Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Lessons from biotech’s unscientific evolution

To apparently little effect, Nature Biotechnology has been commenting on the oddly unscientific ways of biotech for 30 years. Revisiting the exasperation and occasional ridicule of this journal’s editorials, this Comment explores how populist and commercial lobbies have sidetracked regulations — in particular, those for genetically modified organisms and biosimilars. In a lesson germane in today’s political climate, re-establishing a rational path rapidly may reduce the damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. A broad and inclusive enterprise. Nat. Biotechnol. 14, 235 (1996).

  2. Greer, S. L., Jarman, H., Kulikoff, R. & Yaver, M. Lancet Reg. Health Am. 48, 101173 (2025).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Similarity trials. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 1 (2011).

  4. Schellekens, H. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1357–1359 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. The end of the beginning? Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 367 (2006).

  6. Another nail in the biosimilar coffin? Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 198 (2012).

  7. First US biosimilar launch. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1013 (2015).

  8. The INN crowd. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1055 (2013).

  9. Chaudhari, K. & Emerton, D. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 24, 580–581 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Niazi. S. K. BioRationality: entering a new era of affordable biosimilar development. https://www.centerforbiosimilars.com/view/biorationality-the-new-era-of-affordable-biosimilar-development (2025).

  11. Quist, D. & Chapela, I. H. Nature 414, 541–543 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. More gods and monsters. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 207 (1999).

  13. The numerology of idiocy. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 319 (2002).

  14. The fear factor. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 957 (2002).

  15. Reburnishing golden rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 395 (2005).

  16. Label without a cause. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1169 (2014).

  17. An incredible fudge. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 997 (2016).

  18. Senior, M. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02994-1 (2026).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. FDA. Flexible requirements for cell and gene therapies to advance innovation. https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/cellular-gene-therapy-products/flexible-requirements-cell-and-gene-therapies-advance-innovation (2026).

  20. FDA. Use of Bayesian methodology in clinical trials of drug and biological products. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/use-bayesian-methodology-clinical-trials-drug-and-biological-products (2026).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Hodgson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hodgson, J. Lessons from biotech’s unscientific evolution. Nat Biotechnol 44, 342–344 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-026-03029-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-026-03029-z

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing