Supplementary Figure 7: Performance of the 5′-end methods in published datasets. | Nature Methods

Supplementary Figure 7: Performance of the 5′-end methods in published datasets.

From: Comprehensive comparative analysis of 5′-end RNA-sequencing methods

Supplementary Figure 7

Sensitivity, precision, and F1 score (y-axis) for each lab method (x-axis). Comparison of (a) CAGE (replicates A and B) to RAMPAGE for K-562, (b) CAGE to Oligo capping for MCF-7, and (c) CAGE to STRT for mouse hippocampus. CAGE performed better than other methods in these comparisons.

Back to article page