in obesity. Curr. Obes. Rep. 1, 208–215 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  186. Dong, Q. et al. Rapid glucocorticoid mediation of suppressed testosterone biosynthesis in male mice subjected to immobilization stress. J. Androl. 25, 973–981 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. Liu, M. et al. Prenatal dexamethasone exposure programs the decreased testosterone synthesis in offspring rats by low level of endogenous glucocorticoids. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 43, 1461–1472 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  188. Palnitkar, G. et al. Linking sleep disturbance to idiopathic male infertility. Sleep. Med. Rev. 42, 149–159 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  189. Gautam, R., Priyadarshini, E., Patel, A. K. & Arora, T. Assessing the impact and mechanisms of environmental pollutants (heavy metals and pesticides) on the male reproductive system: a comprehensive review. J. Environ. Sci. Health C Toxicol. Carcinog. 42, 126–153 (2024).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  190. Kadoch, E. et al. The paternal clock: Uncovering the consequences of advanced paternal age on sperm DNA fragmentation. Reprod. Biol. 24, 100931 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  191. Sharma, R. et al. Effects of increased paternal age on sperm quality, reproductive outcome and associated epigenetic risks to offspring. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 13, 35 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  192. Sabeti, P., Pourmasumi, S., Rahiminia, T., Akyash, F. & Talebi, A. R. Etiologies of sperm oxidative stress. Int. J. Reprod. biomedicine 14, 231–240 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  193. Aitken, R. J. Paternal age, de novo mutations, and offspring health? New directions for an ageing problem. Hum. Reprod. 39, 2645–2654 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  194. Gavriliouk, D. & Aitken, R. J. in The Male Role in Pregnancy Loss and Embryo Implantation Failure (ed. Bronson, R.) 23–47 (Springer, 2015).

  195. Nowicka-Bauer, K. et al. Sperm mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress as possible reasons for isolated asthenozoospermia. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 69, 403–417 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  196. Hardeland, R. Melatonin and the electron transport chain. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 74, 3883–3896 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  197. Guthrie, H. & Welch, G. Effects of reactive oxygen species on sperm function. Theriogenology 78, 1700–1708 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  198. Amaral, S. & Ramalho-Santos, J. Aging, mitochondria and male reproductive function. Curr. Aging Sci. 2, 165–173 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  199. Wang, J.-J. et al. Age-related decline of male fertility: mitochondrial dysfunction and the antioxidant interventions. Pharmaceuticals 15, 519 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  200. Short, K. R. et al. Decline in skeletal muscle mitochondrial function with aging in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5618–5623 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  201. Li, W. et al. Chd5 orchestrates chromatin remodelling during sperm development. Nat. Commun. 5, 3812 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  202. Arévalo, L., Merges, G. E., Schneider, S. & Schorle, H. Protamines: lessons learned from mouse models. Reproduction 164, R57–R74 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  203. de Mateo, S. et al. Protamine 2 precursors (Pre-P2), protamine 1 to protamine 2 ratio (P1/P2), and assisted reproduction outcome. Fertil. Steril. 91, 715–722 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  204. Nakidkina, A. & Kuzmina, T. Apoptosis in spermatozoa and its role in deteriorating semen quality. Russ. J. Dev. Biol. 50, 165–172 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  205. Beltrán-Frutos, E. et al. Cellular modifications in spermatogenesis during seasonal testicular regression: an update review in mammals. Animals 12, 1605 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  206. Zakariah, M., Molele, R. A., Mahdy, M. A., Ibrahim, M. I. & McGaw, L. J. Regulation of spermatogenic cell apoptosis by the pro-apoptotic proteins in the testicular tissues of mammalian and avian species. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 247, 107158 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  207. Asadi, A., Ghahremani, R., Abdolmaleki, A. & Rajaei, F. Role of sperm apoptosis and oxidative stress in male infertility: a narrative review. Int. J. Reprod. Biomed. 19, 493–504 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  208. Kasimanickam, R., Pelzer, K. D., Kasimanickam, V., Swecker, W. S. & Thatcher, C. D. Association of classical semen parameters, sperm DNA fragmentation index, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymatic activity of semen in ram-lambs. Theriogenology 65, 1407–1421 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  209. Partyka, A., Babapour, A., Mikita, M., Adeniran, S. & Niżański, W. Lipid peroxidation in avian semen. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 26, 497–509 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  210. Bisht, S. & Dada, R. Oxidative stress: major executioner in disease pathology, role in sperm DNA damage and preventive strategies. Front. Biosci. (Schol. Ed.) 9, 420–447 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  211. Margiana, R. et al. Evaluation of telomere length, reactive oxygen species, and apoptosis in spermatozoa of patients with oligospermia. Cell Biochem. Funct. 42, e3935 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  212. Darmishonnejad, Z. et al. Relationship between sperm telomere length and sperm quality in infertile men. Andrologia 52, e13546 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  213. Tahamtan, S. et al. Reduced sperm telomere length in individuals with varicocele is associated with reduced genomic integrity. Sci. Rep. 9, 4336 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  214. Yang, Q. et al. Sperm telomere length is positively associated with the quality of early embryonic development. Hum. Reprod. 30, 1876–1881 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  215. Yuan, Y. et al. Sperm telomere length as a novel biomarker of male infertility and embryonic development: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Endocrinol. 13, 1079966 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  216. Wyck, S. et al. Oxidative stress in sperm affects the epigenetic reprogramming in early embryonic development. Epigenetics Chromatin 11, 60 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  217. Cheuquemán, C. & Maldonado, R. Non-coding RNAs and chromatin: key epigenetic factors from spermatogenesis to transgenerational inheritance. Biol. Res. 54, 41 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  218. Naveed, M., Shen, Z. & Bao, J. Sperm-borne small non-coding RNAs: potential functions and mechanisms as epigenetic carriers. Cell Biosci. 15, 5 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  219. Ragu, S., Matos-Rodrigues, G. & Lopez, B. S. Replication stress, DNA damage, inflammatory cytokines and innate immune response. Genes 11, 409 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  220. Pezone, A. et al. Inflammation and DNA damage: cause, effect or both. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 19, 200–211 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  221. Dutta, S., Sengupta, P., Slama, P. & Roychoudhury, S. Oxidative stress, testicular inflammatory pathways, and male reproduction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 10043 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  222. Azenabor, A., Ekun, A. O. & Akinloye, O. Impact of inflammation on male reproductive tract. J. Reprod. Infertil. 16, 123–129 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  223. Dupré-Crochet, S., Erard, M. & Nüβe, O. ROS production in phagocytes: why, when, and where? J. Leukoc. Biol. 94, 657–670 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  224. Derbel, R. et al. Relationship between nuclear DNA fragmentation, mitochondrial DNA damage and standard sperm parameters in spermatozoa of infertile patients with leukocytospermia. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 50, 102101 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  225. Moubasher, A. et al. Impact of leukocytospermia on sperm dynamic motility parameters, DNA and chromosomal integrity. Cent. Eur. J. Urol. 71, 470–475 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  226. Gallegos, G. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men with genitourinary infection by Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma. Fertil. Steril. 90, 328–334 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  227. Zhang, Q. et al. Effects of biovar I and biovar II of Ureaplasma urealyticum on sperm parameters, lipid peroxidation, and deoxyribonucleic acid damage in male infertility. Urology 84, 87–92 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  228. Adel Domínguez, M. A., Cardona Maya, W. D. & Mora Topete, A. Sperm DNA fragmentation: focusing treatment on seminal transport fluid beyond sperm production. Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl. 97, 13128 (2025).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  229. Houston, B. J. et al. Heat exposure induces oxidative stress and DNA damage in the male germ line. Biol. Reprod. 98, 593–606 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  230. Kastelic, J., Rizzoto, G. & Thundathil, J. Testicular vascular cone development and its association with scrotal thermoregulation, semen quality and sperm production in bulls. Animal 12, s133–s141 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  231. Durairajanayagam, D., Sharma, R. K., du Plessis, S. S. & Agarwal, A. in Male Infertility: A Complete Guide to Lifestyle and Environmental Factors (eds du Plessis, S. S., Agarwal, A. & Sabanegh, E. S. Jr.) 105–125 (Springer, 2014).

