Fig. 6: Transcript repair in a mouse model of Rett syndrome using circular wobble-optimized CLUSTER guide RNAs and endogenous murine Adars. | Nature Biotechnology

Fig. 6: Transcript repair in a mouse model of Rett syndrome using circular wobble-optimized CLUSTER guide RNAs and endogenous murine Adars.

From: Precise in vivo RNA base editing with a wobble-enhanced circular CLUSTER guide RNA

Fig. 6

a, Editing yields in different brain regions, after delivery of the AAV-PHP.eB-encoded guide RNA through retro-orbital injection into Rett mice carrying the Mecp2 W104>amber mutation and quantification by Sanger sequencing 4 weeks later. b, Correlation between the median editing in a and the geometric mean of the RT–qPCR targets in c,g,i,k. Olfactory bulb, Ob; cerebellum, Cb; hippocampus, Hi; cortex, Cx; midbrain, Mb; thalamus, Th; brainstem, Bs. c, Guide RNA expression quantified by RT–qPCR (normalized to the geometric mean of Actb, Rps29 and Rnu6. d, As in b but correlating a,c. e, Absolute quantification of AAV episomes per cell by standard curve qPCR (normalized to Actb). f, As in b but correlating a,e. g, As in c but for Adar1. h, As in b but correlating a,g. i, As in c but for Adar1 p150. j, As in b but correlating a,i. k, As in c but for Adar2. l, As in b but correlating a,k. m, Bystander off-target events at the guide RNA-binding sites and the TS. n, All amplicon reads with on-target editing binned according to their number of bystander events (based on Supplementary Fig. 14). o, Global RNA editing at 2,533 endogenous sites (coverage  50 reads, REDIportal55). p, Thalamus sections stained for MeCP2 and DAPI (nuclei). For a, data are shown as the median editing percentage ± 95% CI determined in n = 3 mice (nontargeting virus) and n = 5 mice (targeting virus). For statistical analysis, a Mann–Whitney U-test (two-tailed, nonparametric) was applied. For c,e,g,i,k,m,n, data are shown as the median fold change ± 95% CI or median number of copies per cell ± 95% CI determined in n = 2 mice (three technical replicates each). The NGS analysis in o is based on results from n = 1 (nontargeting virus) or n = 2 (targeting virus) mice. The results in p are derived from n = 1 mouse per group. For b,d,f,h,j,l, the values were determined by simple linear regression.

Back to article page