Extended Data Fig. 4: Current-voltage (IV) and conductance-voltage (GV) plots confirm that GluA2-containing AMPARs are polyamine insensitive and kinetic properties corroborate CNIH presence in the AMPAR complex. | Nature

Extended Data Fig. 4: Current-voltage (IV) and conductance-voltage (GV) plots confirm that GluA2-containing AMPARs are polyamine insensitive and kinetic properties corroborate CNIH presence in the AMPAR complex.

From: GluA2-containing AMPA receptors form a continuum of Ca2+-permeable channels

Extended Data Fig. 4: Current-voltage (IV) and conductance-voltage (GV) plots confirm that GluA2-containing AMPARs are polyamine insensitive and kinetic properties corroborate CNIH presence in the AMPAR complex.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

a. IV plots of different AMPAR-TARP + CNIH complexes in external 150 mM Na+ (open circles fitted by a 4th order polynomial function) solution. b. GV plots of the AMPAR-TARP complexes obtained from IV curves above (a). Open circles show average normalized response and colored shading show se.m. (A1γ2/A2 + CNIH-2: n = 9; A1/A2γ2 + CNIH-2: n = 8; A1γ2/A2 + CNIH-3: n = 6; A1/A2γ2 + CNIH-3: n = 9). c. Example membrane currents evoked by 10 mM L-Glu (250 ms duration) on GluA1/A2 AMPARs co-assembled with either TARP γ2 and CNIH2 or TARP γ2 and CNH3 (c). The grey shadow shows the SEM of the response. d. Comparison of gating properties between A1/A2γ2 (in grey) vs A1/A2γ2 + CNIH-3 (black) receptors. e. CNIH-3 slows desensitization kinetics of A1/A2γ2 receptors (A1/A2γ2: τdes = 7.5 ± 0.6 ms, n = 16; A1/A2γ2 + CNIH-3: τdes = 22.5 ± 1.7 ms, n = 9). Equilibrium current was enhanced by CNIH-3 (A1/A2γ2: Equilibrium current = 2.9 ± 0.4 %, n = 16; A1/A2γ2 + CNIH-3: Equilibrium current = 14.7 ± 1.3 %, n = 9). CNIH-3 also slowed the off-kinetics of AMPARs (A1/A2γ2: τoff = 6.8 ± 0.5 ms, n = 19; A1/A2γ2 + CNIH-3: τoff = 23.5 ± 1.5 ms, n = 14) and the deactivation kinetics (A1/A2γ2: τdeact = 1.5 ± 0.1 ms, n = 6; A1/A2γ2 + CNIH-3: τdeact = 7.0 ± 0.8 ms, n = 9). Two-sided unpaired t-tests with Welch correction. p-value *** <0.001. f. AMPAR-TARP + CNIH complexes arranged by the reversal potential observed in 108 mM external Ca2+ solution (A1/A2: ErevCa2+ = −44.8 ± 2.8 mV, n = 6; A1γ2/A2 + CNIH-3: ErevCa2+ = −33.6 ± 1.7 mV, n = 6; A1γ2/A2 + CNIH-2: ErevCa2+ = −25.8 ± 2.2 mV, n = 9; A2γ2/A3 + CNIH-3: ErevCa2+ = −29.7 ± 2.2 mV, n = 5; A1γ8/A2 + CNIH-3: ErevCa2+ = −31.2 ± 2.7 mV, n = 5; A1/A2γ8 + CNIH-3: ErevCa2+ = −18.9 ± 3.4 mV, n = 6). Orange square shows the A1/A2γ2 AMPAR to highlight changes in the Ca2+ reversal potential induced by CNIH-2 and -3 auxiliary proteins (cyan squares, A1/A2γ2 + CNIH-2: ErevCa2+ = −1.8 ± 2.5 mV, n = 8; A1/A2γ2 + CNIH-3: ErevCa2+ = 7.5 ± 1.1 mV, n = 9). Sky-blue circle denotes A1/A2γ2 + CNIH-3 with the A789F mutation which left-shifts the Ca2+ reversal potential (A1AF/A2γ2 + CNIH-3: ErevCa2+ = −25.5 ± 3.1 mV, n = 8). g. Pooled data of PCa/PNa from the AMPAR complexes shown in (f) grouped by CNIH and TARP type (A1γ2/A2 + CNIH-2: PCa/PNa = 0.15 ± 0.02, n = 9; A1/A2γ2 + CNIH-2: PCa/PNa = 0.55 ± 0.11, n = 8; A1γ2/A2 + CNIH-3: PCa/PNa = 0.10 ± 0.01, n = 6; A1/A2γ2 + CNIH-3: PCa/PNa = 0.95 ± 0.05, n = 9; A1AF/A2γ2 + CNIH-3: PCa/PNa = 0.16 ± 0.02, n = 8; A1γ8/A2 + CNIH-3: PCa/PNa = 0.12 ± 0.02, n = 5; A1/A2γ8 + CNIH-3: PCa/PNa = 0.23 ± 0.04, n = 6; A2γ2/A3 + CNIH-3: PCa/PNa = 0.12 ± 0.02, n = 5). Two-sided Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA followed by Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni-Holmes correction. p-value * <0.05, ** <0.01, *** <0.001.

Source data

Back to article page