Fig. 4: GLP-2 drives ILC2-dependent tuft cell expansion. | Nature Immunology

Fig. 4: GLP-2 drives ILC2-dependent tuft cell expansion.

From: TSLP links intestinal nutrient sensing with amplification of the ILC2–tuft cell circuit

Fig. 4: GLP-2 drives ILC2-dependent tuft cell expansion.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

a, Representative imaging of tuft cells in jejunum after three daily injections of GLP-2[Gly2]. EdU was injected 24 h before tissue harvest. Green, EdU; red, DCLK1; white, EPCAM; blue, DAPI; ×20 objective. Scale bars, 100 µm. b, Quantification of jejunal tuft cells after three daily GLP-2[Gly2] injections or vehicle control in WT, Tslpr−/−, Tslprfl/flIl5Cre+, Il4rα−/−, Il13rα−/− and Il4rαfl/flVil1Cre+ mice. For tuft cell quantification, images were acquired using ×20 objective, and total DCLK1+EPCAM+ cells in each field were counted and normalized by total number of villus–crypt axes in the field. Each dot represents an imaging field, total N = 232; data pooled from 3 to 10 mice. A plot with averages of each mouse is included in Extended Data Fig. 9b. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA with correction for multiple comparisons, ****P < 0.0001. Error bars indicate samples mean ± s.e.m. c, Quantification of jejunal tuft cells after three daily GLP-2[Gly2] or vehicle control injections in Tslpfl/fl, Tslpfl/flNesCreERT2+ and Tslpfl/flPdgfrαCreERT2+ mice. Each dot represents an imaging field, total N = 80; data pooled from 3 to 6 mice. A plot with averages of each mouse is included in Extended Data Fig. 9d. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA with correction for multiple comparisons, ****P < 0.0001. Error bars indicate samples mean ± s.e.m. d, Representative imaging showing CCK+ EECs in Vil1FlpCckCreR26DualhM3Dq mice. Red, Cck-mCherry; green, Vil1-GFP; blue, DAPI; ×20 objective. Scale bar, 100 µm. eg, Quantification of jejunal tuft cells after administration of clozapine N-oxide CNO or vehicle control in Vil1FlpCckCreR26DualhM3Dq mice. e, Percentage of tuft cells among the CD45 epithelial fraction by flow cytometric analysis. Two independent experiment repeats were combined to generate the plot. Biological replicates N = 6 for each column group were compared using two-tailed unpaired t-test, **P < 0.005. Error bars indicate samples mean ± s.e.m. f, Representative imaging of tuft cells. Red, DCLK1; white, Vil1-GFP; blue, DAPI; ×20 objective. Scale bars, 100 µm. g, Quantification of tuft cells. Each dot represents an imaging field, N = 25 for control group and N = 28 for CNO treatment group; data pooled from 6 mice each group from 2 independent experiments. A plot with averages of each mouse is included in Extended Data Fig. 9g. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed unpaired t-test, ****P < 0.0001. Error bars indicate samples mean ± s.e.m.

Back to article page