Supplementary Figure 5: Relationship between delay-period activity and predictive licking on operant trials. | Nature Neuroscience

Supplementary Figure 5: Relationship between delay-period activity and predictive licking on operant trials.

From: Predictive and reactive reward signals conveyed by climbing fiber inputs to cerebellar Purkinje cells

Supplementary Figure 5

a. Example of microzone from animal that exhibited predictive licking showing delay period activity on both correct (left, black) and incorrect (right, red) trials. N = 162 correct trials and 124 incorrect trials. b. Same as panel a but for animal that did not exhibit predictive licking. N = 156 correct trials and 115 incorrect trials. c. Comparison of mean microzonal activity during delay period (-500 to 0 ms relative to reward) in significantly activated microzones on correct and incorrect trials. Dots of the same color represent microzones from the same recording. N = 14 microzones from 6 mice. d. Comparison of degree of predictive licking on correct and incorrect trials. N = 6 sessions from 6 mice. e. Relationship between level of delay period activation and degree of predictive licking on correct trials. N = 14 microzones from 6 mice. f. Same as panel e but for incorrect trials. Traces in panels a and b and data points in panels d-f are shown as mean ± s.e.m. Black line and shaded bars in panels d-f represent linear fit and 95% confidence interval through all data points (linear regression; panel c, p = 2 × 10−6; panel d, p = 5 × 10−8; panel e, p = 0.5; panel f, p = 0.9).

Back to article page