  232. Kang, C., Punjani, N., Lee, R. K., Li, P. S. & Goldstein, M. Effect of varicoceles on spermatogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 121, 114–124 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  233. Szabó, A. et al. Assessing the efficacy of varicocelectomy, antioxidants, FSH treatment, and lifestyle modifications on sperm DNA fragmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 15, 10118 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  234. Miyaso, H., Ogawa, Y. & Itoh, M. Microenvironment for spermatogenesis and sperm maturation. Histochem. Cell Biol. 157, 273–285 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  235. Ramos, L., De Boer, P., Meuleman, E., Braat, D. & Wetzels, A. Chromatin condensation and DNA damage of human epididymal spermatozoa in obstructive azoospermia. Reprod. Biomed. Online 8, 392–397 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  236. Szatanek, R. et al. The methods of choice for extracellular vesicles (EVs) characterization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 1153 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  237. Foot, N. J. & Kumar, S. The role of extracellular vesicles in sperm function and male fertility. Subcell. Biochem. 97, 483–500 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  238. Ribas-Maynou, J. et al. Protective role of extracellular vesicles against oxidative DNA damage. Biol. Res. 58, 14 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  239. Zhang, W., Liu, R., Chen, Y., Wang, M. & Du, J. Crosstalk between oxidative stress and exosomes. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 3553617 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  240. Mahdavinezhad, F. et al. Protective roles of seminal plasma exosomes and microvesicles during human sperm cryopreservation. Reprod. Biomed. Online 45, 341–353 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  241. Chabory, E. et al. Epididymis seleno-independent glutathione peroxidase 5 maintains sperm DNA integrity in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 119, 2074–2085 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  242. Ali, K. H. et al. Protective effects of canthaxanthin-loaded seminal exosomes on the quality of human spermatozoa during cryopreservation. J. Drug. Deliv. Sci. Technol. 96, 105696 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  243. Qamar, A. Y., Fang, X., Kim, M. J. & Cho, J. Improved post-thaw quality of canine semen after treatment with exosomes from conditioned medium of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Animals 9, 865 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  244. Du, J. et al. Boar seminal plasma exosomes maintain sperm function by infiltrating into the sperm membrane. Oncotarget 7, 58832 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  245. Wang, Y. et al. Exosomes from porcine serum as endogenous additive maintain function of boar sperm during liquid preservation at 17° C in vitro. Theriogenology 219, 147–156 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  246. Shamsi, R. R., Jozani, R. J., Asadpour, R., Rahbar, M. & Taravat, M. Seminal plasma-derived exosome preserves the quality parameters of the post-thaw semen of bulls with low freezeability. Biopreserv. Biobank. 23, 364–373 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  247. Uzbekova, S. et al. Protein cargo of extracellular vesicles from bovine follicular fluid and analysis of their origin from different ovarian cells. Front. Vet. Sci. 7, 584948 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  248. Tamessar, C. T. et al. Roles of male reproductive tract extracellular vesicles in reproduction. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 85, e13338 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  249. Alminana, C. et al. Deciphering the oviductal extracellular vesicles content across the estrous cycle: implications for the gametes–oviduct interactions and the environment of the potential embryo. BMC Genomics 19, 622 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  250. Goss, D. M., Vasilescu, S. A., Warkiani, M. E., Thompson, J. G. & Gardner, D. K. in Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques (eds Gardner, D. K., Weissman, A., Howles, C. M. & Shoham, Z.) 302–316 (CRC Press, 2023).

