Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Patents
  • Published:

PATENTS

Negative innovation: when patents are bad for patients

Incentives in patent law have driven innovation into spaces that are affirmatively harmful to patients, and patentees are discouraged from taking steps to improve the product so as to prevent adverse health outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Feldman, R. Stanf. J. Law Bus. Finance 18, 250–318 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Feldman, R. Harvard J. Legis. 57, 309–310 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buccafusco, C. & Masur, J. S. Wash. Univ. Law Rev. (in the press).

  4. Feldman, R. Columbia Sci. Technol. Law Rev. 21, 1–35 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roin, B. N. Tex. Law Rev. 87, 503–570 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson, A. L., Cohen, J. T., Greenberg, D. & Kent, D. M. Ann. Intern. Med. 151, 662–667 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kapczynski, A. UCLA Law Rev. 59, 970–1026 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eisenberg, R. S. Mich. Telecomm. Technol. Law Rev. 13, 345–388 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ratain, M. J., Moslehi, J. J. & Lichter, A. S. JAMA Oncol. 7, 177–178 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Advani, R. H. et al. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 88–94 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pollyea, D. A. et al. Blood 114, 3713 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pharmacyclics to host webcast and conference call to discuss clinical updates on its HDAC and BTK program as presented at the American Society of Hematology Meeting Dec. 6 & 7. BioSpace https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/pharmacyclics-inc-to-host-webcast-and-conference-call-to-discuss-clinical-updates-on-its-hdac-and-btk-program-as-presented-at-the-american-society-o/?s=105 (4 December 2009).

  13. Pharmacyclics reports second quarter fiscal 2010 financial results. PR Newswire https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/pharmacyclics-reports-second-quarter-fiscal-2010-financial-results-84154162.html (11 February 2010).

  14. FDA. NDA #205552 original-1 clinical pharmacology review. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2013/205552Orig1s000ClinPharmR.pdf (2013).

  15. FDA. NDA #205552 original-2 clinical pharmacology review. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2014/205552Orig2s000ClinPharmR.pdf (2014).

  16. Buggy, J. J., Fyfe, G. & Loury, D. J. US patent 8,754,090 (2014).

  17. Hao, J., Rodriguez-Monguio, R. & Seoane-Vazquez, E. PLoS One 10, e0140708 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oo, C. & Sy, S. K. B. Drug Discov. Today 23, 457–459 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Posner, G. Pharma: Greed, Lies, and the Poisoning of America (Avid Reader Press, 2020).

  20. Petersen, M. A question of timing: a lawsuit claims Gilead Sciences could have developed a less-harmful version of its HIV treatment sooner. Los Angeles Times https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-gilead-20160529-snap-story.html (29 May 2016).

  21. Price, W. N. II Columbia Law Rev. 120, 769–833 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Risch, M. George Mason Law Rev. 19, 57–111 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sachs, R. E. Cardozo Law Rev. 39, 1991–2047 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Frakes, M. & Wasserman, M. F. Investing in ex ante regulation: evidence from pharmaceutical patent examination. Working Paper No. w27579 (NBER, 2020).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank C. Kim for research assistance and S. Hemphill for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed extensively to the work presented in the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin C. Feldman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

D.A.H. and M.J.R. are directors of the Optimal Cancer Care Alliance. M.J.R. is also a consultant for multiple biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, patent litigation consultant and expert witness on behalf of multiple generic pharmaceutical companies, and a co-inventor on a pending patent for low-dose tocilizumab to treat COVID-19.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feldman, R.C., Hyman, D.A., Price, W.N. et al. Negative innovation: when patents are bad for patients. Nat Biotechnol 39, 914–916 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00999-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00999-0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer