Fig. 5: Comparison of CO2 abatement potentials, abatement costs and technology contributions under different policy scenarios. | Nature

Fig. 5: Comparison of CO2 abatement potentials, abatement costs and technology contributions under different policy scenarios.

From: Technological pathways for cost-effective steel decarbonization

Fig. 5

a,b, Global CO2 emissions and production costs of all steel plants during 2020–2050 under the least-cost pathways with varying policy strengths (late, medium and early). The numbers in yellow, green and purple indicate differences between adjacent scenarios: cumulative CO2 abatement and average abatement cost (a) and increases in total production cost (b), corresponding to the areas between neighbouring solid lines. c, Abatement potentials and abatement costs of different decarbonization technologies worldwide and in major regions over 2020–2050 under the late, medium and early scenarios, compared with reference pathways without policy intervention.

Back to article page