  251. Garg, R. K. The alarming rise of lifestyle diseases and their impact on public health: a comprehensive overview and strategies for overcoming the epidemic. J. Res. Med. Sci. 30, 1 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  252. Jurewicz, J. et al. Lifestyle and semen quality: role of modifiable risk factors. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 60, 43–51 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  253. Alahmar, A. T. Effect of vitamin C, vitamin E, zinc, selenium, and coenzyme Q10 in infertile men with idiopathic oligoasthenozoospermia. Int. J. Infertil. Fetal Med. 8, 45–49 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  254. Alahmar, A. T. & Singh, R. Comparison of the effects of coenzyme Q10 and Centrum multivitamins on semen parameters, oxidative stress markers, and sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men with idiopathic oligoasthenospermia. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med. 49, 49–56 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  255. Alahmar, A. T. N. The Impact of Coenzyme Q10 on Seminal Oxidative Stress Markers, Sperm DNA Fragmentation, and Predictors of Pregnancy in Men with Idiopathic Infertility. Thesis, Staffordshire University (2022).

  256. Salas-Huetos, A. et al. The effect of nutrients and dietary supplements on sperm quality parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Adv. Nutr. 9, 833–848 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  257. Ferramosca, A. & Zara, V. Diet and male fertility: the impact of nutrients and antioxidants on sperm energetic metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 2542 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  258. Jóźków, P. & Rossato, M. The impact of intense exercise on semen quality. Am. J. Mens Health 11, 654–662 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  259. Guo, Y., Wang, A., Liu, X. & Li, E. Effects of resveratrol on reducing spermatogenic dysfunction caused by high-intensity exercise. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 17, 42 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  260. Ibanez-Perez, J., Santos-Zorrozua, B., Lopez-Lopez, E., Matorras, R. & Garcia-Orad, A. An update on the implication of physical activity on semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 299, 901–921 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  261. Taha, E. A., Ez-Aldin, A. M., Sayed, S. K., Ghandour, N. M. & Mostafa, T. Effect of smoking on sperm vitality, DNA integrity, seminal oxidative stress, zinc in fertile men. Urology 80, 822–825 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  262. Cui, X., Jing, X., Wu, X., Wang, Z. & Li, Q. Potential effect of smoking on semen quality through DNA damage and the downregulation of Chk1 in sperm. Mol. Med. Rep. 14, 753–761 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  263. La Maestra, S., De Flora, S. & Micale, R. T. Effect of cigarette smoke on DNA damage, oxidative stress, and morphological alterations in mouse testis and spermatozoa. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 218, 117–122 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  264. Aboulmaouahib, S. et al. Impact of alcohol and cigarette smoking consumption in male fertility potential: Looks at lipid peroxidation, enzymatic antioxidant activities and sperm DNA damage. Andrologia 50, e12926 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  265. Dada, R. et al. Yoga and meditation as a therapeutic intervention in oxidative stress and oxidative DNA damage to paternal genome. J. Yoga Phys. Ther. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7595.1000217 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  266. Yadav, A., Tiwari, P. & Dada, R. Yoga and lifestyle changes: a path to improved fertility — a narrative review. Int. J. Yoga 17, 10–19 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  267. Gosálvez, J., González-Martínez, M., López-Fernández, C., Fernández, J. L. & Sánchez-Martín, P. Shorter abstinence decreases sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in ejaculate. Fertil. Steril. 96, 1083–1086 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  268. Sokol, P., Drakopoulos, P. & Polyzos, N. P. The effect of ejaculatory abstinence interval on sperm parameters and clinical outcome of ART. A systematic review of the literature. J. Clin. Med. 10, 3213 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  269. Roque, M. & Esteves, S. C. Effect of varicocele repair on sperm DNA fragmentation: a review. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 50, 583–603 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  270. Zini, A., San Gabriel, M. & Baazeem, A. Antioxidants and sperm DNA damage: a clinical perspective. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 26, 427–432 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  271. Tremellen, K., Miari, G., Froiland, D. & Thompson, J. A randomised control trial examining the effect of an antioxidant (Menevit) on pregnancy outcome during IVF-ICSI treatment. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 47, 216–221 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  272. Farkouh, A. et al. Sperm DNA integrity and male infertility: a narrative review and guide for the reproductive physicians. Transl. Androl. Urol. 11, 1023–1044 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  273. Mahé, C. et al. Sperm migration, selection, survival, and fertilizing ability in the mammalian oviduct. Biol. Reprod. 105, 317–331 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  274. Dalton, J. C. Frozen bovine semen storage, semen handling, and site of deposition. Vet Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 40, 157–165 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  275. Rickard, J. & de Graaf, S. Sperm surface changes and their consequences for sperm transit through the female reproductive tract. Theriogenology 150, 96–105 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  276. Suarez, S. S. & Pacey, A. Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract. Hum. Reprod. Update 12, 23–37 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  277. Dai, P. et al. pH homeodynamics and male fertility: a coordinated regulation of acid-based balance during sperm journey to fertilization. Biomolecules 14, 685 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  278. Miller, D. The epic journey of sperm through the female reproductive tract. Animal 12, s110–s120 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  279. Noakes, D. E., Parkinson, T. J. & England, G. C. Arthur’s Veterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics — E-Book 10th edn (Elsevier, 2018).

