Fig. 2: QSMap/QSMapR benchmark.
From: A fully automated benchmarking suite to compare macromolecular complexes
a, The average runtimes for homo N-mers to determine tractable problem sizes. Naive enumerations are impractical for N > 10, whereas QSMap and QSMapR enable mapping of larger structures. b, QSMap often finds chain mappings with higher QS-scores compared with QSMapR. c, For comparisons based on global superposition-based metrics, QSMapR is the preferred method. b,c, Shaded areas highlight data points with notable score differences (absolute difference ≥ 0.1).
