Extended Data Fig. 3: Quality assessment and analysis of mouse spermatogenesis data. | Nature

Extended Data Fig. 3: Quality assessment and analysis of mouse spermatogenesis data.

From: Transcriptome and translatome co-evolution in mammals

Extended Data Fig. 3

a, Ribosome footprint length distributions across Ribo-seq libraries (nt, nucleotides). b, Fractions of Ribo-seq and RNA-seq reads mapped to 5′-UTRs, CDSs and 3′-UTRs, respectively. c, Distribution of Ribo-seq and RNA-seq reads across the three reading frames in the CDS of dominant splicing isoforms (frame 1: canonical reading frame). d, PCA based on 11,057 genes robustly expressed (median FPKM > 1) across mouse spermatogenesis libraries. The scree plot (inset) indicates the percentage of variance explained by each of the first 10 PCs. e, Expression variation at the translatome layer calculated for simulated scenarios with different amounts of translational contribution (see Methods for details). Dashed line corresponds to IQR calculated at the transcriptome layer. f, g, Spearman’s ρ between transcription abundance and translational efficiency was calculated for 5,060 robustly expressed (median FPKM > 1 across organ libraries) 1:1 amniote orthologues in bulk testis across the amniotes (f) and across spermatogenesis stages in mouse (g). h, i, Translational efficiency (h) and translational shift (i) for clusters of genes (gene numbers in parentheses) with distinct translational efficiency patterns (Mfuzz clustering). Arrows indicate translational efficiency increases or decreases compared to the respective global pattern (Fig. 1e). *indicates a cluster of genes, which escape expression repression and delay at the translatome layer. j, Expression of individual genes, representing each of the five translational efficiency clusters, at the transcriptome and translatome layers (left column); shift in expression timing between expression layers for the corresponding genes (right column) with crosses representing the centres of mass of gene expression across spermatogenesis. k, Tissue-specificity (tissue Tau) across translational efficiency clusters. Cluster I, highlighted in colour, is dominated by testis-specific genes. Box plots represent the median ± 25th and 75th percentiles; whiskers are at 1.5 × IQR. l, Gene-expression divergence at the two expression layers for genes with stage-specific expression across spermatogenesis among 8,109 1:1 orthologues robustly expressed (FPKM > 1) in macaque, mouse and opossum.

Back to article page