Extended Data Fig. 5: Method-to-method differences in sensitivity to behavioral changepoints are robust to parameter settings. | Nature Methods

Extended Data Fig. 5: Method-to-method differences in sensitivity to behavioral changepoints are robust to parameter settings.

From: Keypoint-MoSeq: parsing behavior by linking point tracking to pose dynamics

Extended Data Fig. 5: Method-to-method differences in sensitivity to behavioral changepoints are robust to parameter settings.

a) Output of unsupervised behavior segmentation algorithms across a range of parameter settings, applied to 2D keypoint data from two different camera angles (N=1 model fits per parameter set). The median state duration (left) and the average (z-scored) keypoint change score aligned to state transitions (right) are shown for each method and parameter value. Gray pointers indicate default parameter values used for subsequent analysis (see Supplementary Table 3 for a summary of parameters). b) Distributions showing the number of transitions that occur during each rear. c) Accuracy of kinematic decoding models that were fit to state sequences from each method.

Back to article page