Extended Data Fig. 1: Justification for and validation of the genetics and genetic induction approach employed in the suite of GEMMs. | Nature

Extended Data Fig. 1: Justification for and validation of the genetics and genetic induction approach employed in the suite of GEMMs.

From: Human-correlated genetic models identify precision therapy for liver cancer

Extended Data Fig. 1: Justification for and validation of the genetics and genetic induction approach employed in the suite of GEMMs.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

(a) Dose finding for clonal induction using AAV.TBG.Cre in a R26-LSL-tdTomato reporter mouse model. Experimental scheme for b-d. (b-d) Decreasing doses of AAV.TBG.Cre lead to decreased recombination of the LSL and thus less RFP+ hepatocytes (b-c) Quantification of RFP+ hepatocytes by sex and dose. n = 4 mice throughout except n = 3 for 5×109 female (single sample excluded due to inconsistent RFP staining). Data shown as mean ± s.e.m.. GC = genomic copies. (d) Representative images of immunofluorescent staining demonstrating exclusive and dose-dependent targeting of hepatocytes by AAV.TBG.Cre. Individual Channels for the zone 3 marker glutamine synthetase (GS, yellow), HNF4a (magenta), RFP (green), DAPI (blue). Scale bar equals 100 µm. (e) AAV.TBG.Cre sex-dependent clonal induction variation over time. Experimental scheme for f-i. (f) Quantification of RFP+ hepatocytes using GS shows clonal induction within zone 3 and outside zone 3 but no significant zonal expansion over time using a dose of 6.4*108 GC/mouse. n = 5 (male d3 + d7, female d3 + d7), 8 (female d5), 9 (male d5). Data shown as mean ± s.e.m. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey correction (g) Male mice recombine at a higher rate than female mice after induction with 6.4*108 GC/mouse with no additional residual recombination from 5 to 7 days post induction. n = 5 (male d3 + d7, female d3 + d7), 8 (female d5), 9 (male d5). Data shown as mean ± s.e.m., Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s correction (h) Representative images of Cre-driven recombination rates in males and females on d3, d5, and d7 post induction; GS (green), HNF4a (magenta), RFP (yellow) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar equals 50 µm. (i) Summary of mouse cohorts used in j-l. (j) A lower induction rate in females leads to a lower tumour burden compared to males with the same mutational background. n = 28 (Cohort 5) and 19 (Cohort 6) mice. Data shown as mean ± s.e.m. Unpaired two tailed t-test. (k) Lower tumour burden due to a lower induction rate causes a prolonged survival in female mice compared to males with the same mutational background. n = 53 (male, Cohort 5) and 22 (female, Cohort 6) mice. Log rank test. (l) Mutational burden and induction dose influence tumour penetrance and survival outcomes. n = 11 (Cohort 1), 8 (Cohort 2), 14 (Cohort 3), 9 (Cohort 4), 53 (Cohort 5 – same data as k), 3 (Cohort 7). Log rank test. All panels: GC = genomic copies. Please note that individual cohort survival data shown for Cohort 5 and 6 are also shown in Extended Data Fig. 2a to allow direct comparison with data in that figure. (m) Analysis of the TCGA PanCancer dataset shows odds ratio for co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity of modelled HCC driver genes. n = 353. One-sided Fisher Exact Test, */**/*** denote p ≤ 0.05/0.01/0.001 respectively. (n) Mutual exclusivity of drivers is fluid and can change depending on tumour stage as shown for CTNNB1 and TP53; reanalysis of data from Nault et al.86. n = 73 (BCLC 0), 404 (BCLC A), 157 (BCLC B), 101 (BCLC C). One-sided Fisher Exact Test. (o) Genotyping of bulk end stage tumour in representative cohorts. Genotyping by cohort and allelic recombination within individual mice (bars) – representative mice are aligned between alleles within cohorts. Comparison is made to known colony genotype testing presence/absence of allelic recombination to prediction displayed as false/true positives/negatives. Recombination accuracy denotes true positive + true negative/positive + negative. Cdkn1a and Cdkn2a were constitutive knockouts in the relevant colonies.

Source data

Back to article page