Extended Data Fig. 6: The electrochemical performance of DRS-Li₃V₂O₅.

a, Voltage profiles of DRS-Li_3+xV₂O₅ over 1,000 cycles at 1 A g⁻¹. b, Comparison of the electrochemical performance of DRS-Li₃V₂O₅ with different voltage windows under a current density of 0.1 A g⁻¹. c, Voltage profiles of DRS-Li₃V₂O₅ in voltage windows of 0.01–2 V, 0.1–2 V, 0.2–2 V and 0.3–2 V, respectively. d, The initial charge voltage curve of a Li||LiNi_0.8Mn_0.1Co_0.1O₂ half-cell under 0.1 A g⁻¹ and the discharge voltage curve of a Li||DRS-Li₃V₂O₅ half-cell under 0.1 A g⁻¹ were used to simulate the charge voltage profile of a DRS-Li₃V₂O₅||LiNi_0.8Mn_0.1Co_0.1O₂ full cell. e, Voltage profiles of a Li||LiNi_0.8Mn_0.1Co_0.1O₂ half-cell under charge–discharge current densities of 0.1 A g⁻¹ and 0.5 A g⁻¹, with voltage window 2.8–4.3 V. The LiNi_0.8Mn_0.1Co_0.1O₂ delivered specific capacities of 190 mA h g⁻¹ and 160 mA h g⁻¹ under 0.1 A g⁻¹ and 0.5 A g⁻¹, respectively. f, Voltage profiles of a DRS-Li₃V₂O₅||LiNi_0.8Mn_0.1Co_0.1O₂ full cell under charge–discharge current densities of 0.1 A g⁻¹ and 0.5 A g⁻¹, with voltage window 1.5–3.9 V. The full cell delivered specific capacities of 189 mA h g⁻¹ and 155 mA h g⁻¹ under 0.1 A g⁻¹ and 0.5 A g⁻¹, respectively. g, Discharge voltage profiles of DRS-Li₃V₂O₅ with 30 wt% of carbon under various charge–discharge current densities, with voltage window 0.01–2.0 V. h, Discharge voltage profiles of DRS-Li₃V₂O₅ with 10 wt% of carbon under various charge–discharge current densities, with voltage window 0.01–2.0 V. i, XRD patterns of DRS-Li₃V₂O₅ prepared by different methods. Comparison of the electrochemical (Echem) performance of the fresh DRS-Li₃V₂O₅ and the aged DRS-Li₃V₂O₅ prepared by chemical (Chem) synthesis. j, Cycling stability (Ch, charge; DCh, discharge) under a current density of 0.1 A g⁻¹. k, Representative voltage profiles of chemically synthesized DRS-Li₃V₂O₅.