Fig. 2: Theory constrained by emission and contrail observations can explain contrail ice formation on volatile particles under low-soot, lean-burn combustor conditions. | Nature

Fig. 2: Theory constrained by emission and contrail observations can explain contrail ice formation on volatile particles under low-soot, lean-burn combustor conditions.

From: Substantial aircraft contrail formation at low soot emission levels

Fig. 2: Theory constrained by emission and contrail observations can explain contrail ice formation on volatile particles under low-soot, lean-burn combustor conditions.

Dependence of contrail ice crystal numbers on combustion mode and fuel composition. The symbols show mean and arithmetic standard deviation of non-volatile (EInv, d > 14 nm) and ice (EIice, d > 0.6 µm) particle number emissions indices measured under lean-burn and forced rich-burn combustor configurations for Jet A-1 (black) and a HEFA-blend (green) at 218 K ambient temperature. The lines denote simulations with the updated ACM model3 at comparable conditions (218 K, 10 K below TSA; refs. 39,50) for lean- and rich-burn combustion modes and three fuel composition cases (Jet A-1 with 192 ppmm sulfur; HEFA-blend with 75 ppmm sulfur; and HEFA-SPK with 3 ppmm sulfur; see also Table 1). The grey dotted line indicates the 1:1 relationship. More details on measurement conditions for the near-field emission and the far-field contrail measurements are provided in the Methods and Extended Data Tables 2 and 3. Reduced ice particle number emission indices were measured and modelled for low-sulfur low-aromatic HEFA-blend compared with Jet A-1.

Back to article page