  280. McKinnon, A. O., Squires, E. L., Vaala, W. E. & Varner, D. D. Equine Reproduction 2nd edn (Wiley, 2011).

  281. Canisso, I. F., Segabinazzi, L. G. & Fedorka, C. E. Persistent breeding-induced endometritis in mares — a multifaceted challenge: from clinical aspects to immunopathogenesis and pathobiology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1432 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  282. Li, F., Duan, X., Li, M. & Ma, X. Sperm DNA fragmentation index affect pregnancy outcomes and offspring safety in assisted reproductive technology. Sci. Rep. 14, 356 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  283. Shan, L. et al. Perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoic acid inhibit progesterone-responsive capacitation through cAMP/PKA signaling pathway and induce DNA damage in human sperm. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 100, 104165 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  284. Zhang, K. et al. Decreased AKAP4/PKA signaling pathway in high DFI sperm affects sperm capacitation. Asian J. Androl. 26, 25–33 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  285. Afsari, M. et al. ANXA2, SP17, SERPINA5, PRDX2 genes, and sperm DNA fragmentation differentially represented in male partners of infertile couples with normal and abnormal sperm parameters. Andrologia 54, e14556 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  286. Zheng, W.-W. et al. Sperm DNA damage has a negative effect on early embryonic development following in vitro fertilization. Asian J. Androl. 20, 75–79 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  287. Speyer, B. et al. Fall in implantation rates following ICSI with sperm with high DNA fragmentation. Hum. Reprod. 25, 1609–1618 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  288. Borges, E. Jr et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation is correlated with poor embryo development, lower implantation rate, and higher miscarriage rate in reproductive cycles of non-male factor infertility. Fertil. Steril. 112, 483–490 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  289. Wang, S. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation measured by sperm chromatin dispersion impacts morphokinetic parameters, fertilization rate and blastocyst quality in ICSI treatments. Zygote 30, 72–79 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  290. Salehi, M., reza Afarinesh, M., Haghpanah, T., Novin, M. G. & Farifteh, F. Impact of sperm DNA fragmentation on ICSI outcome and incidence of apoptosis of human pre-implantation embryos obtained from in vitro matured MII oocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 510, 110–115 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  291. Jiang, H. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation index: limited effectiveness on predicting embryo quality in assisted reproduction technology treatments. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 23, 14 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  292. González-Marín, C., Gosálvez, J. & Roy, R. Types, causes, detection and repair of DNA fragmentation in animal and human sperm cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13, 14026–14052 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  293. García-Rodríguez, A., Gosálvez, J., Agarwal, A., Roy, R. & Johnston, S. DNA damage and repair in human reproductive cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 31 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  294. Mohan, D. & Murugan, M. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on invitro fertilization: from embryo development to clinical pregnancy success. J. Neonatal Surg. 14, 1502–1515 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  295. Cortese, M., Moster, D. & Wilcox, A. J. Term birth weight and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Epidemiology 32, 583–590 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  296. Yu, H., Shi, C., Zhan, C., Wang, C. & Chen, J. Association of sperm DNA fragmentation with higher miscarriage rates in non-male factor infertility reproductive cycles. Transl. Androl. Urol. 14, 1456–1465 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  297. Stenqvist, A. et al. High sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation index is associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia following assisted reproduction treatment. Fertil. Steril. 123, 97–104 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  298. Fu, W. et al. High sperm DNA fragmentation increased embryo aneuploidy rate in patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing. Reprod. Biomed. Online 47, 103366 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  299. Fu, W. et al. Elevated sperm DNA fragmentation is correlated with an increased chromosomal aneuploidy rate of miscarried conceptus in women of advanced age undergoing fresh embryo transfer cycle. Front. Endocrinol. 15, 1289763 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  300. Gao, J. et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on the incidence and origin of whole and segmental chromosomal aneuploidies in human embryos. Reproduction 166, 117–124 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  301. Fatehi, A. N. et al. DNA damage in bovine sperm does not block fertilization and early embryonic development but induces apoptosis after the first cleavages. J. Androl. 27, 176–188 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  302. Abah, K. O. et al. Association between sperm DNA fragmentation and fertility parameters in farm animals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Vet. Res. 21, 204 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  303. Donatti, L. M., Martello, C. L., Andrade, G. M., Oliveira, N. P. & Frantz, N. Advanced paternal age affects the sperm DNA fragmentation index and may lead to lower good-quality blastocysts. Reprod. Sci. 30, 2489–2494 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  304. Carreira, J. et al. Does sperm quality and DNA integrity differ in cryopreserved semen samples from young, adult, and aged Nellore bulls? Basic. Clin. Androl. 27, 12 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  305. Pardede, B. P., Supriatna, I., Yudi, Y. & Agil, M. Decreased bull fertility: age-related changes in sperm motility and DNA fragmentation. E3S Web Conf. 151, 01010 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  306. Griffin, R. A. et al. Age-related DNA damage in stallions: an ongoing investigation. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 125, 104590 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  307. Yatsenko, A. N. & Turek, P. J. Reproductive genetics and the aging male. