Extended Data Table 1 Comparison of anomalous Hall conductivity \({{\boldsymbol{\sigma }}}_{{\boldsymbol{x}}{\boldsymbol{y}}}^{{\bf{A}}}\) in zero-field and saturation magnetic field \({{\boldsymbol{B}}}_{{\bf{sat}}}^{{\bf{est}}}\) among bulk single crystalline antiferromagnets with small net magnetization

From: A metallic p-wave magnet with commensurate spin helix

Material

Spin texture

q-vector

\({B}_{{\rm{sat}}}^{{\rm{est}}}\)

\({\sigma }_{xy}^{{\rm{A}}}\)

\({\sigma }_{xy}^{{\rm{A}}}/{\sigma }_{xx}\)

\({T}_{\max }\)

Ref.

  

(r.l.u.)

(T)

(Ω−1cm−1)

(%)

(K)

 

Gd3(Ru0.95Rh0.05)4Al12

non-collinear

\(\left(\frac{1}{6},\frac{1}{6},0\right)\)

5.5

600

4.2 − 4.7

2

This work

\({{\rm{Mn}}}_{3}{\rm{Sn}}\)

non-collinear

(0, 0, 0)

660

20 − 140

0.4 − 2.4

2

27,47

Mn3Ge

non-collinear

(0, 0, 0)

1500

15 − 350

0.4 − 3.6

2

28,48

Mn3Ga

non-collinear

(0, 0, 0)

180

18

0.5

300

49

Mn3Sb

non-collinear

(0, 0, 0)

650

310

1.1 − 1.5

150

50

Mn3Pt

non-collinear

(0, 0, 0)

2445

100

0.8

120

51

CoNb3S6

non-coplanar

\(\left(\frac{1}{2},0,0\right)\)

250

27

0.7

23

29

CoTa3S6

non-coplanar

\(\left(\frac{1}{2},0,0\right)\)

170

75 − 135

0.9  −  1.6

6

30,31

Mn5Si3

non-coplanar

\(\left(\frac{1}{2},0,0\right)\)

180

160

2.3

25

52

NbMnP

non-collinear

(0, 0, 0)

1100

230

1.9 − 3.2

2

53

TaMnP

non-collinear

(0, 0, 0)

1200

370

1.4 − 2.7

2

54

Ce2CuGe6

collinear

(0, 0, 0)

90

550

0.2

1.3

55

  1. Gd3(Ru0.95Rh0.05)4Al12 shows a commensurate non-collinear spin texture, a giant anomalous Hall conductivity, and a large Hall angle. It also has a low magnetic field for transition into the ferromagnetic state, simplifying the data analysis. \({T}_{\max }\) is a temperature where \({\sigma }_{xy}^{{\rm{A}}}\) takes a maximum value. Error bar of \({\sigma }_{xy}^{{\rm{A}}}/{\sigma }_{xx}\) in our material is estimated from the variation of the values between a bulk sample and a device. As for Mn3Sn and Mn3Ge, error bars for \({\sigma }_{xy}^{{\rm{A}}}\) and \({\sigma }_{xy}^{{\rm{A}}}/{\sigma }_{xx}\) indicate variation of the values for different field directions. Since \({\sigma }_{xy}^{{\rm{A}}}/{\sigma }_{xx}\) of Mn3Sb, NbMnP, and TaMnP takes a maximum at temperatures different from \({T}_{\max }\) of \({\sigma }_{xy}^{{\rm{A}}}\), we added error bars for these compounds. As for CoTa3S6, error bars are added because there is a variation in reported values of \({\sigma }_{xy}^{{\rm{A}}}\). In Fig. 4f, we use \({\sigma }_{xy}^{{\rm{A}}}\) and \({\sigma }_{xy}^{{\rm{A}}}/{\sigma }_{xx}\) at \({T}_{\max }\), and also add error bars for \({\sigma }_{xy}^{{\rm{A}}}/{\sigma }_{xx}\) based on this table. References 47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55.