Extended Data Fig. 9: Transcriptomic analysis reveals that TH1-like Treg cells inhibit CD8+ T cell memory during LCMV infection.
From: IFNγ-induction of TH1-like regulatory T cells controls antiviral responses

a-c, scRNA-seq of splenic pooled Tetramer+ (GP33, GP276, NP396) CD8+ T cells from Foxp3Cre-YFP or Ifngr1L/LFoxp3Cre-YFP mice (n = 3), 16 dpi with Cl. 13. a, UMAP embedding Tetramer+ CD8+ T cells into a two-dimensional space to generate 8 distinct clusters, with categories shown. b, Distribution of cells amongst clusters from individual mice. c, Percentage of cells in the memory cluster. d, e, Foxp3Cre-YFP or Ifngr1L/LFoxp3Cre-YFP mice were infected with Arm. and the expression of effector CD8+ cells (d) (n = 18, control; n = 16, Ifngr1-deficient) and the ratio of MPECs to SLECs within splenic pooled CD44hiCD62Llo Tetramer+ CD8+ T cells (e) (n = 8) were determined by flow cytometry. f, g, Expression of Ifngr1 within the bulk population (f) and within the memory cluster (g) of the splenic pooled Tetramer+ CD8+ T cells from the scRNA-seq dataset in a-c (n = 3). h-j, Rag1–/– mice were reconstituted with Ifngr1–/– (n = 12) or control (WT) (n = 13) Treg cells and infected with Arm. h, i, Frequency of splenic CD44hiCD62Llo (h) and CD44hiCD62Lhi (i, left), and number of CD44hiCD62Lhi (i, right) pooled Tetramer+ CD8+ T cells were determined by flow cytometry. j, Frequency of (left) and total number of (right) MPECs (upper) and SLECs (lower), and the ratio of MPECs to SLECs, splenic pooled Tetramer+ CD8+ T cells were determined by flow cytometry. k, heatmap of DE of the IL16/CD4/CCR5 signaling axis in Treg cells from the scRNA-seq dataset in a-c. l-n, Foxp3Cre-YFP and Ifngr1L/LFoxp3Cre-YFP mice were infected with Arm. and transcripts of the IL16/CD4/CCR5 signaling axis in Treg cells (l) (n = 11) or Il16 (m) (n = 11) and Ccl5 (n) (n = 6, control; n = 9, Ifngr1-deficient) expression in Treg cells and CD44hiCD62Llo CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, were determined by qPCR. a-n, Data are presented as mean values and represent biologically independent mice and 1 (a-c, f, g), 2 (e, k, n) or 3 (d, h-j, l, m) independent experiments. Statistical significance and P values were determined by an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test relative to the Foxp3Cre-YFP mice (c-g) or Rag1–/– + WT Treg cells (h-j), or by multiple unpaired Student t-tests relative to Foxp3Cre-YFP mice (l) or by two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. (m,n), Adjusted P values were determined by one-way ANOVA (b) or Wilcoxon rank-sum test (k) relative to infected Foxp3Cre-YFP mice (P values indicated when significant); NS, not significant.