Abstract
Sperm DNA fragmentation is a recognized factor in male infertility with direct implications for embryo development, implantation and pregnancy outcomes. Historically, standard semen analysis has not included assessments of DNA integrity, creating a clear need for advanced diagnostic tools. DNA damage can arise through pathways such as apoptosis, oxidative stress and exposure to environmental toxins, all of which compromise reproductive potential. Several methodologies exist for measuring sperm DNA fragmentation, including the sperm chromatin structure assay, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL), the Comet assay and sperm chromatin dispersion, each of which has unique advantages and limitations. Novel automated imaging platforms incorporating machine learning algorithms have emerged, enabling high-throughput, single-sperm assessment and reducing subjectivity associated with manual scoring. Species differences further complicate the understanding of DNA stability and sperm quality, especially in livestock and models of artificial insemination; nonetheless, physiological similarities between humans and species close to humans provide useful translational insights. Emerging sperm selection technologies, including microfluidics, hyaluronic acid affinity systems and magnetic-activated cell sorting, show promise in reducing DNA fragmentation, improving reproductive outcomes and decreasing pregnancy loss. As the field progresses toward increasingly personalized fertility treatments, measures of DNA integrity will remain central to optimizing assisted reproduction success rates across species.
Key points
-
Sperm DNA fragmentation is a major factor affecting male fertility, and can affect embryo development, embryo implantation and, ultimately, living offspring; none of these factors is usually defined by a standard semen analysis.
-
DNA damage can be induced by oxidative stress, apoptosis and environmental toxins, which contribute to sperm DNA fragmentation, which in turn reduces reproductive capability in both humans and livestock species.
-
Assays such as the sperm chromatin structure assay, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling, Comet and sperm chromatin dispersion are unique methodologies to identify sperm DNA fragmentation. Each has advantages, disadvantages and importance based on the clinical or research initiative.
-
Species-specific differences in sperm DNA integrity make it very difficult to use standard thresholds, particularly in artificial insemination and breeding programmes, but thresholds are relatively consistent within humans as a species.
-
New sperm selection techniques, particularly microfluidics and magnetic-activated cell sorting are now being used to enhance fertility outcomes in assisted reproduction, and can help to reduce sperm DNA fragmentation through enhanced selection of high-quality sperm with intact DNA.
-
New therapeutic approaches, such as extracellular vesicles, stem cell-derived components and specific antioxidant treatments, seem to have substantial promise in reducing sperm DNA fragmentation. These strategies work by improving sperm quality, decreasing oxidative stress and promoting mechanisms that repair DNA.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout





Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eisenberg, M. L. et al. Male infertility. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 9, 49 (2023).
Vallet-Buisan, M., Mecca, R., Jones, C., Coward, K. & Yeste, M. Contribution of semen to early embryo development: fertilization and beyond. Hum. Reprod. Update https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmad006 (2023).
Agarwal, A. et al. Male infertility. Lancet 397, 319–333 (2021).
Khatun, A., Rahman, M. S. & Pang, M.-G. Clinical assessment of the male fertility. Obstet. Gynecol. Sci. 61, 179–191 (2018).
Barbăroșie, C., Agarwal, A. & Henkel, R. Diagnostic value of advanced semen analysis in evaluation of male infertility. Andrologia 53, e13625 (2021).
Esteves, S. C. Evolution of the World Health Organization semen analysis manual: where are we? Nat. Rev. Urol. 19, 439–446 (2022).
Zhang, Z. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation index and pregnancy outcome after IVF or ICSI: a meta-analysis. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 32, 17–26 (2015).
Peng, T. et al. Machine learning-based clustering to identify the combined effect of the DNA fragmentation index and conventional semen parameters on in vitro fertilization outcomes. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 21, 26 (2023).
Hungerford, A. J., Bakos, H. W. & Aitken, R. J. Addition of vitamin C mitigates the loss of antioxidant capacity, vitality and DNA integrity in cryopreserved human semen samples. Antioxidants 13, 247 (2024).
Aitken, R. J., Drevet, J. R., Moazamian, A. & Gharagozloo, P. Male infertility and oxidative stress: a focus on the underlying mechanisms. Antioxidants 11, 306 (2022).
Jiang, W. et al. What sperm parameters effect blastocyst formation and quality during ICSI with severe male infertility. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 70, 218–227 (2024).
Lismer, A. & Kimmins, S. Emerging evidence that the mammalian sperm epigenome serves as a template for embryo development. Nat. Commun. 14, 2142 (2023).
Vasilescu, S. A., Ding, L., Parast, F. Y., Nosrati, R. & Warkiani, M. E. Sperm quality metrics were improved by a biomimetic microfluidic selection platform compared to swim-up methods. Microsyst. Nanoengineering 9, 37 (2023).
Pacey, A. Environmental and lifestyle factors associated with sperm DNA damage. Hum. Fertil. 13, 189–193 (2010).
Radwan, M. et al. Sperm DNA damage — the effect of stress and everyday life factors. Int. J. Impot. Res. 28, 148–154 (2016).
Lewis, S. & Aitken, R. DNA damage to spermatozoa has impacts on fertilization and pregnancy. Cell Tissue Res. 322, 33–41 (2005).
Finelli, R., Moreira, B. P., Alves, M. G. & Agarwal, A. Unraveling the molecular impact of sperm DNA damage on human reproduction. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1358, 77–113 (2022).
Horta, F., Catt, S., Ramachandran, P., Vollenhoven, B. & Temple-Smith, P. Female ageing affects the DNA repair capacity of oocytes in IVF using a controlled model of sperm DNA damage in mice. Hum. Reprod. 35, 529–544 (2020).
Vaughan, D., Tirado, E., Garcia, D., Datta, V. & Sakkas, D. DNA fragmentation of sperm: a radical examination of the contribution of oxidative stress and age in 16 945 semen samples. Hum. Reprod. 35, 2188–2196 (2020).
Robertson, M. J., Chambers, C., Spanner, E. A., de Graaf, S. P. & Rickard, J. P. The assessment of sperm DNA integrity: implications for assisted reproductive technology fertility outcomes across livestock species. Biology 13, 539 (2024).
Kumaresan, A., Das Gupta, M., Datta, T. K. & Morrell, J. M. Sperm DNA integrity and male fertility in farm animals: a review. Front. Veterinary Sci. 7, 321 (2020).
Rajska, I. Freeze drying as a method of long-term conservation of mammalian semen — a review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 21, 1209–1234 (2021).
Kölle, S. Sperm–oviduct interactions: key factors for sperm survival and maintenance of sperm fertilizing capacity. Andrology 10, 837–843 (2022).
Saint-Dizier, M. et al. Sperm interactions with the female reproductive tract: a key for successful fertilization in mammals. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 516, 110956 (2020).
Li, S. & Winuthayanon, W. Oviduct: roles in fertilization and early embryo development. J. Endocrinol. 232, R1–R26 (2017).
Ellington, J. E. et al. Higher-quality human sperm in a sample selectively attach to oviduct (fallopian tube) epithelial cells in vitro. Fertil. Steril. 71, 924–929 (1999).
Nagaki, C. A. P., Hamilton, T. R.dS. & D’Avila Assumpção, M. E. O. What is known so far about bull sperm protamination: a review. Anim. Reprod. 19, e20210109 (2022).
Dogan, S. et al. Sperm protamine-status correlates to the fertility of breeding bulls. Biol. Reprod. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.114.124255 (2015).
Chłopik, A. & Wysokińska, A. Canine spermatozoa — What do we know about their morphology and physiology? An overview. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 55, 113–126 (2020).
Hungerford, A., Bakos, H. W. & Aitken, R. J. Sperm cryopreservation: current status and future developments. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 35, 265–281 (2022).
Yánez-Ortiz, I., Catalán, J., Rodríguez-Gil, J. E., Miró, J. & Yeste, M. Advances in sperm cryopreservation in farm animals: cattle, horse, pig and sheep. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 246, 106904 (2022).
Peris-Frau, P. et al. Sperm cryodamage in ruminants: understanding the molecular changes induced by the cryopreservation process to optimize sperm quality. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 2781 (2020).
Oldenbroek, J. K. & Windig, J. J. Opportunities of genomics for the use of semen cryo-conserved in gene banks. Front. Genet. 13, 907411 (2022).
Tamburrino, L. et al. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa: functional, molecular and clinical aspects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 4656 (2023).
The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Fertility preservation and reproduction in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies: a committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 100, 1224–1231 (2013).
Di Santo, M., Tarozzi, N., Nadalini, M. & Borini, A. Human sperm cryopreservation: update on techniques, effect on DNA integrity, and implications for ART. Adv. Urol. 2012, 854837 (2012).
Pavlovych, O. et al. Ultrastructural and functional characteristics of human spermatozoa after cryopreservation by vitrification. Probl. Cryobiol. Cryomed. 30, 24–33 (2020).
Yurchuk, T., Petrushkо, M., Gapon, A., Piniaiev, V. & Kuleshova, L. The impact of cryopreservation on the morphology of spermatozoa in men with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia. Cryobiology 100, 117–124 (2021).
Gunes, S., Al-Sadaan, M. & Agarwal, A. Spermatogenesis, DNA damage and DNA repair mechanisms in male infertility. Reprod. Biomed. Online 31, 309–319 (2015).
Henkel, R. & Leisegang, K. in Male Infertility: Contemporary Clinical Approaches, andrologyA ART and Antioxidants (eds Parekattil, S. J., Esteves, S. C. & Agarwal, A.) 361–375 (Springer, 2020).
Okada, Y. Sperm chromatin condensation: epigenetic mechanisms to compact the genome and spatiotemporal regulation from inside and outside the nucleus. Genes. Genet. Syst. 97, 41–53 (2022).
Liu, T. et al. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of apoptosis during dissociated spermatogenesis. Front. Physiol. 8, 188 (2017).
