Extended Data Fig. 3: Evaluation of annotation false discovery rate (FDR) and fraction gold-standard peaks annotated correctly using different reference databases. | Nature Methods

Extended Data Fig. 3: Evaluation of annotation false discovery rate (FDR) and fraction gold-standard peaks annotated correctly using different reference databases.

From: Metabolite discovery through global annotation of untargeted metabolomics data

Extended Data Fig. 3: Evaluation of annotation false discovery rate (FDR) and fraction gold-standard peaks annotated correctly using different reference databases.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

The four tested reference compound databases are HMDB (human metabolomics database), PBCM (short for PubChemLite.0.2.0, zenodo.org/record/3611238), PBCM_BIO (short for PubChemLite_BioPathway, a subset of biopathway related entries in PubChemLite.0.2.0) and YMDB (yeast metabolomics database). (a) False discovery rate estimated using target-decoy strategy. (b) Fraction of 314 manually curated ‘ground truth’ annotations made correctly. For A and B, each individual data point (circle) is from a different randomized decoy library. N = 10 randomized libraries were tested for each reference compound database. Boxes show median and IQR and whiskers extend to largest and smallest value no further than ±1.5 × IQR from hinge.

Back to article page