Extended Data Fig. 4: Performance of Mice Location Decoders in Familiar Environment.
A-F. Pooled error cumulative probability plots of the mice that appear in the averaged data in Fig. 4. A. Mean error size: 43.7 ± 0.1 and 54.1 ± 0.1, for the decoder trained on the real data and the shuffled data respectively, 1-sided permutation test, p = 0.009). B. Mean error size: 41.4 ± 0.2 and 61.1 ± 0.3, for the decoder trained on the real data and the shuffled data respectively, 1-sided permutation test, p = 0.027). C. Mean error size: 37.8 ± 0.2 and 56.6 ± 0.2, for the decoder trained on the real data and the shuffled data respectively, 1-sided permutation test, p = 0.009). D. Mean error size: 49.6 ± 0.2 and 60.2 ± 0.2, for the decoder trained on the real data and the shuffled data respectively, 1-sided permutation test, p = 0.151). E. Mean error size: 43.9 ± 0.3 and 62.6 ± 0.2, for the decoder trained on the real data and the shuffled data respectively, 1-sided permutation test, p = 0.037). F. Mean error size: 49.9 ± 0.1 and 62.2 ± 0.2, for the decoder trained on the real data and the shuffled data respectively, 1-sided permutation test, p = 0.061). Data presented as mean (bold line) ±SEM (shaded area). Different mice are colour-coded as in Fig. 2d.