Fok, K. L., Chen, H., Ruan, Y. C. & Chan, H. C. Novel regulators of spermatogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 29, 31–42 (2014).
Napoletano, F. et al. p53-dependent programmed necrosis controls germ cell homeostasis during spermatogenesis. PLoS Genet. 13, e1007024 (2017).
Hussain, T. et al. Unraveling the harmful effect of oxidative stress on male fertility: a mechanistic insight. Front. Endocrinol. 14, 1070692 (2023).
Pardiñas, M. L. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation and microfluidics: a new era in human sperm selection. Me. Reprod. Embryol. Clin. 9, 100121 (2022).
Aziz, N., Said, T., Paasch, U. & Agarwal, A. The relationship between human sperm apoptosis, morphology and the sperm deformity index. Hum. Reprod. 22, 1413–1419 (2007).
Jiang, H. & Huang, C.-J. Aberrant protamination in sperm correlates to anomalous nuclear and cytoplasmic architectures in infertile males with sperm dysmorphology. Asian J. Androl. 26, 183–188 (2024).
O’Donnell, L. Mechanisms of spermiogenesis and spermiation and how they are disturbed. Spermatogenesis 4, e979623 (2014).
Hao, S.-L., Ni, F.-D. & Yang, W.-X. The dynamics and regulation of chromatin remodeling during spermiogenesis. Gene 706, 201–210 (2019).
Sakkas, D. & Alvarez, J. G. Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis. Fertil. Steril. 93, 1027–1036 (2010).
O’Donnell, L., Nicholls, P. K., O’Bryan, M. K., McLachlan, R. I. & Stanton, P. G. Spermiation: the process of sperm release. Spermatogenesis 1, 14–35 (2011).
Kaur Gill-Sharma, M., Choudhuri, J. & D’Souza, S. Sperm chromatin protamination: an endocrine perspective. Protein Peptide Lett. 18, 786–801 (2011).
Rathke, C., Baarends, W. M., Awe, S. & Renkawitz-Pohl, R. Chromatin dynamics during spermiogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1839, 155–168 (2014).
Crapster, J. A. et al. HIPK4 is essential for murine spermiogenesis. elife 9, e50209 (2020).
Ni, K., Spiess, A. N., Schuppe, H. C. & Steger, K. The impact of sperm protamine deficiency and sperm DNA damage on human male fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrology 4, 789–799 (2016).
Oliva, R. & Ballescà, J. L. Altered histone retention and epigenetic modifications in the sperm of infertile men. Asian J. Androl. 14, 239–240 (2011).
Miller, D., Brinkworth, M. & Iles, D. Paternal DNA packaging in spermatozoa: more than the sum of its parts? DNA, histones, protamines and epigenetics. Reproduction 139, 287–301 (2010).
Meyer, R. G., Ketchum, C. C. & Meyer-Ficca, M. L. Heritable sperm chromatin epigenetics: a break to remember. Biol. Reprod. 97, 784–797 (2017).
Moritz, L. & Hammoud, S. S. The art of packaging the sperm genome: molecular and structural basis of the histone-to-protamine exchange. Front. Endocrinol. 13, 895502 (2022).
Leduc, F., Maquennehan, V., Nkoma, G. B. & Boissonneault, G. DNA damage response during chromatin remodeling in elongating spermatids of mice. Biol. Reprod. 78, 324–332 (2008).
Cavé, T., Desmarais, R., Lacombe-Burgoyne, C. & Boissonneault, G. Genetic instability and chromatin remodeling in spermatids. Genes 10, 40 (2019).
Gosálvez, J., Fernández, C. L., Johnston, S. D. & Bartolomé-Nebreda, J. Role of DNase activity in human sperm DNA fragmentation. Biomolecules 14, 304 (2024).
Liu, K.-S., Mao, X.-D., Pan, F. & An, R. F. Effect and mechanisms of reproductive tract infection on oxidative stress parameters, sperm DNA fragmentation, and semen quality in infertile males. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 19, 97 (2021).
Wang, K. et al. Role of oxidative stress in varicocele. Front. Genet. 13, 850114 (2022).
Sciorio, R. et al. Potential effects of environmental toxicants on sperm quality and potential risk for fertility in humans. Front. Endocrinol. 16, 1545593 (2025).
Virant-Klun, I., Imamovic-Kumalic, S. & Pinter, B. From oxidative stress to male infertility: review of the associations of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (bisphenols, phthalates, and parabens) with human semen quality. Antioxidants 11, 1617 (2022).
Mendes, S. et al. The role of ROS as a double-edged sword in (in)fertility: the impact of cancer treatment. Cancers 14, 1585 (2022).
Newman, H., Catt, S., Vining, B., Vollenhoven, B. & Horta, F. DNA repair and response to sperm DNA damage in oocytes and embryos, and the potential consequences in ART: a systematic review. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 28, gaab071 (2022).
Ménézo, Y., Dale, B. & Cohen, M. DNA damage and repair in human oocytes and embryos: a review. Zygote 18, 357–365 (2010).
Stringer, J. M., Winship, A., Liew, S. H. & Hutt, K. The capacity of oocytes for DNA repair. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 75, 2777–2792 (2018).
Esquerré-Lamare, C. et al. Sperm aneuploidy and DNA fragmentation in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss: a multicenter case-control study. Basic Clin. Androl. 28, 4 (2018).
Kurpisz, M., Havryluk, A., Nakonechnyj, A., Chopyak, V. & Kamieniczna, M. Cryptorchidism and long-term consequences. Reprod. Biol. 10, 19–35 (2010).
Silva, C. A., Cocuzza, M., Borba, E. F. & Bonfá, E. Cutting-edge issues in autoimmune orchitis. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 42, 256–263 (2012).
Fawzy, F., Hussein, A., Eid, M. M., Kashash, A. M. E. & Salem, H. K. Cryptorchidism and fertility. Clin. Med. Insights Reprod. Health 9, 39–43 (2015).
Bujan, L. et al. Impact of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for testicular germ cell tumors on spermatogenesis and sperm DNA: a multicenter prospective study from the CECOS network. Fertil. Steril. 100, 673–680.e2 (2013).
Paoli, D. et al. Testicular cancer and sperm DNA damage: short-and long-term effects of antineoplastic treatment. Andrology 3, 122–128 (2015).
Meistrich, M. L. Effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy on spermatogenesis in humans. Fertil. Steril. 100, 1180–1186 (2013).
Meistrich, M. L. Risks of genetic damage in offspring conceived using spermatozoa produced during chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Andrology 8, 545–558 (2020).
Wang, Y. et al. Research progress on the role and mechanism of DNA damage repair in germ cell development. Front. Endocrinol. 14, 1234280 (2023).
Takeshima, T., Kuroda, S. & Yumura, Y. Cancer chemotherapy and chemiluminescence detection of reactive oxygen species in human semen. Antioxidants 8, 449 (2019).
Esquerré-Lamare, C., Isus, F., Moinard, N. & Bujan, L. Sperm DNA fragmentation after radioiodine treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer. Basic. Clin. Androl. 25, 8 (2015).
Lambrot, R. et al. High radiosensitivity of germ cells in human male fetus. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 92, 2632–2639 (2007).
Georgakopoulos, I. et al. Radiotherapy and testicular function: a comprehensive review of the radiation-induced effects with an emphasis on spermatogenesis. Biomedicines 12, 1492 (2024).
Lai, P. M. & Chan, K. M. Roles of histone H2A variants in cancer development, prognosis, and treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 3144 (2024).
Maselli, J. Chemotherapeutic Agents Used to Treat Testicular Cancer Affect the Sperm Proteome, Male Fertility and Progeny Outcome. Thesis, McGill University (2013).
Wo, J. Y. & Viswanathan, A. N. Impact of radiotherapy on fertility, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes in female cancer patients. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 73, 1304–1312 (2009).
Meirow, D. & Schiff, E. Appraisal of chemotherapy effects on reproductive outcome according to animal studies and clinical data. J. Natl Cancer Inst. Monogr. 2005, 21–25 (2005).
Rabaca, A. et al. Use of antioxidant could ameliorate the negative impact of etoposide on human sperm DNA during chemotherapy. Reprod. Biomed. Online 40, 856–866 (2020).
Ståhl, O. et al. Sperm DNA integrity in cancer patients: the effect of disease and treatment. Int. J. Androl. 32, 695–703 (2009).
Abou-El-Naga, A. M., Abdraboh, M. E., El-Magd, M. A., Mansour, S. & Mansour, H. A. E.-H. Impact of cryopreservation agents on sperm quality, DNA fragmentation, and apoptotic markers in fertile and infertile males. Sci. Rep. 15, 30072 (2025).
Aitken, R. J. Sperm DNA integrity: a special issue exploring the causes, consequences, and treatment of DNA damage in human spermatozoa. Andrology 11, 1541–1544 (2023).
Velez, D. & Ohlander, S. Medical therapies causing iatrogenic male infertility. Fertil. Steril. 116, 618–624 (2021).
Mima, M., Greenwald, D. & Ohlander, S. Environmental toxins and male fertility. Curr. Urol. Rep. 19, 50 (2018).
Gil-Guzman, E. et al. Differential production of reactive oxygen species by subsets of human spermatozoa at different stages of maturation. Hum. Reprod. 16, 1922–1930 (2001).
Agarwal, A., Said, T. M., Bedaiwy, M. A., Banerjee, J. & Alvarez, J. G. Oxidative stress in an assisted reproductive techniques setting. Fertil. Steril. 86, 503–512 (2006).
Pan, J., Liu, P., Yu, X., Zhang, Z. & Liu, J. The adverse role of endocrine disrupting chemicals in the reproductive system. Front. Endocrinol. 14, 1324993 (2024).
Chianese, R. & Pierantoni, R. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production alters sperm quality. Antioxidants 10, 92 (2021).
Mahfouz, R. Z. et al. Sperm viability, apoptosis, and intracellular reactive oxygen species levels in human spermatozoa before and after induction of oxidative stress. Fertil. Steril. 93, 814–821 (2010).
Ménézo, Y. J. et al. Antioxidants to reduce sperm DNA fragmentation: an unexpected adverse effect. Reprod. Biomed. Online 14, 418–421 (2007).
Alvarez, J. G. & Gosalvez, J. in Studies on Men’s Health and Fertility (eds Agarwal, A., Aitken, R. J. & Alvarez, J. G.) 221–235 (Humana, 2012).
D’Amours, O. et al. Evidences of biological functions of biliverdin reductase A in the bovine epididymis. J. Cell. Physiol. 231, 1077–1089 (2016).
Goss, D. M., Vasilescu, S. A., Sacks, G., Gardner, D. K. & Warkiani, M. E. Microfluidics facilitating the use of small extracellular vesicles in innovative approaches to male infertility. Nat. Rev. Urol. 20, 66–95 (2023).
Aitken, R. J. et al. Electrophilic aldehydes generated by sperm metabolism activate mitochondrial reactive oxygen species generation and apoptosis by targeting succinate dehydrogenase. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 33048–33060 (2012).
Wang, Y., Fu, X. & Li, H. Mechanisms of oxidative stress-induced sperm dysfunction. Front. Endocrinol. 16, 1520835 (2025).
Panner Selvam, M. K., Ambar, R. F., Agarwal, A. & Henkel, R. Etiologies of sperm DNA damage and its impact on male infertility. Andrologia 53, e13706 (2021).
Surai, P. et al. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant protection in avian semen — review. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 14, 1024–1050 (2001).
Collodel, G., Castellini, C., Lee, J. C.-Y. & Signorini, C. Relevance of fatty acids to sperm maturation and quality. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 7038124 (2020).
Collodel, G., Moretti, E., Noto, D., Corsaro, R. & Signorini, C. Oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids as a promising area of research in infertility. Antioxidants 11, 1002 (2022).
Sailer, B. L., Sarkar, L. J., Bjordahl, J. A., Jost, L. K. & Evenson, D. P. Effects of heat stress on mouse testicular cells and sperm chromatin structure. J. Androl. 18, 294–301 (1997).
Budzinska, M. et al. The role of the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis in human ejaculated sperm damage under a state of scrotal heat stress. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 41, 99–108 (2024).
Ho, C. L. T. et al. The relationship between genitourinary microorganisms and oxidative stress, sperm DNA fragmentation and semen parameters in infertile men. Andrologia 54, e14322 (2022).
Takalani, N. B. et al. Role of oxidative stress in male infertility. Reprod. Fertil. 4, e230024 (2023).
Homa, S. T. et al. A comparison between two assays for measuring seminal oxidative stress and their relationship with sperm DNA fragmentation and semen parameters. Genes 10, 236 (2019).
Ko, E. Y., Sabanegh, E. S. Jr & Agarwal, A. Male infertility testing: reactive oxygen species and antioxidant capacity. Fertil. Steril. 102, 1518–1527 (2014).
Aib, H., Parvez, M. S. & Czédli, H. M. Pharmaceuticals and microplastics in aquatic environments: a comprehensive review of pathways and distribution, toxicological and ecological effects. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 22, 799 (2025).
Gautam, R., Priyadarshini, E., Nirala, J. & Rajamani, P. in Environmental Radiobiology (eds Schofield, P. N. & Mothersill, C. E.) 67–77 (CRC Press, 2023).
Katole, S. B., Kumar, P. & Patil, R. D. Environmental pollutants and livestock health: a review. Veterinary Res. Int. 1, 1–13 (2013).
Wrzecińska, M., Kowalczyk, A., Cwynar, P. & Czerniawska-Piątkowska, E. Disorders of the reproductive health of cattle as a response to exposure to toxic metals. Biology 10, 882 (2021).
Krzastek, S. C., Farhi, J., Gray, M. & Smith, R. P. Impact of environmental toxin exposure on male fertility potential. Transl. Androl. Urol. 9, 2797–2813 (2020).
Godswill, A. C. & Godspel, A. C. Physiological effects of plastic wastes on the endocrine system (bisphenol A, phthalates, bisphenol S, PBDEs, TBBPA). Int. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 4, 11–29 (2019).
Madhu, N. R. et al. in Oxidative Stress and Toxicity in Reproductive Biology and Medicine: A Comprehensive Update on Male Infertility Volume II (eds Roychoudhury, S. & Kesari, K. K.) 33–58 (Springer, 2022).
Baloch, S., Kazi, T. G., Baig, J. A., Afridi, H. I. & Arain, M. B. Occupational exposure of lead and cadmium on adolescent and adult workers of battery recycling and welding workshops: adverse impact on health. Sci. Total. Environ. 720, 137549 (2020).
Mukherjee, A. et al. Arsenic and other geogenic contaminants in global groundwater. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 5, 312–328 (2024).
Crump, K. L. & Trudeau, V. L. Mercury-induced reproductive impairment in fish. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 28, 895–907 (2009).
Donkor, A. K., Ghoveisi, H. & Bonzongo, J.-C. J. Use of metallic mercury in artisanal gold mining by amalgamation: a review of temporal and spatial trends and environmental pollution. Minerals 14, 555 (2024).
do Carmo Cupertino, M. et al. Cadmium-induced testicular damage is associated with mineral imbalance, increased antioxidant enzymes activity and protein oxidation in rats. Life Sci. 175, 23–30 (2017).
Zhang, T. et al. Effects of low lead exposure on sperm quality and sperm DNA methylation in adult men. Cell Biosci. 11, 150 (2021).
Yeung, B. H., Wan, H. T., Law, A. Y. & Wong, C. K. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: multiple effects on testicular signaling and spermatogenesis. Spermatogenesis 1, 231–239 (2011).
Rato, L. & Sousa, A. C. The impact of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in male fertility: focus on the action of obesogens. J. Xenobiotics 11, 163–196 (2021).
Sikka, S. C. & Wang, R. Endocrine disruptors and estrogenic effects on male reproductive axis. Asian J. Androl. 10, 134–145 (2008).
Amir, S. et al. Endocrine disruptors acting on estrogen and androgen pathways cause reproductive disorders through multiple mechanisms: a review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 1464 (2021).
Kleshchev, M., Osadchuk, A. & Osadchuk, L. Impaired semen quality, an increase of sperm morphological defects and DNA fragmentation associated with environmental pollution in urban population of young men from Western Siberia, Russia. PLoS ONE 16, e0258900 (2021).
Rubes, J. et al. Genetic polymorphisms influence the susceptibility of men to sperm DNA damage associated with exposure to air pollution. Mutat. Res. 683, 9–15 (2010).
Omolaoye, T. S. et al. Implications of exposure to air pollution on male reproduction: the role of oxidative stress. Antioxidants 13, 64 (2024).
Calogero, A. et al. Environmental car exhaust pollution damages human sperm chromatin and DNA. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 34, e139–e143 (2011).
Estill, M. S. & Krawetz, S. A. The epigenetic consequences of paternal exposure to environmental contaminants and reproductive toxicants. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 3, 202–213 (2016).
Menezo, Y., Dale, B. & Elder, K. The negative impact of the environment on methylation/epigenetic marking in gametes and embryos: a plea for action to protect the fertility of future generations. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 86, 1273–1282 (2019).
Brehm, E. & Flaws, J. A. Transgenerational effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals on male and female reproduction. Endocrinology 160, 1421–1435 (2019).
Parelho, C., Bernardo, F., Camarinho, R., Rodrigues, A. S. & Garcia, P. Testicular damage and farming environments — an integrative ecotoxicological link. Chemosphere 155, 135–141 (2016).
Hamlin, H. J. & Guillette, L. J. in Environmental Impacts on Reproductive Health and Fertility Ch. 7 (eds Woodruff, T. J. et al.) 92–102 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).
Aitken, R. J., De Iuliis, G. N., Finnie, J. M., Hedges, A. & McLachlan, R. I. Analysis of the relationships between oxidative stress, DNA damage and sperm vitality in a patient population: development of diagnostic criteria. Hum. Reprod. 25, 2415–2426 (2010).
Gualtieri, R. et al. Sperm oxidative stress during in vitro manipulation and its effects on sperm function and embryo development. Antioxidants 10, 1025 (2021).
Kou, Z. et al. Boar seminal plasma improves sperm quality by enhancing its antioxidant capacity during liquid storage at 17 C. Zygote 30, 695–703 (2022).
Catalán, J. et al. Impact of seminal plasma antioxidants on DNA fragmentation and lipid peroxidation of frozen–thawed horse sperm. Antioxidants 13, 322 (2024).
Gualtieri, R. et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress caused by cryopreservation in reproductive cells. Antioxidants 10, 337 (2021).
Kumar, A., Prasad, J., Srivastava, N. & Ghosh, S. Strategies to minimize various stress-related freeze–thaw damages during conventional cryopreservation of mammalian spermatozoa. Biopreserv. Biobank. 17, 603–612 (2019).
Yelumalai, S. et al. Clinician-induced (iatrogenic) damage incurred during human infertility treatment: detrimental effects of sperm selection methods and cryopreservation upon the viability, DNA integrity, and function of human sperm. Asian Pac. J. Reprod. 1, 69–75 (2012).
Simon, L., Zini, A., Dyachenko, A., Ciampi, A. & Carrell, D. T. A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of sperm DNA damage on in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Asian J. Androl. 19, 80–90 (2017).
Esteves, S. C., Roque, M., Bedoschi, G., Haahr, T. & Humaidan, P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection for male infertility and consequences for offspring. Nat. Rev. Urol. 15, 535–562 (2018).
Wang, Y. et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in-vitro fertilisation for couples with infertility with non-severe male factor: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 403, 924–934 (2024).
Chou, C.-W., Chen, S.-U., Chang, C.-H., Tsai, Y.-Y. & Huang, C.-C. Aggressive sperm immobilization improves reproductive outcomes in patients with suboptimal semen parameters and previous ICSI fertilization failure. Sci. Rep. 14, 5363 (2024).
Avendaño, C. et al. Fragmentation of DNA in morphologically normal human spermatozoa. Fertil. Steril. 91, 1077–1084 (2009).
Avendaño, C. & Oehninger, S. DNA fragmentation in morphologically normal spermatozoa: how much should we be concerned in the ICSI era? J. Androl. 32, 356–363 (2011).
Leahy, T. & Gadella, B. M. Sperm surface changes and physiological consequences induced by sperm handling and storage. Reproduction 142, 759–778 (2011).
Delaroche, L., Besnard, L., Ouary, V., Bazin, F. & Cassuto, G. Disposables used cumulatively in routine IVF procedures could display toxicity. Hum. Reprod. 39, 936–954 (2024).
Kaltsas, A. et al. Oxidative-stress-mediated epigenetic dysregulation in spermatogenesis: implications for male infertility and offspring health. Genes 16, 93 (2025).
Vasilescu, S. A. et al. A biomimetic sperm selection device for routine sperm selection. Reprod. Biomed. Online 50, 104433 (2025).
El-Sakka, A. I. Routine assessment of sperm DNA fragmentation in clinical practice: commentary and perspective. Transl. Androl. Urol. 6, S640–S643 (2017).
Balawender, K. & Orkisz, S. The impact of selected modifiable lifestyle factors on male fertility in the modern world. Cent. Eur. J. Urol. 73, 563–568 (2020).
Bisht, S., Faiq, M., Tolahunase, M. & Dada, R. Oxidative stress and male infertility. Nat. Rev. Urol. 14, 470–485 (2017).
Tesarik, J. Lifestyle and environmental factors affecting male fertility, individual predisposition, prevention, and intervention. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 26, 2797 (2025).
Anifandis, G. et al. The impact of cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption on sperm parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) measured by Halosperm®. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 290, 777–782 (2014).
Hammadeh, M., Hamad, M., Montenarh, M. & Fischer-Hammadeh, C. Protamine contents and P1/P2 ratio in human spermatozoa from smokers and non-smokers. Hum. Reprod. 25, 2708–2720 (2010).
Hamad, M., Shelko, N., Kartarius, S., Montenarh, M. & Hammadeh, M. Impact of cigarette smoking on histone (H2B) to protamine ratio in human spermatozoa and its relation to sperm parameters. Andrology 2, 666–677 (2014).
Yu, B. et al. Cigarette smoking is associated with abnormal histone-to-protamine transition in human sperm. Fertil. Steril. 101, 51–57.e1 (2014).
Nkpaa, K. W., Amadi, B. A., Adedara, I. A., Wegwu, M. O. & Farombi, E. O. Ethanol exacerbates manganese-induced functional alterations along the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis of male rats. Neurosci. Lett. 684, 47–54 (2018).
Dupont, C. et al. Obesity leads to higher risk of sperm DNA damage in infertile patients. Asian J. Androl. 15, 622–625 (2013).
Sciorio, R., Tramontano, L., Adel, M. & Fleming, S. Decrease in sperm parameters in the 21st century: obesity, lifestyle, or environmental factors? An updated narrative review. J. Pers. Med. 14, 198 (2024).
Peel, A., Saini, A., Deluao, J. C. & McPherson, N. O. Sperm DNA damage: the possible link between obesity and male infertility, an update of the current literature. Andrology 11, 1635–1652 (2023).
Banerjee, A. et al. Altered composition of high-lipid diet may generate reactive oxygen species by disturbing the balance of antioxidant and free radicals. J. Basic. Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 31, 20190141 (2020).
Nguyen, N. D., Le, M. T., Tran, N. Q. T., Nguyen, Q. H. V. & Cao, T. N. Micronutrient supplements as antioxidants in improving sperm quality and reducing DNA fragmentation. Basic. Clin. Androl. 33, 23 (2023).
Nowotny, K., Jung, T., Höhn, A., Weber, D. & Grune, T. Advanced glycation end products and oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biomolecules 5, 194–222 (2015).
Ramalho-Santos, J., Amaral, S. & Oliveira, P. J. Diabetes and the impairment of reproductive function: possible role of mitochondria and reactive oxygen species. Curr. Diabetes Rev. 4, 46–54 (2008).
Li, H. et al. Physical activity, sedentary time, and sperm DNA fragmentation index in healthy Japanese men. Reprod. Biomed. Online 51, 105015 (2025).
Manna, P. & Jain, S. K. Obesity, oxidative stress, adipose tissue dysfunction, and the associated health risks: causes and therapeutic strategies. Metab. Syndr. Relat. Disord. 13, 423–444 (2015).
Sharma, A., Minhas, S., Dhillo, W. S. & Jayasena, C. N. Male infertility due to testicular disorders. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 106, e442–e459 (2021).
Spanoudaki, M. et al. Exercise as a promising agent against cancer: evaluating its anti-cancer molecular mechanisms. Cancers 15, 5135 (2023).
García-Manso, J. M. & Valverde Esteve, T. in Exercise and Human Reproduction: Induced Fertility Disorders and Possible Therapies (eds Vaamonde, D., du Plessis, S. S. & Agarwal, A.) 153–165 (Springer, 2016).
Fiala, O., Hanzlova, M., Borska, L., Fiala, Z. & Holmannova, D. Beyond physical exhaustion: understanding overtraining syndrome through the lens of molecular mechanisms and clinical manifestation. Sports Med. Health Sci. 7, 237–248 (2025).
Slattery, K., Bentley, D. & Coutts, A. J. The role of oxidative, inflammatory and neuroendocrinological systems during exercise stress in athletes: implications of antioxidant supplementation on physiological adaptation during intensified physical training. Sports Med. 45, 453–471 (2015).
Albano, G. D. et al. Adverse effects of anabolic-androgenic steroids: a literature review. Healthcare 9, 97 (2021).
Shokri, S. et al. Combination of running exercise and high dose of anabolic androgenic steroid, nandrolone decanoate, increases protamine deficiency and DNA damage in rat spermatozoa. Andrologia 46, 184–190 (2014).
Vaamonde, D., Algar-Santacruz, C., Abbasi, A. & García-Manso, J. M. Sperm DNA fragmentation as a result of ultra-endurance exercise training in male athletes. Andrologia 50, e12793 (2018).
Lucassen, E. A. & Cizza, G. The hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, obesity, and chronic stress exposure: sleep and the HPA axis in obesity. Curr. Obes. Rep. 1, 208–215 (2012).
Dong, Q. et al. Rapid glucocorticoid mediation of suppressed testosterone biosynthesis in male mice subjected to immobilization stress. J. Androl. 25, 973–981 (2004).
Liu, M. et al. Prenatal dexamethasone exposure programs the decreased testosterone synthesis in offspring rats by low level of endogenous glucocorticoids. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 43, 1461–1472 (2022).
Palnitkar, G. et al. Linking sleep disturbance to idiopathic male infertility. Sleep. Med. Rev. 42, 149–159 (2018).
Gautam, R., Priyadarshini, E., Patel, A. K. & Arora, T. Assessing the impact and mechanisms of environmental pollutants (heavy metals and pesticides) on the male reproductive system: a comprehensive review. J. Environ. Sci. Health C Toxicol. Carcinog. 42, 126–153 (2024).
Kadoch, E. et al. The paternal clock: Uncovering the consequences of advanced paternal age on sperm DNA fragmentation. Reprod. Biol. 24, 100931 (2024).
Sharma, R. et al. Effects of increased paternal age on sperm quality, reproductive outcome and associated epigenetic risks to offspring. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 13, 35 (2015).
Sabeti, P., Pourmasumi, S., Rahiminia, T., Akyash, F. & Talebi, A. R. Etiologies of sperm oxidative stress. Int. J. Reprod. biomedicine 14, 231–240 (2016).
Aitken, R. J. Paternal age, de novo mutations, and offspring health? New directions for an ageing problem. Hum. Reprod. 39, 2645–2654 (2024).
Gavriliouk, D. & Aitken, R. J. in The Male Role in Pregnancy Loss and Embryo Implantation Failure (ed. Bronson, R.) 23–47 (Springer, 2015).
Nowicka-Bauer, K. et al. Sperm mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress as possible reasons for isolated asthenozoospermia. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 69, 403–417 (2018).
Hardeland, R. Melatonin and the electron transport chain. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 74, 3883–3896 (2017).
Guthrie, H. & Welch, G. Effects of reactive oxygen species on sperm function. Theriogenology 78, 1700–1708 (2012).
Amaral, S. & Ramalho-Santos, J. Aging, mitochondria and male reproductive function. Curr. Aging Sci. 2, 165–173 (2009).
Wang, J.-J. et al. Age-related decline of male fertility: mitochondrial dysfunction and the antioxidant interventions. Pharmaceuticals 15, 519 (2022).
Short, K. R. et al. Decline in skeletal muscle mitochondrial function with aging in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5618–5623 (2005).
Li, W. et al. Chd5 orchestrates chromatin remodelling during sperm development. Nat. Commun. 5, 3812 (2014).
Arévalo, L., Merges, G. E., Schneider, S. & Schorle, H. Protamines: lessons learned from mouse models. Reproduction 164, R57–R74 (2022).
de Mateo, S. et al. Protamine 2 precursors (Pre-P2), protamine 1 to protamine 2 ratio (P1/P2), and assisted reproduction outcome. Fertil. Steril. 91, 715–722 (2009).
Nakidkina, A. & Kuzmina, T. Apoptosis in spermatozoa and its role in deteriorating semen quality. Russ. J. Dev. Biol. 50, 165–172 (2019).
Beltrán-Frutos, E. et al. Cellular modifications in spermatogenesis during seasonal testicular regression: an update review in mammals. Animals 12, 1605 (2022).
Zakariah, M., Molele, R. A., Mahdy, M. A., Ibrahim, M. I. & McGaw, L. J. Regulation of spermatogenic cell apoptosis by the pro-apoptotic proteins in the testicular tissues of mammalian and avian species. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 247, 107158 (2022).
Asadi, A., Ghahremani, R., Abdolmaleki, A. & Rajaei, F. Role of sperm apoptosis and oxidative stress in male infertility: a narrative review. Int. J. Reprod. Biomed. 19, 493–504 (2021).
Kasimanickam, R., Pelzer, K. D., Kasimanickam, V., Swecker, W. S. & Thatcher, C. D. Association of classical semen parameters, sperm DNA fragmentation index, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymatic activity of semen in ram-lambs. Theriogenology 65, 1407–1421 (2006).
Partyka, A., Babapour, A., Mikita, M., Adeniran, S. & Niżański, W. Lipid peroxidation in avian semen. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 26, 497–509 (2023).
Bisht, S. & Dada, R. Oxidative stress: major executioner in disease pathology, role in sperm DNA damage and preventive strategies. Front. Biosci. (Schol. Ed.) 9, 420–447 (2017).
Margiana, R. et al. Evaluation of telomere length, reactive oxygen species, and apoptosis in spermatozoa of patients with oligospermia. Cell Biochem. Funct. 42, e3935 (2024).
Darmishonnejad, Z. et al. Relationship between sperm telomere length and sperm quality in infertile men. Andrologia 52, e13546 (2020).
Tahamtan, S. et al. Reduced sperm telomere length in individuals with varicocele is associated with reduced genomic integrity. Sci. Rep. 9, 4336 (2019).
Yang, Q. et al. Sperm telomere length is positively associated with the quality of early embryonic development. Hum. Reprod. 30, 1876–1881 (2015).
Yuan, Y. et al. Sperm telomere length as a novel biomarker of male infertility and embryonic development: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Endocrinol. 13, 1079966 (2023).
Wyck, S. et al. Oxidative stress in sperm affects the epigenetic reprogramming in early embryonic development. Epigenetics Chromatin 11, 60 (2018).
Cheuquemán, C. & Maldonado, R. Non-coding RNAs and chromatin: key epigenetic factors from spermatogenesis to transgenerational inheritance. Biol. Res. 54, 41 (2021).
Naveed, M., Shen, Z. & Bao, J. Sperm-borne small non-coding RNAs: potential functions and mechanisms as epigenetic carriers. Cell Biosci. 15, 5 (2025).
Ragu, S., Matos-Rodrigues, G. & Lopez, B. S. Replication stress, DNA damage, inflammatory cytokines and innate immune response. Genes 11, 409 (2020).
Pezone, A. et al. Inflammation and DNA damage: cause, effect or both. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 19, 200–211 (2023).
Dutta, S., Sengupta, P., Slama, P. & Roychoudhury, S. Oxidative stress, testicular inflammatory pathways, and male reproduction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 10043 (2021).
Azenabor, A., Ekun, A. O. & Akinloye, O. Impact of inflammation on male reproductive tract. J. Reprod. Infertil. 16, 123–129 (2015).
Dupré-Crochet, S., Erard, M. & Nüβe, O. ROS production in phagocytes: why, when, and where? J. Leukoc. Biol. 94, 657–670 (2013).
Derbel, R. et al. Relationship between nuclear DNA fragmentation, mitochondrial DNA damage and standard sperm parameters in spermatozoa of infertile patients with leukocytospermia. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 50, 102101 (2021).
Moubasher, A. et al. Impact of leukocytospermia on sperm dynamic motility parameters, DNA and chromosomal integrity. Cent. Eur. J. Urol. 71, 470–475 (2018).
Gallegos, G. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men with genitourinary infection by Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma. Fertil. Steril. 90, 328–334 (2008).
Zhang, Q. et al. Effects of biovar I and biovar II of Ureaplasma urealyticum on sperm parameters, lipid peroxidation, and deoxyribonucleic acid damage in male infertility. Urology 84, 87–92 (2014).
Adel Domínguez, M. A., Cardona Maya, W. D. & Mora Topete, A. Sperm DNA fragmentation: focusing treatment on seminal transport fluid beyond sperm production. Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl. 97, 13128 (2025).
Houston, B. J. et al. Heat exposure induces oxidative stress and DNA damage in the male germ line. Biol. Reprod. 98, 593–606 (2018).
Kastelic, J., Rizzoto, G. & Thundathil, J. Testicular vascular cone development and its association with scrotal thermoregulation, semen quality and sperm production in bulls. Animal 12, s133–s141 (2018).
Durairajanayagam, D., Sharma, R. K., du Plessis, S. S. & Agarwal, A. in Male Infertility: A Complete Guide to Lifestyle and Environmental Factors (eds du Plessis, S. S., Agarwal, A. & Sabanegh, E. S. Jr.) 105–125 (Springer, 2014).
Kang, C., Punjani, N., Lee, R. K., Li, P. S. & Goldstein, M. Effect of varicoceles on spermatogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 121, 114–124 (2022).
Szabó, A. et al. Assessing the efficacy of varicocelectomy, antioxidants, FSH treatment, and lifestyle modifications on sperm DNA fragmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 15, 10118 (2025).
Miyaso, H., Ogawa, Y. & Itoh, M. Microenvironment for spermatogenesis and sperm maturation. Histochem. Cell Biol. 157, 273–285 (2022).
Ramos, L., De Boer, P., Meuleman, E., Braat, D. & Wetzels, A. Chromatin condensation and DNA damage of human epididymal spermatozoa in obstructive azoospermia. Reprod. Biomed. Online 8, 392–397 (2004).
Szatanek, R. et al. The methods of choice for extracellular vesicles (EVs) characterization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 1153 (2017).
Foot, N. J. & Kumar, S. The role of extracellular vesicles in sperm function and male fertility. Subcell. Biochem. 97, 483–500 (2021).
Ribas-Maynou, J. et al. Protective role of extracellular vesicles against oxidative DNA damage. Biol. Res. 58, 14 (2025).
Zhang, W., Liu, R., Chen, Y., Wang, M. & Du, J. Crosstalk between oxidative stress and exosomes. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 3553617 (2022).
Mahdavinezhad, F. et al. Protective roles of seminal plasma exosomes and microvesicles during human sperm cryopreservation. Reprod. Biomed. Online 45, 341–353 (2022).
Chabory, E. et al. Epididymis seleno-independent glutathione peroxidase 5 maintains sperm DNA integrity in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 119, 2074–2085 (2009).
Ali, K. H. et al. Protective effects of canthaxanthin-loaded seminal exosomes on the quality of human spermatozoa during cryopreservation. J. Drug. Deliv. Sci. Technol. 96, 105696 (2024).
Qamar, A. Y., Fang, X., Kim, M. J. & Cho, J. Improved post-thaw quality of canine semen after treatment with exosomes from conditioned medium of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Animals 9, 865 (2019).
Du, J. et al. Boar seminal plasma exosomes maintain sperm function by infiltrating into the sperm membrane. Oncotarget 7, 58832 (2016).
Wang, Y. et al. Exosomes from porcine serum as endogenous additive maintain function of boar sperm during liquid preservation at 17° C in vitro. Theriogenology 219, 147–156 (2024).
Shamsi, R. R., Jozani, R. J., Asadpour, R., Rahbar, M. & Taravat, M. Seminal plasma-derived exosome preserves the quality parameters of the post-thaw semen of bulls with low freezeability. Biopreserv. Biobank. 23, 364–373 (2025).
Uzbekova, S. et al. Protein cargo of extracellular vesicles from bovine follicular fluid and analysis of their origin from different ovarian cells. Front. Vet. Sci. 7, 584948 (2020).
Tamessar, C. T. et al. Roles of male reproductive tract extracellular vesicles in reproduction. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 85, e13338 (2021).
Alminana, C. et al. Deciphering the oviductal extracellular vesicles content across the estrous cycle: implications for the gametes–oviduct interactions and the environment of the potential embryo. BMC Genomics 19, 622 (2018).
Goss, D. M., Vasilescu, S. A., Warkiani, M. E., Thompson, J. G. & Gardner, D. K. in Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques (eds Gardner, D. K., Weissman, A., Howles, C. M. & Shoham, Z.) 302–316 (CRC Press, 2023).
Garg, R. K. The alarming rise of lifestyle diseases and their impact on public health: a comprehensive overview and strategies for overcoming the epidemic. J. Res. Med. Sci. 30, 1 (2025).
Jurewicz, J. et al. Lifestyle and semen quality: role of modifiable risk factors. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 60, 43–51 (2014).
Alahmar, A. T. Effect of vitamin C, vitamin E, zinc, selenium, and coenzyme Q10 in infertile men with idiopathic oligoasthenozoospermia. Int. J. Infertil. Fetal Med. 8, 45–49 (2013).
Alahmar, A. T. & Singh, R. Comparison of the effects of coenzyme Q10 and Centrum multivitamins on semen parameters, oxidative stress markers, and sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men with idiopathic oligoasthenospermia. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med. 49, 49–56 (2022).
Alahmar, A. T. N. The Impact of Coenzyme Q10 on Seminal Oxidative Stress Markers, Sperm DNA Fragmentation, and Predictors of Pregnancy in Men with Idiopathic Infertility. Thesis, Staffordshire University (2022).
Salas-Huetos, A. et al. The effect of nutrients and dietary supplements on sperm quality parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Adv. Nutr. 9, 833–848 (2018).
Ferramosca, A. & Zara, V. Diet and male fertility: the impact of nutrients and antioxidants on sperm energetic metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 2542 (2022).
Jóźków, P. & Rossato, M. The impact of intense exercise on semen quality. Am. J. Mens Health 11, 654–662 (2017).
Guo, Y., Wang, A., Liu, X. & Li, E. Effects of resveratrol on reducing spermatogenic dysfunction caused by high-intensity exercise. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 17, 42 (2019).
Ibanez-Perez, J., Santos-Zorrozua, B., Lopez-Lopez, E., Matorras, R. & Garcia-Orad, A. An update on the implication of physical activity on semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 299, 901–921 (2019).
Taha, E. A., Ez-Aldin, A. M., Sayed, S. K., Ghandour, N. M. & Mostafa, T. Effect of smoking on sperm vitality, DNA integrity, seminal oxidative stress, zinc in fertile men. Urology 80, 822–825 (2012).
Cui, X., Jing, X., Wu, X., Wang, Z. & Li, Q. Potential effect of smoking on semen quality through DNA damage and the downregulation of Chk1 in sperm. Mol. Med. Rep. 14, 753–761 (2016).
La Maestra, S., De Flora, S. & Micale, R. T. Effect of cigarette smoke on DNA damage, oxidative stress, and morphological alterations in mouse testis and spermatozoa. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 218, 117–122 (2015).
Aboulmaouahib, S. et al. Impact of alcohol and cigarette smoking consumption in male fertility potential: Looks at lipid peroxidation, enzymatic antioxidant activities and sperm DNA damage. Andrologia 50, e12926 (2018).
Dada, R. et al. Yoga and meditation as a therapeutic intervention in oxidative stress and oxidative DNA damage to paternal genome. J. Yoga Phys. Ther. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7595.1000217 (2015).
Yadav, A., Tiwari, P. & Dada, R. Yoga and lifestyle changes: a path to improved fertility — a narrative review. Int. J. Yoga 17, 10–19 (2024).
Gosálvez, J., González-Martínez, M., López-Fernández, C., Fernández, J. L. & Sánchez-Martín, P. Shorter abstinence decreases sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in ejaculate. Fertil. Steril. 96, 1083–1086 (2011).
Sokol, P., Drakopoulos, P. & Polyzos, N. P. The effect of ejaculatory abstinence interval on sperm parameters and clinical outcome of ART. A systematic review of the literature. J. Clin. Med. 10, 3213 (2021).
Roque, M. & Esteves, S. C. Effect of varicocele repair on sperm DNA fragmentation: a review. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 50, 583–603 (2018).
Zini, A., San Gabriel, M. & Baazeem, A. Antioxidants and sperm DNA damage: a clinical perspective. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 26, 427–432 (2009).
Tremellen, K., Miari, G., Froiland, D. & Thompson, J. A randomised control trial examining the effect of an antioxidant (Menevit) on pregnancy outcome during IVF-ICSI treatment. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 47, 216–221 (2007).
Farkouh, A. et al. Sperm DNA integrity and male infertility: a narrative review and guide for the reproductive physicians. Transl. Androl. Urol. 11, 1023–1044 (2022).
Mahé, C. et al. Sperm migration, selection, survival, and fertilizing ability in the mammalian oviduct. Biol. Reprod. 105, 317–331 (2021).
Dalton, J. C. Frozen bovine semen storage, semen handling, and site of deposition. Vet Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 40, 157–165 (2024).
Rickard, J. & de Graaf, S. Sperm surface changes and their consequences for sperm transit through the female reproductive tract. Theriogenology 150, 96–105 (2020).
Suarez, S. S. & Pacey, A. Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract. Hum. Reprod. Update 12, 23–37 (2006).
Dai, P. et al. pH homeodynamics and male fertility: a coordinated regulation of acid-based balance during sperm journey to fertilization. Biomolecules 14, 685 (2024).
Miller, D. The epic journey of sperm through the female reproductive tract. Animal 12, s110–s120 (2018).
Noakes, D. E., Parkinson, T. J. & England, G. C. Arthur’s Veterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics — E-Book 10th edn (Elsevier, 2018).
McKinnon, A. O., Squires, E. L., Vaala, W. E. & Varner, D. D. Equine Reproduction 2nd edn (Wiley, 2011).
Canisso, I. F., Segabinazzi, L. G. & Fedorka, C. E. Persistent breeding-induced endometritis in mares — a multifaceted challenge: from clinical aspects to immunopathogenesis and pathobiology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1432 (2020).
Li, F., Duan, X., Li, M. & Ma, X. Sperm DNA fragmentation index affect pregnancy outcomes and offspring safety in assisted reproductive technology. Sci. Rep. 14, 356 (2024).
Shan, L. et al. Perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoic acid inhibit progesterone-responsive capacitation through cAMP/PKA signaling pathway and induce DNA damage in human sperm. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 100, 104165 (2023).
Zhang, K. et al. Decreased AKAP4/PKA signaling pathway in high DFI sperm affects sperm capacitation. Asian J. Androl. 26, 25–33 (2024).
Afsari, M. et al. ANXA2, SP17, SERPINA5, PRDX2 genes, and sperm DNA fragmentation differentially represented in male partners of infertile couples with normal and abnormal sperm parameters. Andrologia 54, e14556 (2022).
Zheng, W.-W. et al. Sperm DNA damage has a negative effect on early embryonic development following in vitro fertilization. Asian J. Androl. 20, 75–79 (2018).
Speyer, B. et al. Fall in implantation rates following ICSI with sperm with high DNA fragmentation. Hum. Reprod. 25, 1609–1618 (2010).
Borges, E. Jr et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation is correlated with poor embryo development, lower implantation rate, and higher miscarriage rate in reproductive cycles of non-male factor infertility. Fertil. Steril. 112, 483–490 (2019).
Wang, S. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation measured by sperm chromatin dispersion impacts morphokinetic parameters, fertilization rate and blastocyst quality in ICSI treatments. Zygote 30, 72–79 (2022).
Salehi, M., reza Afarinesh, M., Haghpanah, T., Novin, M. G. & Farifteh, F. Impact of sperm DNA fragmentation on ICSI outcome and incidence of apoptosis of human pre-implantation embryos obtained from in vitro matured MII oocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 510, 110–115 (2019).
Jiang, H. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation index: limited effectiveness on predicting embryo quality in assisted reproduction technology treatments. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 23, 14 (2025).
González-Marín, C., Gosálvez, J. & Roy, R. Types, causes, detection and repair of DNA fragmentation in animal and human sperm cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13, 14026–14052 (2012).
García-Rodríguez, A., Gosálvez, J., Agarwal, A., Roy, R. & Johnston, S. DNA damage and repair in human reproductive cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 31 (2018).
Mohan, D. & Murugan, M. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on invitro fertilization: from embryo development to clinical pregnancy success. J. Neonatal Surg. 14, 1502–1515 (2025).
Cortese, M., Moster, D. & Wilcox, A. J. Term birth weight and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Epidemiology 32, 583–590 (2021).
Yu, H., Shi, C., Zhan, C., Wang, C. & Chen, J. Association of sperm DNA fragmentation with higher miscarriage rates in non-male factor infertility reproductive cycles. Transl. Androl. Urol. 14, 1456–1465 (2025).
Stenqvist, A. et al. High sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation index is associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia following assisted reproduction treatment. Fertil. Steril. 123, 97–104 (2025).
Fu, W. et al. High sperm DNA fragmentation increased embryo aneuploidy rate in patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing. Reprod. Biomed. Online 47, 103366 (2023).
Fu, W. et al. Elevated sperm DNA fragmentation is correlated with an increased chromosomal aneuploidy rate of miscarried conceptus in women of advanced age undergoing fresh embryo transfer cycle. Front. Endocrinol. 15, 1289763 (2024).
Gao, J. et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on the incidence and origin of whole and segmental chromosomal aneuploidies in human embryos. Reproduction 166, 117–124 (2023).
Fatehi, A. N. et al. DNA damage in bovine sperm does not block fertilization and early embryonic development but induces apoptosis after the first cleavages. J. Androl. 27, 176–188 (2006).
Abah, K. O. et al. Association between sperm DNA fragmentation and fertility parameters in farm animals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Vet. Res. 21, 204 (2025).
Donatti, L. M., Martello, C. L., Andrade, G. M., Oliveira, N. P. & Frantz, N. Advanced paternal age affects the sperm DNA fragmentation index and may lead to lower good-quality blastocysts. Reprod. Sci. 30, 2489–2494 (2023).
Carreira, J. et al. Does sperm quality and DNA integrity differ in cryopreserved semen samples from young, adult, and aged Nellore bulls? Basic. Clin. Androl. 27, 12 (2017).
Pardede, B. P., Supriatna, I., Yudi, Y. & Agil, M. Decreased bull fertility: age-related changes in sperm motility and DNA fragmentation. E3S Web Conf. 151, 01010 (2020).
Griffin, R. A. et al. Age-related DNA damage in stallions: an ongoing investigation. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 125, 104590 (2023).
Yatsenko, A. N. & Turek, P. J. Reproductive genetics and the aging male. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 35, 933–941 (2018).
Elkhatib, I. et al. The influence of male age and sperm parameters on blastulation and euploidy rates. Fertil. Steril. 124, 1006–1015 (2025).
Cao, C. et al. Understanding recurrent pregnancy loss: recent advances on its etiology, clinical diagnosis, and management. Med. Rev. 2, 570–589 (2023).
Naglot, S., Thapliyal, A., Tomar, A. K. & Yadav, S. Male contributory factors in recurrent pregnancy loss. Reprod. Sci. 30, 2107–2121 (2023).
Zhang, L. et al. Association between semen parameters and recurrent pregnancy loss: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 50, 545–556 (2024).
Antonouli, S. et al. The impact of sperm DNA fragmentation on ICSI outcome in cases of donated oocytes. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 300, 207–215 (2019).
Yao, G. et al. Association between sperm DNA fragmentation index and recurrent pregnancy loss: results from 1485 participants undergoing fertility evaluation. Front. Endocrinol. 15, 1493186 (2025).
Lee, C.-I. et al. Personalized prediction model for miscarriage: in-depth sperm DNA fragmentation. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 42, 1717–1727 (2025).
Akhtar, M. F. et al. Effect of sperm cryopreservation in farm animals using nanotechnology. Animals 12, 2277 (2022).
Gürler, H. et al. Effects of cryopreservation on sperm viability, synthesis of reactive oxygen species, and DNA damage of bovine sperm. Theriogenology 86, 562–571 (2016).
Wach-Gygax, L. et al. Seasonal changes of DNA fragmentation and quality of raw and cold-stored stallion spermatozoa. Theriogenology 99, 98–104 (2017).
Peris, S. I., Bilodeau, J. F., Dufour, M. & Bailey, J. L. Impact of cryopreservation and reactive oxygen species on DNA integrity, lipid peroxidation, and functional parameters in ram sperm. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 74, 878–892 (2007).
Kopeika, J., Thornhill, A. & Khalaf, Y. The effect of cryopreservation on the genome of gametes and embryos: principles of cryobiology and critical appraisal of the evidence. Hum. Reprod. Update 21, 209–227 (2015).
Valcarce, D., Cartón-García, F., Riesco, M., Herráez, M. & Robles, V. Analysis of DNA damage after human sperm cryopreservation in genes crucial for fertilization and early embryo development. Andrology 1, 723–730 (2013).
Robinson, L. et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. 27, 2908–2917 (2012).
Cissen, M. et al. Measuring sperm DNA fragmentation and clinical outcomes of medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 11, e0165125 (2016).
Wan, X. J. et al. Correlation of the sperm DNA fragmentation index with semen parameters and its impact on fresh embryo transfer outcomes — a retrospective study. PeerJ 13, e19451 (2025).
Castellini, C. et al. Relationship between leukocytospermia, reproductive potential after assisted reproductive technology, and sperm parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case–control studies. Andrology 8, 125–135 (2020).
Agarwal, A. et al. Impact of antioxidant therapy on natural pregnancy outcomes and semen parameters in infertile men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J. Mens Health 41, 14–48 (2022).
Romano, M. et al. High sperm DNA fragmentation: do we have robust evidence to support antioxidants and testicular sperm extraction to improve fertility outcomes? A narrative review. Front. Endocrinol. 14, 1150951 (2023).
Tunc, O., Thompson, J. & Tremellen, K. Improvement in sperm DNA quality using an oral antioxidant therapy. Reprod. Biomed. Online 18, 761–768 (2009).
Angrimani, D.dS. R. et al. Extender supplementation with antioxidants selected after the evaluation of sperm susceptibility to oxidative challenges in goats. Anim. Biotechnol. 30, 21–29 (2019).
Peña, S. T. Jr, Gummow, B., Parker, A. J. & Paris, D. B. Antioxidant supplementation mitigates DNA damage in boar (Sus scrofa domesticus) spermatozoa induced by tropical summer. PLoS ONE 14, e0216143 (2019).
Shojaeian, K., Nouri, H. & Kohram, H. Does MnTBAP ameliorate DNA fragmentation and in vivo fertility of frozen-thawed Arabian stallion sperm? Theriogenology 108, 16–21 (2018).
Ribas-Maynou, J. et al. Double stranded sperm DNA breaks, measured by Comet assay, are associated with unexplained recurrent miscarriage in couples without a female factor. PLoS ONE 7, e44679 (2012).
Casanovas, A. et al. Double-stranded sperm DNA damage is a cause of delay in embryo development and can impair implantation rates. Fertil. Steril. 111, 699–707.e1 (2019).
Okubo, T. et al. Performing a sperm DNA fragmentation test in addition to semen examination based on the WHO criteria can be a more accurate diagnosis of IVF outcomes. BMC Urol. 23, 78 (2023).
Agarwal, A. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation: a new guideline for clinicians. World J. Mens Health 38, 412–471 (2020).
Esteves, S. C. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations. Andrologia 53, e13874 (2021).
Fernández, J. L., Johnston, S. & Gosálvez, J. in A Clinician’s Guide to Sperm DNA and Chromatin Damage (eds Zini, A. & Agarwal, A.) 137–152 (Springer, 2018).
Kaiyal, R. S. et al. Sperm chromatin dispersion assay reliability and assisted reproductive technology outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrology 13, 718–730 (2025).
Gosálvez, J., López-Fernández, C. & Fernández, J. L. in Sperm Chromatin: Biological and Clinical Applications in Male Infertility and Assisted Reproduction (eds Zini, A. & Agarwal, A.) 151–170 (Springer, 2011).
Tímermans, A. et al. DNA fragmentation of human spermatozoa: simple assessment of single- and double-strand DNA breaks and their respective dynamic behavioral response. Andrology 8, 1287–1303 (2020).
Gajski, G. et al. Application of the comet assay for the evaluation of DNA damage in mature sperm. Mutat. Res./Rev. Mutat. Res.788, 108398 (2021).
Simon, L. & Carrell, D. T. in Spermatogenesis: Methods and Protocols (eds Carrell, D. T. & Aston, K. I.) 137–146 (Humana, 2013).
Simon, L. et al. DNA damage: COMET assay. Man. Sperm Funct. Test. Hum. Assist. Reprod. 202, 212 (2021).
Jiang, N. et al. An overview of comet assay application for detecting DNA damage in aquatic animals. Agriculture 13, 623 (2023).
Simon, L., Lutton, D., McManus, J. & Lewis, S. E. Sperm DNA damage measured by the alkaline Comet assay as an independent predictor of male infertility and in vitro fertilization success. Fertil. Steril. 95, 652–657 (2011).
Evenson, D. P. The Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA®) and other sperm DNA fragmentation tests for evaluation of sperm nuclear DNA integrity as related to fertility. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 169, 56–75 (2016).
Evenson, D. P. & Wixon, R. Environmental toxicants cause sperm DNA fragmentation as detected by the Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA®). Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacology 207, 532–537 (2005).
Larson-Cook, K. L. et al. Relationship between the outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques and sperm DNA fragmentation as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay. Fertil. Steril. 80, 895–902 (2003).
Chen, Y., Li, W. & Chen, X. The Association of Sperm DNA fragment and assisted reproductive outcomes: a meta-analysis. Computational Math. methods Med. 2022, 1126616 (2022).
Sharma, R., Iovine, C., Agarwal, A. & Henkel, R. TUNEL assay—Standardized method for testing sperm DNA fragmentation. Andrologia 53, e13738 (2021).
Sharma, R., Masaki, J. & Agarwal, A. in Spermatogenesis: Methods and Protocols (eds Carrell, D. T. & Aston, K. I.) 121–136 (Humana, 2013).
Mitchell, L., De Iuliis, G. & Aitken, R. J. The TUNEL assay consistently underestimates DNA damage in human spermatozoa and is influenced by DNA compaction and cell vitality: development of an improved methodology. Int. J. Androl. 34, 2–13 (2011).
Henkel, R. in Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress: Basics and Measurement of Oxidative Stress (eds Andreescu, S., Henkel, R. & Khelfi, A.) 497–504 (Springer, 2024).
You, J. B. et al. Machine learning for sperm selection. Nat. Rev. Urol. 18, 387–403 (2021).
Hsu, C. T. et al. Development and integration of LensHooke® R10 for automatic and standardized diagnosis for sperm DNA fragmentation. Andrology 11, 1337–1344 (2023).
Wang, Y. et al. Prediction of DNA integrity from morphological parameters using a single-sperm DNA fragmentation index assay. Adv. Sci. 6, 1900712 (2019).
Baldán, F. J., García-Gil, D. & Fernandez-Basso, C. Revolutionizing Sperm Analysis with AI: A Review of Computer-Aided Sperm Analysis Systems. Computation 13, 132 (2025).
López, G., Lafuente, R., Checa, M. A., Carreras, R. & Brassesco, M. Diagnostic value of sperm DNA fragmentation and sperm high-magnification for predicting outcome of assisted reproduction treatment. Asian J. Androl. 15, 790–794 (2013).
Hozyen, M. et al. Reproductive outcomes of different sperm selection techniques for ICSI patients with abnormal sperm DNA fragmentation: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod. Sci. 29, 220–228 (2022).
Villeneuve, P. et al. Spermatozoa isolation with Felix™ outperforms conventional density gradient centrifugation preparation in selecting cells with low DNA damage. Andrology 11, 1593–1604 (2023).
Zhao, F., Yang, Q., Shi, S., Luo, X. & Sun, Y. Semen preparation methods and sperm telomere length: density gradient centrifugation versus the swim up procedure. Sci. Rep. 6, 39051 (2016).
Gode, F., Gürbüz, A. S., Tamer, B., Pala, I. & Isik, A. Z. The effects of microfluidic sperm sorting, density gradient and swim-up methods on semen oxidation reduction potential. Urol. J. 17, 397–401 (2020).
Malvezzi, H., Sharma, R., Agarwal, A., Abuzenadah, A. M. & Abu-Elmagd, M. Sperm quality after density gradient centrifugation with three commercially available media: a controlled trial. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 12, 121 (2014).
Muratori, M. et al. Sperm selection with density gradient centrifugation and swim up: effect on DNA fragmentation in viable spermatozoa. Sci. Rep. 9, 7492 (2019).
Ricci, G. et al. Semen preparation methods and sperm apoptosis: swim-up versus gradient-density centrifugation technique. Fertil. Steril. 91, 632–638 (2009).
Kim, E.-K. et al. Comparison of the effect of different media on the clinical outcomes of the density-gradient centrifugation/swim-up and swim-up methods. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med. 42, 22–29 (2015).
Marzano, G. et al. Sperm selection in assisted reproduction: a review of established methods and cutting-edge possibilities. Biotechnol. Adv. 40, 107498 (2020).
Kadu, K. S. et al. Application of physiological sperm selection in assisted reproductive technology (ART) for patients with diabetes mellitus: a case report. Cureus 16, e53018 (2024).
Lotti, F. & Maggi, M. Effects of diabetes mellitus on sperm quality and fertility outcomes: clinical evidence. Andrology 11, 399–416 (2023).
Banti, M., Van Zyl, E. & Kafetzis, D. Sperm preparation with microfluidic sperm sorting chip may improve intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes compared to density gradient centrifugation. Reprod. Sci. 31, 1695–1704 (2024).
Gisbert Iranzo, A. et al. Sperm selection using microfluidic techniques significantly decreases sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF), enhancing reproductive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biology 14, 792 (2025).
Romero-Aguirregomezcorta, J. et al. Sperm selection by rheotaxis improves sperm quality and early embryo development. Reproduction 161, 343–352 (2021).
Zhang, Y. et al. Generation of gradients on a microfluidic device: toward a high-throughput investigation of spermatozoa chemotaxis. PLoS ONE 10, e0142555 (2015).
Ko, Y.-J., Maeng, J.-H., Hwang, S. Y. & Ahn, Y. Design, fabrication, and testing of a microfluidic device for thermotaxis and chemotaxis assays of sperm. SLAS Technol. 23, 507–515 (2018).
Bhat, G. R., Lone, F. A. & Dalal, J. Microfluidics — a novel technique for high-quality sperm selection for greater ART outcomes. FASEB Bioadv. 6, 406–423 (2024).
Herbicht, R., Neufeld, G., Klein, C. & Henning, H. Evaluation of a novel microfluidic chip-like device for purifying bovine frozen-thawed semen for in vitro fertilization. Theriogenology 209, 50–59 (2023).
Gonzalez-Castro, R. A. & Carnevale, E. M. Use of microfluidics to sort stallion sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 202, 1–9 (2019).
Yan, S., Zhang, J., Yuan, D. & Li, W. Hybrid microfluidics combined with active and passive approaches for continuous cell separation. Electrophoresis 38, 238–249 (2017).
Adolfsson, E., Ingberg, J., Ingberg, E. & Bohlin, T. Clinical validation and experiences of the microfluidics sperm preparation device ZyMot™. Reprod. Biomed. Online 48, 103995 (2024).
Misko, V. R., Nori, F. & De Malsche, W. Motility-dependent selective transport of active matter in trap arrays: separation methods based on trapping-detrapping and deterministic lateral displacement. Nanoscale 17, 13434–13446 (2025).
Simon, L. et al. Micro-electrophoresis: a noninvasive method of sperm selection based on membrane charge. Fertil. Steril. 103, 361–366.e3 (2015).
Yan, Y., Zhang, B., Fu, Q., Wu, J. & Liu, R. A fully integrated biomimetic microfluidic device for evaluation of sperm response to thermotaxis and chemotaxis. Lab. Chip 21, 310–318 (2021).
Smirnova, O. et al. Design clues for motility and rheotaxis-based microfluidic chips for sperm sorting. Prog. Biomed. Eng. 7, 042004 (2025).
Chen, S. et al. Microfluidic thermotaxic selection of highly motile sperm and in vitro fertilization. Bio-Des. Manuf. 7, 687–700 (2024).
Surendran, A. N., Zhou, R. & Lin, Y. Microfluidic devices for magnetic separation of biological particles: a review. J. Med. Devices 15, 024001 (2021).
Elsayed, M. Field Programmable Lab on a Chip Systems Using Digital Microfluidics and Optoelectronic Tweezers. Thesis, Univ. Toronto, (2024).
Sartorelli, E. M. P., Mazzucatto, L. F. & de Pina-Neto, J. M. Effect of paternal age on human sperm chromosomes. Fertil. Steril. 76, 1119–1123 (2001).
Escudé-Logares, L., Serrano-Novillo, C., Uroz, L., Galindo, A. & Márquez, C. Advanced paternal age: a new indicator for the use of microfluidic devices for sperm DNA fragmentation selection. J. Clin. Med. 13, 457 (2024).
Kocur, O. M. et al. Can a sperm selection technique improve embryo ploidy? Andrology 11, 1605–1612 (2023).
Kocur, O. M. et al. Assessing male gamete genome integrity to ameliorate poor assisted reproductive technology clinical outcome. F S Sci. 4, 2–10 (2023).
Dabiri, M. et al. Biomimetic angular microfluidic platform for onsite selection of high-quality animal sperm, Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.103028 (2025).
Alkan, H. et al. Does using microfluidic sperm sorting chips in bovine IVEP affect blastocyst development? Reprod. Domestic Anim. 58, 1012–1020 (2023).
Yaghoobi, M. et al. Faster sperm selected by rheotaxis leads to superior early embryonic development in vitro. Lab. Chip 24, 210–223 (2024).
Vigolo, V., Gautier, C., Falomo, M. E. & Aurich, C. Selection of frozen–thawed stallion semen by microfluidic technology. Reprod. Domestic Anim. 58, 443–449 (2023).
Rashki Ghaleno, L. et al. Exploring the role of hyaluronic acid in reproductive biology and beyond: applications in assisted reproduction and tissue engineering. Adv. Biol. 8, 2300621 (2024).
Gómez-Torres, M. J. et al. Molecular chaperone HSPA2 distribution during hyaluronic acid selection in human sperm. Reprod. Sci. 30, 1176–1185 (2023).
Avalos-Durán, G. et al. Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. conventional ICSI in couples with male factor: a systematic review. JBRA Assist. Reprod. 22, 139–147 (2018).
West, R. et al. Sperm selection with hyaluronic acid improved live birth outcomes among older couples and was connected to sperm DNA quality, potentially affecting all treatment outcomes. Hum. Reprod. 37, 1106–1125 (2022).
Marchlewska, K. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation index and hyaluronan binding ability in men from infertile couples and men with testicular germ cell tumor. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 7893961 (2016).
Pacheco, A. et al. Magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS): a useful sperm-selection technique in cases of high levels of sperm DNA fragmentation. J. Clin. Med. 9, 3976 (2020).
Garrido, N. & Gil Juliá, M. The use of non-apoptotic sperm selected by magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) to enhance reproductive outcomes: what the evidence says. Biology 13, 30 (2024).
Gil, M., Sar-Shalom, V., Melendez Sivira, Y., Carreras, R. & Checa, M. A. Sperm selection using magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 30, 479–485 (2013).
Hasanen, E. et al. PICSI vs. MACS for abnormal sperm DNA fragmentation ICSI cases: a prospective randomized trial. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 37, 2605–2613 (2020).
Hamacher, T. Semen Refinement: Microfluidic Separation Techniques for the Removal of Micro-Organisms from Semen for the Veterinary Industry. Dissertation, Univ. Twente (2021).
Chan, P. J., Jacobson, J. D., Corselli, J. U. & Patton, W. C. A simple zeta method for sperm selection based on membrane charge. Fertil. Steril. 85, 481–486 (2006).
Ribas et al. Comprehensive analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation by five different assays: TUNEL assay, SCSA, SCD test and alkaline and neutral Comet assay. Andrology 1, 715–722 (2013).
Cariati, F. et al. Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction. J. Pers. Med. 14, 726 (2024).
Zhang, X., Chao, S., Ye, N. & Ouyang, D. Emerging trends in sperm selection: enhancing success rates in assisted reproduction. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 22, 67 (2024).
Jones, R. E. & Lopez, K. H. Human Reproductive Biology (Academic Press, 2013).
Prochowska, S., Napierkowska, S., Czech, B. & Niżański, W. Feline sperm head morphometry in relation to male pedigree and fertility. Theriogenology 208, 119–125 (2023).
Nussdorfer, P., Cilenšek, I., Zorn, B. & Petrovič, D. Adapted methods for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in assessment of human sperm morphology. Bosn. J. Basic. Med. Sci. 18, 43–48 (2018).
Endo, T. et al. Multiple ageing effects on testicular/epididymal germ cells lead to decreased male fertility in mice. Commun. Biol. 7, 16 (2024).
Mahé, C. et al. Sperm-fluid-cell interplays in the bovine oviduct: glycosaminoglycans modulate sperm binding to the isthmic reservoir. Sci. Rep. 13, 10311 (2023).
Murawski, M. et al. The utility of nanowater for ram semen cryopreservation. Exp. Biol. Med. 240, 611–617 (2015).
Ebel, F. et al. Optimized protocol for high-vacuum scanning electron microscopy analysis of polyacrylamide hydrogel-attached sperm cells in a binary system. Microsc. Res. Tech. 87, 1122–1127 (2024).
Palomino, J. & De los Reyes, M. A scanning electron microscopy study of frozen / thawed dog sperm during in vitro gamete interaction. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 44, 278–283 (2009).
Kushawaha, B. et al. Collapsed mitochondrial cristae in goat spermatozoa due to mercury result in lethality and compromised motility along with altered kinematic patterns. Sci. Rep. 11, 646 (2021).
Khophloiklang, V., Chanapiwat, P. & Kaeoket, K. Camellia oil with its rich in fatty acids enhances post-thawed boar sperm quality. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 66, 6 (2024).
Rex, A., Aagaard, J. & Fedder, J. DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa: a historical review. Andrology 5, 622–630 (2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.D. researched data for the article. M.D., R.R., D.K.G., S.P.d.G. and M.E.W. contributed substantially to discussion of the content. M.D., D.M.G. and M.B. wrote the article. All authors reviewed and/or edited the manuscript before submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Urology thanks Geoffry De Iuliis, Olena M. Kocurand the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dabiri, M., Goss, D.M., Ramasamy, R. et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation and its influence on mammalian reproduction. Nat Rev Urol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-025-01123-6
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-025-01123-6