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 35, 933–941 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  308. Elkhatib, I. et al. The influence of male age and sperm parameters on blastulation and euploidy rates. Fertil. Steril. 124, 1006–1015 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  309. Cao, C. et al. Understanding recurrent pregnancy loss: recent advances on its etiology, clinical diagnosis, and management. Med. Rev. 2, 570–589 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  310. Naglot, S., Thapliyal, A., Tomar, A. K. & Yadav, S. Male contributory factors in recurrent pregnancy loss. Reprod. Sci. 30, 2107–2121 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  311. Zhang, L. et al. Association between semen parameters and recurrent pregnancy loss: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 50, 545–556 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  312. Antonouli, S. et al. The impact of sperm DNA fragmentation on ICSI outcome in cases of donated oocytes. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 300, 207–215 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  313. Yao, G. et al. Association between sperm DNA fragmentation index and recurrent pregnancy loss: results from 1485 participants undergoing fertility evaluation. Front. Endocrinol. 15, 1493186 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  314. Lee, C.-I. et al. Personalized prediction model for miscarriage: in-depth sperm DNA fragmentation. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 42, 1717–1727 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  315. Akhtar, M. F. et al. Effect of sperm cryopreservation in farm animals using nanotechnology. Animals 12, 2277 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  316. Gürler, H. et al. Effects of cryopreservation on sperm viability, synthesis of reactive oxygen species, and DNA damage of bovine sperm. Theriogenology 86, 562–571 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  317. Wach-Gygax, L. et al. Seasonal changes of DNA fragmentation and quality of raw and cold-stored stallion spermatozoa. Theriogenology 99, 98–104 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  318. Peris, S. I., Bilodeau, J. F., Dufour, M. & Bailey, J. L. Impact of cryopreservation and reactive oxygen species on DNA integrity, lipid peroxidation, and functional parameters in ram sperm. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 74, 878–892 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  319. Kopeika, J., Thornhill, A. & Khalaf, Y. The effect of cryopreservation on the genome of gametes and embryos: principles of cryobiology and critical appraisal of the evidence. Hum. Reprod. Update 21, 209–227 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  320. Valcarce, D., Cartón-García, F., Riesco, M., Herráez, M. & Robles, V. Analysis of DNA damage after human sperm cryopreservation in genes crucial for fertilization and early embryo development. Andrology 1, 723–730 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  321. Robinson, L. et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. 27, 2908–2917 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  322. Cissen, M. et al. Measuring sperm DNA fragmentation and clinical outcomes of medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 11, e0165125 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  323. Wan, X. J. et al. Correlation of the sperm DNA fragmentation index with semen parameters and its impact on fresh embryo transfer outcomes — a retrospective study. PeerJ 13, e19451 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  324. Castellini, C. et al. Relationship between leukocytospermia, reproductive potential after assisted reproductive technology, and sperm parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case–control studies. Andrology 8, 125–135 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  325. Agarwal, A. et al. Impact of antioxidant therapy on natural pregnancy outcomes and semen parameters in infertile men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J. Mens Health 41, 14–48 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  326. Romano, M. et al. High sperm DNA fragmentation: do we have robust evidence to support antioxidants and testicular sperm extraction to improve fertility outcomes? A narrative review. Front. Endocrinol. 14, 1150951 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  327. Tunc, O., Thompson, J. & Tremellen, K. Improvement in sperm DNA quality using an oral antioxidant therapy. Reprod. Biomed. Online 18, 761–768 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  328. Angrimani, D.dS. R. et al. Extender supplementation with antioxidants selected after the evaluation of sperm susceptibility to oxidative challenges in goats. Anim. Biotechnol. 30, 21–29 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  329. Peña, S. T. Jr, Gummow, B., Parker, A. J. & Paris, D. B. Antioxidant supplementation mitigates DNA damage in boar (Sus scrofa domesticus) spermatozoa induced by tropical summer. PLoS ONE 14, e0216143 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  330. Shojaeian, K., Nouri, H. & Kohram, H. Does MnTBAP ameliorate DNA fragmentation and in vivo fertility of frozen-thawed Arabian stallion sperm? Theriogenology 108, 16–21 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  331. Ribas-Maynou, J. et al. Double stranded sperm DNA breaks, measured by Comet assay, are associated with unexplained recurrent miscarriage in couples without a female factor. PLoS ONE 7, e44679 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  332. Casanovas, A. et al. Double-stranded sperm DNA damage is a cause of delay in embryo development and can impair implantation rates. Fertil. Steril. 111, 699–707.e1 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  333. Okubo, T. et al. Performing a sperm DNA fragmentation test in addition to semen examination based on the WHO criteria can be a more accurate diagnosis of IVF outcomes. BMC Urol. 23, 78 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  334. Agarwal, A. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation: a new guideline for clinicians. World J. Mens Health 38, 412–471 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  335. Esteves, S. C. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations. Andrologia 53, e13874 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  336. Fernández, J. L., Johnston, S. & Gosálvez, J. in A Clinician’s Guide to Sperm DNA and Chromatin Damage (eds Zini, A. & Agarwal, A.) 137–152 (Springer, 2018).

