Fig. 2: Comparison of high-quality reference genomes from de novo assembly and HGG.
From: A human gut bacterial genome and culture collection for improved metagenomic analyses
a, Read base usage as a percentage of total read bases present within the metagenomics samples (n = 13,490) that could be mapped to their respective de novo assembled contigs (min., 22.23; Q1: 62.87; median, 76.89; Q3, 89.99; max., 99.98) and metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs; min., 0.16; Q1, 8.17; median, 16.09; Q3, 31.16; max., 65.64). b, Total number of classified bins using HGG (blue), genomes derived from the HBC collection alone (HBC; orange), the HMP (purple) and gastrointestinal derived isolates from the HMP (HMP-GI; green). c, Total number of 39,913 MAGs classified using subsampled sets of genomes from the HGG (blue), HBC (orange), HMP (purple) and HMP-GI (green). Error bars show mean and s.d. (n = 100 bootstraps).
