Extended Data Fig. 11: Spilt-GAL4 lines targeting oviDN input neurons and analysis of oviDN inputs in the hemibrain connectome.
From: A rise-to-threshold process for a relative-value decision

a-r, Average z-projection of oviDN input split-GAL4 lines in the brain (top) and ventral nerve cord (bottom) in order of x-axis in Fig. 6a (see Supplementary Table 3 for additional information). Green shows UAS-CsChrimson-mVenus expression in the targeted neurons and magenta represents a neuropil counterstain (Methods). s, In panels s-v, we show circuit motifs that are not supported by our analysis of the hemibrain connectome16, in contrast to the motif reported in Fig. 6e, which is supported (see Methods for more discussion). This panel shows that no chemical-synapse-based recurrent circuit is observed between the oviDNs themselves in the hemibrain connectome at a threshold of ≥ 10 synapses per connection (even true at a threshold of ≥ 2 synapses here). (For reference on the potential functional significance of a 10 synapse threshold, ~15-20 neurons make ≥ 10 synapses onto an individual oviDN in the hemibrain.) Scatter plot of connections between pairs of neurons is shown to right. Both data points are from a single pair of oviDNs. t, We found in the hemibrain connectome all pairs of cells that fulfilled the circuit diagram shown on the left at a threshold of ≥ 1 synapse per connection. No direct, bidirectional, chemical-synapse-based recurrent circuit could be detected between individual oviDNs and any oviDN input neuron in the hemibrain connectome at a threshold of ≥ 10 synapses per connection (even true at a threshold of ≥ 4 synapses per connection here). Scatter plot of connections shown to right; each dot represents the connections between two neurons. Orange points represent pairs of connected neurons diagrammed in the recurrent circuit in Fig. 6e, but assayed for participation in a different circuit motif here. u, We found in the hemibrain connectome all sets of four cells that fulfilled the circuit diagram shown on the left at a threshold of ≥ 1 synapse per connection. None of these putative circuits had ≥ 10 synapses for all four connections, which we interpret to mean that no chemical-synapse-based, disynaptic recurrent circuit exists between individual oviDNs and a single class of oviDN input neuron. Cell classes (types) were based on the hemibrain v1.2.1 connectome annotation16. Scatter plot of connections is shown to right; each dot represents the connections between a set of four neurons. Orange points represent sets of four neurons diagrammed in the recurrent circuit in Fig. 6e, but assayed for participation in a different circuit motif here. For example, the orange dot indicated by an arrow represents the following connections between single cells: oviDNa(right)←groupU(right)↔groupU(left)→oviDNb(left). v, Same as panel u, but for a different circuit architecture. Each point, once again, represents the connections between a set of four neurons. None of these putative circuits had ≥ 10 synapses for all four connections.