  337. Kaiyal, R. S. et al. Sperm chromatin dispersion assay reliability and assisted reproductive technology outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrology 13, 718–730 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  338. Gosálvez, J., López-Fernández, C. & Fernández, J. L. in Sperm Chromatin: Biological and Clinical Applications in Male Infertility and Assisted Reproduction (eds Zini, A. & Agarwal, A.) 151–170 (Springer, 2011).

  339. Tímermans, A. et al. DNA fragmentation of human spermatozoa: simple assessment of single- and double-strand DNA breaks and their respective dynamic behavioral response. Andrology 8, 1287–1303 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  340. Gajski, G. et al. Application of the comet assay for the evaluation of DNA damage in mature sperm. Mutat. Res./Rev. Mutat. Res.788, 108398 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  341. Simon, L. & Carrell, D. T. in Spermatogenesis: Methods and Protocols (eds Carrell, D. T. & Aston, K. I.) 137–146 (Humana, 2013).

  342. Simon, L. et al. DNA damage: COMET assay. Man. Sperm Funct. Test. Hum. Assist. Reprod. 202, 212 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  343. Jiang, N. et al. An overview of comet assay application for detecting DNA damage in aquatic animals. Agriculture 13, 623 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  344. Simon, L., Lutton, D., McManus, J. & Lewis, S. E. Sperm DNA damage measured by the alkaline Comet assay as an independent predictor of male infertility and in vitro fertilization success. Fertil. Steril. 95, 652–657 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  345. Evenson, D. P. The Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA®) and other sperm DNA fragmentation tests for evaluation of sperm nuclear DNA integrity as related to fertility. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 169, 56–75 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  346. Evenson, D. P. & Wixon, R. Environmental toxicants cause sperm DNA fragmentation as detected by the Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA®). Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacology 207, 532–537 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  347. Larson-Cook, K. L. et al. Relationship between the outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques and sperm DNA fragmentation as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay. Fertil. Steril. 80, 895–902 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  348. Chen, Y., Li, W. & Chen, X. The Association of Sperm DNA fragment and assisted reproductive outcomes: a meta-analysis. Computational Math. methods Med. 2022, 1126616 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  349. Sharma, R., Iovine, C., Agarwal, A. & Henkel, R. TUNEL assay—Standardized method for testing sperm DNA fragmentation. Andrologia 53, e13738 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  350. Sharma, R., Masaki, J. & Agarwal, A. in Spermatogenesis: Methods and Protocols (eds Carrell, D. T. & Aston, K. I.) 121–136 (Humana, 2013).

  351. Mitchell, L., De Iuliis, G. & Aitken, R. J. The TUNEL assay consistently underestimates DNA damage in human spermatozoa and is influenced by DNA compaction and cell vitality: development of an improved methodology. Int. J. Androl. 34, 2–13 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  352. Henkel, R. in Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress: Basics and Measurement of Oxidative Stress (eds Andreescu, S., Henkel, R. & Khelfi, A.) 497–504 (Springer, 2024).

