Extended Data Fig. 4: Determination of the effective activation energy using isoconversional principle. | Nature

Extended Data Fig. 4: Determination of the effective activation energy using isoconversional principle.

From: One step from oxides to sustainable bulk alloys

Extended Data Fig. 4: Determination of the effective activation energy using isoconversional principle.

a, Flynn−Wall−Ozawa (FWO) method54,55. b, Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose (KAS) method56,57. c, Calculated effective activation energy (\({E}_{\alpha }\)) as a function of conversion rate (\(\alpha \)). The theoretical basis of these analyses roots in the isoconversional principle31,32, presuming that for any given chemical reaction, the reaction rate at a constant extent of conversion should only depend on temperature. It is hence possible to evaluate the effective activation energy (\({E}_{\alpha }\)) for individual conversion rate (\(\alpha \)) in a model-free manner, without priori assumption of the reaction model. For a non-isothermal process (in this case, continuous heating), the generalized kinetic rate theory states: \({\rm{d}}\alpha \,/{\rm{d}}t=k(T)f(\alpha )\), where \(k(T)\) is the rate constant, whose temperature dependency closely follows Arrhenius law: \(k(T)={k}_{0}\exp (\,-\,Q/{RT})\), and \(f(\alpha )\) represents a complex function of \(\alpha \). When a constant heating rate is utilized during a TGA measurement: \(\beta ={\rm{d}}T\,/{\rm{d}}t\), a further correlation can be set: \({\rm{d}}\alpha \,/{\rm{d}}T=({\rm{d}}\alpha \,/{\rm{d}}t)({\rm{d}}t\,/{\rm{d}}T)=(1/\beta )({\rm{d}}\alpha \,/{\rm{d}}t)\) and the generalized rate equation hence becomes: \({\rm{d}}\alpha /{\rm{d}}T=({k}_{0}/\beta )\exp (\,-\,Q/{k}_{{\rm{B}}}T)f(\alpha )\), whose temperature integration is: \(g(\alpha )=\int (1/f(\alpha )){\rm{d}}\alpha =({k}_{0}/\beta )\int \exp (\,-\,Q/{k}_{{\rm{B}}}T){\rm{d}}T\). The FWO method takes the integration with Doyle’s approximation54,55, leading to: \(\mathrm{ln}(\beta )=\mathrm{ln}({k}_{0}\,{E}_{\alpha }/Rg(\alpha ))-5.3305-1.052({E}_{\alpha }/R{T}_{\alpha })\), thus by evaluating the slope on the \(\mathrm{ln}\left(\beta \right)v.s.\left(1/{T}_{\alpha }\right)\) plot per each \(\alpha \), the effective activation energy can be obtained. The KAS method56,57, on the other hand, takes a linear integration that brings about: \(\mathrm{ln}(\beta /{T}_{\alpha }^{2})=\mathrm{ln}({k}_{0}\,{E}_{\alpha }/Rg(\alpha ))-({E}_{\alpha }/R{T}_{\alpha })\), and thus on the \(\mathrm{ln}(\beta /{T}_{\alpha }^{2}){v}.s.\,(1/{T}_{\alpha })\) the effective activation energy can be determined at each \(\alpha \). The presence of a non-constant \({E}_{\alpha }\) throughout an \(\alpha \) range of 0.05–0.85 proves the onsets of more than one reaction process at play, as further revealed in the main text using in situ SXRD.

Back to article page