Extended Data Fig. 6: Comparison of circulating and infiltrating fractions. | Nature Genetics

Extended Data Fig. 6: Comparison of circulating and infiltrating fractions.

From: ImmuneLENS characterizes systemic immune dysregulation in aging and cancer

Extended Data Fig. 6: Comparison of circulating and infiltrating fractions.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

a, Boxplots showing different fractions calculated in ImmuneLENS in circulating blood and infiltrating tumor samples; pie charts show the percentage of cases when infiltrating fractions is higher or lower than circulating with significance assessed using a two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test. P = 0, represents P values less than the limit of double-precision floating numbers in R, 2.22 × 10308 b, Pearson correlation of infiltrating and circulating fractions within the 100KGP cohort. Dashed black line represents the Pearson correlation = 0 and separates positive and negative correlations. Multiple hypothesis adjustments were performed using the Holm–Bonferroni method. Boxplots in a show the median, lower and upper quartile and with whiskers extending to 1.5× interquartile range above and below the interquartile range. P values for Pearson’s R values were derived from a two-tailed t-distribution using the correlation coefficient and sample size.

Back to article page