  353. You, J. B. et al. Machine learning for sperm selection. Nat. Rev. Urol. 18, 387–403 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  354. Hsu, C. T. et al. Development and integration of LensHooke® R10 for automatic and standardized diagnosis for sperm DNA fragmentation. Andrology 11, 1337–1344 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  355. Wang, Y. et al. Prediction of DNA integrity from morphological parameters using a single-sperm DNA fragmentation index assay. Adv. Sci. 6, 1900712 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  356. Baldán, F. J., García-Gil, D. & Fernandez-Basso, C. Revolutionizing Sperm Analysis with AI: A Review of Computer-Aided Sperm Analysis Systems. Computation 13, 132 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  357. López, G., Lafuente, R., Checa, M. A., Carreras, R. & Brassesco, M. Diagnostic value of sperm DNA fragmentation and sperm high-magnification for predicting outcome of assisted reproduction treatment. Asian J. Androl. 15, 790–794 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  358. Hozyen, M. et al. Reproductive outcomes of different sperm selection techniques for ICSI patients with abnormal sperm DNA fragmentation: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod. Sci. 29, 220–228 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  359. Villeneuve, P. et al. Spermatozoa isolation with Felix™ outperforms conventional density gradient centrifugation preparation in selecting cells with low DNA damage. Andrology 11, 1593–1604 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  360. Zhao, F., Yang, Q., Shi, S., Luo, X. & Sun, Y. Semen preparation methods and sperm telomere length: density gradient centrifugation versus the swim up procedure. Sci. Rep. 6, 39051 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  361. Gode, F., Gürbüz, A. S., Tamer, B., Pala, I. & Isik, A. Z. The effects of microfluidic sperm sorting, density gradient and swim-up methods on semen oxidation reduction potential. Urol. J. 17, 397–401 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  362. Malvezzi, H., Sharma, R., Agarwal, A., Abuzenadah, A. M. & Abu-Elmagd, M. Sperm quality after density gradient centrifugation with three commercially available media: a controlled trial. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 12, 121 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  363. Muratori, M. et al. Sperm selection with density gradient centrifugation and swim up: effect on DNA fragmentation in viable spermatozoa. Sci. Rep. 9, 7492 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  364. Ricci, G. et al. Semen preparation methods and sperm apoptosis: swim-up versus gradient-density centrifugation technique. Fertil. Steril. 91, 632–638 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  365. Kim, E.-K. et al. Comparison of the effect of different media on the clinical outcomes of the density-gradient centrifugation/swim-up and swim-up methods. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med. 42, 22–29 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  366. Marzano, G. et al. Sperm selection in assisted reproduction: a review of established methods and cutting-edge possibilities. Biotechnol. Adv. 40, 107498 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  367. Kadu, K. S. et al. Application of physiological sperm selection in assisted reproductive technology (ART) for patients with diabetes mellitus: a case report. Cureus 16, e53018 (2024).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  368. Lotti, F. & Maggi, M. Effects of diabetes mellitus on sperm quality and fertility outcomes: clinical evidence. Andrology 11, 399–416 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  369. Banti, M., Van Zyl, E. & Kafetzis, D. Sperm preparation with microfluidic sperm sorting chip may improve intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes compared to density gradient centrifugation. Reprod. Sci. 31, 1695–1704 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  370. Gisbert Iranzo, A. et al. Sperm selection using microfluidic techniques significantly decreases sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF), enhancing reproductive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biology 14, 792 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  371. Romero-Aguirregomezcorta, J. et al. Sperm selection by rheotaxis improves sperm quality and early embryo development. Reproduction 161, 343–352 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  372. Zhang, Y. et al. Generation of gradients on a microfluidic device: toward a high-throughput investigation of spermatozoa chemotaxis. PLoS ONE 10, e0142555 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  373. Ko, Y.-J., Maeng, J.-H., Hwang, S. Y. & Ahn, Y. Design, fabrication, and testing of a microfluidic device for thermotaxis and chemotaxis assays of sperm. SLAS Technol. 23, 507–515 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  374. Bhat, G. R., Lone, F. A. & Dalal, J. Microfluidics — a novel technique for high-quality sperm selection for greater ART outcomes. FASEB Bioadv. 6, 406–423 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  375. Herbicht, R., Neufeld, G., Klein, C. & Henning, H. Evaluation of a novel microfluidic chip-like device for purifying bovine frozen-thawed semen for in vitro fertilization. Theriogenology 209, 50–59 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  376. Gonzalez-Castro, R. A. & Carnevale, E. M. Use of microfluidics to sort stallion sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 202, 1–9 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  377. Yan, S., Zhang, J., Yuan, D. & Li, W. Hybrid microfluidics combined with active and passive approaches for continuous cell separation. Electrophoresis 38, 238–249 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  378. Adolfsson, E., Ingberg, J., Ingberg, E. & Bohlin, T. Clinical validation and experiences of the microfluidics sperm preparation device ZyMot™. Reprod. Biomed. Online 48, 103995 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  379. Misko, V. R., Nori, F. & De Malsche, W. Motility-dependent selective transport of active matter in trap arrays: separation methods based on trapping-detrapping and deterministic lateral displacement. Nanoscale 17, 13434–13446 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  380. Simon, L. et al. Micro-electrophoresis: a noninvasive method of sperm selection based on membrane charge. Fertil. Steril. 103, 361–366.e3 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  381. Yan, Y., Zhang, B., Fu, Q., Wu, J. & Liu, R. A fully integrated biomimetic microfluidic device for evaluation of sperm response to thermotaxis and chemotaxis. Lab. Chip 21, 310–318 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  382. Smirnova, O. et al. Design clues for motility and rheotaxis-based microfluidic chips for sperm sorting. Prog. Biomed. Eng. 7, 042004 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  383. Chen, S. et al. Microfluidic thermotaxic selection of highly motile sperm and in vitro fertilization. Bio-Des. Manuf. 7, 687–700 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  384. Surendran, A. N., Zhou, R. & Lin, Y. Microfluidic devices for magnetic separation of biological particles: a review. J. Med. Devices 15, 024001 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  385. Elsayed, M. Field Programmable Lab on a Chip Systems Using Digital Microfluidics and Optoelectronic Tweezers. Thesis, Univ. Toronto, (2024).

  386. Sartorelli, E. M. P., Mazzucatto, L. F. & de Pina-Neto, J. M. Effect of paternal age on human sperm chromosomes. Fertil. Steril. 76, 1119–1123 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  387. Escudé-Logares, L., Serrano-Novillo, C., Uroz, L., Galindo, A. & Márquez, C. Advanced paternal age: a new indicator for the use of microfluidic devices for sperm DNA fragmentation selection. J. Clin. Med. 13, 457 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  388. Kocur, O. M. et al. Can a sperm selection technique improve embryo ploidy? Andrology 11, 1605–1612 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  389. Kocur, O. M. et al. Assessing male gamete genome integrity to ameliorate poor assisted reproductive technology clinical outcome. F S Sci. 4, 2–10 (2023).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  390. Dabiri, M. et al. Biomimetic angular microfluidic platform for onsite selection of high-quality animal sperm, Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.103028 (2025).

