Extended Data Fig. 11: Potential structural mechanism of SPE and PEA recognition among TAAR members.
From: Structural basis of amine odorant perception by a mammal olfactory receptor

a, The potency and efficacy of Gαs-Gβγ dissociation in receptor (mTAAR2-6, 7d, 8c, and 9)-overexpressing HEK293 cells in response to stimulation with PEA. The heatmap is colored according to the value of pEC50 and Emax from 3 independent experiments (n = 3). ND, signal not detectable. b, Dose response curves of Gαs-Gβγ dissociation in receptor (mTAAR2-6, 7d, 8c, and 9)-overexpressing HEK293 cells in response to stimulation with PEA. Values are represented as mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments (n = 3). c, Effects of mutations of key residues in SPE-binding hydrophobic pocket of mTAAR9 in response to the stimulation with SPE. The heatmap is colored according to the value of ΔpEC50 (ΔpEC50 = pEC50 of mutant - pEC50 of wild type). Values were from 3 independent experiments (n = 3). d, Dose response curves of mutations of key residues in SPE-binding hydrophobic pocket of mTAAR9 in response to stimulation with SPE. Values are represented as mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments (n = 3). Consistently, structurally equivalent mutations of these 4 hydrophobic residues of F1173.37T, F1684.61V, Y2746.51C, V2977.39T/C, and V3007.42A/G decreased SPE-induced mTAAR9 activation. e-f, Dose response curves of HEK293 cells overexpressing wild type and mutants (F1684.61L and V3007.42A) of mTAAR9 (c) or wild type and mutants (L170F4.61 and A2947.42V) of mTAAR5 (d) in response to SPE stimulation. Values are represented as mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments (n = 3). Mutation of F1684.61L and V3007.42A in mTAAR9 indeed decreased SPE-induced receptor activation by 5.13 ± 0.66- and 27.2 ± 5.04-fold, respectively (e), whereas mutation of L1704.61F and A2947.42V in mTAAR5 increased SPE-stimulated receptor activation by 5.43 ± 0.55- and 9.26 ± 0.68-fold, respectively(f). These results suggest that the binding of these 2 residues contributes to the potency difference of SPE that acts between the 2 mTAAR members. g, Effects of mutations of key residues in PEA-binding pocket of mTAAR9 in response to the stimulation with PEA. The heatmap is colored according to the value of ΔpEC50 (ΔpEC50 = pEC50 of mutant - pEC50 of wild type). Values were from 3 independent experiments (n = 3). h, Dose response curves of mutations of key residues in PEA-binding hydrophobic pocket of mTAAR9 in response to stimulation with PEA. Values are represented as mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments (n = 3). Notably, mutating the four residues in mTAAR4/6/7d/9 to structurally equivalent residues present in other mTAARs, including F/Y3.37L/T, Y6.51C, Y7.35L, or V7.39T/C, significantly decreased the PEA-induced mTAAR9 activities. i, Effects of mutations of key residues in PEA-binding pocket of mTAAR7d in response to the stimulation with PEA. The heatmap is colored according to the value of ΔpEC50 (ΔpEC50 = pEC50 of mutant - pEC50 of wild type). Values were from 3 independent experiments (n = 3). j, Dose response curves of mutations of key residues of mTAAR7d in response to stimulation with PEA by Gαs-Gβγ dissociation assay. Values are represented as mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments (n = 3). Notably, mutating the four residues in mTAAR4/6/7d/9 to structurally equivalent residues present in other mTAARs, including F/Y3.37L/T, Y6.51C, Y7.35L, or V7.39T/C, significantly decreased the PEA-induced mTAAR7d activities.