Extended Data Fig. 2: Comparison between T/P values for the Orocopia–Pelona–Rand schist and for the entire dataset used in this study. | Nature

Extended Data Fig. 2: Comparison between T/P values for the Orocopia–Pelona–Rand schist and for the entire dataset used in this study.

From: Metamorphism and the evolution of plate tectonics

Extended Data Fig. 2

a, All data are divided into low-, intermediate- and high-T/P after ref. 4. b, Moving averages (300-Myr window) and one-standard-deviation envelopes of the data shown in a. The OPRS is thought to have formed in response to a transition from steeper, colder subduction (‘Franciscan-type’) to shallower (more gently dipping), hotter subduction related to the incoming of an oceanic plateau (thicker, more buoyant oceanic lithosphere)26. Many Mesoproterozoic and Palaeoproterozoic orogenic belts preserve bimodal distributions of metamorphism, with the lower-T/P rocks (‘intermediate-T/P’ in this figure) being characterized by average T/P similar to that of the OPRS (about 500–650 °C GPa−1)26, including the Grenville, Sveconorwegian, Trans-North China, Trans-Hudson, Eburnean, Ubendian–Usagaran and Belomorian belts.

Back to article page