  391. Alkan, H. et al. Does using microfluidic sperm sorting chips in bovine IVEP affect blastocyst development? Reprod. Domestic Anim. 58, 1012–1020 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  392. Yaghoobi, M. et al. Faster sperm selected by rheotaxis leads to superior early embryonic development in vitro. Lab. Chip 24, 210–223 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  393. Vigolo, V., Gautier, C., Falomo, M. E. & Aurich, C. Selection of frozen–thawed stallion semen by microfluidic technology. Reprod. Domestic Anim. 58, 443–449 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  394. Rashki Ghaleno, L. et al. Exploring the role of hyaluronic acid in reproductive biology and beyond: applications in assisted reproduction and tissue engineering. Adv. Biol. 8, 2300621 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  395. Gómez-Torres, M. J. et al. Molecular chaperone HSPA2 distribution during hyaluronic acid selection in human sperm. Reprod. Sci. 30, 1176–1185 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  396. Avalos-Durán, G. et al. Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. conventional ICSI in couples with male factor: a systematic review. JBRA Assist. Reprod. 22, 139–147 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  397. West, R. et al. Sperm selection with hyaluronic acid improved live birth outcomes among older couples and was connected to sperm DNA quality, potentially affecting all treatment outcomes. Hum. Reprod. 37, 1106–1125 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  398. Marchlewska, K. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation index and hyaluronan binding ability in men from infertile couples and men with testicular germ cell tumor. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 7893961 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  399. Pacheco, A. et al. Magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS): a useful sperm-selection technique in cases of high levels of sperm DNA fragmentation. J. Clin. Med. 9, 3976 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  400. Garrido, N. & Gil Juliá, M. The use of non-apoptotic sperm selected by magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) to enhance reproductive outcomes: what the evidence says. Biology 13, 30 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  401. Gil, M., Sar-Shalom, V., Melendez Sivira, Y., Carreras, R. & Checa, M. A. Sperm selection using magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 30, 479–485 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  402. Hasanen, E. et al. PICSI vs. MACS for abnormal sperm DNA fragmentation ICSI cases: a prospective randomized trial. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 37, 2605–2613 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  403. Hamacher, T. Semen Refinement: Microfluidic Separation Techniques for the Removal of Micro-Organisms from Semen for the Veterinary Industry. Dissertation, Univ. Twente (2021).

  404. Chan, P. J., Jacobson, J. D., Corselli, J. U. & Patton, W. C. A simple zeta method for sperm selection based on membrane charge. Fertil. Steril. 85, 481–486 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  405. Ribas et al. Comprehensive analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation by five different assays: TUNEL assay, SCSA, SCD test and alkaline and neutral Comet assay. Andrology 1, 715–722 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  406. Cariati, F. et al. Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction. J. Pers. Med. 14, 726 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  407. Zhang, X., Chao, S., Ye, N. & Ouyang, D. Emerging trends in sperm selection: enhancing success rates in assisted reproduction. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 22, 67 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  408. Jones, R. E. & Lopez, K. H. Human Reproductive Biology (Academic Press, 2013).

  409. Prochowska, S., Napierkowska, S., Czech, B. & Niżański, W. Feline sperm head morphometry in relation to male pedigree and fertility. Theriogenology 208, 119–125 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  410. Nussdorfer, P., Cilenšek, I., Zorn, B. & Petrovič, D. Adapted methods for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in assessment of human sperm morphology. Bosn. J. Basic. Med. Sci. 18, 43–48 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  411. Endo, T. et al. Multiple ageing effects on testicular/epididymal germ cells lead to decreased male fertility in mice. Commun. Biol. 7, 16 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  412. Mahé, C. et al. Sperm-fluid-cell interplays in the bovine oviduct: glycosaminoglycans modulate sperm binding to the isthmic reservoir. Sci. Rep. 13, 10311 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  413. Murawski, M. et al. The utility of nanowater for ram semen cryopreservation. Exp. Biol. Med. 240, 611–617 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  414. Ebel, F. et al. Optimized protocol for high-vacuum scanning electron microscopy analysis of polyacrylamide hydrogel-attached sperm cells in a binary system. Microsc. Res. Tech. 87, 1122–1127 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  415. Palomino, J. & De los Reyes, M. A scanning electron microscopy study of frozen / thawed dog sperm during in vitro gamete interaction. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 44, 278–283 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  416. Kushawaha, B. et al. Collapsed mitochondrial cristae in goat spermatozoa due to mercury result in lethality and compromised motility along with altered kinematic patterns. Sci. Rep. 11, 646 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  417. Khophloiklang, V., Chanapiwat, P. & Kaeoket, K. Camellia oil with its rich in fatty acids enhances post-thawed boar sperm quality. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 66, 6 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  418. Rex, A., Aagaard, J. & Fedder, J. DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa: a historical review. Andrology 5, 622–630 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.D. researched data for the article. M.D., R.R., D.K.G., S.P.d.G. and M.E.W. contributed substantially to discussion of the content. M.D., D.M.G. and M.B. wrote the article. All authors reviewed and/or edited the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Ebrahimi Warkiani.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Urology thanks Geoffry De Iuliis, Olena M. Kocurand the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dabiri, M., Goss, D.M., Ramasamy, R. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation and its influence on mammalian reproduction. Nat Rev Urol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-025-01123-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-025-01123-6

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing